Progress in diagnosis and treatment of gastric signet-ring cell carcinoma

YAN Meng-pei, HUANG Hua

Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (9) : 1292-1298.

PDF(1321 KB)
PDF(1321 KB)
Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (9) : 1292-1298. DOI: 10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2026.09.22

Progress in diagnosis and treatment of gastric signet-ring cell carcinoma

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Gastric signet-ring cell carcinoma (GSRCC) is a poorly cohesive subtype of gastric adenocarcinoma with distinctive morphology and biological behavior. Its proportion has increased in recent years, and it tends to occur at a younger age, is relatively more common in women, and exhibits diffuse infiltration, early metastasis, and treatment resistance. Pure and mixed GSRCC differ in invasiveness, lymph node metastasis, and prognosis. Accurate assessment of the signet-ring cell proportion, molecular features, and immunophenotype therefore facilitates stratified management. Early lesions are easily missed because of subtle mucosal changes, scattered tumor-cell infiltration, and inadequate sampling by routine superficial biopsy; histopathology remains the basis of diagnosis. Multiple deep biopsies, endoscopic ultrasonography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and fibroblast activation protein inhibitor positron emission tomography/computed tomography may improve detection of primary lesions and peritoneal or ovarian metastases. Treatment should be individualized according to stage, signet-ring cell component, and molecular biomarkers. Endoscopic resection may be performed for eligible early lesions, whereas radical gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy remains the mainstay for other resectable tumors. Advanced disease requires the integrated use of perioperative chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and intraperitoneal perfusion therapy. GSRCC is generally less sensitive to conventional chemotherapy. Therapies targeting CLDN18.2 and other molecular targets are promising, but GSRCC-specific evidence remains relatively limited. Future efforts should include strengthening screening of high-risk populations, investigating molecular subtypes, resistance mechanisms, and the immune microenvironment in depth, and improving artificial intelligence-assisted diagnosis and prognostic assessment to advance precision diagnosis and treatment.

Key words

gastric signet-ring cell carcinoma / pathological classification / diagnosis / multimodal treatment / prognosis

Cite this article

Download Citations
YAN Meng-pei , HUANG Hua. Progress in diagnosis and treatment of gastric signet-ring cell carcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery. 2026, 46(9): 1292-1298 https://doi.org/10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2026.09.22

References

[1]
Kushima R. The updated WHO classification of digestive system tumours-gastric adenocarcinoma and dysplasia[J]. Pathologe, 2022, 43(1):8-15. DOI:10.1007/s00292-021-01023-7.
[2]
Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition[J]. Gastric Cancer, 2011, 14(2):101-112. DOI:10.1007/s10120-011-0041-5.
[3]
Kao YC, Fang WL, Wang RF, et al. Clinicopathological differences in signet ring cell adenocarcinoma between early and advanced gastric cancer[J]. Gastric Cancer, 2019, 22(2):255-263. DOI:10.1007/s10120-018-0860-8.
[4]
Henson DE, Dittus C, Younes M, et al. Differential trends in the intestinal and diffuse types of gastric carcinoma in the United States, 1973-2000: Increase in the signet ring cell type[J]. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2004, 128(7):765-770. DOI:10.5858/2004-128-765-DTITIA.
During the last 50 years, the incidence and mortality of gastric cancer has declined in many countries. This decline has primarily included the intestinal type (Lauren classification). However, there is an impression among pathologists that the diffuse type, especially the signet ring cell subtype, has become more prevalent.Using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program of the National Cancer Institute, we analyzed the trends of the 2 primary types (intestinal and diffuse) of gastric carcinomas from 1973 through 2000.Trends in age-adjusted rates were determined for gastric carcinomas through the SEER statistical program (SEER*Stat), which is available on the Internet to the public.During the period studied, the intestinal type continued to decline in males, females, African Americans, and whites. The intestinal type was more common in males than in females and more common in African Americans than in whites. In contrast, a consistent increase in the rate of the diffuse type of gastric carcinoma was seen during this period. The rate increased from 0.3 cases per 100 000 persons in 1973 to 1.8 cases per 100 000 persons in 2000. This increase was seen in males, females, African Americans, and whites. The predominant increase occurred in the signet ring type.The results indicate a progressive decrease in the incidence of the intestinal type of gastric cancer and an increase in the diffuse type of gastric carcinoma, especially the signet ring cell type. The clinical implications of the increase are considered.
[5]
Zheng R, Zhang S, Zeng H, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2016[J]. J Natl Cancer Cent, 2022, 2(1):1-9. DOI:10.1016/j.jncc.2022.02.002.
[6]
Pernot S, Voron T, Perkins G, et al. Signet-ring cell carcinoma of the stomach: Impact on prognosis and specific therapeutic challenge[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2015, 21(40):11428-11438. DOI:10.3748/wjg.v21.i40.11428.
[7]
Michelon I, Saeed A. Young-onset gastric cancer: Clinical and genetic perspectives[J]. J Gastric Cancer, 2026, 26(1):52-61. DOI:10.5230/jgc.2026.26.e9.
[8]
Kim DY, Park YK, Joo JK, et al. Clinicopathological characteristics of signet ring cell carcinoma of the stomach[J]. ANZ J Surg, 2004, 74(12):1060-1064. DOI:10.1111/j.1445-1433.2004.03268.x.
[9]
Sundar R, Nakayama I, Markar SR, et al. Gastric cancer[J]. Lancet, 2025, 405(10494):2087-2102. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00052-2.
Gastric cancer remains a major health challenge worldwide, with nearly 1 million new cases annually contributing to more than 650 000 deaths. Epidemiologically, gastric cancer shows substantial geographical variation in incidence, with higher rates in Asia, South America, and eastern Europe, and a rapid increase in early-onset cases among people younger than 50 years. Key risk factors for gastric cancer include Helicobacter pylori infection, diet, obesity, smoking, and genetic predisposition. Early detection through comprehensive diagnostic procedures is crucial for optimising treatment outcomes. Standard treatment approaches for locally advanced gastric cancer include surgical resection, particularly D2 lymphadenectomy, complemented by chemotherapy and radiotherapy. There is increasing implementation of minimally invasive surgical techniques for operable disease and integration of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies for advanced stages. Emerging therapies, such as novel targeted treatments and next-generation immunotherapies, show promise in improving survival and quality of life. Future directions in the management of gastric cancer focus on precision medicine, continued advancement in immunotherapy, novel early detection methods, and a multidisciplinary approach to care. These strategies aim to enhance the overall effectiveness of treatment and prognosis worldwide.Copyright © 2025 Copyright © 2025 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
[10]
Camargo MC, Goto Y, Zabaleta J, et al. Sex hormones, hormonal interventions, and gastric cancer risk: A meta-analysis[J]. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2012, 21(1):20-38. DOI:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0834.
