Pancreatic surgery with en bloc venous resection and reconstruction is becoming increasingly common in the current era of expanding neoadjuvant oncologic therapies and advanced surgical techniques for patients with more anatomically complex tumors. However, patients who have alterations in their venous outflow are at increased risk for postoperative portomesenteric venous stenosis and/or thrombosis. Cross-sectional imaging for postoperative surveillance, including multiphase CT or MRI, is critical for recognizing portomesenteric venous complications and thus implementing early intervention and preventing complications related to portomesenteric venous hypertension. Hypertension-related complications include ascites, variceal or gastrointestinal bleeding, postprandial abdominal pain, intestinal edema, protein-losing enteropathy, malabsorptive diarrhea, and splenomegaly. Percutaneous transhepatic, transsplenic, and transjugular portomesenteric interventions, including venoplasty, stent placement, and thrombectomy or thrombolysis, are safe and effective options for restoring patency to the portomesenteric venous system. Preintervention CT or MRI and diagnostic catheter venography are important for procedural planning, while postintervention CT or MRI surveillance is critical for detecting recurrent stenosis or thrombosis, or de novo portomesenteric venous disease. RSNA, 2020.

The fate of the portal vein (PV) after pancreatoduodenectomy, especially its long-term patency and associated complications, has received little attention. The aim of this study was to explore the long-term patency rate of the PV after pancreatoduodenectomy, focusing on risk factors for PV stenosis/occlusion and associated complications.Serial CT images of patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy for periampullary cancer between January 2000 and June 2012 in a single institution were evaluated for PV stenosis or occlusion.A total of 826 patients were enrolled. The PV stenosis/occlusion rate after pancreatoduodenectomy was 19.6 per cent and the 5-year patency rate 69.9 per cent. The most frequent cause of PV stenosis/occlusion was local recurrence followed by postoperative change and PV thrombosis. Patients who underwent PV resection had a higher PV stenosis/occlusion rate than those who did not (51 versus 17.4 per cent; P < 0.001). The 3-year patency rate was highest in patients with cancer of the ampulla of Vater and lowest in patients with pancreatic cancer (91.9 versus 55.5 per cent respectively; P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that risk factors for PV stenosis/occlusion included primary tumour location, chemoradiotherapy and PV resection. PV stenosis or occlusion without disease recurrence was observed in 17.3 per cent of the patients. PV resection and grade B or C pancreatic fistula were independent risk factors for PV stenosis/occlusion. Among 162 patients with PV stenosis or occlusion, five (3.1 per cent) had fatal recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding.PV stenosis or occlusion is common after pancreatoduodenectomy, particularly if the PV has been resected and/or chemoradiotherapy was given after surgery. Although recurrence is the most frequent cause of PV stenosis/occlusion, this complication is found in a significant proportion of patients without disease recurrence.© 2014 BJS Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

The long-term patency of the portal vein (PV) in patients who survive after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) remains unclear. The aim of the present study was to investigate the clinical features and risk factors for benign PV stenosis after PD.We retrospectively analyzed the patients who underwent PD from September 2002 and December 2015 at our institution without intraoperative radiation therapy or concomitant PV resection. The postoperative computed tomography of each patient was evaluated, and PV stenosis was defined as the shortest diameter of the PV being <3 mm. The patients with PV stenosis due to local recurrence were excluded.Of the 458 patients, PV stenosis occurred in 57 (12.4%), including benign PV stenosis in 28 (6.1%) and PV stenosis due to local recurrence in 29 (6.3%). Of the 28 patients with benign PV stenosis, 7 (25%) developed symptoms related to portal hypertension, namely recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding in 5 and refractory ascites in 2. Six patients were treated with percutaneous transhepatic PV stent placement, and all of their symptoms improved. A multivariate analysis found that a postoperative pancreatic fistula was an independent risk factor for benign PV stenosis after PD (odds ratio, 4.36; p = 0.005).Postoperative pancreatic fistula was a significant risk factor for benign PV stenosis after PD. Stent placement for benign PV stenosis was effective for the patients with symptoms due to portal hypertension.

Thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy have been used to treat postoperative main portal vein and superior mesenteric vein thrombosis.To evaluate the safety and efficacy of balloon angioplasty and/or stent placement without thrombolysis or thrombectomy for treating such thromboses.Fourteen patients with postoperative main portal vein or superior mesenteric vein thrombosis underwent percutaneous transhepatic balloon angioplasty and/or stent placement without thrombolysis or thrombectomy. The rates of technical and clinical success, major complications, and recurrence were evaluated retrospectively.Initial technical success was achieved in 13 of the 14 patients (93%). After the procedures, these 13 patients showed brisk portal inflow, without a significant amount of residual thrombus in the stented lumen or embolism. One patient was considered to be a technical failure despite showing a brisk portal inflow because 50% stenosis and partial residual thrombus remained in the stented lumen. Initial clinical success was achieved in 13 patients. One patient with technical success died of acute respiratory distress syndrome 8 days after the procedure, whereas one patient with technical failure achieved clinical success. One patient experienced acute rethrombosis 8 days after the procedure. During the median follow-up period of 16.3 months, rethrombosis occurred in six patients (43%), including one patient with acute rethrombosis.Balloon angioplasty and/or stent placement without thrombolysis or thrombectomy may be a safe and effective treatment modality for postoperative main portal vein and superior mesenteric vein thrombosis.© 2013 The Foundation Acta Radiologica.

Background: Portal vein stenosis develops due to different causes including postoperative inflammation and oncological processes. However, limited effective therapy is available for portal vein stenosis. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the efficacy of a portal vein stent for portal vein stenosis after hepatobiliary pancreatic surgery and to determine the factors associated with stent patency.Methods: From December 2003 to December 2015, portal vein stents were implanted in 29 patients who had portal vein stenosis after hepatobiliary pancreatic surgery. We conducted a retrospective analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of portal vein stent placement. Twelve clinical variables were analyzed for their role in stent patency.Results: The symptoms before portal vein stent placements included nine patients with hepatic encephalopathy, six patients with gastrointestinal bleeding, four patients with ascites, and four patients with hyperbilirubinemia. Portal vein thrombosis due to postoperative portal stenosis was found in four patients. Portal vein stent were successfully implanted without any major complications. Of the 21 patients with symptoms, 17 showed improvement, and stent patency was maintained in 22 (76%) patients. The presence of a collateral vein is the only variable related to the development of an occlusion after portal stenting.Conclusion: Portal vein stent were implanted safely and had good long-term patency. This procedure is useful to relieve portal hypertension-related symptoms and to improve the quality of life. Our data strongly suggest that embolization to block blood flow in a collateral vein during portal vein stent placement will improve the patency of the stent.

Portal vein stent placement is used for portal vein stenosis. However, reports on post-pancreatic surgery cases are rare. Whether antithrombotic therapy should be administered remains controversial. In this paper, we reviewed current data to evaluate the influence of antithrombosis on stent patency after pancreatic surgery.This systematic review and meta-analysis compared studies in which patients did or did not receive antithrombotic therapy after portal vein stent placement. We compared patency after stent placement and complication rate.There were 22 (n=207) studies in which patients received antithrombotic therapy and 8 (n=61) in which patients did not receive therapy. Antithrombotic agents, such as aspirin, clopidogrel, heparin, and warfarin, were used. The overall patency rates were similar between the groups (79.2% in the antithrombosis group vs. 88.0% in the non-antithrombosis group). Subgroup analyses included those for the etiology of stenosis, types of antithrombotic agents, acute or chronic stenosis, and causes of stent stenosis. None revealed a significant difference between the patency rates in the antithrombosis and non-antithrombosis groups. However, bleeding complications only occurred in patients who received antithrombotic therapy.There is no significant benefit of antithrombotic therapy after portal vein stent placement following pancreatic surgery. Antithrombotic therapy should be performed with caution because it may cause complications, such as bleeding.Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

