急性胰腺炎后糖尿病研究进展

张玉玺, 卢炯地, 丁乙轩, 高崇崇, 曹锋, 李非

中国实用外科杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (11) : 1349-1352.

PDF(1233 KB)
PDF(1233 KB)
中国实用外科杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (11) : 1349-1352. DOI: 10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2025.11.26
文献综述

急性胰腺炎后糖尿病研究进展

作者信息 +

Research progress on post-acute pancreatitis diabetes mellitus

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

急性胰腺炎后糖尿病作为急性胰腺炎(AP)的远期并发症之一,5年累积发病率达40%。诊断需先排除既往糖尿病史,并在AP发作>90 d根据美国糖尿病协会诊断标准进行确诊。高危人群包括年轻、复发、重症或坏死性AP,伴外分泌功能不全,胰腺脂肪沉积或代谢综合征等。病理基础涉及β细胞损伤、自身免疫激活、炎症介导胰岛素抵抗及肠-胰岛素轴紊乱等多种机制。管理强调急性期积极补液及抗炎降低后遗损伤;AP恢复期定期进行血糖筛查;降糖药物首选二甲双胍,必要时行胰岛素及胰酶替代以优化血糖与营养;对于全胰切除病人,可考虑行胰岛自体移植以改善远期预后。

Abstract

Post acute pancreatitis diabetes mellitus is a common long term complication of acute pancreatitis (AP), with a 5 year cumulative incidence of approximately 40%. Diagnosis requires exclusion of pre existing diabetes and confirmation ≥ 90 days after an AP episode according to the American Diabetes Association criteria. High risk groups include younger patients, those with recurrent, severe, or necrotising AP, and individuals with pancreatic exocrine insufficiency, intrapancreatic fat deposition or metabolic syndrome. The pathogenesis is multifactorial, encompassing β cell injury, autoimmune activation, inflammation driven insulin resistance and disruption of the gut-islet axis. Management priorities include aggressive fluid resuscitation and anti inflammatory therapy during the acute phase to limit residual damage; periodic glycaemic screening during convalescence; and metformin as the first line glucose lowering agent, with early insulin and pancreatic enzyme replacement when needed to optimise glycaemic control and nutrition.For patients undergoing total pancreatectomy, autologous islet transplantation may be considered to optimize long-term outcomes.

关键词

急性胰腺炎 / 急性胰腺炎后糖尿病 / 外分泌胰腺糖尿病

Key words

acute pancreatitis / post acute pancreatitis diabetes mellitus / exocrine pancreatic diabetes

引用本文

导出引用
张玉玺, 卢炯地, 丁乙轩, . 急性胰腺炎后糖尿病研究进展[J]. 中国实用外科杂志. 2025, 45(11): 1349-1352 https://doi.org/10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2025.11.26
ZHANG Yu-xi, LU Jiong-di, DING Yi-xuan, et al. Research progress on post-acute pancreatitis diabetes mellitus[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery. 2025, 45(11): 1349-1352 https://doi.org/10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2025.11.26
中图分类号: R6   