[11]
Matsui M, Kojima O, Kawakami S, et al. The prognosis of patients with gastric cancer possessing sex hormone receptors[J]. Surg Today, 1992, 22(5):421-425. DOI:10.1007/BF00308791.
Estrogen receptors (ER) and progesterone receptors (PgR) were immunohistologically investigated in 107 patients with gastric cancer who underwent curative resection. Both ER and PgR were detected only in the cancer cell nucleus. The ER positive rate was 27.7% for males and 31.0% for females, while the PgR positive rate was 9.2% for males and 11.9% for females. Clinicopathologically, the ER positive rate was slightly higher in young females and in cases of poorly differentiated gastric cancer. When cumulative survival rates were analyzed in relation to the presence or absence of receptors, the 10-year cumulative survival rate after surgery was significantly lower in the ER positive cases, being 15.7% cent, than in the ER negative cases, being 62.7%, and also significantly lower in the PgR positive cases, being 18.2%, than in the PgR negative cases, being 48.3%. The coexistence of ER and PgR in gastric cancer tissues suggests that the ER is physiologically active, or that ER positive gastric cancer is hormone-dependent. The poor prognosis of patients with receptor positive gastric cancer suggests that gastric cancer with these receptors is highly malignant.
[12]
Lee HJ, Lee IK, Kim JW, et al. Clinical characteristics of gastric cancer associated with pregnancy[J]. Dig Surg, 2009, 26(1):31-36. DOI:10.1159/000193330.
<i>Background/Aims:</i> This study was conducted to evaluate the clinical features and treatment outcome of gastric cancer associated with pregnancy. <i>Methods:</i> Clinicopathologic characteristics of 15 patients who were diagnosed as having gastric cancer during pregnancy or within 1 year after delivery (the P-related group) were compared with those of 53 age-matched pregnancy-unrelated gastric cancer patients (the control group). <i>Results:</i> Significant differences were found in tumor stage and surgical curability; the numbers of stage IV disease were 12 (80%) and 21 (40%; p = 0.006), and those of curative resection were 4 (27%) and 20 (62%; p = 0.02) in the P-related and the control group, respectively. Three-year survival rate was significantly lower in the P-related group (23.3%) than in the control group (52.8%; p = 0.007). In the P-related group, only 3 patients, including one patient diagnosed using endoscopy, survived without recurrences. In the multivariate analysis, pregnancy was not identified as an independent risk factor associated with poor outcome. <i>Conclusion:</i> Gastric cancer associated with pregnancy is discovered at its advanced stage and consequently shows a dismal prognosis. Considering that the patients who underwent curative resection have a favorable prognosis, primary efforts should be focused on early diagnosis.
[13]
Isobe T, Hashimoto K, Kizaki J, et al. Characteristics and prognosis of gastric cancer in young patients[J]. Oncol Rep, 2013, 30(1):43-49. DOI:10.3892/or.2013.2467.
The clinicopathological features of gastric cancer (GC) differ between younger and older patients, and it is thought that younger patients have a worse prognosis than older patients due to delayed diagnosis and more aggressive tumor behavior. These characteristics, however, remain controversial. A total of 3,818 patients with pathologically confirmed primary gastric adenocarcinoma were treated at our institution. We analyzed the difference in demographic and clinicopathological characteristics between 169 young [≤40 years of age, younger group (YG)] and 3,649 older [>40 years of age, older group (OG)] GC patients. There was a significantly higher proportion of females in the YG compared with the OG (53.3 and 31.0%, respectively; P<0.0001). The 5-year overall survival of the YG was significantly lower compared to that of the OG (59.7 and 65.9%, respectively; P=0.049). However, YG patients with curative resection had a similar 5-year survival rate to OG patients with curative resection (88.0 and 85.8%, respectively; P=0.547). Female patients in the YG showed a significantly lower survival rate than males in the YG (44.3 and 73.1%, respectively; P=0.0002). Multivariate analyses revealed that macroscopic type, depth of invasion, peritoneal metastasis, distant metastasis and curative resection were independent prognostic factors for the YG with GC. Young GC patients who undergo curative resection do not have a worse prognosis than older patients. Early diagnosis is important in successfully carrying out a curative resection and offering a better prognosis, particularly in females.
[14]
Blair VR, McLeod M, Carneiro F, et al. Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer: Updated clinical practice guidelines[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2020, 21(8):e386-e397. DOI:10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30219-9.
Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) is an autosomal dominant cancer syndrome that is characterised by a high prevalence of diffuse gastric cancer and lobular breast cancer. It is largely caused by inactivating germline mutations in the tumour suppressor gene CDH1, although pathogenic variants in CTNNA1 occur in a minority of families with HDGC. In this Policy Review, we present updated clinical practice guidelines for HDGC from the International Gastric Cancer Linkage Consortium (IGCLC), which recognise the emerging evidence of variability in gastric cancer risk between families with HDGC, the growing capability of endoscopic and histological surveillance in HDGC, and increased experience of managing long-term sequelae of total gastrectomy in young patients. To redress the balance between the accessibility, cost, and acceptance of genetic testing and the increased identification of pathogenic variant carriers, the HDGC genetic testing criteria have been relaxed, mainly through less restrictive age limits. Prophylactic total gastrectomy remains the recommended option for gastric cancer risk management in pathogenic CDH1 variant carriers. However, there is increasing confidence from the IGCLC that endoscopic surveillance in expert centres can be safely offered to patients who wish to postpone surgery, or to those whose risk of developing gastric cancer is not well defined.Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
[15]
Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines 2021(6th edition)[J]. Gastric Cancer, 2023, 26(1):1-25. DOI:10.1007/s10120-022-01331-8.
The sixth edition of the Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines was completed in July 2021, incorporating new evidence that emerged after publication of the previous edition. It consists of a text-based “Treatments” part and a “Clinical Questions” part including recommendations and explanations for clinical questions. The treatments parts include a comprehensive description regarding surgery, endoscopic resection and chemotherapy for gastric cancer. The clinical question part is based on the literature search and evaluation by an independent systematic review team. Consequently, not only evidence for each therapeutic recommendation was clearly shown, but it also identified the research fields that require further evaluation to provide appropriate recommendations.
[16]
Amin MB, Greene FL, Edge SB, et al. The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more “personalized” approach to cancer staging[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2017, 67(2):93-99. DOI:10.3322/caac.21388.
[17]
Waddell T, Verheij M, Allum W, et al. Gastric cancer: ESMO-ESSO-ESTRO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up[J]. Ann Oncol, 2013, 24(Suppl 6):vi57-vi63. DOI:10.1093/annonc/mdt344.
