单吻合口十二指肠-回肠旁路联合胃袖状切除术术后营养不良的修正手术

梁辉, 沈佳佳

中国实用外科杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (9) : 1215-1220.

PDF(1302 KB)
PDF(1302 KB)
中国实用外科杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (9) : 1215-1220. DOI: 10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2026.09.10
专题笔谈·减重手术的修正手术及远期并发症处理

单吻合口十二指肠-回肠旁路联合胃袖状切除术术后营养不良的修正手术

作者信息 +

Revisional surgery for malnutrition after single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

减重与代谢手术是治疗重度肥胖及其相关代谢性疾病的有效方法。单吻合口十二指肠-回肠旁路联合胃袖状切除术(SADI-S)是胆胰分流并十二指肠转位术(BPD-DS)的简化改良术式,通过减少一个吻合口并保留幽门功能,在维持良好减重及改善糖代谢效果的同时降低了手术难度。然而,术后营养不良,尤其是顽固性低蛋白血症和微量营养素缺乏,仍是制约其广泛应用的主要问题。SADI-S术后营养不良与共同通道过短导致的吸收不良、胃容量缩小及胃肠激素变化引起的摄入减少、腹泻导致的营养素额外丢失,以及个体间全小肠长度差异密切相关,其中共同通道长度是影响营养风险的关键参数。严重低蛋白血症、顽固性腹泻及营养不良性肝病病人经饮食调整和营养补充等保守治疗无效时,须考虑修正手术。共同通道延长术是最常用的修正术式,可纠正低蛋白血症、缓解腹泻,并保留部分减重效果;病情危及生命时,可选择十二指肠-十二指肠吻合术或转换为Roux-en-Y结构。充分的术前营养优化、术中精确测量全小肠长度及术后严密的多学科随访是修正手术成功的关键。基于全小肠长度比例进行个体化共同通道设计,有望兼顾减重效果与营养风险,是SADI-S进一步优化的重要方向。

Abstract

Metabolic and bariatric surgery is an effective treatment for severe obesity and related metabolic diseases. Single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S), a simplified modification of biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS), reduces surgical complexity by eliminating one anastomosis and preserving pyloric function while maintaining favorable weight-loss and glycemic outcomes. However, postoperative malnutrition, particularly refractory hypoproteinemia and micronutrient deficiencies, remains a major limitation to its widespread use. Malnutrition after SADI-S is closely associated with malabsorption caused by an excessively short common channel, reduced intake resulting from decreased gastric capacity and gastrointestinal hormonal changes, additional nutrient loss due to diarrhea, and marked interindividual variation in total small bowel length. Common channel length is a key determinant of nutritional risk. Revisional surgery should be considered for patients with severe hypoproteinemia, intractable diarrhea, or malnutrition-associated liver disease who are refractory to conservative treatment such as dietary modification and nutritional supplementation. Common channel elongation is the most frequently used revisional procedure; it can correct hypoproteinemia and relieve diarrhea while preserving part of the weight-loss effect. Duodeno-duodenostomy or conversion to a Roux-en-Y configuration may be used as salvage procedures in life-threatening cases. Adequate preoperative nutritional optimization, precise intraoperative measurement of total small bowel length, and close multidisciplinary postoperative follow-up are essential for successful revision. Individualized common channel design based on the proportion of total small bowel length may help balance weight-loss efficacy and nutritional risk and represents an important direction for further optimization of SADI-S.

关键词

减重代谢外科 / 单吻合口十二指肠-回肠旁路联合胃袖状切除术 / 营养不良 / 修正手术 / 胆胰分流并十二指肠转位术

Key words

metabolic and bariatric surgery / single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy / malnutrition / revisional surgery / biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch

引用本文

导出引用
梁辉, 沈佳佳. 单吻合口十二指肠-回肠旁路联合胃袖状切除术术后营养不良的修正手术[J]. 中国实用外科杂志. 2026, 46(9): 1215-1220 https://doi.org/10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2026.09.10
LIANG Hui, SHEN Jia-jia. Revisional surgery for malnutrition after single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery. 2026, 46(9): 1215-1220 https://doi.org/10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2026.09.10
中图分类号: R6   