参考文献

[1]
Petrov MS. Diabetes of the exocrine pancreas: American Diabetes Association-compliant lexicon[J]. Pancreatology, 2017, 17(4): 523-526. DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2017.06.007.
Multidisciplinary teams, including gastroenterologists, endocrinologists, surgeons, dietitians, primary care physicians, and other health professionals, are involved in management of individuals with diabetes of the exocrine pancreas (DEP). This necessitates introduction of a uniform terminology to ensure proper communication and reporting. Because DEP is a form of secondary diabetes mellitus, it makes sense to align the evolving DEP lexicon with nomenclature and diagnostic standards advocated by a world leading professional body in the field of diabetes such as the American Diabetes Association. This Editorial offers a historical excursus on the terms used and proposes a new concise nomenclature and diagnostic criteria. This new taxonomy of DEP, compliant with the American Diabetes Association standards of diagnosis and care for patients with diabetes mellitus, will ensure standardisation of reporting in future clinical studies on DEP and enable a dynamic incorporation of glucose dysregulation mechanisms related specifically to diseases of the exocrine pancreas as new evidence emerges.Copyright © 2017 IAP and EPC. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
[2]
Xiao AY, Tan MLY, Wu LM, et al. Global incidence and mortality of pancreatic diseases: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of population-based cohort studies[J]. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2016, 1(1): 45-55. DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(16)30004-8.
[3]
中华医学会外科学分会胰腺外科学组. 中国急性胰腺炎诊治指南(2021)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2021, 41(7):739-746. DOI:10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2021.07.03.
[4]
Das SLM, Singh PP, Phillips ARJ, et al. Newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus after acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Gut, 2014, 63(5): 818-831. DOI:10.1136/gutjnl-2013-305062
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is common in the general population and it poses a heavy burden to society in the form of long-term disability, healthcare use and costs. The pancreas is a key player in glucose homeostasis, but the occurrence of newly diagnosed DM after acute pancreatitis (AP), the most frequent disease of the pancreas, has never been assessed systematically. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic literature review to determine the prevalence and time course of DM and related conditions after the first attack of AP as well as the impact of covariates.Relevant literature cited in three electronic databases (Scopus, EMBASE and MEDLINE) was reviewed independently by two authors. The main outcome measures studied were newly diagnosed prediabetes, DM, or DM treated with insulin. Pooled prevalence and 95% CIs were calculated for all outcomes.A total of 24 prospective clinical studies, involving 1102 patients with first episode of AP, met all the eligibility criteria. Prediabetes and/or DM was observed in 37% (95% CI 30% to 45%) individuals after AP. The pooled prevalence of prediabetes, DM and treatment with insulin after AP was 16% (95% CI 9% to 24%), 23% (95% CI 16% to 31%), and 15% (95% CI 9% to 21%), respectively. Newly diagnosed DM developed in 15% of individuals within 12 months after first episode of AP and the risk increased significantly at 5 years (relative risk 2.7 (95% CI 1.9 to 3.8)). A similar trend was observed with regard to treatment with insulin. The severity of AP, its aetiology, individuals' age and gender had minimal effect on the studied outcomes.Patients with AP often develop prediabetes and/or DM after discharge from hospital, and have a greater than twofold increased risk of DM over 5 years. Further studies are warranted to determine the optimal strategy for its detection and whether the risk of developing DM after AP can be reduced.
[5]
American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. 2. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes: Standards of care in diabetes-2024[J]. Diabetes Care, 2024, 47(suppl 1): s20-s42. DOI:10.2337/dc24-S002.
The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, an interprofessional expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.© 2024 by the American Diabetes Association.
[6]
Ho TW, Wu JM, Kuo TC, et al. Change of both endocrine and exocrine insufficiencies after acute pancreatitis in non-diabetic patients: A nationwide population-based study[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2015, 94(27): e1123. DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000001123.
[7]
Bendor CD, Bardugo A, Zucker I, et al. Childhood pancreatitis and risk for incident diabetes in adulthood[J]. Diabetes Care, 2020, 43(1): 145-151. DOI:10.2337/dc19-1562.