[18]
Humar B, Blair V, Charlton A, et al. E-cadherin deficiency initiates gastric signet-ring cell carcinoma in mice and man[J]. Cancer Res, 2009, 69(5):2050-2056. DOI:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-2457.
The importance of loss of the cell-cell adhesion molecule E-cadherin (encoded by CDH1) to tumor progression is well established. However, CDH1 germ-line mutations predispose to the cancer susceptibility syndrome hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC), suggesting a role for E-cadherin in tumor initiation. The earliest indications of cancer in the stomachs of CDH1 mutation carriers are microscopic foci of intramucosal signet-ring cell carcinoma (SRCC; designated "eHDGC"). Here, we used N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU) to promote gastric carcinogenesis in wild-type (wt) and cdh1(+/-) mice. MNU induced a variety of gastric tumors; however, intramucosal SRCC developed with an 11 times higher incidence in cdh1(+/-) mice compared with wt mice. The murine SRCC resembled the human eHDGCs in that they were hypoproliferative, lacked nuclear beta-catenin accumulation, and had reduced membrane localization of E-cadherin and its interacting junctional proteins. The down-regulation of E-cadherin in the murine SRCCs confirmed the importance of the second CDH1 hit to the initiation of diffuse gastric cancer. CDH1 promoter hypermethylation has been proposed to be a major second hit in advanced HDGC; however, its contribution to eHDGC was unknown. We thus examined a series of human eHDGC and detected CDH1 promoter methylation in 50% of foci. Promoter methylation was accompanied by reduced wt CDH1 mRNA levels in the foci and had a monoclonal pattern, consistent with an epigenetic initiation of disease. Together, these findings provide compelling evidence for a deficiency in cell-to-cell adhesion being sufficient to initiate diffuse gastric cancer in the absence of hyperproliferation and beta-catenin activation.
[19]
Zhang X, Wang M, Wang Y, et al. Clinicopathologic significance of Her-2 and P53 expressions in gastric cancer[J]. Asian J Surg, 2023, 46(1):526-531. DOI:10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.06.039.
[20]
Hirotsu Y, Mochizuki H, Amemiya K, et al. Deficiency of mismatch repair genes is less frequently observed in signet ring cell compared with non-signet ring cell gastric cancer[J]. Med Oncol, 2019, 36(3):23. DOI:10.1007/s12032-019-1246-4.
Signet ring cell (SRC) gastric cancer at advanced stage has poor prognosis. While a recent study reported nearly one-third of SRC cases contain tumors with deficient mismatch repair (MMR) genes, other studies in SRC have been inconclusive. To re-analyze the results, we performed immunohistochemical staining of MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2 proteins in 38 SRC gastric tumors compared with 109 non-SRC (NSRC) tumors from 94 patients. In contrast to the previous study, all SRC gastric tumors normally expressed MMR proteins, whereas 22 of 109 of NSRC (20%) showed deficient MMR proteins. To reinforce our results, we referred to the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) genomic database and found that only 6 (6%) of 99 samples with diffuse gastric tumors showed deficient MMR, whereas 64 (21%) of 304 in intestinal gastric tumors showed deficient MMR. Our results as well as the TCGA database indicated that MMR genes are infrequently inactivated in SRC gastric cancer. These findings indicate that SRC patients may not be the best candidates for immuno-oncology therapy.
[21]
Jin S, Xu B, Yu L, et al. The PD-1, PD-L1 expression and CD3+ T cell infiltration in relation to outcome in advanced gastric signet-ring cell carcinoma, representing a potential biomarker for immunotherapy[J]. Oncotarget, 2017, 8(24):38850-38862. DOI:10.18632/oncotarget.16407.
Recent data supports a potentially significant role for immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of gastric cancer. However, there are few data on the clinical implications of immunotherapy markers in gastric signet-ring cell carcinoma (SRCC). We evaluated the expression of programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1), programmed cell death ligand 1(PD-L1), infiltration by CD3+ T cell, microsatellite instability (MSI), and Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV), and the relationship of each factor to survival in 89 advanced SRCC patients. All patients received 5-FU-based first-line chemotherapy. PD-L1 and PD-1 were expressed in 40.4% and 18.0% of the patients, respectively. There was a significant correlation between PD-L1 and PD-1 expression (r=0.363, p<0.001). There was loss of at least 1 of the 4 DNA mismatch repair (DNA-MMR) gene proteins in 32.6% of samples. Only 1 case out of 89 was EBV positive, with concurrent PD-L1 positivity, a high degree of CD3+ T cell infiltration and MSI. Increased CD3+ T cells numbers was associated with increased PD-1 expression (r=0.256, p=0.012) and MSI status (r=0.208, p=0.049). High CD3+ T cell infiltration was related to better OS (23.7 months, 95% CI: 19.0-38.0 vs 15.8 months, 95% CI: 13.0-22.0, p=0.033), but was not an independent prognostic factor for survival after multivariate analysis (HR=0.68, 95% CI: 0.42-1.10, p=0.116). CD3+ T cell was more infiltrated in PD-1 positive, tumors with MSI and were associated with better OS, indicating an adaptive immune resistance may be occurring. Further research into the cancer immunotherapy markers of SRCC immune microenvironment may highlight targets for immunotherapy.
[22]
Nguyen MD, Plasil B, Wen P, et al. Mucin profiles in signet-ring cell carcinoma[J]. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2006, 130(6):799-804. DOI:10.5858/2006-130-799-MPISCC.
Signet-ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) is a poorly differentiated mucin-producing adenocarcinoma that may arise from many different organs, but all SRCCs share identical morphology. It is not possible to differentiate sites of origin for metastatic SRCC based on morphology alone. Mucins are high-molecular-weight glycoproteins differentially expressed in glandular epithelia and in adenocarcinomas.To identify mucin profiles of primary and metastatic SRCCs using immunohistochemistry to determine whether mucin staining could help distinguish sites of origin.Forty-seven SRCCs, including 38 primary (21 stomach, 11 colorectum, and 6 breast) and 9 metastases from these primary sites were retrieved from archival files. Consecutive tissue sections were immunostained with monoclonal antibodies against MUC1, MUC2, MUC4, MUC5AC (MUC5), and MUC6 on separate slides. Cytoplasmic staining was scored based on proportion of positive tumor cells as follows: 0+ (<5%), 1+ (5%-25%), 2+ (26%-50%), and 3+ (>50%). Mucin profiles were recorded as MUC+, MUCv, and MUC- for consistent, variable, and negative expression, respectively.The mucin profiles for gastric, colorectum, and breast SRCCs are MUC1.2.4.5.6v, MUC2.4+/MUC5v/ MUC1.6-, and MUC1+/MUC2.5.6v/MUC4-, respectively. Mucin profiles of metastatic cases shared profiles with their respective primaries.Signet-ring cell carcinomas of the stomach, colorectum, and breast have distinct mucin expression patterns that are maintained in metastases. Mucin profiling may be useful to identify the origin of a metastatic SRCC of unknown primary.