参考文献

[1]
NCD Risk Factor Collaboration(NCD-RisC). Worldwide trends in underweight and obesity from 1990 to 2022: A pooled analysis of 3663 population-representative studies with 222 million children, adolescents,and adults[J]. Lancet, 2024, 403(10431):1027-1050.DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02750-2.
[2]
Eisenberg D, Shikora SA, Aarts E, et al. 2022 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery(ASMBS)and International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders(IFSO): Indications for metabolic and bariatric surgery[J]. Surg Obes Relat Dis, 2022, 18(12):1345-1356.DOI:10.1016/j.soard.2022.08.013.
Major updates to 1991 National Institutes of Health guidelines for bariatric surgery.Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
[3]
李梦伊, 王桂琦, 于卫华, 等. 大中华减重与代谢手术数据库2025年度报告[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2026, 46(6):789-803.DOI:10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2026.06.14.
[4]
Franken RJ, Sluiter NR, Franken J, et al. Treatment options for weight regain or insufficient weight loss after sleeve gastrectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Obes Surg, 2022, 32(6):2035-2046. DOI:10.1007/s11695-022-06020-0.
Weight failure after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is frequently observed. Consensus on the most effective treatment is lacking. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess revisional strategies for weight regain (WR) or insufficient weight loss (IWL) following SG. The included studies reported on endoscopic gastroplasty (ESG), re-sleeve gastrectomy (re-SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB), single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass (SADI), and duodenal switch (DS). All techniques resulted in clinically relevant weight loss. Although our data suggest that revisional OAGB was the most effective procedure, the lack of direct comparisons precludes strong conclusions. All procedures were feasible but differed regarding complication rates. Choice of procedure is depending on patient's characteristics and surgeons' expertise.© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
[5]
Sánchez-Pernaute A, Rubio Herrera MA, Pérez-Aguirre E, et al. Proximal duodenal-ileal end-to-side bypass with sleeve gastrectomy: Proposed technique[J]. Obes Surg, 2007, 17(12):1614-1618. DOI:10.1007/s11695-007-9287-8.
Proximal duodenal-ileal end-to-side bypass with sleeve gastrectomy is a new bariatric technique based on the biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch in which after the sleeve gastrectomy, the duodenum is anastomosed to the ileum in a Billroth-II fashion. A 200-cm common channel-alimentary limb is devised. Anticipating an appropriate weight loss, at least similar to that obtained after gastric bypass, theoretical benefits for operated patients are a shorter operative time, the performance of only one anastomosis, and no mesentery opening. A prospective trial is now being conducted to find out the results of the procedure and to compare them to those obtained with gastric bypass and standard duodenal switch.
[6]
Brown WA, de Leon Ballesteros GP, Ooi G, et al. Single anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy/one anastomosis duodenal switch(SADI-S/OADS)IFSO position statement-update 2020[J]. Obes Surg, 2021, 31(1):3-25. DOI:10.1007/s11695-020-05134-7.
[7]
Hess DS, Hess DW. Biliopancreatic diversion with a duodenal switch[J]. Obes Surg, 1998, 8(3):267-282.DOI:10.1381/096089298765554476.
This paper evaluates biliopancreatic diversion combined with the duodenal switch, forming a hybrid procedure which is a combination of restriction and malabsorption.The evaluation is of the first 440 patients undergoing this procedure who had had no previous bariatric surgery. The mean starting weight was 183 kg, with 41% of our patients considered super morbidly obese (BMI > 50).There was an average maximum weight loss of 80% excess weight by 24 months postoperation; this continued at a 70% level for 8 years. Major complications were found in almost 9% of the cases. There were two perioperative deaths, one from pulmonary embolism and one from acute pulmonary obstruction. There were 36 type II diabetics, all of whom have discontinued medication following the surgery. Seventeen revisions were performed to correct excess weight loss and low protein levels. There have been no marginal ulcers, no cases of dumping syndrome, no foreign material used, and the procedure is a pyloric saving procedure which is functionally reversible.This operation has vastly improved the lives of seriously obese patients with many comorbidities. All type II diabetics have essentially been cured of their disease. The procedure was tolerated well and patients are quite satisfied. There was minimal regain of weight with this method.
[8]
Marceau P, Hould FS, Simard S, et al. Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch[J]. World J Surg, 1998, 22(9):947-954.DOI:10.1007/s002689900498.