The relationship between acute pancreatitis and incident diabetes is unclear. We assessed whether a resolved single event of acute pancreatitis in childhood was associated with incident diabetes in adulthood.A nationwide, population-based study of 1,802,110 Israeli adolescents (mean age 17.4 years [range 16-20]) who were examined before compulsory military service between 1979 and 2008 and whose data were linked to the Israeli National Diabetes Registry (INDR). Resolved pancreatitis was defined as a history of a single event of acute pancreatitis with normal pancreatic function at enrollment. Logistic regression analysis was applied.Incident diabetes developed in 4.6% of subjects with resolved pancreatitis (13 of 281; none of these cases were identified as type 1 diabetes) and 2.5% among the unexposed group (44,463 of 1,801,716). Resolved acute pancreatitis was associated with incident diabetes with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.23 (95% CI 1.25-3.98) with adjustment for age, sex, and birth year. Findings persisted after further adjustments for baseline BMI and sociodemographic confounders (OR 2.10 [95% CI 1.15-3.84]). Childhood pancreatitis was associated with a diagnosis of diabetes at a younger age, with 92% of diabetes case subjects diagnosed before 40 years of age compared with 47% in the unexposed group ( = 0.002). The association accentuated when the study sample was limited to individuals of unimpaired health or normal BMI at baseline.A history of acute pancreatitis in childhood with normal pancreatic function in late adolescence is a risk factor for incident type 2 diabetes, especially at young adulthood.© 2019 by the American Diabetes Association.
[8]
Pendharkar SA, Mathew J, Petrov MS. Age- and sex-specific prevalence of diabetes associated with diseases of the exocrine pancreas: A population-based study[J]. Dig Liver Dis, 2017, 49(5): 540-544.DOI:10.1016/j.dld.2016.12.010.
[9]
Shen HN, Yang CC, Chang YH, et al. Risk of diabetes mellitus after first-attack acute pancreatitis: A national population-based study[J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2015, 110(12): 1698-1706. DOI:10.1038/ajg.2015.356.
[10]
Cho J, Scragg R, Petrov MS. The influence of cholecystectomy and recurrent biliary events on the risk of post-pancreatitis diabetes mellitus: A nationwide cohort study in patients with first attack of acute pancreatitis[J]. HPB, 2021, 23(6): 937-944. DOI:10.1016/j.hpb.2020.10.010.
It is unknown whether cholecystectomy for acute pancreatitis (AP) affects the risk of post-pancreatitis diabetes mellitus (PPDM). We aimed to investigate the associations between cholecystectomy, recurrent biliary events prior to cholecystectomy, and the risk of PPDM in patients with AP.Using New Zealand nationwide data from 2007 to 2016, patients with first admission for AP were identified (n = 10,870). Cholecystectomy was considered as a time-dependent exposure. Timing of cholecystectomy was categorized as same-admission, readmission, and delayed cholecystectomy. Recurrent biliary events prior to cholecystectomy were identified. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were conducted.Among 2147 patients who underwent cholecystectomy, 141 (6.6%) developed PPDM. Overall, cholecystectomy was not significantly associated with the risk of PPDM (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 0.94-1.38). Delayed cholecystectomy was significantly associated with an increased risk of PPDM (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.83). Patients who had 2 or ≥3 recurrent biliary events prior to cholecystectomy were at a significantly increased risk of PPDM.Cholecystectomy in general was not associated with the risk of PPDM in patients with AP. Two or more repeated attacks of AP (or other biliary events) were associated with a significantly increased risk of PPDM.Copyright © 2020 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
[11]
Zhi M, Zhu X, Lugea A, et al. Incidence of new onset diabetes mellitus secondary to acute pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Front Physiol, 2019, 10: 637. DOI:10.3389/fphys.2019.00637.
Patients who have an episode of acute pancreatitis (AP) frequently develop diabetes mellitus (DM) over time. The reported incidence of DM after AP varies depending on the severity, etiology and the extent of pancreatic necrosis during AP. We performed a systematic review to determine the incidence of new-onset DM after AP episode (s), and compared the rate of DM in AP patients based upon different disease characteristics. A total of 31 relevant studies with 13894 subjects were collected from Medline, Embase, and Web of Science. Stata 15 software was used for data analyses in the meta-analysis. The random-effects pooled incidence was 23.0% for DM (95% CI 16.0-31.0%) and 15.0% (95% CI 9.0-23.0%) for DM treated with insulin. We noted substantial heterogeneity in incidence estimates for DM and DM treated with insulin ( = 95.61 and 71.78%; both < 0·001). The DM incidence was higher in the populations that had a severe AP (SAP) episode than in those with mild acute pancreatitis (MAP) (39 vs. 14%). Patients that displayed pancreatic necrosis during the AP attack(s) had a higher frequency of DM than those without necrosis (37 vs. 11%). In addition, the pooled incidence of DM was higher after alcoholic compared to biliary AP (28 vs. 12%). The incidence of insulin use after SAP and alcoholic AP was 21 and 18%, respectively, with very low heterogeneities. According to duration of follow-up, the pooled rate of DM and insulin use within 5 years after AP was 20 and 14%, while the rate associated with follow-up duration of more than 5 years was elevated to 37 and 25%, respectively. On meta-regression, year of publication, male proportion, age at DM test, and duration of follow-up were neither positively nor negatively associated with the incidence of DM and DM treated with insulin in patients who had a prior AP attack. Patients with AP developed DM after discharge from hospital with a frequency of about 23%. SAP, alcoholic AP and acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP) were associated with increased incidence of DM. Assessments of severity, etiology, and pancreatic necrosis are critical for predicting DM development after AP.
[12]