[23]
Horie Y, Miura K, Matsui K, et al. Marked elevation of plasma carcinoembryonic antigen and stomach carcinoma[J]. Cancer, 1996, 77(10):1991-1997. DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960515)77:10<1991::AID-CNCR5>3.0.CO;2-K.
[24]
Mann DV, Edwards R, Ho S, et al. Elevated tumour marker CA19-9: Clinical interpretation and influence of obstructive jaundice[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2000, 26(5):474-479. DOI:10.1053/ejso.1999.0925.
[25]
Link Y, Romano A, Bejar J, et al. Widespread osteoblastic metastases and marked elevation of CA19-9 as a presentation of signet ring cell gastric carcinoma[J]. J Gastrointest Oncol, 2016, 7(2):E1-E5. DOI:10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2015.086.
[26]
Zheng HC, Li XH, Hara T, et al. Mixed-type gastric carcinomas exhibit more aggressive features and indicate the histogenesis of carcinomas[J]. Virchows Arch, 2008, 452(5):525-534. DOI:10.1007/s00428-007-0572-7.
To investigate the pathobiological behaviors of gastric mixed-type (MT) carcinomas and gastric carcinogenesis, the clinicopathological characteristics of MT carcinomas were analyzed and compared with intestinal-type (IT) and diffuse-type (DT) carcinomas. The expression of Ki-67, caspase-3, p53, fragile histine triad (FHIT), maspin, extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer (EMMPRIN), vascular growth factor (VEGF), MUC-2, 4, 5AC and 6, CD44, E-cadherin, β-catenin, and phosphorylated glycogen synthase kinase 3β-ser9 (P-GSK3β-ser9) was examined on tissue microarrays using immunohistochemistry. It was found that MT carcinomas exhibited large size, deep invasion, frequent local invasion, and lymph node metastasis in comparison with IT and DT carcinomas (p < 0.05). All the markers except MUC-5AC showed higher expression in IT than DT carcinomas (p < 0.05). The expression of maspin, EMMPRIN, VEGF, MUC-4, and membrane E-cadherin was stronger in MT intestinal than diffuse component (p < 0.05). Immunoreactivities to Ki-67, EMMPRIN, and VEGF were weaker in IT carcinoma than in the MT intestinal portion (p < 0.05), while the opposite was true for CD44, MUC-2, and MUC-6 (p < 0.05). The MT diffuse component displayed a higher expression of FHIT, VEGF, and P-GSK3β-ser9 than DT carcinoma (p < 0.05). The accumulative survival rate of the IT carcinoma patients was higher than the other types (p < 0.05). The invasive depth, venous invasion, lymph node, peritoneal or liver metastasis, and Lauren's classification were independent prognostic factors for gastric carcinomas (p < 0.05). These findings suggested that MT carcinomas were also indicated to be more aggressive than IT and DT carcinomas. Significant differences were observed in the proliferation, apoptosis, angiogenesis, mucin secretion, and cell adhesion between IT and DT carcinomas, whereas only a few of these characteristics showed differences between the MT intestinal and diffuse parts, thus suggesting that both the MT components might originate from the stem cells with similar genetic traits, but follow different histogenic pathways.
[27]
陈骄华, 苏思标. 基于病理的胃纯印戒细胞癌与胃混合印戒细胞癌肿瘤生物学行为对比分析[J]. 胃肠病学, 2024, 29(6):325-333.
[28]
Xu B, Liu F, Liu Q, et al. Highly expressed Claudin18.2 as a potential therapeutic target in advanced gastric signet-ring cell carcinoma(SRCC)[J]. J Gastrointest Oncol, 2020, 11(6):1431-1439. DOI:10.21037/jgo-20-344.
[29]
姜经伟, 胡青青, 安方梅, 等. 内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗早期胃印戒细胞癌的疗效及非治愈性切除的危险因素分析[J]. 现代消化及介入诊疗, 2021, 26(1):13-19. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2159.2021.01.004.
[30]
Agnes A, Estrella JS, Badgwell B. The significance of a nineteenth century definition in the era of genomics: Linitis plastica[J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2017, 15(1):123. DOI:10.1186/s12957-017-1187-3.
Background: Linitis plastica due to gastric adenocarcinoma is a condition with a long history, but still lacks a standardized definition and is commonly confused with Borrmann type IV, Lauren diffuse, and signet-cell type gastric cancer. The absence of a clear definition is a problem when investigating its biological characteristics and role as a possible independent factor for prognosis. Nevertheless, the biological behavior for linitis plastica, which is unique, may be valuable in risk stratification and have implications for treatment. A definition of linitis plastica based on molecular or genomic criteria could represent a useful starting point for investigating new targeted therapies.Main body: This literature review of linitis plastica will focus on the current classifications for gastric cancer, illustrating how the concept of linitis plastica relates to them in most cases and identifying a clear and reproducible definition. Moreover, the review will highlight the diagnostic challenges associated with linitis plastica, its prognostic implications, and the therapeutic options available. Future perspectives for its management are also addressed.Conclusion: Linitis plastica is a carcinoma with a scirrhous stroma, involving the submucosal and muscular layers of the stomach even in the absence of mucosal alteration. In most cases, the primary cancer cells are signet-ring cells or scattered cells in the context of a poorly differentiated carcinoma. Diagnosis is challenging. Staging should be thorough, including diagnostic laparoscopy in all cases due to the high incidence of peritoneal involvement. The prognostic significance of linitis plastica is still controversial. Curative-intent surgery, when feasible, should be performed, with a multimodality treatment approach. Cancer-stroma interactions are important features of this disease, and represent attaining potential target for future therapies. Future pathologic assessments of gastric cancer should report the stromal reaction in order to allow better characterization of the tumor.
[31]
Habib A, Kumari A, Nazir Z, et al. Revolutionizing gastric linitis plastica diagnosis: The crucial role of EUS-FNA in a sequential diagnostic approach[J]. Int J Surg, 2024, 110(5):2529-2531. DOI:10.1097/JS9.0000000000001209.
[32]
Pang Y, Zhao L, Luo Z, et al. Comparison of 68Ga-FAPI and 18F-FDG uptake in gastric, duodenal, and colorectal cancers[J]. Radiology, 2021, 298(2):393-402. DOI:10.1148/radiol.2020203275.
[33]
Yang JJ, Wang XY, Ma R, et al. Prediction of lymph node metastasis in early gastric signet-ring cell carcinoma: A real-world retrospective cohort study[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2023, 29(24):3807-3824. DOI:10.3748/wjg.v29.i24.3807.