In 1990 Scopinaro's technique of biliopancreatic diversion with distal gastrectomy (DG) and gastroileostomy was modified. A sleeve gastrectomy with duodenal switch (DS) was used instead of the distal gastrectomy; and the length of the common channel was made 100 cm instead of 50 cm. A questionnaire and a prescription for blood work were sent to 252 patients who underwent DG a mean 8.3 years ago (range 6-13 years) and 465 patients who underwent DS 4.1 years ago (range 1.7-6.0 years). The questionnaire response rate was 93%, and laboratory work was completed for 65% of both groups. The mean weight loss after DG was 37 +/- 21 kg and after DS 46 +/- 20 kg. There were fewer side effects after DS: The number of daily stools was lower (p < 0.0002), as was the prevalence of diarrhea (p < 0.01), vomiting (p < 0.001), and bone pain (p < 0.001). Greater benefits related to several aspects of life were reported after DS than DG (p < 0.0001). The mean serum levels of ferritin, calcium, and vitamin A were higher (p < 0.001), and parathyroid hormone was lower. The yearly revision rate for excessive malabsorption was 1.7% per year after DG and 0.1% per year after DS. The two procedures were equally efficient for treating co-morbid conditions such as diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia. Biliopancreatic diversion with sleeve gastrectomy/duodenal switch and a 100-cm common limb was shown to produce greater weight loss with fewer side effects.
[9]
Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. JAMA, 2004, 292(14):1724-1737. DOI:10.1001/jama.292.14.1724.
About 5% of the US population is morbidly obese. This disease remains largely refractory to diet and drug therapy, but generally responds well to bariatric surgery.To determine the impact of bariatric surgery on weight loss, operative mortality outcome, and 4 obesity comorbidities (diabetes, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and obstructive sleep apnea).Electronic literature search of MEDLINE, Current Contents, and the Cochrane Library databases plus manual reference checks of all articles on bariatric surgery published in the English language between 1990 and 2003. Two levels of screening were used on 2738 citations.A total of 136 fully extracted studies, which included 91 overlapping patient populations (kin studies), were included for a total of 22,094 patients. Nineteen percent of the patients were men and 72.6% were women, with a mean age of 39 years (range, 16-64 years). Sex was not reported for 1537 patients (8%). The baseline mean body mass index for 16 944 patients was 46.9 (range, 32.3-68.8).A random effects model was used in the meta-analysis. The mean (95% confidence interval) percentage of excess weight loss was 61.2% (58.1%-64.4%) for all patients; 47.5% (40.7%-54.2%) for patients who underwent gastric banding; 61.6% (56.7%-66.5%), gastric bypass; 68.2% (61.5%-74.8%), gastroplasty; and 70.1% (66.3%-73.9%), biliopancreatic diversion or duodenal switch. Operative mortality (< or =30 days) in the extracted studies was 0.1% for the purely restrictive procedures, 0.5% for gastric bypass, and 1.1% for biliopancreatic diversion or duodenal switch. Diabetes was completely resolved in 76.8% of patients and resolved or improved in 86.0%. Hyperlipidemia improved in 70% or more of patients. Hypertension was resolved in 61.7% of patients and resolved or improved in 78.5%. Obstructive sleep apnea was resolved in 85.7% of patients and was resolved or improved in 83.6% of patients.Effective weight loss was achieved in morbidly obese patients after undergoing bariatric surgery. A substantial majority of patients with diabetes, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and obstructive sleep apnea experienced complete resolution or improvement.
[10]
Cohen RV, Salminen P, Schauer PR, et al. Back to the future: Malabsorption is the Achilles’heel of hypoabsorptive metabolic/bariatric procedures[J]. Br J Surg, 2024, 111(3):znae073. DOI:10.1093/bjs/znae073.
[11]
Sánchez-Pernaute A, Rubio MÁ, Pérez Aguirre E, et al. Single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy: Metabolic improvement and weight loss in first 100 patients[J]. Surg Obes Relat Dis, 2013, 9(5):731-735.DOI:10.1016/j.soard.2012.07.018.
Single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy is a simplified 1-loop duodenal switch with a 200-250 common channel. Our objective was to analyze the weight loss and metabolic results of the technique on a series of 100 consecutively operated patients at a tertiary center university hospital.A total of 100 patients consecutively underwent surgery. The criteria of inclusion were morbid obesity or metabolic disease. In the first 50 cases, the common/efferent limb measured 200 cm. The length was changed to 250 cm to reduce the hypoproteinemia rate.No mortality and no severe complications developed. The mean excess weight loss was >95% maintained during the follow-up period. More than 90% of the patients experimented complete remission of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Two conversions to a standard duodenal switch with a longer alimentary channel were required because of recurrent hypoproteinemia. Hypertension was controlled in 98% of the patients, with a 58% remission rate. The mean number of bowel movements was 2.5/d.Single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy is a simplified duodenal switch procedure that is safe and quicker to perform and offers good results for the treatment of both morbid obesity and its metabolic complications.Copyright © 2013 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
[12]
Sánchez-Pernaute A, Rubio MÁ, Cabrerizo L, et al. Single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy(SADI-S)for obese diabetic patients[J]. Surg Obes Relat Dis, 2015, 11(5):1092-1098.DOI:10.1016/j.soard.2015.01.024.