Yu BJ, Li NS, He WH, et al. Pancreatic necrosis and severity are independent risk factors for pancreatic endocrine insufficiency after acute pancreatitis: A long-term follow-up study[J]. WJG, 2020, 26(23): 3260-3270. DOI:10.3748/wjg.v26.i23.3260.
[13]
Cho J, Scragg R, Pandol SJ, et al. Exocrine pancreatic dysfunction increases the risk of new‐onset diabetes mellitus: Results of a nationwide cohort study[J]. Clinical Translational Sci, 2021, 14(1): 170-178. DOI:10.1111/cts.12837.
It is well established that individuals with diabetes mellitus (DM) may develop exocrine pancreatic dysfunction (EPD) requiring pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy, whereas the converse relationship has been poorly studied. Pancreatitis is a disease that is well suited to investigate the latter as it is often characterized by the development of EPD and/or new‐onset DM. The aim was to investigate the association between EPD and the risk of new‐onset DM in individuals after the first attack of pancreatitis. Using nationwide pharmaceutical dispensing data and hospital discharge data, this cohort study included a total of 9,124 post‐pancreatitis individuals. EPD was defined as having two or more dispensing records of pancreatic enzymes. Considering EPD as a time‐dependent variable, multivariable Cox regression analysis was conducted. A 1‐year lag period between EPD and DM was introduced to minimize reverse causality. Age, sex, ethnicity, alcohol consumption, tobacco smoking, social deprivation index, Charlson comorbidity index, and use of proton pump inhibitors were adjusted for. In the overall cohort, EPD was associated with a significantly higher risk for new‐onset DM (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.83; 95% confidence interval, 2.37–6.18). The association remained statistically significant when a 1‐year lag period was applied (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.38–4.58), as well as when the analysis was constrained to mild acute pancreatitis (4.65; 2.18–9.93). The findings suggest that individuals with EPD, even those without extensive mechanistic destruction of the pancreas, are at an increased risk for new‐onset DM. Purposely designed studies are warranted to investigate mechanisms behind the association and if the mechanisms could be targeted therapeutically.
[14]
Singh RG, Cervantes A, Kim JU, et al. Intrapancreatic fat deposition and visceral fat volume are associated with the presence of diabetes after acute pancreatitis[J]. Amn J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, 2019, 316(6): G806-G815. DOI:10.1152/ajpgi.00385.2018.
[15]
Firkins SA, Hart PA, Papachristou GI, et al. Identification of a risk profile for new-onset diabetes after acute pancreatitis[J]. Pancreas, 2021, 50(5): 696-703. DOI:10.1097/MPA.0000000000001818.
[16]
Zhang J, Lv Y, Hou J, et al. Machine learning for post-acute pancreatitis diabetes mellitus prediction and personalized treatment recommendations[J]. Sci Rep, 2023, 13(1). DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-31947-4.
[17]
Tu J, Yang Y, Zhang J, et al. Effect of the disease severity on the risk of developing new-onset diabetes after acute pancreatitis[J]. Medicine, 2018, 97(22): e10713. DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000010713.
[18]
Zhang X, Tao J, Yu J, et al. Inhibition of notch activity promotes pancreatic cytokeratin 5-positive cell differentiation to beta cells and improves glucose homeostasis following acute pancreatitis[J]. Cell Death Dis, 2021, 12(10): 867. DOI:10.1038/s41419-021-04160-2.
Some individuals develop prediabetes and/or diabetes following acute pancreatitis (AP). AP-induced beta-cell injury and the limited regenerative capacity of beta cells might account for pancreatic endocrine insufficiency. Previously, we found that only a few pancreatic cytokeratin 5 positive (Krt5) cells differentiated into beta cells in the murine AP model, which was insufficient to maintain glucose homeostasis. Notch signaling determines pancreatic progenitor differentiation in pancreas development. This study aimed to examine whether Notch signaling inhibition could promote pancreatic Krt5 cell differentiation into beta cells and improve glucose homeostasis following AP. Pancreatic tissues from patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP) were used to evaluate beta-cell injury, Krt5 cell activation and differentiation, and Notch activity. The murine AP model was induced by cerulein, and the effect of Notch inhibition on Krt5 cell differentiation was evaluated both in vivo and in vitro. The results demonstrated beta-cell loss in ANP patients and AP mice. Krt5 cells were activated in ANP pancreases along with persistently elevated Notch activity, which resulted in the formation of massive duct-like structures. AP mice that received Notch inhibitor showed that impaired glucose tolerance was reversed 7 and 15 days following AP, and increased numbers of newborn small islets due to increased differentiation of Krt5 cells to beta cells to some extent. In addition, Krt5 cells isolated from AP mice showed increased differentiation to beta cells by Notch inhibition. Collectively, these findings suggest that beta-cell loss contributes to pancreatic endocrine insufficiency following AP, and inhibition of Notch activity promotes pancreatic Krt5 cell differentiation to beta cells and improves glucose homeostasis. The findings from this study may shed light on the potential treatment of prediabetes/diabetes following AP.© 2021. The Author(s).
[19]