[34]
Arer IM, Yabanoglu H, Akdur A, et al. Total versus subtotal gastrectomy for signet ring cell carcinoma of the stomach[J]. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak, 2017, 27(10):616-620. PMID:29056122.
To determine the adequate surgery type for the treatment of signet ring cell of stomach in terms of postoperative complications and survival.Comparative analytical study.Baskent University Adana Teaching and Research Center, Adana, Turkey, between 2006 and 2015.Atotal of 46 patients with the diagnosis of gastric signet ring cell, who underwent total or subtotal gastrectomy, were enrolled in this study. Patients were compared according to age, gender, tumor location, TNM stage, survival and mortality rates, operation time, complication and recurrence. Comparisons between groups were performed by using Mann-Whitney U-test for the data not normally distributed. The categorical data were analyzed by using the Chisquare test or Fisher's exact test, where applicable. Kaplan-Meier test was used for survival curve and Long-rank test was used for survival differences between groups. Values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically for all tests.Of the 46 patients, 29 (63.0%) were male. The mean age was 56.6 ±13.2 years. The median tumor size was 5.0 cm (IQR: 3.0-6.6). Twenty-six (56.5%) patients were in total gastrectomy, whereas 20 (43.5%) were in subtotal gastrectomy group. Five-year cumulative survival rate was 0.487. Five-year overall survival rate for early and advanced signet ring cell carcinoma was 0.830 and 0.164, respectively (p<0.001). Five-year overall survival rate for total and subtotal gastrectomy groups were 0.422 and 0.582, respectively (P=0.417). Complications were observed in 17.4% (n=8) of all 46 patients.Subtotal gastrectomy can be performed safely for patients with gastric signet ring cell carcinoma and is equal to total gastrectomy with respect to prognosis and complication rates.
[35]
Kim YI, Kim YW, Choi IJ, et al. Long-term survival after endoscopic resection versus surgery in early gastric cancers[J]. Endoscopy, 2015, 47(4):293-301. DOI:10.1055/s-0034-1391284.
[36]
Okubo K, Arigami T, Matsushita D, et al. Evaluation of postoperative quality of life by PGSAS-45 following local gastrectomy based on the sentinel lymph node concept in early gastric cancer[J]. Gastric Cancer, 2020, 23(4):746-753. DOI:10.1007/s10120-020-01047-7.
The usefulness of sentinel node navigation surgery (SNNS) for early gastric cancer has been demonstrated in a multicenter prospective study. However, quality of life (QOL) after local resection remains unclear. This present study investigated QOL after local resection and distal gastrectomy.We examined 69 patients who underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LADG) (n = 44) and laparoscopic local resection (LLR) (n = 25) in our hospital between September 2011 and May 2018. We conducted a combination of laparoscopic and endoscopic approaches to neoplasia with non-exposure technique (CLEAN-NET) with SNNS as LLR. All patients had pStage I or II and none had received adjuvant chemotherapy. We evaluated QOL using the postgastrectomy syndrome assessment scale questionnaire (PGSAS-45) 1, 6, and 12 months after surgery.In PGSAS-45, no significant differences were observed between LLR and LADG at 1 and 6 months after surgery. At 12 months, the LLR group scored better for some of the subscales (SS). In the endoscopic evaluation, the LLR group showed significant improvements in residual gastritis at 6 months (P = 0.006) and esophageal reflux and residual gastritis at 12 months (P = 0.021 and P = 0.017). A significant difference was observed in the prognostic nutritional index, which was assessed using serum samples, between the two groups at 6 months (P = 0.028). The body weight ratio was better in the LLR group than in the LADG group at 6 and 12 months (P = 0.041 and P = 0.007, respectively).CLEAN-NET with SNNS preserved a better QOL and nutrition status than LADG in patients with early gastric cancer.
[37]
Kim YW, Min JS, Yoon HM, et al. Laparoscopic sentinel node navigation surgery for stomach preservation in patients with early gastric cancer: A randomized clinical trial[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2022, 40(21):2342-2351. DOI:10.1200/JCO.21.02242.
To compare postoperative complications, long-term survival, and quality of life (QOL) after laparoscopic sentinel node navigation surgery (LSNNS) and laparoscopic standard gastrectomy (LSG).
[38]
Li Y, Ma FH, Xue LY, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs. upfront surgery for gastric signet ring cell carcinoma: A retrospective, propensity score-matched study[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2020, 26(8):818-827. DOI:10.3748/wjg.v26.i8.818.
[39]
Gertsen EC, van der Veen A, Brenkman HJF, et al. Multimodal therapy versus primary surgery for gastric and gastroesophageal junction diffuse type carcinoma, with a focus on signet ring cell carcinoma: A nationwide study[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2024, 31(3):1760-1772. DOI:10.1245/s10434-023-14690-y.
Diffuse type adenocarcinoma and, more specifically, signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) of the stomach and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) have a poor prognosis and the value of neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy (nCRT) is unclear.All patients who underwent surgery for diffuse type gastric and GEJ carcinoma between 2004 and 2015 were retrospectively included from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. The primary outcome was overall survival after surgery. Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted. Furthermore, multivariable Poisson and Cox regressions were performed, correcting for confounders. To comply with the Cox regression proportional hazard assumption, gastric cancer survival was split into two groups, i.e. <90 days and >90 days, postoperatively by adding an interaction variable.Analyses included 2046 patients with diffuse type cancer: 1728 gastric cancers (50% SRCC) and 318 GEJ cancers (39% SRCC). In the gastric cancer group, 49% received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) and 51% received primary surgery (PS). All-cause mortality within 90 days postoperatively was lower after nCT (hazard ratio [HR] 0.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20-0.44; p < 0.001). Also after 90 days, mortality was lower in the nCT group (HR for the interaction variable 2.84, 95% CI 1.87-4.30, p < 0.001; total HR 0.29*2.84 = 0.84). In the GEJ group, 38% received nCT, 22% received nCRT, and 39% received PS. All-cause mortality was lower after nCT (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.43-0.93; p = 0.020) compared with PS. The nCRT group was removed from the Cox regression analysis since the Kaplan-Meier curves of nCRT and PS intersected. The results for gastric and GEJ carcinomas were similar between the SRCC and non-SRCC subgroups.For gastric and GEJ diffuse type cancer, including SRCC, nCT was associated with increased survival.© 2023. Society of Surgical Oncology.
[40]
Phoo NLL, Dejkriengkraikul P, Khaw-On P, et al. Transcriptomic profiling reveals AKR1C1 and AKR1C3 mediate cisplatin resistance in signet ring cell gastric carcinoma via autophagic cell death[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2021, 22(22):12512. DOI:10.3390/ijms222212512.