Bariatric operations achieve a high remission rate of type 2 diabetes in patients with morbid obesity. Malabsorptive operations usually are followed by a higher rate of metabolic improvement, though complications and secondary effects of these operations are usually higher.Analyze the results of a simplified duodenal switch, the single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) on patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2 DM).University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.Ninety-seven T2 DM patients with a mean body mass index (BMI) of 44.3 kg/m(2) were included. Mean preoperative glycated hemoglobin was 7.6%, and mean duration of the disease was 8.5 years. Forty patients were under insulin treatment. SADI-S was completed with a sleeve gastrectomy performed over a 54 French bougie and a 200 cm common limb in 28 cases and 250 cm in 69.Follow up was possible for 86 patients (95.5%) in the first postoperative year, 74 (92.5%) in the second, 66 (91.6%) in the third, 46 (86.7%) in the fourth and 25 out of 32 (78%) in the fifht postoperative year. Mean glycemia and glycated hemoglobin decreased immediately. Control of the disease, with HbA1c below 6%, was obtained in 70 to 84% in the long term, depending on the initial antidiabetic therapy. Most patients abandoned antidiabetic therapy after the operation. Absolute remission rate was higher for patients under oral therapy than for those under initial insulin therapy, 92.5% versus 47% in the first postoperative year, 96.4% versus 56% in the third and 75% versus 38.4% in the fifth. A short diabetes history and no need for insulin were related to a higher remission rate. Three patients had to be reoperated for recurrent hypoproteinemia.SADI-S is an effective therapeutic option for obese patients with diabetes mellitus.Copyright © 2015 American Society for Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
[13]
姜涛, 王伦, 胡立夫. 胃袖状切除术联合单吻合口十二指肠-回肠旁路术的价值、问题及对策[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2023, 43(5):519-523.DOI:10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2023.05.08.
[14]
Cottam A, Cottam D, Roslin M, et al. A matched cohort analysis of sleeve gastrectomy with and without 300 cm loop duodenal switch with 18-month follow-up[J]. Obes Surg, 2016, 26(10):2363-2369. DOI:10.1007/s11695-016-2133-0.
[15]
Roslin MS, Gagner M, Goriparthi R, et al. The rationale for a duodenal switch as the primary surgical treatment of advanced type 2 diabetes mellitus and metabolic disease[J]. Surg Obes Relat Dis, 2015, 11(3):704-710. DOI:10.1016/j.soard.2014.11.017.
[16]
梁辉, 管蔚, 刘欢, 等. 腹腔镜胃袖状切除术联合十二指肠空肠吻合术与腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术治疗非肥胖型2型糖尿病的疗效比较[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2013, 12(12):909-913.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-9752.2013.12.006.
[17]
Ballato ES, Shenoy RS, Le Gardeur De Tilly C, et al. Single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy in the United States: Has increased volume impacted safety?[J/OL]. Surg Obes Relat Dis, 2026,online ahead of print.DOI:10.1016/j.soard.2026.05.011.
[18]
Gentileschi P, Sensi B, Siragusa L, et al. Evolution of bariatric surgery in Italy in the last 11 years: Data from the SICOB yearly national survey[J]. Obes Surg, 2023, 33(3):930-937. DOI:10.1007/s11695-022-06435-9.
Bariatric surgery (BS) is a relatively novel surgical field and is in continuous expansion and evolution.
[19]
李梦伊, 刘雁军, 于卫华, 等. 大中华减重与代谢手术数据库2022年度报告[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2023, 43(5):540-551.DOI:10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2023.05.13.
[20]
中国医师协会外科医师分会肥胖和代谢病外科专家工作组, 中国医师协会外科医师分会肥胖代谢病综合管理与护理专家工作组, 中国肥胖代谢外科研究协作组, 等. 中国肥胖代谢外科数据库:2024年度报告[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2025, 11(2):85-91.DOI:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9605.2025.02.001.
[21]
林晋生, 屠印芳, 张弘玮, 等. 2型糖尿病合并肥胖患者腹腔镜下袖状胃切除术后复胖行SADI-S术后3年随访1例报告[J]. 复旦学报(医学版), 2026, 53(1):117-121.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-8467.2026.01.015.
[22]
王伦, 赵玉会, 王泽雨, 等. 达芬奇机器人单吻合口十二指肠回肠旁路联合袖状胃切除术治疗肥胖患者的安全性及学习曲线[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2022, 25(5):454-461. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20210711-00273.
[23]
肖明昊, 王伦, 李世星, 等. 单吻合口十二指肠回肠旁路联合袖状胃切除术治疗肥胖症及2型糖尿病的中期疗效分析[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2024, 27(10):1056-1062.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20231007-00117.
[24]
胡力夫, 王伦, 李世星, 等. 单吻合口十二指肠回肠旁路联合袖状胃切除术治疗肥胖症病人的疗效和营养评价[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2024, 27(9):945-952.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20230810-00041.
[25]
Surve A, Cottam D, Medlin W, et al. Long-term outcomes of primary single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy(SADI-S)[J]. Surg Obes Relat Dis, 2020, 16(11):1638-1646. DOI:10.1016/j.soard.2020.07.019.