Kharoud HK, Mettler T, Freeman ML, et al. Type 1 diabetes mellitus in patients with recurrent acute and chronic pancreatitis: A case series[J]. Pancreatology, 2021, 21(1): 95-97. DOI:10.1016/j.pan.2020.12.006.
Pancreatogenic diabetes mellitus has been assumed to result from non-immune beta cell destruction when the pancreas is replaced by fibrotic tissue secondary to acute and chronic pancreatitis. We hypothesize that recurrent episodes of pancreatic inflammation may increase the risk for developing β-cell autoimmunity in susceptible individuals.We describe 11 patients who had both recurrent acute and/or chronic pancreatitis and type 1 diabetes (T1D) requiring insulin therapy.All 11 patients had positive autoantibodies and 8 patients tested had minimal to undetectable (7/8) or moderate (1/8) stimulated C-peptide at 12 months after T1D onset. Three had biopsy confirmation of insulitis.These cases lend support to the theory that pancreatitis may increase risk for T1D. We postulate that the pro-inflammatory conditions of pancreatitis may increase posttranslational protein modifications of β-cell antigens and neoepitope generation, which are potential initiating events for loss of β-cell self-tolerance.Copyright © 2020 IAP and EPC. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
[20]
Tatum JD, Hornung L, Bellin MD, et al. High rate of islets autoimmunity in pediatric patients with index admission of acute pancreatitis[J]. Pediatric Diabetes, 2023, 2023: 1-9. DOI:10.1155/2023/9170497.
[21]
Petrov MS. Panorama of mediators in postpancreatitis diabetes mellitus[J]. Curr Opin Gastroenterol, 2020, 36(5): 443-451. DOI:10.1097/MOG.0000000000000654.
To provide an overview of mediators involved in the pathogenesis of postacute pancreatitis diabetes mellitus.
[22]
Huang W, De La Iglesia-García D, Baston-Rey I, et al. Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency following acute pancreatitis: Systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Dig Dis Sci, 2019, 64(7): 1985-2005. DOI:10.1007/s10620-019-05568-9.
[23]
Nyirjesy SC, Peleckis AJ, Eiel JN, et al. Effects of GLP-1 and GIP on islet function in glucose-intolerant, pancreatic-insufficient cystic fibrosis[J]. Diabetes, 2022, 71(10): 2153-2165. DOI:10.2337/db22-0399.
Impaired insulin and incretin secretion underlie abnormal glucose tolerance (AGT) in pancreatic insufficient cystic fibrosis (PI-CF). Whether the incretin hormones glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) can enhance pancreatic islet function in CF is not known. We studied 32 adults with PI-CF and AGT randomized to receive either GLP-1 (n=16) or GIP (n=16) during glucose-potentiated arginine (GPA) testing of islet function on two occasions with either incretin or placebo infused by randomized, double-blind, cross-over fashion. Another 4 adults with PI-CF and normal glucose tolerance (NGT) and 4 matched non-CF controls underwent similar assessment with GIP. In PI-CF with AGT, GLP-1 substantially augmented second-phase insulin secretion, but without effect on the acute insulin response to GPA or the proinsulin secretory ratio (PISR), while GIP infusion did not enhance second phase or GPA-induced insulin secretion but increased the PISR. GIP also did not enhance second-phase insulin in PI-CF with NGT but did so markedly in non-CF controls. These data indicate that GLP-1, but not GIP, augments glucose-dependent insulin secretion in PI-CF, supporting the likelihood that GLP-1 agonists could have therapeutic benefit in this population. Understanding loss of GIP's insulinotropic action in PI-CF may lead to novel insights into diabetes pathogenesis.© 2022 by the American Diabetes Association.
[24]
Valdes AM, Walter J, Segal E, et al. Role of the gut microbiota in nutrition and health[J]. BMJ, 2018, 361: k2179. DOI:10.1136/bmj.k2179.
[25]
Lee AA, Baker JR, Wamsteker EJ, et al. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth is common in chronic pancreatitis and associates with diabetes, chronic pancreatitis severity, low zinc levels, and opiate use[J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2019, 114(7): 1163-1171. DOI:10.14309/ajg.0000000000000200.
Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) is often present in patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP) with persistent steatorrhea, despite pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy. Overall prevalence of SIBO, diagnosed by glucose breath test (GBT), varies between 0% and 40% but 0%-21% in those without upper gastrointestinal (GI) surgery. We investigated the prevalence and nonsurgical independent predictors of SIBO in CP without upper GI surgery.Two hundred seventy-three patients ≥18 years old had a presumptive diagnosis of CP and a GBT between 1989 and 2017. We defined CP by Mayo score (0-16) ≥4 and a positive GBT for SIBO by Rome consensus criteria and retrospectively collected data for 5 a priori variables (age, opiates, alcohol use, diabetes mellitus (DM), gastroparesis) and 41 investigational variables (demographics, GI symptoms, comorbidities, CP etiologies and cofactors, CP symptom duration, Mayo score and nondiabetes components, and biochemical variables).Ninety-eight of 273 patients had definite CP and 40.8% had SIBO. Five of 46 variables predicted SIBO: opiates, P = 0.005; DM, P = 0.04; total Mayo score, P < 0.05; zinc, P = 0.005; and albumin, P < 0.05). Multivariable analysis of 3 noncorrelated variables identified zinc level (odds ratio = 0.0001; P = 0.03) as the sole independent predictor of SIBO (model C-statistic = 0.89; P < 0.001).SIBO, diagnosed by GBT, occurs in 40.8% of patients with CP without upper GI surgery. In patients with CP, markers of more severe CP (low zinc level, DM and increased Mayo score) and opiate use should raise clinical suspicion for SIBO, particularly in patients with persistent steatorrhea or weight loss despite pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy.