Signet ring cell gastric carcinoma (SRCGC) is a lethal malignancy that has developed drug resistance to cisplatin therapies. The aim of this study was to characterize the acquisition of the cisplatin-resistance SRCGC cell line (KATO/DDP cells) and to understand the molecular mechanisms underlying cisplatin resistance. Transcriptomic and bioinformatic analyses were used to identify the candidate gene. This was confirmed by qPCR and Western blot. Aldoketoreductase1C1 and 1C3 (AKR1C1 and AKR1C3) were the most promising molecules in KATO/DDP cells. A specific inhibitor of AKR1C1 (5PBSA) and AKR1C3 (ASP9521) was used to enhance cisplatin-induced KATO/DPP cell death. Although cisplatin alone induced KATO/DDP apoptosis, a combination treatment of cisplatin and the AKR1C inhibitors had no influence on percent cell apoptosis. In conjunction with the autophagy inhibitor, 3MA, attenuated the effects of 5PBSA or ASP9521 to enhance cisplatin-induced cell death. These results indicated that AKR1C1 and 1C3 regulated cisplatin-induced KATO/DDP cell death via autophagy. Moreover, cisplatin in combination with AKR1C inhibitors and N-acetyl cysteine increased KATO/DDP cells’ viability when compared with a combination treatment of cisplatin and the inhibitors. Taken together, our results suggested that AKR1C1 and 1C3 play a crucial role in cisplatin resistance of SRCGC by regulating redox-dependent autophagy.
[41]
Shah MA, Shitara K, Ajani JA, et al. Zolbetuximab plus CAPOX in CLDN18.2-positive gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: The randomized, phase 3 GLOW trial[J]. Nat Med, 2023, 29(8):2133-2141. DOI:10.1038/s41591-023-02465-7.
There is an urgent need for first-line treatment options for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction (mG/GEJ) adenocarcinoma. Claudin-18 isoform 2 (CLDN18.2) is expressed in normal gastric cells and maintained in malignant G/GEJ adenocarcinoma cells. GLOW (closed enrollment), a global, double-blind, phase 3 study, examined zolbetuximab, a monoclonal antibody that targets CLDN18.2, plus capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) as first-line treatment for CLDN18.2-positive, HER2-negative, locally advanced unresectable or mG/GEJ adenocarcinoma. Patients (n = 507) were randomized 1:1 (block sizes of two) to zolbetuximab plus CAPOX or placebo plus CAPOX. GLOW met the primary endpoint of progression-free survival (median, 8.21 months versus 6.80 months with zolbetuximab versus placebo; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.687; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.544-0.866; P = 0.0007) and key secondary endpoint of overall survival (median, 14.39 months versus 12.16 months; HR = 0.771; 95% CI, 0.615-0.965; P = 0.0118). Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events were similar with zolbetuximab (72.8%) and placebo (69.9%). Zolbetuximab plus CAPOX represents a potential new first-line therapy for patients with CLDN18.2-positive, HER2-negative, locally advanced unresectable or mG/GEJ adenocarcinoma. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03653507.© 2023. The Author(s).
[42]
Janjigian YY, Shitara K, Moehler M, et al. First-line nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced gastric, gastro-oesophageal junction, and oesophageal adenocarcinoma(CheckMate 649): A randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial[J]. Lancet, 2021, 398(10294):27-40. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00797-2.
First-line chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma has a median overall survival (OS) of less than 1 year. We aimed to evaluate first-line programmed cell death (PD)-1 inhibitor-based therapies in gastric, gastro-oesophageal junction, and oesophageal adenocarcinoma. We report the first results for nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone.In this multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial (CheckMate 649), we enrolled adults (≥18 years) with previously untreated, unresectable, non-HER2-positive gastric, gastro-oesophageal junction, or oesophageal adenocarcinoma, regardless of PD-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression from 175 hospitals and cancer centres in 29 countries. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1 while all three groups were open) via interactive web response technology (block sizes of six) to nivolumab (360 mg every 3 weeks or 240 mg every 2 weeks) plus chemotherapy (capecitabine and oxaliplatin every 3 weeks or leucovorin, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin every 2 weeks), nivolumab plus ipilimumab, or chemotherapy alone. Primary endpoints for nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone were OS or progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review, in patients whose tumours had a PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) of five or more. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of the assigned treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02872116.From March 27, 2017, to April 24, 2019, of 2687 patients assessed for eligibility, we concurrently randomly assigned 1581 patients to treatment (nivolumab plus chemotherapy [n=789, 50%] or chemotherapy alone [n=792, 50%]). The median follow-up for OS was 13·1 months (IQR 6·7-19·1) for nivolumab plus chemotherapy and 11·1 months (5·8-16·1) for chemotherapy alone. Nivolumab plus chemotherapy resulted in significant improvements in OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0·71 [98·4% CI 0·59-0·86]; p<0·0001) and PFS (HR 0·68 [98 % CI 0·56-0·81]; p<0·0001) versus chemotherapy alone in patients with a PD-L1 CPS of five or more (minimum follow-up 12·1 months). Additional results showed significant improvement in OS, along with PFS benefit, in patients with a PD-L1 CPS of one or more and all randomly assigned patients. Among all treated patients, 462 (59%) of 782 patients in the nivolumab plus chemotherapy group and 341 (44%) of 767 patients in the chemotherapy alone group had grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events. The most common any-grade treatment-related adverse events (≥25%) were nausea, diarrhoea, and peripheral neuropathy across both groups. 16 (2%) deaths in the nivolumab plus chemotherapy group and four (1%) deaths in the chemotherapy alone group were considered to be treatment-related. No new safety signals were identified.Nivolumab is the first PD-1 inhibitor to show superior OS, along with PFS benefit and an acceptable safety profile, in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in previously untreated patients with advanced gastric, gastro-oesophageal junction, or oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Nivolumab plus chemotherapy represents a new standard first-line treatment for these patients.Bristol Myers Squibb, in collaboration with Ono Pharmaceutical.Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
[43]
Kakushima N, Kamoshida T, Hirai S, et al. Early gastric cancer with Krukenberg tumor and review of cases of intramucosal gastric cancers with Krukenberg tumor[J]. J Gastroenterol, 2003, 38(12):1176-1180. DOI:10.1007/s00535-003-1227-3.
A 47-year-old woman was admitted because of hypermenorrhea. Transvaginal ultrasonography revealed an ovarian tumor and myoma uteri, and total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was performed. Histology revealed signet-ring cell carcinoma in the right ovary. In order to find out the primary site of this tumor, gastroendoscopy was performed after the operation, and showed a IIc lesion in the lower body of the stomach; biopsy specimens showed signet-ring cell carcinoma similar to that in the right ovary. Total gastrectomy revealed that the lesion was an early gastric cancer confined to the mucosa, but there was lymphatic invasion slightly beneath the muscularis mucosa, with regional lymph node metastasis. In the light of a review of the seven cases of early gastric cancer with Krukenberg tumor previously reported, lymphatic metastasis seemed to be the most likely pathway of ovarian metastasis in early gastric cancers.
