超声容积断层自动扫描在老年腹壁切口疝诊治中应用价值研究

裘之瑛, 李绍杰, 唐健雄, 方靓, 陈林

中国实用外科杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4) : 497-502.

PDF(2053 KB)
PDF(2053 KB)
中国实用外科杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4) : 497-502. DOI: 10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2026.04.19
论著

超声容积断层自动扫描在老年腹壁切口疝诊治中应用价值研究

作者信息 +

Application of ultrasonic volume auto-scan in the diagnosis and treatment of elderly abdominal incisional hernia

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 探讨超声容积断层自动扫描(UVAS)在老年腹壁切口疝诊断、分类和治疗中的应用价值。方法 采用前瞻性、随机、单盲研究方法,以2023年8月至2024年12月复旦大学附属华东医院疝和腹壁外科招募的46例老年腹壁切口疝病人为研究对象,共56个腹壁缺损(疝环),使用UVAS测量疝环宽度、面积和疝囊体积(HSV),与CT测得的HSV进行一致性评价,将基于超声图像的切口疝分类诊断与手术诊断进行比较。结果 UVAS和CT测量HCV数值比率的平均数为1.007,接近1,仅1.79%(1/56)的点在95%一致性界限(0.997-1.026)以外,可认为两种检查测量HSV具有较好的一致性。根据腹壁缺损的位置和宽度,UVAS术前分类与术后诊断的符合率为94.6%、98.2%,达成良好的一致性(K=0.86,95%CI 0.718-0.996;K=0.95,95%CI 0.887-0.999)。在大切口疝和巨大切口疝中,补片尺寸是UVAS测量腹壁缺损面积的2~9倍。结论 UVAS可准确诊断并测量腹壁切口疝的疝环宽度、面积和HSV,进行术前分类定位,具有无辐射危害和即时提供报告的优势,为老年腹腔切口疝病人术前全面评估提供详细可靠的客观数据及影像资料。

Abstract

Objective To explore the application of ultrasonic volume auto-scan (UVAS) in the classification, diagnosis, and treatment of abdominal incisional hernia. Methods Using a prospective, randomized, and single-blind study design, The study subjects were 46 elderly patients with abdominal wall incisional hernia recruited from the Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, from August 2023 to December 2024. totally 56 abdominal wall defects (hernia rings), were recruited based on inclusion criteria. UVAS was employed to measure the width, area, and hernia sac volume (HSV) of the hernia rings. The consistency between these measurements and the HSV determined by CT was evaluated. Additionally, the ultrasound-based classification diagnosis of incisional hernia was compared with the surgical diagnosis. Results The average ratio of UVAS and CT measurements for HSV values was 1.007, which was close to 1. Only 1.79% (1/56) of the points fall outside the 95% consistency bounds 0.997-1.026, which showed good consistency between the two methods in measuring HSV. Based on the location and width of the abdominal wall defect, UVAS preoperative classification diagnosis showed a good accuracy rate (94.6%, 98.2%), achieving good consistency with postoperative diagnosis (K=0.86, 95%CI 0.718-0.996; K=0.95, 95%CI 0.887-0.999). In large and giant incisional hernias, the mesh size is 2 to 9 times the area of the abdominal wall defect measured by UVAS. Conclusion UVAS could accurately diagnose and measure the width, area, and HSV of abdominal incisional hernia, perform preoperative classification and localization, have the advantages of no radiation hazard and instant report provision and provide detailed and reliable data and imaging information for comprehensive preoperative evaluation of elderly patients with incisional hernia.

关键词

超声容积断层自动扫描 / 老年 / 切口疝 / 腹壁缺损 / 疝囊体积

Key words

ultrasonic volume auto-scan / elderly / incisional hernia / abdominal wall defect / hernia sac volume

引用本文

导出引用
裘之瑛, 李绍杰, 唐健雄, . 超声容积断层自动扫描在老年腹壁切口疝诊治中应用价值研究[J]. 中国实用外科杂志. 2026, 46(4): 497-502 https://doi.org/10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2026.04.19
QIU Zhi-ying, LI Shao-jie, TANG Jian-xiong, et al. Application of ultrasonic volume auto-scan in the diagnosis and treatment of elderly abdominal incisional hernia[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery. 2026, 46(4): 497-502 https://doi.org/10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2026.04.19
中图分类号: R6   