The long-term outcomes of primary single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) have never been reported in the literature.The study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes after primary laparoscopic SADI-S (LSADI-S).Single, private institute, United States.Data from 750 patients who underwent a primary LSADI-S from June 2013 through November 2019 by 3 surgeons were retrospectively analyzed.Seven hundred fifty patients were included in the study. The mean age and preoperative body mass index were 49.3 ± 13.1 years and 50 ± 12.6 kg/m, respectively. Follow-up was available on 109 patients (61%) at 5 years and on 87 patients (53%) at 6 years. Six patients did not have any follow-up. The average operative time and length of stay were 67.6 ± 27.4 minutes and 1.5 ±.8 days, respectively. The intraoperative, short-term, and long-term complication rates were 0%, 7.8%, 11.7%, respectively. The 30-day emergency room visit, readmission, and reoperation rates were.4%, 1.1%, and 1.1%, respectively. In total, there were 15 (2%) grade IIIb long-term complications unique to LSADI-S. Complete remission of type 2 diabetes was seen in 77% of the diabetic population. At 5 and 6 years, the mean change in body mass index was 17.5 ± 6.9 and 17.6 ± 6.4 kg/m, respectively. The mortality rate was.5%.LSADI-S is effective in this retrospective review in achieving good initial weight loss and weight maintenance. Although our data show acceptable nutritional complications, questions still remain because of the retrospective nature of the study.Copyright © 2020 American Society for Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
[26]
Sánchez-Pernaute A, Rubio Herrera MÁ, Pérez Ferré N, et al. Long-term results of single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy(SADI-S)[J]. Obes Surg, 2022, 32(3):682-689. DOI:10.1007/s11695-021-05879-9.
Single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) is a simplification of the duodenal switch (DS) in which the alimentary limb is eliminated, and the common channel is lengthened from 200 to 300 cm. Short-term results have demonstrated that SADI-S is safe and reproducible and that weight loss and comorbidities resolution are comparable to biliopancreatic diversion or DS.To analyze the long-term outcomes of SADI-S.From May 2007 to December 2015, 164 patients were consecutively submitted to a one-step SADI-S. The mean age was 47 years, and the mean body mass index (BMI) was 45.8 kg/m. A total of 101 patients had type 2 diabetes, 91 arterial hypertension, 81 obstructive apnea, and 118 dyslipidemia. Limb length was 200 cm in 50 cases, 250 cm in 99, and 300 cm in 15.There was no mortality. One patient had a gastric leak, and 2 patients had an anastomotic leak. A total of 25% of the patients were lost to follow-up at 10 years. Excess weight loss and total weight loss were 87% and 38% at 5 years and 80% and 34% at 10 years. A total of 12 patients were submitted to revisional surgery for hypoproteinemia. Preoperatively 41 diabetics were under insulin treatment; at 5 years, 7 remained with insulin and 12 at 10 years. Mean glycemia was 104 mg/dL at 5 years and 118 mg/dL at 10 years. Mean HbA1c was 5.51% at 5 years and 5.86 at 10 years.In the long term, SADI-S offers satisfactory weight loss and comorbidities resolution.© 2022. The Author(s).
[27]
Marincola G, Velluti V, Voloudakis N, et al. Medium-term nutritional and metabolic outcome of single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy(SADI-S)[J]. Nutrients, 2023, 15(3):742.DOI:10.3390/nu15030742.
[28]
Ortiz-Zuñiga AM, Costa-Forner P, Cirera de Tudela A, et al. The impact of the length of the common intestinal loop on metabolic and nutritional outcomes of patients with severe obesity who undergo single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy: 5-year follow-up[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2022, 32(9):955-961.DOI:10.1089/lap.2021.0863.
Single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) is a recent bariatric surgery technique, highly effective in terms of weight loss. Nevertheless, data regarding the impact of SADI-S at mid-long term (after >5 years of follow-up) are scarce. To evaluate the effect of lengths of common intestinal loop on the evolution of patients with morbid obesity (MO), who undergo SADI-S. Descriptive study (case series), including patients with MO who underwent SADI-S procedure between January 2012 and December 2015 with at least 5 years of follow-up. Patients were classified as "Old-SADI-S" (OS) when length of the common alimentary loop was <2.5 m and "New-SADI-S" (NS) when length was >2.5 m. Clinical parameters and nutritional parameters were included. Twenty-nine cases were included (17 OS; 12 NS), 86.2% women and mean age 46.7 ± 1 years. After 12 months, OS had significantly lower body mass index (29.7 ± 4.8 kg/m versus 32.0 ± 5.1 kg/m,  = .01), without significant differences in the resolution of comorbidities. Nevertheless, OS group had severe malabsorptive complications requiring surgical conversion of OS to NS in 7 patients after 8 months. At 5 years of follow-up, no significant difference was seen between the two groups and resolution of comorbidities was maintained during this period of time. SADI-S is effective in terms of weight loss and resolution of comorbidities at 5 years of follow-up, regardless of the length of the common intestinal loop. However, a common intestinal loop <2.5 m was associated with severe malabsorptive complications that determined the surgical re-conversion in all cases.
[29]
Gagner M. Hypoabsorption not malabsorption, hypoabsorptive surgery and not malabsorptive surgery[J]. Obes Surg, 2016, 26(11):2783-2784. DOI:10.1007/s11695-016-2350-6.
[30]