[44]
Bonnot PE, Piessen G, Kepenekian V, et al. Cytoreductive surgery with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastases(CYTO-CHIP study): A propensity score analysis[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2019, 37(23):2028-2040. DOI:10.1200/JCO.18.01688.
Gastric cancer (GC) with peritoneal metastases (PMs) is a poor prognostic evolution. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) yields promising results, but the impact of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) remains controversial. Here we aimed to compare outcomes between CRS-HIPEC versus CRS alone (CRSa) among patients with PMs from GC.
[45]
Luksta M, Bausys A, Gendvilaite N, et al. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy(PIPAC)for gastric cancer peritoneal metastases: Results from the Lithuanian PIPAC Program[J]. Cancers(Basel), 2024, 16(17):2992. DOI:10.3390/cancers16172992.
[46]
Beeharry MK, Ni ZT, Yang ZY, et al. Study protocol of a multicenter phase Ⅲ randomized controlled trial investigating the efficiency of the combination of neoadjuvant chemotherapy(NAC)and neoadjuvant laparoscopic intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy(NLHIPEC)followed by R0 gastrectomy with intraoperative HIPEC for advanced gastric cancer(AGC): DRAGON II trial[J]. BMC Cancer, 2020, 20(1):224. DOI:10.1186/s12885-020-6701-2.
Even though treatment modalities such as adjuvant systemic radio-chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) have individually have improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates in advanced Gastric Cancer (AGC), the peritoneum still presides as a common site of treatment failure and disease recurrence. The role of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been acknowledged as prophylaxis for peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) in AGC patients and in this study, we aim at investigating the safety and efficacy of the combination of neoadjuvant laparoscopic HIPEC (NLHIPEC) with NAC in the neoadjuvant phase followed by surgery of curative intent with intraoperative HIPEC followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (AC).
[47]
Ishigami H, Fujiwara Y, Fukushima R, et al. Phase III trial comparing intraperitoneal and intravenous paclitaxel plus S-1 versus cisplatin plus S-1 in patients with gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis: PHOENIX-GC trial[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2018, 36(19):1922-1929. DOI:10.1200/JCO.2018.77.8613.
Purpose Intraperitoneal paclitaxel plus systemic chemotherapy demonstrated promising clinical effects in patients with gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis. We aimed to verify its superiority over standard systemic chemotherapy in overall survival. Patients and Methods This randomized phase III trial enrolled patients with gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis who had received no or short-term (< 2 months) chemotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned at a two-to-one ratio to receive intraperitoneal and intravenous paclitaxel plus S-1 (IP; intraperitoneal paclitaxel 20 mg/m and intravenous paclitaxel 50 mg/m on days 1 and 8 plus S-1 80 mg/m per day on days 1 to 14 for a 3-week cycle) or S-1 plus cisplatin (SP; S-1 80 mg/m per day on days 1 to 21 plus cisplatin 60 mg/m on day 8 for a 5-week cycle), stratified by center, previous chemotherapy, and extent of peritoneal metastasis. The primary end point was overall survival. Secondary end points were response rate, 3-year overall survival rate, and safety. Results We enrolled 183 patients and performed efficacy analyses in 164 eligible patients. Baseline characteristics were balanced between the arms, except that patients in the IP arm had significantly more ascites. The median survival times for the IP and SP arms were 17.7 and 15.2 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.49 to 1.04; stratified log-rank P =.080). In the sensitivity analysis adjusted for baseline ascites, the hazard ratio was 0.59 (95% CI, 0.39 to 0.87; P =.008). The 3-year overall survival rate was 21.9% (95% CI, 14.9% to 29.9%) in the IP arm and 6.0% (95% CI, 1.6% to 14.9%) in the SP arm. Both regimens were well tolerated. Conclusion This trial failed to show statistical superiority of intraperitoneal paclitaxel plus systemic chemotherapy. However, the exploratory analyses suggested possible clinical benefits of intraperitoneal paclitaxel for gastric cancer.
[48]
Sewastjanow-Silva M, Xiao L, Abdelhakeem A, et al. Survival benefit of palliative oophorectomy for patients with ovarian metastasis from baseline metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2025, 43(21):2361-2371. DOI:10.1200/JCO-24-01678.
To compare overall survival (OS) in patients with baseline metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma (GA) with and without ovarian metastasis (OM). Furthermore, within the group that had ovarian metastases, we aimed to assess whether there was a survival benefit (SB) with palliative oophorectomy (PO).
[49]
Luo D, Wang H, Liu J, et al. Combined MDM2 and G2/M checkpoint inhibition induces synergistic antitumor response in gastric signet-ring cell carcinoma[J]. Cancer Lett, 2025, 613:217500. DOI:10.1016/j.canlet.2025.217500.
[50]
Shen Y, Li Y, Wang Z, et al. The prognostic value of FAR and a novel FAR-CA125 score in resectable gastric signet ring cell carcinoma patients[J]. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 2023, 149(12):9597-9608. DOI:10.1007/s00432-023-04870-4.
The fibrinogen to albumin ratio (FAR) is increasingly regarded as a potential biomarker for predicting prognosis in variety of malignant tumors, but not in gastric signet ring cell carcinoma (GSRC). This study seeks to examine the prognostic value of the FAR and explore a novel FAR-CA125 score (FCS) in resectable GSRC patients.A retrospective cohort was conducted including 330 GSRC patients who underwent curative resection. Kaplan-Meier (K-M) and Cox regression were used to analysis the prognostic value of FAR and FCS. And a predictive nomogram model was developed.The optimal cut-off values for CA125 and FAR were 9.88 and 0.0697, respectively, according to the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC). Th area under the ROC curve of FCS is higher than CA125 and FAR. 330 patients were grouped into three groups according to the FCS. High FCS was related to males, anemia, tumor size, TNM stage, lymph node metastasis, tumor invasion depth, SII, and pathological subtypes. K-M analysis showed that high FCS and FAR were associated with poor survival. In the multivariate analysis, FCS, TNM stage, and SII were independent prognostic factors for poor OS in resectable GSRC patients. And the predictive accuracy of clinical nomogram contained FCS was better than TNM stage.This study indicated that the FCS is a prognostic, and effective biomarker for patients with surgically resectable GSRC. Such developed FCS-based nomogram could be effective tools to assist the clinicians to determine the treatment strategy.© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
[51]
Lionetti R, De Luca M, Travaglino A, et al. Prognostic factors in Krukenberg tumor[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2019, 300(5):1155-1165. DOI:10.1007/s00404-019-05301-x.
