胆道良性疾病影像学技术合理选择

赵海鹰

中国实用外科杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (11) : 1339-1343.

PDF(4616 KB)
PDF(4616 KB)
中国实用外科杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (11) : 1339-1343. DOI: 10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2025.11.24
讲座

胆道良性疾病影像学技术合理选择

作者信息 +

Reasonable selection of imaging techniques in benign biliary diseases

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

合理选择影像学技术对胆道良性疾病的精准诊断和治疗至关重要。经腹超声(TUS)是胆道系统疾病的首选检查方法,超声造影(CEUS)主要用于鉴别病变性质。CT检查能够明确是否存在并发症并排除其他急腹症,是胆道系统疾病术后复查的首选手段。磁共振胰胆管成像(MRCP)是目前最理想的无创胆道树成像技术。内镜技术,如内镜超声(EUS)和内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP),在胆道良性疾病的诊断中占据重要地位。经腹超声检查后,应根据病情,制定后续的超声造影、平扫/增强CT、MRI/MRCP、EUS等检查方案。

Abstract

Reasonable selection of imaging techniques is crucial for accurate diagnosis and treatment of benign biliary diseases. Transabdominal ultrasound (TUS) is the first choice in biliary diseases examination, while contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is mainly used in identification of biliary lesions. CT can clarify the presence of complications and exclude other acute abdominal diseases, becoming the preferred method for postoperative follow-up of biliary system diseases. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is currently the most ideal non-invasive technique for biliary tree imaging. Endoscopic techniques, such as endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), play an important role in the diagnosis of benign biliary diseases. After TUS examination, next examination plans such as CEUS, plain/enhanced CT, MRI/MRCP, EUS, etc. should be performed according to the patient’s condition.

关键词

胆道良性疾病 / 经腹超声 / 超声造影 / 磁共振胰胆管成像 / 内镜超声

Key words

benign biliary diseases / transabdominal ultrasound / contrast enhanced ultrasound / magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography / endoscopic ultrasound

引用本文

导出引用
赵海鹰. 胆道良性疾病影像学技术合理选择[J]. 中国实用外科杂志. 2025, 45(11): 1339-1343 https://doi.org/10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2025.11.24
ZHAO Hai-ying. Reasonable selection of imaging techniques in benign biliary diseases[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery. 2025, 45(11): 1339-1343 https://doi.org/10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2025.11.24
中图分类号: R6   