Percutaneous portal vein (PV) stent placement can be an effective treatment for symptoms associated with portal hypertension. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of PV stenting on the overall survival (OS) in patients with malignant PV stenosis.Two groups of patients with malignant PV stenosis were compared in this retrospective study involving two institutions. A total of 197 patients who underwent PV stenting between November 2016 and August 2019 were established as the stent group, whereas 29 patients with PV stenosis who were treated conservatively between July 2013 and October 2016 constituted the no-stent group. OS was compared between the two groups before and after propensity score matching (PSM). Risk factors associated with OS were evaluated using the Cox proportional hazards model. Procedure-associated adverse events were also evaluated.The stent group finally included 100 patients (median age, 65 [interquartile range, 58-71] years; 64 male). The no-stent group included 22 patients (69 [61-75] years, 13 male). Stent placement was successful in 95% of attempted cases, and the 1- and 2-year stent occlusion-free survival rate was 56% (95% confidence interval, 45%-69%) and 44% (32%-60%), respectively. The median stent occlusion-free survival time was 176 (interquartile range, 70-440) days. OS was significantly longer in the stent group than in the no-stent group (median 294 vs. 87 days, < 0.001 before PSM, = 0.011 after PSM). The 1- and 3-year OS rates before PSM were 40% and 11%, respectively, in the stent group. The 1-year OS rate after PSM was 32% and 5% in the stent and no-stent groups, respectively. Anemia requiring transfusion (n = 2) and acute thrombosis necessitating re-stenting (n = 1) occurred in three patients in the stent group within 1 week.Percutaneous placement of a PV stent may be effective in improving OS in patients with malignant PV stenosis.Copyright © 2022 The Korean Society of Radiology.

Treatment options for patients with portal vein (PV) stenosis or occlusion after surgery are limited. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of PV stent placement in patients with portal vein occlusion or stenosis after radical operation for hepatobiliary pancreatic malignant tumour.We retrospectively reviewed the records of 59 patients who underwent portal venous stent placement at the Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, for PV stenosis or occlusion between February 2008 and February 2012.Stents were placed in the portal venous system across stenotic (n = 47) and occlusive (n = 12) lesions after percutaneous transhepatic portography. Reasons for stent placement were tumour recurrence (n = 30), portal vein resection and anastomosis (n = 18) and post-operative inflammatory changes (n = 11). Pressure gradients (superior mesenteric vein, main PV) decreased immediately after stent placement, from 10.5 mm Hg ± 4.4 (standard deviation) to 2.5 mm Hg ± 2.6 (P < 0.0001). Liver function was improved post-stenting (P < 0.05). The median time between the original surgery and stent placement was 16 (1-137) days in the vascular-orientated group and 306 (13-3703) days in the tumour recurrence group (P < 0.0001). Transient fever developed in 11 patients, but resolved in 2-5 days. Stents were occluded in 15 of the 59 patients (25.4%).PV stent placement is a safe choice, has an acceptable success rate and provides marked relief from portal hypertension due to portal vein occlusion or stenosis after hepatobiliary pancreatic surgery. Liver function data are also improved after portal venous stent placement.© 2013 The Authors. ANZ Journal of Surgery © 2013 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Surgical treatment for PV (portal vein) stenosis/occlusion can pose a fatal risk of massive bleeding from severe adhesions and collateral vessel formation. PV stents placement is a minimally invasive and effective procedure for PV stenosis/occlusion, but PV stents sometimes occlude. The relationship between post-stent PV hemodynamics and stent occlusion has not been thoroughly investigated. Certain precautions during PV stent placement may reduce the risk of stent occlusion. This study aimed to evaluate long-term outcomes of PV stent patency and investigate factors including PV hemodynamics associated with stent occlusion.Thirty-four consecutive patients with PV stenosis/occlusion who underwent PV stent placement in four institutions between December 2006 and February 2021 were retrospectively examined. The primary study endpoints were technical success, clinical success, and cumulative stent patency rate. The secondary endpoints were risk factors of stent occlusion. A univariable Cox proportional hazards model with sixteen variables was used to determine predictors of stent occlusion. Factors with p-value ≤ 0.1 in univariable analysis were included in the multivariable analysis. Alpha was set at 0.05.Technical and clinical success rates were 88.2% and 79.4%, respectively. Six patients (17.7%) experienced stent occlusion. The cumulative stent patency rate at six months, one year, and three years was 79.1%, 79.1%, and 65.9%, respectively. In the univariate analysis, the variables with p-value ≤ 0.1 were lesion length > 4 cm, hepatofugal collateral vein visualization after stent placement, and residual stenosis > 30% after stent placement. In the multivariate analysis, residual stenosis > 30% after stent placement was significantly associated with stent occlusion (hazard ratio, 10.80; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-108.44; p = 0.04).PV stent placement was technically feasible and effective in improving portal hypertension. However, stent occlusion was not uncommon. Residual stenosis > 30% after stent placement was significantly associated with stent occlusion. We should pay attention to correctly assess the range of stenosis and release the stenosis as much as possible.© 2022. The Author(s).

To evaluate the long-term outcomes of endovascular treatment for postoperative portomesenteric vein (PMV) obstruction and identify prognostic factors influencing patency rates.This retrospective single-center study included patients who underwent endovascular intervention for PMV stenosis or occlusion after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery between January 2009 and December 2020. Patient characteristics, technical outcomes, and long-term patency rates were evaluated. In total, 116 patients underwent PMV intervention after liver transplantation (n = 66, 56.9%), hepatectomy (n = 21, 18.1%), or pancreatectomy (n = 29, 25%). Interventions included balloon angioplasty alone (n = 7, 6%) or stent placement (n = 106, 91.4%), performed at a median of 125 days (interquartile range, 8.5-436.5 days) after surgery.The technical success rate of the PMV intervention was 95.7%. Patency rates varied significantly across the surgical groups, with liver transplantation showing superior outcomes compared with hepatectomy and pancreatectomy (5-year primary patency rates: 94.4%, 65.4%, and 64.2%, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed variceal bleeding (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR], 8.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.56-46.1; P =.013), stent length (sHR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.95-0.99; P =.008), cumulative time (sHR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.16-0.65; P =.002), and tumor etiology (sHR, 6.15; 95% CI, 1.02-36.99; P =.047) as independent prognostic factors for patency loss.High technical success rates were achieved with the PMV interventions, with varying long-term patency rates. This study highlights the significance of the initial type of hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery and clinical variables such as variceal bleeding, stent length, and tumor etiology in influencing PMV stenosis outcomes.Copyright © 2025 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Percutaneous transhepatic stent placement has become a common strategy for the postoperative treatment of portal vein (PV)/superior mesenteric veins (SMV) stenosis/occlusion. It has been widely used after liver transplantation surgery; however, reports on stent placement for acute PV/SMV stenosis after pancreatic surgery within postoperative 3 d are rare.Herein, we reported a case of intestinal edema and SMV stenosis 2 d after pancreatic surgery. The patient was successfully treated using stent grafts. Although the stenosis resolved after stent placement, complications, including bleeding, pancreatic fistula, bile leakage, and infection, made the treatment highly challenging. The use of anticoagulants was adjusted multiple times to prevent venous thromboembolism and the risk of bleeding. After careful treatment, the patient stabilized, and stent placement effectively managed postoperative PV/SMV stenosis.Stent placement is effective and feasible for treating acute PV/SMV stenosis after pancreatic surgery even within postoperative 3 d.©The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.