Krukenberg tumor (KT) is a rare secondary ovarian tumor. Little is known about clinicopathologic factors affecting prognosis in KT.To assess the prognostic value of clinicopathologic factors in KT through a systematic review and meta-analysis.Electronic databases were searched from their inception to February 2019 for studies assessing the association of clinicopathologic factors with overall survival in KT. Pooled hazard ratio (HR) was calculated for each factor; a p value < 0.05 was considered significant.Twenty-three studies with 1743 patients were included. A decreased overall survival was significantly associated with peritoneal involvement (HR 1.944; p = 0.003), ascites (HR 2.055; p = 0.034), synchronous presentation (HR 1.679; p = 0.034) and increased serum CEA levels (HR 1.380; p = 0.010), but not with age > 50 (HR 0.946; p = 0.743), menopausal status (HR 1.565; p = 0.204), gastric origin (HR 1.600; p = 0.201), size > 5 cm (HR 1.292; p = 0.119), size > 10 cm (HR 0.925; p = 0.714), bilateral ovarian involvement (HR 1.113; p = 0.347), non-peritoneal extaovarian metastases (HR 1.648; p = 0.237), liver metastases (HR 1.118, p = 0.555), predominant signet ring cell morphology (HR 1.322; p = 0.208) and levels of CA125 (HR 0.933; p = 0.828) and CA19.9 (HR 0.996; p = 0.992).Peritoneal involvement, synchronous presentation, ascites and increased serum CEA levels appear as unfavorable prognostic factors in KT and might affect the patient management.
[52]
吴毅萍, 余虹, 金涛, 等. 基于淋巴结阳性率的胃印戒细胞癌预后模型的建立与验证[J]. 徐州医科大学学报, 2024, 44(8):586-592. DOI:10.12467/j.issn.2096-3882.20240140.
[53]
Lee D, Son SY, Kim YB, et al. Neural invasion is a significant contributor to peritoneal recurrence in signet ring cell gastric carcinoma[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2018, 25(5):1167-1175. DOI:10.1245/s10434-018-6371-3.
Gastric signet ring cell carcinoma (SRC) has shown a favorable outcome in early stages but has a worse prognosis than non-SRC in advanced stages. However, the cause for this stage-dependent prognostic impact has not been determined. This study aimed to compare clinicopathologic features and recurrence patterns between gastric SRC and non-SRC in a cohort of Eastern patients.This study reviewed the prospectively collected data of 764 patients undergoing curative resection for gastric cancer from 2005 to 2008. The demographics, clinicopathologic characteristics, disease-specific survival (DSS) rate, and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate of the patients were analyzed.The SRC patients (n = 176) had a worse prognosis than the non-SRC patients (n = 588), especially in stages T3 and T4. Peritoneal recurrence and the incidence of neural invasion (NI) were significantly increased in the SRC patients, albeit only in stages T3 and T4. In the T3 and T4 patients with NI, peritoneal recurrence occurred more frequently in SRC than in non-SRC (28.7% vs. 13.7%; p = 0.001), but not in the T3 and T4 patients without NI. Only in the patients with NI, SRC led to a significantly shorter DSS (67.6 vs. 90.7 months; p = 0.008) and RFS (67.1 vs. 80.3 months; p = 0.036) than non-SRC.This report is the first to present the relationship between NI and peritoneal recurrence as the cause of stage-dependent prognoses for SRC. A better understanding of NI may lend insight into cancer spread and recurrence, especially in gastric SRC.
[54]
Li C, Qin Y, Zhang WH, et al. Deep learning-based AI model for signet-ring cell carcinoma diagnosis and chemotherapy response prediction in gastric cancer[J]. Med Phys, 2022, 49(3):1535-1546. DOI:10.1002/mp.15437.
We aimed to develop a noninvasive artificial intelligence (AI) model to diagnose signet‐ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) of gastric cancer (GC) and identify patients with SRCC who could benefit from postoperative chemotherapy based on preoperative contrast‐enhanced computed tomography (CT).
[55]
Chen J, Liu K, Luo Y, et al. Single-cell profiling of tumor immune microenvironment reveals immune irresponsiveness in gastric signet-ring cell carcinoma[J]. Gastroenterology, 2023, 165(1):88-103. DOI:10.1053/j.gastro.2023.03.008.
Gastric cancer (GC) is a major cancer type characterized by high heterogeneity in both tumor cells and the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME). One intractable GC subtype is gastric signet-ring cell carcinoma (GSRCC), which is associated with poor prognosis. However, it remains unclear what the GSRCC TIME characteristics are and how these characteristics may contribute to clinical outcomes.We enrolled 32 patients with advanced GC of diverse subtypes and profiled their TIME using an immune-targeted single-cell profiling strategy, including (i) immune-targeted single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq, n = 20 patients) and (ii) protein expression profiling by a targeted antibody panel for mass cytometry (CyTOF, n = 12 patients). We also generated matched V(D)J sequencing of T and B cells along CD45 immunocytes.We find that compared to non-GSRCC, the GSRCC TIME appears to be quiescent where both CD4 and CD8 T cells are difficult to be mobilized, which further impairs the proper functions of B cells. CXCL13, mainly produced by Tfh, Th17, and exhausted CD8 T cells, is a central coordinator of this transformation. We show that CXCL13 expression can predict the response to immune checkpoint blockade in GC patients, which may be related to its effects on tertiary lymphoid structures.Our study provides a comprehensive molecular portrait of immune cell compositions and cell states in advanced GC patients, highlighting adaptive immune irresponsiveness in GSRCC and a mediator role of CXCL13 in TIME. Our targeted single-cell transcriptomic and proteomic profiling represents a powerful approach for TIME-oriented translational research.Copyright © 2023 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
[56]
Valastyan S, Weinberg RA. Tumor metastasis: Molecular insights and evolving paradigms[J]. Cell, 2011, 147(2):275-292. DOI:10.1016/j.cell.2011.09.024.
Metastases represent the end products of a multistep cell-biological process termed the invasion-metastasis cascade, which involves dissemination of cancer cells to anatomically distant organ sites and their subsequent adaptation to foreign tissue microenvironments. Each of these events is driven by the acquisition of genetic and/or epigenetic alterations within tumor cells and the co-option of nonneoplastic stromal cells, which together endow incipient metastatic cells with traits needed to generate macroscopic metastases. Recent advances provide provocative insights into these cell-biological and molecular changes, which have implications regarding the steps of the invasion-metastasis cascade that appear amenable to therapeutic targeting.Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
[57]
王振宁. 胃癌新辅助治疗靶点的研究进展和发展方向[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2024, 44(10):1090-1094. DOI:10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2024.10.02.

Footnotes

利益冲突 所有作者均声明不存在利益冲突

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China, General Program(82273181)
PDF(1321 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