参考文献

[1]
Erstoep L, de Smet GHJ, Sneiders D, et al. Hernia width explains differences in outcomes between primary and incisional hernias: a prospective cohort study of 9159 patients[J]. Hernia, 2021, 25(2):463-469. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-020-02340-1.
[2]
Manoharan S, Liu G, Crump RT, et al. Incisional hernia repair surgery improves patient reported outcomes[J]. Am J Surg, 2020, 219(5):874-878. DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.03.027.
[3]
Melland-Smith M, Khan U, Smith L, et al. Comparison of two fascial defect closure methods for laparoscopic incisional hernia repair[J]. Hernia, 2022, 26(3): 945-951. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-021-02443-3.
[4]
Decker E, Currie A, Baig MK. Prolene hernia system versus Lichtenstein repair for inguinal hernia: A Meta-analysis[J]. Hernia, 2019, 23(3): 541-546. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-019-01897-w.
[5]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组, 中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科专家工作组. 腹壁切口疝诊疗指南(2024版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2025, 45(2): 128-136. DOI:10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2025.02.02.
[6]
Beck WC, Holzman MD, Sharp KW, et al. Comparative effectiveness of dynamic abdominal sonography for hernia vs computed tomography in the diagnosis of incisional hernia[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2013, 216(3):447-453. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.11.012.
[7]
Emily Harris. Radiation from CT scans in young people tied to higher cancer risk[J]. JAMA, 2023, 330(22): 2146. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2023.22935.
[8]
裘之瑛, 陈悦, 常才. 比较自动超声容积断层扫描和传统超声检查在腹外疝诊断分类中的应用价值[J]. 中国超声医学杂, 2012, 28(5): P446-449.
[9]
Den Hartog D, Dur AH, Kamphuis AG, et al. Comparison of ultrasonography with computed tomography in the diagnosis of incisional hernias[J]. Hernia, 2009, 13(1):45-48. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-008-0420-y.
[10]
Al-Mansour MR, Wu J, Gagnon G, et al. Linear versus volumetric CT analysis in predicting tension-free fascial closure in abdominal wall reconstruction[J]. Hernia, 2021, 25(1): 91-98. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-020-02349-6.
[11]
Sima O, De Vismes Ott A, Dias MS, et al. Consistency test of coincidence-summing calculation methods for extended sources[J]. Appl Radiat Isot, 2020, 155(1): 108921. DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2019.108921.
[12]
William CB, Michael DH, Kenneth WS, et al. Comparative effectiveness of dynamic abdominal sonography for hernia vs computed tomography in the diagnosis of incisional hernia[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2013, 216(3):447-452. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.11.012.
[13]
Bloemen A, van Dooren P, Huizinga BF, et al. Comparison of ultrasonography and physical examination in the diagnosis of incisional hernia in a prospective study[J]. Hernia, 2012, 16(1): 53-57. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-011-0865-2.
[14]
Cingi A, Solmaz A, Attaallah W, et al. Enterostomy closure site hernias: a clinical and ultrasonographic evaluation[J]. Hernia, 2008, 12(4): 401-405. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-008-0355-3.
[15]
李健文, 张云, 乐飞. 腹腔镜腹壁切口疝修复术中腹壁功能重建[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2024, 29(4): 285-291. DOI:10.16139/j.1007-9610.2024.04.02.
[16]
Muysoms FE, Miserez M, Berrevoet F, et al. Classification of primary and incisional abdominal wall hernias[J]. Hernia, 2009, 13(4): 407-414. DOI:10.1007/s10029-009-0518-x.
[17]
疝修补术后腹腔间隔室综合征预防与处理专家共识编写委员会, 广东省医师协会疝与腹壁外科医师分会. 疝修补术后腹腔间隔室综合征预防与处理中国专家共识(2022版)[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2022, 31(12):1578-1589. DOI: 10.7659/j.issn.1005-6947.2022.12.004.
[18]
托呼提阿吉·依干木, 艾斯卡尔·艾沙. 腹壁巨大切口疝病者的术前评估及准备分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2014, 8(5):441-443. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2014.05.014.
[19]
汤福鑫, 李英儒, 杨伟胜, 等. 术前渐进性气腹在老年腹壁巨大切口疝修补术中的应用价值[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(2): 105-110. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2019.02.003.
[20]
Holzmer S, DeCino A, McCarthy M, et al. Preoperative progressive pneumoperitoneum for incisional hernia repair with loss of domain[J]. Am Surg, 2018, 84(5): 748-749. PMID: 29966579.

脚注

利益冲突 所有作者均声明不存在利益冲突

基金

上海市卫健委临床研究项目(202340140)
上海申康医院发展中心研究型医师创新转化能力培训项目(SHDC2022CRD021)

PDF(2053 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/