Balamurugan G, Leo SJ, Sivagnanam ST, et al. Comparison of efficacy and safety between Roux-en-Y gastric bypass(RYGB)vs. one anastomosis gastric bypass(OAGB)vs.single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy(SADI-S): A systematic review of bariatric and metabolic surgery[J]. Obes Surg, 2023, 33(7):2194-2209. DOI:10.1007/s11695-023-06602-6.
In recent years, combined restrictive and hypo-absorptive procedures have gained widespread acceptance. The rationale of this systematic review is to compare the safety and efficacy between Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) and single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S). Eighteen eligible studies were finalized for this review. Weight loss outcomes were greater with SADI-S (5 years) and OAGB (10 years). SADI-S offered better resolution of diabetes whereas hypertension and dyslipidaemia resolution were better with OAGB. Although early complications and mortality were higher with SADI-S, late complications were more frequent with RYGB. Both SADI-S and OAGB are as effective as RYGB for weight loss, but OAGB offers lesser complications. However, more data is imperative to determine the next gold standard procedure.© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
[31]
Soong TC, Almalki OM, Lee WJ, et al. Measuring the small bowel length may decrease the incidence of malnutrition after laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass with tailored bypass limb[J]. Surg Obes Relat Dis, 2019, 15(10):1712-1718. DOI:10.1016/j.soard.2019.08.010.
[32]
朱江帆. 单吻合口十二指肠回肠吻合术后吻合口位置重建[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2023, 22(8):977-980.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115610-20230529-00245.
[33]
Sánchez-Pernaute A, Lasses B, López Antoñanzas L, et al. Revisional surgery for malnutrition after SADI-S: Prevalence, indications,techniques and outcomes[J]. Updates Surg, 2024, 76(5):1879-1885. DOI:10.1007/s13304-024-01900-9.
[34]
Lind RP, Salame M, Kendrick M, et al. Management of malnutrition and hepatic impairment after duodenal switch[J]. Obes Surg, 2024, 34(2):602-609.DOI:10.1007/s11695-023-07032-0.
Malnutrition and liver impairment after duodenal switch (DS) are possible and undesired complications, often conservatively treated. However, in specific cases, surgical revision may be necessary. This study aims to describe outcomes achieved by two bariatric surgery centers and address effectiveness and safety of revisional surgical procedures to resolve these complications.A retrospective chart review was performed in two bariatric surgery centers from 2008 to 2022. Patients who required revisional surgery to treat malnutrition and/or liver impairment refractory to nutritional and total parenteral nutrition intervention (TPN) after duodenal switch were included. No comparisons were performed due to the descriptive nature of this study.Thirteen patients underwent revisional surgery, the mean age was 44.7, the 53.8% were females, and the mean preoperative BMI was 54.7 kg/m2; the mean time between DS and revisional procedure was 26.5 months, and 69.1% of patients were placed on TPN. One patient developed hepatic encephalopathy; one patient presented with ascites, pleural effusion, and renal insufficiency, undergoing reoperation after revisional procedure due to a perforated ileal loop. Mortality rate was 0%; all patients regained weight after the revisional procedure, and the mean total protein and albumin blood levels 12 months after surgery were 6.3 and 3.6 g/dl, respectively.While refractory malnutrition and/or liver failure are rare among patients post-DS, if underdiagnosed and untreated, this can lead to irreversible outcomes and death. All revisional procedures included in this study resulted in improvement of the nutritional status and reversal of liver impairment, with low complication rates.© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
[35]
Horsley B, Cottam D, Cottam A, et al. Bowel reconstruction to treat chronic diarrhea and hypoproteinemia following single anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy: A single-site experience[J]. Obes Surg, 2019, 29(8):2387-2391. DOI:10.1007/s11695-019-03847-y.
Single anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) is a modification of the biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS) surgery. A concern with SADI-S is chronic diarrhea and hypoproteinemia. Common channel lengthening (CCL) is a surgical procedure to increase absorption in the small intestine to decrease diarrhea.The aim of this study was to assess the occurrence and treatment of hypoproteinemia and chronic diarrhea with CCL following SADI-S surgery.Private practice in the USA.Patients were included if they underwent SADI-S from September 2013 to March 2018 and following surgery underwent CCL.Average operating time for laparoscopic CCL is 56.5 ± 4.6 min. The average bowel movements for the eight patients before laparoscopic CCL were 9.1 ± 4.7 a day. After the surgery, the bowel movements were reduced to 2.6 ± 0.4 a day. This difference was found to be statistically significantly different (p = .002). The two patients experiencing hypoproteinemia improved protein levels following CCL.CCL is an effective way to treat symptomatic chronic diarrhea after SADI-S when conservative treatments have failed.
[36]
Tacchino RM. Bowel length: Measurement,predictors, and impact on bariatric and metabolic surgery[J]. Surg Obes Relat Dis, 2015, 11(2):328-334.DOI:10.1016/j.soard.2014.09.016.