参考文献

[1]
中华医学会外科学分会胆道外科学组, 中国医师协会外科医师分会胆道外科医师委员会. 胆囊良性疾病外科治疗的专家共识(2021版)[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2022, 60(1):4-9. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20210811-00373.
[2]
Fujita N, Yasuda I, Endo I, et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for cholelithiasis 2021[J]. J Gastroenterol, 2023, 58(9): 801-833. DOI: 10.1007/s00535-023-02014-6.
The Japanese Society of Gastroenterology first published evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for cholelithiasis in 2010, followed by a revision in 2016. Currently, the revised third edition was published to reflect recent evidence on the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of cholelithiasis conforming to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Following this revision, the present English version of the guidelines was updated and published herein. The clinical questions (CQ) in the previous version were reviewed and rearranged into three newly divided categories: background questions (BQ) dealing with basic background knowledge, CQ, and future research questions (FRQ), which refer to issues that require further accumulation of evidence. Finally, 52 questions (29 BQs, 19 CQs, and 4 FRQs) were adopted to cover the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, complications, and prognosis. Based on a literature search using MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Igaku Chuo Zasshi databases for the period between 1983 and August 2019, along with a manual search of new information reported over the past 5 years, the level of evidence was evaluated for each CQ. The strengths of recommendations were determined using the Delphi method by the committee members considering the body of evidence, including benefits and harms, patient preference, and cost-benefit balance. A comprehensive flowchart was prepared for the diagnosis and treatment of gallbladder stones, common bile duct stones, and intrahepatic stones, respectively. The current revised guidelines are expected to be of great assistance to gastroenterologists and general physicians in making decisions on contemporary clinical management for cholelithiasis patients.© 2023. The Author(s).
[3]
Williams E, Beckingham I, El Sayed G, et al. Updated guideline on the management of common bile duct stones (CBDS)[J]. Gut, 2017, 66(5):765-782. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312317.
Common bile duct stones (CBDS) are estimated to be present in 10-20% of individuals with symptomatic gallstones. They can result in a number of health problems, including pain, jaundice, infection and acute pancreatitis. A variety of imaging modalities can be employed to identify the condition, while management of confirmed cases of CBDS may involve endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, surgery and radiological methods of stone extraction. Clinicians are therefore confronted with a number of potentially valid options to diagnose and treat individuals with suspected CBDS. The British Society of Gastroenterology first published a guideline on the management of CBDS in 2008. Since then a number of developments in management have occurred along with further systematic reviews of the available evidence. The following recommendations reflect these changes and provide updated guidance to healthcare professionals who are involved in the care of adult patients with suspected or proven CBDS. It is not a protocol and the recommendations contained within should not replace individual clinical judgement.Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
[4]
罗渝昆. 超声造影在鉴别胆囊疾病中的临床应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2018, 15(1): 1-4. DOI:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2018.01.001.
[5]
中国研究型医院学会超声医学专业委员会, 中国医学影像技术研究会超声分会, 北京超声医学学会. 胆囊高帧率超声造影临床应用专家共识[J]. 中国医学影像学杂志, 2025, 33(3):229-232. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-5185.2025.03.002.
[6]
Ul Hassan Khurshid K, Hinna RE, Khan RSA, et al. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound and transabdominal ultrasound in the detection of gallbladder and common bile duct microlithiasis[J]. Cureus, 2024, 16(4):e58756. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.58756.
[7]
ASGE Standards of Practice Committee; Buxbaum JL, Abbas Fehmi SM, et al. ASGE guideline on the role of endoscopy in the evaluation and management of choledocholithiasis[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2019, 89(6):1075-1105. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.10.001.
Each year choledocholithiasis results in biliary obstruction, cholangitis, and pancreatitis in a significant number of patients. The primary treatment, ERCP, is minimally invasive but associated with adverse events in 6% to 15%. This American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) Standard of Practice (SOP) Guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for the endoscopic evaluation and treatment of choledocholithiasis. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework was used to rigorously review and synthesize the contemporary literature regarding the following topics: EUS versus MRCP for diagnosis, the role of early ERCP in gallstone pancreatitis, endoscopic papillary dilation after sphincterotomy versus sphincterotomy alone for large bile duct stones, and impact of ERCP-guided intraductal therapy for large and difficult choledocholithiasis. Comprehensive systematic reviews were also performed to assess the following: same-admission cholecystectomy for gallstone pancreatitis, clinical predictors of choledocholithiasis, optimal timing of ERCP vis-à-vis cholecystectomy, management of Mirizzi syndrome and hepatolithiasis, and biliary stent therapy for choledocholithiasis. Core clinical questions were derived using an iterative process by the ASGE SOP Committee. This body developed all recommendations founded on the certainty of the evidence, balance of risks and harms, consideration of stakeholder preferences, resource utilization, and cost-effectiveness.Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.
[8]
Kumar SK, Shehata DG, Cetrulo LN, et al. SAGES guidelines for the use of intraoperative imaging of the common bile duct[J]. Surg Endosc, 2025, 39(11):7854-7855. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-025-12142-0.
[9]
陶计林, 胡铭语, 朱建交, 等. 腹腔镜超声引导下肝切除术治疗复发肝胆管结石高位狭窄临床研究[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2024, 44(3):320-325. DOI:10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2024.03.17.
[10]
赵海鹰. 胆囊良性疾病规范化诊治在胆囊癌防治中的意义[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2023, 43(11):1295-1298.DOI:10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2023.11.20.
[11]
Ahmed M, Diggory R. The correlation between ultrasonography and histology in the search for gallstones[J]. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 2011, 93(1):81-83. DOI: 10.1308/003588411X12851639107070.
The majority of published data on the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound in the diagnosis of gallbladder pathology was conducted over 30 years ago and, since the 1990s, ultrasound imaging has been the accepted gold standard. The quality and resolution of ultrasonography has improved significantly since then and we have, therefore, set out to assess whether the progression in technology has translated into improved diagnostic accuracy.In the period December 2005 to December 2008, a total of 2100 patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptoms related to gallbladder disease. All patients underwent ultrasound examination prior to their surgery and histopathological analysis of their gallbladder postoperatively. We undertook a retrospective analysis of these patients comparing their pre-operative ultrasound scan and their histopathology report for the presence or absence of gallstones. Ultrasound scans were performed by a combination of radiologists and ultrasonographers.The study identified a sensitivity of 0.85 and a specificity of 1 for ultrasound in the identification of gallstones. We found a sensitivity of 0.84 and 0.83 for the radiologists and ultrasonographers, respectively.This study suggests that, despite an evolution in the resolution of ultrasound imaging, there has not been a corresponding improvement in sensitivity. There is a false positive rate of 16% which remains unchanged since the early 1990s.
[12]
中华消化杂志编辑委员会, 中华医学会消化病学分会肝胆疾病协作组. 中国慢性胆囊炎、胆囊结石内科诊疗共识意见(2018年)[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2019, 35(6):1231-1236. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2019.06.011.
[13]
景超, 张宏娟, 张力. MRCP和腹部CT检查术前评估胆囊结石合并胆囊炎患者手术难度价值分析[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2025, 28(4):625-628. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2025.04.037.
[14]
陈孝平, 张英泽, 兰平. 外科学(第10版)[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2024:464-469.
[15]
Khafaji MA, Bagasi JT, Albahiti SK, et al. Accuracy of ultrasound and computed tomography in diagnosing acute cholecystitis patients in a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia[J]. Cureus, 2023, 15(9):e44934. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.44934.
[16]
段克才, 董志涛, 方鲲鹏, 等. 黄色肉芽肿性胆囊炎临床诊治策略研究(附110例回顾性分析)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2024, 44(12):1407-1411. DOI:10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2024.12.18.
[17]
Kamaya A, Fung C, Szpakowski JL, et al. Management of incidentally detected gallbladder polyps: Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference Recommendations[J]. Radiology, 2022, 305(2): 277-289. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.213079.
[18]
阮祥, 陈俊杰, 王向, 等. 《美国超声放射医师学会胆囊息肉管理共识(2022)》解读[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2022, 42(9):1005-1009. DOI:10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2022.09.12.
[19]
Jiang D, Qian Y, Gu Y, et al. Establishing a radiomics model using contrast-enhanced ultrasound for preoperative prediction of neoplastic gallbladder polyps exceeding 10 mm[J]. Eur J Med Res, 2025, 30(1):66. DOI: 10.1186/s40001-025-02292-1.
A key challenge in the medical field is managing gallbladder polyps (GBP) > 10 mm, especially when their nature is uncertain. GBP with a diameter exceeding 10 mm are associated with an increased risk of gallbladder cancer, making the key to their management the differentiation between benign and malignant types. The current practice, due to the inability to predict accurately, leads to excessive surgeries and ineffective follow-ups, increasing patient risks and medical burdens.This study aims to establish an imaging radiomics model using clinical data and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to predict neoplastic GBP exceeding 10 mm in diameter preoperatively.Data from 119 patients with GBP > 10 mm of unknown origin were analyzed. A total of 1197 features were extracted from the GBP area using conventional ultrasound (US) and CEUS. Significant features were identified using the Mann-Whitney U test and further refined with a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression model to construct radiomic features. By integrating clinical characteristics, a radiomics nomogram was developed. The diagnostic efficacy of the preoperative logistic regression (LR) model was validated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration plots, and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. CEUS is an examination based on conventional ultrasound, and conventional two-dimensional ultrasound still poses significant challenges in differential diagnosis. CEUS has a high accuracy rate in diagnosing the benign or malignant nature of gallbladder space-occupying lesions, which can significantly reduce the preoperative waiting time for related examinations and provide more reliable diagnostic information for clinical practice.Feature selection via Lasso led to a final LR model incorporating high-density lipoprotein, smoking status, basal width, and Rad_Signature. This model, derived from machine learning frameworks including Support Vector Machine (SVM), Logistic Regression (LR), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) with fivefold cross-validation, showed AUCs of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.90-0.99) and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.72-1.0) in internal validation. The model exhibited excellent calibration, confirmed by calibration graphs and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test (P = 0.551 and 0.544).The LR model accurately predicts neoplastic GBP > 10 mm preoperatively. Radiomics with CEUS is a powerful tool for analysis of GBP > 10 mm. The model not only improves diagnostic accuracy and reduces healthcare costs but also optimizes patient management through personalized treatment plans, enhancing clinical outcomes and ensuring resources are more precisely allocated to patients who need surgery.© 2025. The Author(s).
[20]
Wang Y, Qu C, Zeng J, et al. Establishing a preoperative predictive model for gallbladder adenoma and cholesterol polyps based on machine learning: A multicentre retrospective study[J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2025, 23(1):27. DOI: 10.1186/s12957-025-03671-y.
With the rising diagnostic rate of gallbladder polypoid lesions (GPLs), differentiating benign cholesterol polyps from gallbladder adenomas with a higher preoperative malignancy risk is crucial. This study aimed to establish a preoperative prediction model capable of accurately distinguishing between gallbladder adenomas and cholesterol polyps using machine learning algorithms.We retrospectively analysed the patients' clinical baseline data, serological indicators, and ultrasound imaging data. Using 12 machine learning algorithms, 110 combination predictive models were constructed. The models were evaluated using internal and external cohort validation, receiver operating characteristic curves, area under the curve (AUC) values, calibration curves, and clinical decision curves to determine the best predictive model.Among the 110 combination predictive models, the Support Vector Machine + Random Forest (SVM + RF) model demonstrated the highest AUC values of 0.972 and 0.922 in the training and internal validation sets, respectively, indicating an optimal predictive performance. The model-selected features included gallbladder wall thickness, polyp size, polyp echo, and pedicle. Evaluation through external cohort validation, calibration curves, and clinical decision curves further confirmed its excellent predictive ability for distinguishing gallbladder adenomas from cholesterol polyps. Additionally, this study identified age, adenosine deaminase level, and metabolic syndrome as potential predictive factors for gallbladder adenomas.This study employed the machine learning combination algorithms and preoperative ultrasound imaging data to construct an SVM + RF predictive model, enabling effective preoperative differentiation of gallbladder adenomas and cholesterol polyps. These findings will assist clinicians in accurately assessing the risk of GPLs and providing personalised treatment strategies.© 2025. The Author(s).
[21]
Nakai Y, Isayama H, Wang HP, et al. International consensus statements for endoscopic management of distal biliary stricture[J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2020, 35(6):967-979. DOI: 10.1111/jgh.14955.
Distal biliary strictures (DBS) are common and may be caused by both malignant and benign pathologies. While endoscopic procedures play a major role in their management, a comprehensive review of the subject is still lacking. Our consensus statements were formulated by a group of expert Asian pancreatico‐biliary interventional endoscopists, following a proposal from the Digestive Endoscopy Society of Taiwan, the Thai Association for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, and the Tokyo Conference of Asian Pancreato‐biliary Interventional Endoscopy. Based on a literature review utilizing Medline, Cochrane library, and Embase databases, a total of 19 consensus statements on DBS were made on diagnosis, endoscopic drainage, benign biliary stricture, malignant biliary stricture, and management of recurrent biliary obstruction and other complications. Our consensus statements provide comprehensive guidance for the endoscopic management of DBS.
[22]
李瑞利, 王燕, 王晓月, 等. IgG4相关腹部疾病的临床及影像学表现[J]. 肝胆胰外科杂志, 2022, 34(3):164-169. DOI:10.11952/j.issn.1007-1954.2022.03.007.
[23]
Sirtl S, Bretthauer K, Ahmad M, et al. Severity of gallstone-, sludge-, or microlithiasis-induced pancreatitis-All of the same?[J]. Pancreas, 2024, 53(8):e633-e640. DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000002349.
Severity of microlithiasis- and sludge-induced pancreatitis in comparison to gallstone-induced pancreatitis has never been studied for a lack of definition.
[24]
Măces S, Pătrascu S, Dumitrescu CI, et al. Impact of imaging techniques in the assessment of gallstone pancreatitis[J]. Curr Health Sci J, 2024, 50(2):198-206. DOI: 10.12865/CHSJ.50.02.04.
From the category of biliary disease, gallstones registered an increase during the last years, approximately 6% of men and 9% of women being affected by the pathology in the United States only. In western countries between 10-20% of the adult population is suffering from cholelithiasis. Although increasing age is a major risk factor for their formation, late studies correlate gallstones appearance with an age decrease for the onset of symptoms. We therefore face a younger population manifesting pain and sometimes functional disability. In accordance with statistical analysis, the economic impact of gallstones in highly industrialized countries such as United States produces costs of up to 6.5 billion dollars annually. In this context, the appropriate timing for intervention becomes a factor of major interest. The present review uses 28 articles and specialized literature. Article selection was based on keywords and followed the effectiveness of imaging investigation such as ultrasound, CT and MRI for patients diagnosed with cholelithiasis. Since a direct comparison between the imaging investigation techniques is not concluding we have tried to establish the sensitivity and specificity offered by each imaging assessment. The comparative analysis revealed a p Kruskal-Wallis <0.001 for sensitivity and p Kruskal-Wallis=0.474 for specificity.Copyright © 2022, Medical University Publishing House Craiova.
[25]
Cotton PB, Elta GH, Carter CR, et al. Gallbladder and sphincter of Oddi disorders[J]. Gastroenterology, 2016, 19:S0016-5085(16)00224-9. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.033.
[26]
Olafson SN, Soult AP, Britt RC. The Management of gallstones in pregnancy[J]. Adv Surg, 2025, 59(1):109-119. DOI:10.1016/j.yasu.2025.05.002.
Benign biliary disease is a prevalent surgical issue during pregnancy, often leading to complications that require careful management. The risk of gallstone formation increases due to hormonal changes, particularly elevated estrogen and progesterone levels, which contribute to biliary stasis and cholesterol saturation. Diagnosis typically involves ultrasound as the first-line imaging modality, with additional techniques like MRI and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography considered when necessary. Treatment options range from observation for asymptomatic cases to surgical intervention for symptomatic or complicated disease, with laparoscopic cholecystectomy being the preferred approach due to its lower associated risks.Copyright © 2025 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

基金

辽宁省教育厅高校基本科研项目(面上项目)(LJKMZ20221210)

PDF(4616 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/