[26]
Bharmal SH, Cho J, Alarcon Ramos GC, et al. Trajectories of glycaemia following acute pancreatitis: A prospective longitudinal cohort study with 24 months follow-up[J]. J Gastroenterol, 2020, 55(8): 775-788. DOI:10.1007/s00535-020-01682-y.
New-onset diabetes is the most common sequela of acute pancreatitis (AP). Yet, prospective changes in glycaemia over time have never been investigated comprehensively in this study population. The primary aim was to determine the cumulative incidence of new-onset prediabetes and new-onset diabetes after AP over 24 months of follow-up in a prospective cohort study. The secondary aim was to identify trajectories of glycaemia during follow-up and their predictors at the time of hospitalisation.Patients with a prospective diagnosis of AP and no diabetes based on the American Diabetes Association criteria were followed up every 6 months up to 24 months after hospital discharge. Incidence of new-onset prediabetes/diabetes over each follow-up period was calculated. Group-based trajectory modelling was used to identify common changes in glycaemia. Multinomial regression analyses were conducted to investigate the associations between a wide array of routinely available demographic, anthropometric, laboratory, imaging, and clinical factors and membership in the trajectory groups.A total of 152 patients without diabetes were followed up. The cumulative incidence of new-onset prediabetes and diabetes was 20% at 6 months after hospitalisation and 43% over 24 months of follow-up (p trend < 0.001). Three discrete trajectories of glycaemia were identified: normal-stable glycaemia (32%), moderate-stable glycaemia (60%), and high-increasing glycaemia (8%). Waist circumference was a significant predictor of moderate-stable glycaemia. None of the studied predictors were significantly associated with high-increasing glycaemia.This first prospective cohort study of changes in glycaemia (determined at structured time points in unselected AP patients) showed that at least one out of five patients develops new-onset prediabetes or diabetes at 6 months of follow-up and more than four out of ten-in the first 2 years. Changes in glycaemia after AP follow three discrete trajectories. This may inform prevention or early detection of critical changes in blood glucose metabolism following an attack of AP and, hence, reduce the burden of new-onset diabetes after acute pancreatitis.
[27]
Davidsen L, Jensen MH, Cook ME, et al. Metformin treatment is associated with reduced risk of hypoglycaemia, major adverse cardiovascular events, and all-cause mortality in patients with post-pancreatitis diabetes mellitus: A nationwide cohort study[J]. Eur J Endocrinol, 2024, 190(1): 44-53. DOI:10.1093/ejendo/lvad175.
Post-pancreatitis diabetes mellitus (PPDM) is a frequent complication of pancreatitis and is associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes. Metformin is recommended for the treatment of PPDM, but evidence of its risk-benefit profile is limited. In a pharmaco-epidemiologic study, we investigated the association between metformin treatment and adverse outcomes in patients with PPDM.In a Danish nationwide population-based cohort study, we included adults (≥18 years) with incident PPDM or type 2 diabetes between 2009 and 2018. Post-pancreatitis diabetes mellitus was categorised into acute and chronic subtypes (PPDM-A and PPDM-C). Associations between metformin treatment and severe hypoglycaemia, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and all-cause mortality were examined across the diabetes subgroups using Cox regression analysis. Treatments with metformin, insulin, and other glucose-lowering therapies were handled as time-varying exposures.We included 222 337 individuals with new-onset type 2 diabetes and 3781 with PPDM, of whom 2305 (61%) were classified as PPDM-A and 1476 (39%) as PPDM-C. Treatment with metformin was associated with a lower risk of severe hypoglycaemia (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.41, 95% CI 0.27-0.62, P <.0001), MACE (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.60-0.92, P =.0071), and all-cause mortality (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.49-0.64, P <.0001) in patients with PPDM. In sensitivity analyses and among individuals with type 2 diabetes, metformin treatment exhibited comparable trends of risk reduction.Metformin is associated with a lower risk of adverse outcomes, including all-cause mortality in patients with PPDM, supporting the use of metformin as a glucose-lowering therapy for these patients.© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Endocrinology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
[28]
Cho J, Scragg R, Pandol SJ, et al. Antidiabetic medications and mortality risk in individuals with pancreatic cancer-related diabetes and postpancreatitis diabetes: A nationwide cohort study[J]. Diabetes Care, 2019, 42(9): 1675-1683. DOI:10.2337/dc19-0145.