Small bowel length (SBL) determines the caloric absorptive capacity. The aim of this study was to evaluate SBL to identify patient-specific predictors and the interrelationships of SBL with anthropometric variables.Sex, age, and weight were recorded at the time of surgery when SBL and the estimated jejunal length (JLe) were measured by 3 different methods.The mean SBL of 443 patients undergoing laparotomy (78% female) was 690±93.7 cm (range 350-1049 cm). Sex was correlated with SBL, as men had a longer small bowel than women (729±85 versus 678±92, P<.0001) and were significantly taller (173±8.2 versus 161±6.9, P<.001). Age did not correlate with SBL. The differences in length between fully stretched small bowel and nonstretched small bowel and between fully stretched small bowel and laparoscopic bowel were 137±19 cm and 32.4±11.4 cm, respectively. In a multivariate linear regression analysis model that included sex, age, height, and weight, only height was significantly correlated with SBL (P<.00001) and explained 12% of the variance in SBL. Sex, age, height, and JLe, but not SBL, were statistically highly significant in predicting 75% of the variance of body weight.A positive association between height and SBL was found. Sex, age, height, and JLe may be strong predictors of weight. Individual JLe may be of importance in determining the weight loss and resolution of metabolic co-morbidities. Measuring the SBL can prevent the risk of nutritional consequences in malabsorptive, revisional, and metabolic procedures.Copyright © 2015 American Society for Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
[37]
Ruiz-Tovar J, Carbajo MA, Jimenez JM, et al. Are there ideal small bowel limb lengths for one-anastomosis gastric bypass(OAGB)to obtain optimal weight loss and remission of comorbidities with minimal nutritional deficiencies?[J]. World J Surg, 2020, 44(3):855-862. DOI:10.1007/s00268-019-05243-0.
Ideal jejunal and ileal lengths in bariatric/metabolic procedures to be left in alimentary continuity still remain unclear. We aimed to evaluate different lengths of biliopancreatic limb (BPL) and common limb (CL) performed in a series of patients submitted to OAGB, and correlate them with weight loss and nutritional deficits.A prospective observational study of 350 consecutive morbidly obese patients undergoing OAGB was performed. BPL and CL lengths were determined intraoperatively; BPL/TBL and CL/TBL ratios were then calculated. Anthropometric variables, remission of comorbidities and specific supplementation needs were recorded at 1, 2 and 5 years after surgery.Three hundred patients were included for final analysis. BPL length and BPL/TBL ratio directly correlated with Units of BMI lost (UBMIL). Conversely, CL length and CL/TBL ratio showed an inverse correlation with UBMIL. Establishing a BMI ≤ 25 kg/m as ideal, the most accurate AUC, to predict achieving an ideal BMI at 1, 2 and 5 years after surgery, was obtained for the CL/TBL ratio, followed by the CL length at 1, 2 and 5 years. An ideal range was established between 0.40 and 0.43 for the CL/TBL ratio, and 200 to 220 cm for the CL length. Among these ranges, there were no cases of protein or calorie malnutrition.TBL measurement is essential to obtain optimal outcomes after OAGB, both in terms of excellent weight loss and remission/improvement of comorbidities, as well as with a low risk of nutritional deficiencies. The CL/TBL ratio, followed by CL length, are the most accurate parameters to predict a 5-year postoperative BMI ≤ 25 kg/m.
[38]
Vahibe A, Aizpuru MJ, Sarr MG, et al. Safety and efficacy of revisional surgery as a treatment for malnutrition after bariatric surgery[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2023, 236(1):156-166. DOI:10.1097/XCS.0000000000000397.
[39]
Chen S, Chiang J, Ghanem O, et al. Decision-making considerations in revisional bariatric surgery[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2024, 34(4):400-406.DOI:10.1097/SLE.0000000000001296.
With drastic variations in bariatric practices, consensus is lacking on an optimal approach for revisional bariatric surgeries.The authors reviewed and consolidated bariatric surgery literature to provide specific revision suggestions based on each index surgery, including adjustable gastric band (AGB), sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS), single anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve (SADI-S), one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB), and vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG).AGB has the highest weight recurrence rate and can be converted to RYGB, SG, and BPD-DS. After index SG, common surgical options include a resleeve or RYGB. The RYGB roux limb can be distalized and pouch resized in context of reflux, and the entire anatomy can be revised into BPD-DS. Data analyzing revisional surgery after a single anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve was limited. In patients with one anastomosis gastric bypass and vertical banded gastroplasty anatomy, most revisions were the conversion to RYGB.As revisional bariatric surgery becomes more common, the best approach depends on the patient's indication for surgery and preexisting anatomy.Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
[40]
