PDF(2922 KB)
计算机视觉人工智能模型在胃袖状切除联合胃底折叠及同期行食管裂孔疝修补术中应用研究
周哲琦, 艾克拜尔·艾力, 艾尔肯·乌马尔, 阿布都艾合提·买买提明, 克力木·阿不都热依木
中国实用外科杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (3) : 368-375.
PDF(2922 KB)
PDF(2922 KB)
计算机视觉人工智能模型在胃袖状切除联合胃底折叠及同期行食管裂孔疝修补术中应用研究
Research on the application of computer vision artificial intelligence model in gastric sleeve resection combined with fundoplication and concomitant hiatal hernia repair
目的 构建基于YOLOv11m深度学习框架的腹腔镜胃袖状切除联合胃底折叠术(LSGFD)同期实施食管裂孔疝修补术(HHR)一体化手术场景的计算机视觉人工智能模型,并进行独立验证,旨在为未来手术导航及机器人半自动化手术系统的研发提供视觉模块支持。 方法 回顾性分析新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院微创、疝和腹壁外科及和田地区人民医院肝胆外科行LSGFD联合HHR的手术视频资料。经筛选及处理后获得3180张样本图片,通过实例分割进行标注。采用分层随机划分法进行数据集分配,首先从总样本中随机抽取10%的样本作为独立测试集,随后从剩余 90% 的样本中进一步随机抽取20%的样本作为验证集,剩余部分则全部作为训练集。调用YOLOv11m深度学习的权重文件进行迁移训练与验证。 结果 分层随机划分后,训练集、验证集和独立测试集分别包含16 239、4022、2196个目标。模型在边界框损失、分割损失、分类损失及分布焦点损失上均呈持续且稳定的下降趋势;验证集损失曲线与训练集一致,提示模型未见明显过拟合,泛化能力良好。在独立测试集上,模型整体检测与分割性能优异:边界框(Box)与掩码(Mask)的IoU=0.5的平均精度均值(mAP50)均为0.908;Box精确率(P)、召回率(R)分别为0.848、0.884,Mask(P)、Mask(R)分别为0.846、0.881。Box mAP50>0.90的类别涵盖胃抓钳、肝脏拉钩、肝脏、胃、纱布、超声刀、肠钳、持针器、分离钳、切割闭合器、脾脏及施夹器;Box mAP50在0.80~0.90的类别包括生物夹、针、折叠瓣、食管(Mask mAP50>0.9);Box mAP50<0.80的类别为膈肌脚和膈肌(Mask mAP50>0.8)。 结论 计算机视觉人工智能模型可高效、精准地检测与分割LSGFD联合HHR的关键解剖结构与手术器械,可为该术式后续多场景拓展应用提供技术支持。
Objective To construct a computer vision artificial intelligence model for the integrated surgical scenario of laparoscopic gastric sleeve resection combined with fundoplication (LSGFD) plus concomitant hiatal hernia repair (HHR) based on the YOLOv11m deep learning framework, and to conduct independent verification, for providing visual module support for the future development of surgical navigation and robotic semi-automated surgical systems. Methods The surgical video data of patients who underwent LSGFD combined with HHR at the Department of Minimally Invasive, Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, People’s Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region and the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Hotan Regional People’s Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. After screening and processing, a total of 3180 sample images were obtained and annotated via instance segmentation. Stratified random sampling method was adopted for dataset allocation: first, 10% of the total samples were randomly selected as the independent test set; subsequently, 20% of the remaining 90% samples were further randomly extracted as the validation set; the rest were all assigned as the training set. The weight files of the YOLOv11m deep learning model were loaded for transfer training and validation. Results After stratified random partitioning, the training set, validation set, and independent test set contained 16 239, 4022, and 2196 targets, respectively. The model showed a continuous and stable downward trend in bounding box loss, segmentation loss, classification loss, and distribution focal loss; the loss curve of the validation set was consistent with that of the training set, suggesting no overfitting and good generalization ability of the model. On the independent test set, the model demonstrated excellent overall detection and segmentation performance: the mean average precision at IoU=0.5 (mAP50) for both the bounding box (Box) and mask (Mask) was 0.908; the precision (P) and recall (R) for Box were 0.848 and 0.884, respectively, and for Mask were 0.846 and 0.881, respectively. Categories with a Box mAP50 > 0.90 included gastric graspers, liver retractors, liver, stomach, gauze, ultrasonic scalpels, intestinal clamps, needle holders, dissecting forceps, staplers, spleen, and appliers.Categories with a Box mAP50 between 0.80 and 0.90 included biological clips, needles, folded flaps, and esophagus (with a Mask mAP50 > 0.9).Categories with a Box mAP50 < 0.80 were diaphragmatic crus and diaphragm (with a Mask mAP50 > 0.8). Conclusion Computer vision artificial intelligence model technology can efficiently and accurately detect and segment the key anatomical structures and surgical instruments involved in the combined LSGFD and HHR procedure, thereby providing technical support for the subsequent expanded application of this surgical approach across multiple scenarios.