There are no specific treatment guidelines for diabetes of the exocrine pancreas. High-quality studies are warranted to investigate whether the use of antidiabetic medications has survival benefit in individuals with diabetes of the exocrine pancreas. The objective was to determine the risk of mortality associated with the use of antidiabetic medications in individuals with pancreatic cancer-related diabetes (PCRD) and postpancreatitis diabetes mellitus (PPDM).Nationwide pharmaceutical dispensing data (2006-2015) linked to hospital discharge data were used to identify 1,862 individuals with PCRD or PPDM. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was conducted, and the risk was expressed as hazard ratios and 95% CIs. A 6-month lag was used to minimize reverse causality.In individuals with PCRD, ever users of metformin (adjusted hazard ratio 0.54; 95% CI 0.46-0.63) and ever users of insulin (adjusted hazard ratio 0.46; 95% CI 0.39-0.55) had significantly lower risks of mortality compared with never users of antidiabetic medications. These associations attenuated toward the null with the use of a 6-month lag. In individuals with PPDM, ever users of metformin had a significantly lower risk of mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 0.51; 95% CI 0.36-0.70), whereas ever-users of insulin did not have a significantly changed risk of mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 0.75; 95% CI 0.49-1.14) compared with never users of antidiabetic medications. The former association remained significant with the use of a 6-month lag.Metformin promotes a survival benefit in individuals with PPDM but not PCRD. Reverse causality may play a role in the association between insulin use and mortality in PCRD.© 2019 by the American Diabetes Association.
[29]
Hopkins R, Young KG, Thomas NJ, et al. Treatment outcomes with oral anti-hyperglycaemic therapies in people with diabetes secondary to a pancreatic condition (type 3c diabetes): a population-based cohort study[J]. Diabetes Obes Metab, 2025, 27(3): 1544-1553. DOI:10.1111/dom.16163.
To assess outcomes of oral anti-hyperglycaemic therapies in people with diabetes secondary to a pancreatic condition (type 3c), where specific treatment guidance is limited.Using hospital-linked UK primary care records (Clinical Practice Research Datalink; 2004-2020), we identified 7084 people with a pancreatic condition (acute pancreatitis, chronic pancreatitis, pancreatic cancer and haemochromatosis) preceding diabetes diagnosis (type 3c cohort), initiating oral glucose-lowering therapy (metformin, sulphonylureas, SGLT2-inhibitors, DPP4-inhibitors or thiazolidinediones), and without concurrent insulin treatment. We stratified by pancreatic exocrine insufficiency [PEI] (n = 5917 without PEI, 1167 with PEI) and matched to 97 227 type 2 diabetes (T2D) controls. 12-month HbA1c response and weight change and 6-month treatment discontinuation were compared in type 3c versus T2D.People with type 3c diabetes had substantial mean HbA1c reduction with oral therapies in those without PEI (12.2 [95%CI 12.0-12.4] mmol/mol) and with PEI (9.4 [8.9-10.0] mmol/mol). Compared to T2D controls, people with type 3c without PEI had similar mean HbA1c reduction (0.7 [0.4-1.0] mmol/mol difference) and odds of discontinuation (Odds ratio [OR] 1.08 [0.98-1.19]). In contrast, people with type 3c and PEI had lower mean HbA1c response (3.5 [2.9-4.1] mmol/mol lesser reduction) and greater discontinuation (OR 2.03 [1.73-2.36]) versus T2D controls. Weight change in type 3c was similar to T2D. Results were largely consistent across underlying pancreatic conditions and drug classes.Oral anti-hyperglycaemic therapies are effective in people with type 3c diabetes and could provide an important component of glycaemic management. PEI could identify people with type 3c requiring closer monitoring of treatment response.© 2025 The Author(s). Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
[30]
Goodarzi MO, Petrov MS. Diabetes of the exocrine pancreas: Implications for pharmacological management[J]. Drugs, 2023, 83(12): 1077-1090. DOI:10.1007/s40265-023-01913-5.
Post-pancreatitis diabetes mellitus, pancreatic cancer-related diabetes, and cystic fibrosis-related diabetes are often underappreciated. As a result, a substantial proportion of people with these sub-types of diabetes receive antidiabetic medications that may be suboptimal, if not harmful, in the context of their underlying disease of the exocrine pancreas. The present article delineates both classical (biguanides, insulin, sulfonylureas, α-glucosidase inhibitors, thiazolidinediones, and meglitinides) and newer (glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, amylin analogs, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors, D2 receptor agonists, bile acid sequestrants, and dual glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor co-agonists) therapies and provides recommendations for managing people with diabetes of the exocrine pancreas based on the most up-to-date clinical evidence. Also, several emerging directions (lipid-enriched pathways, Y4 receptor agonism, glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucagon receptor co-agonism) are presented with a view to informing the process of new drug discovery and development.© 2023. The Author(s).
[31]
Woodmansey C, McGovern AP, McCullough KA, et al. Incidence, demographics, and clinical characteristics of diabetes of the exocrine pancreas (type 3c): A retrospective cohort study[J]. Diabetes Care, 2017, 40(11): 1486-1493. DOI:10.2337/dc17-0542.
This study was conducted to describe the incidence of diabetes following pancreatic disease, assess how these patients are classified by clinicians, and compare clinical characteristics with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.Primary care records in England ( = 2,360,631) were searched for incident cases of adult-onset diabetes between 1 January 2005 and 31 March 2016. We examined demographics, diabetes classification, glycemic control, and insulin use in those with and without pancreatic disease (subcategorized into acute pancreatitis or chronic pancreatic disease) before diabetes diagnosis. Regression analysis was used to control for baseline potential risk factors for poor glycemic control (HbA ≥7% [53 mmol/mol]) and insulin requirement.We identified 31,789 new diagnoses of adult-onset diabetes. Diabetes following pancreatic disease (2.59 [95% CI 2.38-2.81] per 100,000 person-years) was more common than type 1 diabetes (1.64 [1.47-1.82]; < 0.001). The 559 cases of diabetes following pancreatic disease were mostly classified by clinicians as type 2 diabetes (87.8%) and uncommonly as diabetes of the exocrine pancreas (2.7%). Diabetes following pancreatic disease was diagnosed at a median age of 59 years and BMI of 29.2 kg/m. Diabetes following pancreatic disease was associated with poor glycemic control (adjusted odds ratio, 1.7 [1.3-2.2]; < 0.001) compared with type 2 diabetes. Insulin use within 5 years was 4.1% (3.8-4.4) with type 2 diabetes, 20.9% (14.6-28.9) with diabetes following acute pancreatitis, and 45.8% (34.2-57.9) with diabetes following chronic pancreatic disease.Diabetes of the exocrine pancreas is frequently labeled type 2 diabetes but has worse glycemic control and a markedly greater requirement for insulin.© 2017 by the American Diabetes Association.
[32]
Hollemans RA, Hallensleben NDL, Mager DJ, et al. Pancreatic exocrine insufficiency following acute pancreatitis: Systematic review and study level meta-analysis[J]. Pancreatology, 2018, 18(3): 253-262. DOI:10.1016/j.pan.2018.02.009.
This study systematically explores the prevalence of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI) after acute pancreatitis in different subgroups of etiology (biliary/alcoholic/other), disease severity and follow-up time (<12, 12-36 and > 36 months after index admission).PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched, 32 studies were included in this study level meta-analysis.In a total of 1495 patients with acute pancreatitis, tested at a mean of 36 months after index admission, the pooled prevalence of PEI was 27.1% (95%-confidence interval [CI]: 20.3%-35.1%). Patients from seven studies (n = 194) underwent direct tests with pooled prevalence of 41.7% [18.5%-69.2%]. Patients from 26 studies (n = 1305) underwent indirect tests with pooled prevalence of 24.4% [18.3%-31.8%]. In subgroup analyses on patients that underwent fecal elastase-1 tests, PEI occurred more often in alcoholic pancreatitis (22.7% [16.6%-30.1%]) than in biliary pancreatitis (10.2% [6.2%-16.4%]) or other etiology (13.4% [7.7%-22.4%]; P = 0.02). Pooled prevalence of PEI after mild and severe pancreatitis was 19.4% [8.6%-38.2%] and 33.4% [22.6%-46.3%] respectively in studies using fecal elaste-1 tests (P = 0.049). Similar results were seen in patients without (18.9% [9.3%-34.6%]) and with necrotizing pancreatitis (32.0% [18.2%-49.8%]; P = 0.053). Over time, the prevalence of PEI decreased in patients who underwent the fecal elastase-1 test and increased in patients who underwent the fecal fat analysis.After acute pancreatitis, a quarter of all patients develop PEI during follow-up. Alcoholic etiology and severe and necrotizing pancreatitis are associated with higher risk of PEI. The prevalence of PEI may change as time of follow-up increases.Copyright © 2018 IAP and EPC. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
[33]
汤承基, 周佳, 宋颖辉, 等. 胰腺外分泌功能不全的病因、诊断及治疗进展[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2025, 34(3):572-578. DOI:10.7659/j.issn.1005-6947.240517.
[34]
Witkowski P, Eaton A, Porter S, et al. Predictors of diabetes outcomes at 1 year after islet autotransplantation: data from a multicenter cohort study[J]. Diabetes Care, 2025, 48(9): 1493-1501. DOI:10.2337/dc25-0620.
Total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation (TPIAT) may relieve pain for patients with intractable recurrent acute or chronic pancreatitis. In this first multicenter cohort study of TPIAT, we aimed to identify predictors of favorable diabetes outcomes following TPIAT to aid in surgical counseling and decision making.We included 384 patients (mean [SD] age 29.6 [17.1] years; 61.7% female) who underwent TPIAT and were enrolled in the National Institutes of Health-sponsored multicenter Prospective Observational Study of TPIAT (POST). Outcomes were reported for insulin use, HbA1c, and islet graft function. Univariable and multivariable modeling was performed to evaluate predictors of diabetes outcomes after TPIAT.At 1 year post-TPIAT, 83% of patients retained islet function (C-peptide >0.3 ng/mL), 20% were off insulin, and 60% had HbA1c <7%. Outcomes were most favorable in those with normoglycemia pre-TPIAT and in children. In multivariable analysis, insulin independence at 1 year was associated with pediatric age (odds ratio [OR] 2.3 [95% CI 1.3-4.3] vs. adults) and pretransplant HbA1c (OR 4.0 [1.7-9.1] per 1% decrease HbA1c). The odds of achieving a goal HbA1c <7% was associated with White race (OR 4.3 [1.7-11]) and pre-TPIAT HbA1c (OR 2.2 [1.1-4.3] per 1% decrease). Islet graft function was associated with pre-TPIAT fasting C-peptide (OR 2.18 [1.42-3.35] per 1 ng/mL increase) and baseline HbA1c (OR 1.89 [1.18-3] per 1% decrease).Patients with normoglycemia and children more often were off insulin. In multivariable models, pre-TPIAT HbA1c was strongly predictive of insulin independence, islet function, and HbA1c <7% at 1 year.© 2025 by the American Diabetes Association.

基金

国家自然科学基金项目(82470678)
北京市医院管理局科研培育项目(PX2023030)
北京市医院管理局科研培育项目(PX20250806)
北京市自然科学基金项目(7242069)

PDF(1233 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/