Mechanick JI, Apovian C, Brethauer S, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutrition,metabolic, and nonsurgical support of patients undergoing bariatric procedures-2019 update: Cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology,The Obesity Society,American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery,Obesity Medicine Association, and American Society of Anesthesiologists-Executive summary[J]. Endocr Pract, 2019, 25(12):1346-1359. DOI:10.4158/GL-2019-0406.
The development of these updated clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) was commissioned by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE), The Obesity Society, American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, Obesity Medicine Association, and American Society of Anesthesiologists Boards of Directors in adherence with the AACE 2017 protocol for standardized production of CPGs, algorithms, and checklists. Each recommendation was evaluated and updated based on new evidence from 2013 to the present and subjective factors provided by experts. New or updated topics in this CPG include: contextualization in an adiposity-based chronic disease complications-centric model, nuance-based and algorithm/checklist-assisted clinical decision-making about procedure selection, novel bariatric procedures, enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery protocols, and logistical concerns (including cost factors) in the current health-care arena. There are 85 numbered recommendations that have updated supporting evidence, of which 61 are revised and 12 are new. Noting that there can be multiple recommendation statements within a single numbered recommendation, there are 31 (13%) Grade A, 42 (17%) Grade B, 72 (29%) Grade C, and 101 (41%) Grade D recommendations. There are 858 citations, of which 81 (9.4%) are evidence level (EL) 1 (highest), 562 (65.5%) are EL 2, 72 (8.4%) are EL 3, and 143 (16.7%) are EL 4 (lowest). Bariatric procedures remain a safe and effective intervention for higher-risk patients with obesity. Clinical decision-making should be evidence based within the context of a chronic disease. A team approach to perioperative care is mandatory, with special attention to nutritional and metabolic issues. = hemoglobin A1c; = American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists; = adiposity-based chronic disease; = American College of Endocrinology; = American Diabetes Association; = Apnea-Hypopnea Index; = American Society of Anesthesiologists; = American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery; = body mass index; = biliopancreatic diversion; = biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch; = confidence interval; = continuous positive airway pressure; = clinical practice guideline; = C-reactive protein; = computed tomography; = cardiovascular disease; = dysglycemia-based chronic disease; = duodenal switch; = deep venous thrombosis; = dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; = essential fatty acid; = evidence level; = enteral nutrition; = enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery; = U.S. Food and Drug Administration; = Guidelines for Guidelines; = gastroesophageal reflux disease; = gastrointestinal; = health-care professional(s); = hypertension; = intensive care unit; = intragastric balloon(s); = intravenous; = laparoscopic adjustable gastric band; = laparoscopic adjustable gastric banded plication; = laparoscopic greater curvature (gastric) plication; = laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; = laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy; = metabolic syndrome; = nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; = nonalcoholic steatohepatitis; = nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug; = osteoarthritis; = one-anastomosis gastric bypass; = Obesity Medicine Association; = odds ratio; = obesity-related complication(s); = obstructive sleep apnea; = pulmonary embolism; = parenteral nutrition; = pulmonary recruitment maneuver; = randomized controlled trial; = registered dietician; = recommended daily allowance; = Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; = sleeve gastrectomy; = small intestinal bacterial overgrowth; = The Obesity Society; = thyroid-stimulating hormone; = type 1 diabetes; = type 2 diabetes; = venous thromboembolism; = Wernicke encephalopathy; = World Health Organization.
[41]
Esparham A, Anari Moghadam H, Khorgami Z. Revisional single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy after failed adjustable gastric band or sleeve gastrectomy: A meta-analysis of efficacy and safety[J]. Surg Obes Relat Dis, 2026, 22(3):359-368.DOI:10.1016/j.soard.2025.10.018.
[42]
Axer S, Al-Tai S, Ihle C, et al. Five-year outcomes after single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass(SADI)vs.biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch(BPD/DS): A randomized clinical trial[J]. Obes Surg, 2026, 36(7):3832-3839. DOI:10.1007/s11695-026-08797-w.
[43]
Lin S, Guan W, Shen J, et al. Loop versus Roux-en-Y duodenojejunal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy for type 2 diabetes: Three-year outcomes of a single-center randomized controlled trial[J]. Obes Surg, 2026, 36(4):1555-1563.DOI:10.1007/s11695-026-08535-2.

脚注

利益冲突 所有作者均声明不存在利益冲突

基金

江苏省科教能力提升工程(江苏省医学重点学科)项目(ZDXK202222)

PDF(1302 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/

〈 〉