人工智能 / 计算机视觉模型 / 深度学习 / 胃袖状切除联合胃底折叠术 / 食管裂孔疝修补术
artificial intelligence / computer vision model / deep learning / sleeve gastrectomy combined with fundoplication / hiatal hernia repair
| [1] |
张鹏, 张忠涛. 重视胃袖状切除术后胃食管反流病和袖状胃胸腔内上移问题[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2024, 44(8): 854-857. DOI: 10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2024.08.03.
|
| [2] |
唐欣, 周福庆, 陈宇涵, 等. 胃袖状切除术后发生胃食管反流病临床影响因素分析[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2025, 45(2): 227-230. DOI: 10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2025.02.17.
|
| [3] |
中华医学会外科学分会甲状腺及代谢外科学组, 中国医师协会外科医师分会肥胖和代谢病外科专家工作组. 中国肥胖及代谢疾病外科治疗指南(2024版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2024, 44(8): 841-849. DOI: 10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2024.08.01.
|
| [4] |
Sleeve gastrectomy with fundoplication is emerging as a new surgical option for obesity with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, comparative data on different fundoplication techniques combined with sleeve gastrectomy are limited.To compare the mid-term efficacy of sleeve gastrectomy with Nissen fundoplication (SGNF) versus sleeve gastrectomy with Toupet fundoplication (SGTF) in patients affected by obesity with GERD.This retrospective study enrolled 54 patients affected by obesity with GERD who underwent SGNF or SGTF between January 2019 and November 2023.Of 54 initially enrolled patients, 3 were lost to follow-up. The remaining 51 were analyzed: 24 underwent SGNF and 27 underwent SGTF. Postoperative hospital stay was significantly longer in the SGNF group (5.5 [4, 7] days), compared to the SGTF group (4 [3, 5] days) (P = 0.002). At 3-5 years after surgery, mean %TWL was 25.77 ± 7.71% in the SGNF group and 28.16 ± 10.59% in the SGTF group (P = 0.475). Remission of GERD was seen in 75.0% (SGNF) and 72.7% (SGTF) of patients (P = 0.846); both groups showed a significant decrease in GERD-Q scores from baseline (P < 0.001). Endoscopic follow-up demonstrated esophagitis decreased from 23.5% preoperatively to 8.0% postoperatively in the combined cohort.SGNF and SGTF were shown to be a safe and effective intervention with comparative outcomes at mid-term follow-up. A prospective randomized clinical trial with longer follow-up is needed to elucidate the long-term outcomes.© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
|
| [5] |
This randomised controlled trial compared the efficacy of modified laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with fundoplication (LSGFD) versus standard laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in achieving weight loss and alleviating gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in patients with obesity.
|
| [6] |
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), including erosive esophagitis, is highly prevalent in the obese population. Barrett's esophagus is the consequence of untreated GERD. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is one of the most frequently performed bariatric procedures. This study presents results after 5 years of follow-up of combined LSG and Rossetti fundoplication for the treatment of GERD, esophagitis, and Barrett's esophagus in patients with morbid obesity.To evaluate long-term results after sleeve gastrectomy with Rossetti fundoplication.Public university hospital in Italy.Since January 2015, more than 450 patients with obesity underwent sleeve gastrectomy with a Rossetti fundoplication procedure as part of prospective studies underway at our center performed by 4 different expert bariatric surgeons. Currently, 127 patients have a follow-up of 5 years or more.Mean patient age was 42.9 ± 10.3 years, and mean body mass index was 42.4 ± 6.1 kg/m. In total, 74.8% of patients were experiencing GERD before surgery. In 29 of 127 patients (22.8%), preoperative gastroscopy showed signs of esophagitis and/or Barrett's esophagus. In particular, 23 of 127 patients (18.1%) had grade A esophagitis, 2 of 127 (1.6%) had grade B, 2 of 127 (1.6%) had grade C, and 2 of 127 (1.6%) had Barrett's esophagus. Mean operative time was 51 ± 21 minutes. No intraoperative complications or conversions were reported. A regular postoperative course was seen in 91.3% of patients. Sixty months after surgery, more than 95% of patients did not experience any reflux symptoms. Percent total weight loss at follow-up was comparable with that with sleeve gastrectomy. Endoscopic follow-up demonstrated improvement of esophagitis lesions (including Barrett's esophagus) present in the preoperative setting.Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with Rossetti fundoplication is well tolerated, feasible, and safe in patients with obesity, providing adequate weight loss results and complete resolution of clinical signs of GERD. We have recorded an improvement in esophagitis lesions present at preoperative gastroscopy and complete resolution of Barrett's esophagus within 5 years of follow-up.Copyright © 2022 American Society for Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
张嘉炜, 王瑞, 张克诚, 等. 烧烫伤创面深度智能检测模型P-YOLO的建立及测试效果[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(5): 379-385. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-9450.2024.05.002.
|
| [9] |
This study investigated the application of a deep learning-based object detection model for accurate localization and orientation estimation of spinal fixation surgical instruments during surgery.We employed the You Only Look Once (YOLO) object detection framework with oriented bounding boxes (OBBs) to address the challenge of non-axis-aligned instruments in surgical scenes. The initial dataset of 100 images was created using brochure and website images from 11 manufacturers of commercially available pedicle screws used in spinal fusion surgeries, and data augmentation was used to expand 300 images. The model was trained, validated, and tested using 70%, 20%, and 10% of the images of lumbar pedicle screws, with the training process running for 100 epochs.The model testing results showed that it could detect the locations of the pedicle screws in the surgical scene as well as their direction angles through the OBBs. The F1 score of the model was 0.86 (precision: 1.00, recall: 0.80) at each confidence level and mAP50. The high precision suggests that the model effectively identifies true positive instrument detections, although the recall indicates a slight limitation in capturing all instruments present. This approach offers advantages over traditional object detection in bounding boxes for tasks where object orientation is crucial, and our findings suggest the potential of YOLOv8 OBB models in real-world surgical applications such as instrument tracking and surgical navigation.Future work will explore incorporating additional data and the potential of hyperparameter optimization to improve overall model performance.Copyright © 2024 Korean Neurotraumatology Society.
|
| [10] |
张珂诚, 乔治, 杨力, 等. 计算机视觉人工智能技术在腹腔镜胃癌根治术中对器械和脏器的检测识别:一项多中心临床研究[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2024, 27(5): 464-470. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20240125-00041.
|
| [11] |
郭子豪, 刘昶. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除联合胃底折叠术对肥胖伴胃食管反流病的研究进展[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2023, 30(5): 635-640. DOI: 10.7507/1007-9424.202302008.
|
| [12] |
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most frequently performed procedure in bariatric–metabolic surgery (BMS) worldwide, accounting for approximately 90% of BMS procedures in Japan. While numerous studies have reported on the safety and efficacy of LSG, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) remains a major postoperative complication. Although Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is preferred for severe obesity with GERD, it is less suitable for Japanese patients who have a higher risk of gastric cancer due to the remnant stomach which is difficult to observe with esophago‐gastro‐duodenoscopy. To address de novo and exacerbation GERD after LSG, we conducted LSG with Toupet fundoplication (T‐sleeve) for Japanese patients with severe obesity. In our first T‐sleeve case, the patient demonstrated sufficient weight loss and improved GERD following surgery. Hence, we suggest that T‐sleeve is a feasible option for Japanese patients with obesity and concurrent GERD.
|
| [13] |
Bariatric surgery has emerged as an effective therapeutic approach for combating obesity. As the most commonly performed bariatric surgery, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has a long-term and effective outcome in weight reduction. However, studies have reported an increased incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) among patients after LSG. For those who fail to respond to conventional oral acid-suppressing medication, surgical intervention comes into consideration. The most commonly performed revisional surgery for sleeve gastrectomy is the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, which can effectively alleviate the symptoms of reflux in patients and also continues to promote weight loss in patients who have not achieved satisfactory results or have experienced weight regain. In addition to this established procedure, innovative techniques such as laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) are being explored. MSA is less invasive, has good reflux treatment outcomes, and its safety and efficacy are supported by the literature, making it a promising tool for the future treatment of gastroesophageal reflux. This article also explores the role of endoscopic interventions for GERD treatment of post-sleeve gastrectomy patients. Although these methods have shown some therapeutic effect, their efficacy still requires further study due to a lack of support from more clinical data. For patients with preoperative hiatal hernia or gastroesophageal reflux symptoms, some experts now consider performing LSG combined with hiatal hernia repair or fundoplication to alleviate or prevent postoperative reflux symptoms. Both of these surgical approaches have demonstrated favorable outcomes; however, the addition of fundoplication requires further investigation regarding its long-term effects and potential postoperative complications. This article gathers and examines the current laparoscopic and endoscopic treatments for refractory gastroesophageal reflux following LSG, as well as the concurrent treatment of LSG in patients with preoperative gastroesophageal reflux or hiatal hernia.
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
利益冲突 所有作者均声明不存在利益冲突
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |