Individualized efficacy analysis of the laparoscopic-endoscopic cooperative sentinel lymph node navigation surgery strategy for early gastric cancer

WANG Zi-meng, ZHENG Zhi, WEI Xi-cheng, HOU Yi, JIAN Yue-yang, XU Rui, ZHANG Hai-qiao, LIU Xiao-ye, ZHAO Yu, WANG Yong-jun, JI Ming, CHEN Guang-yong, SUN Xiu-jing, ZHU Sheng-tao, YIN Jie, LI Peng, ZHANG Jun, ZHANG Zhong-tao, ZHANG Shu-tian

Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (7) : 945-952.

PDF(1328 KB)
PDF(1328 KB)
Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (7) : 945-952. DOI: 10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2026.07.16

Individualized efficacy analysis of the laparoscopic-endoscopic cooperative sentinel lymph node navigation surgery strategy for early gastric cancer

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective To explore the efficacy and safety of the laparoscopic-endoscopic cooperative surgery combined sentinel lymph node navigation surgery (LECS-SNNS) strategy in early gastric cancer (EGC) patients with different indications. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinicopathological data of 60 consecutive EGC patients who underwent LECS-SNNS at Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, between August 2023 and November 2025. Among them, 13 patients underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) combined with laparoscopic sentinel lymph node basin dissection (LSBD) (ESD-LSBD group); 30 received laparoscopic-endoscopic regional gastrectomy (LRG) combined with LSBD (LRG-LSBD group); and 17 underwent LSBD alone (LSBD group). Clinicopathological characteristics, gastric emptying time, nutritional status, quality of life (QoL), and perioperative complications were analyzed and evaluated. Results Four patients were converted to standard D2 radical gastrectomy due to sentinel lymph node metastasis. Except for a significantly higher proportion of pT1b (73.3%) stages in the LRG-LSBD group than in the other two groups (P<0.05), no statistically significant differences were observed among the three groups regarding baseline characteristics and the number of detected lymph nodes. Regarding perioperative indicators, the LSBD group had a significantly shorter operative time than the LRG-LSBD group (P=0.001) and a markedly shorter postoperative hospital stay than the other two groups (both P<0.017). Intraoperative blood loss in the LSBD and ESD-LSBD groups was significantly lower than that in the LRG-LSBD group (both P<0.017). The gastric half-emptying time at 1 week postoperatively was significantly longer than the preoperative baseline across all three groups, which markedly improved at 3 months postoperatively, showing no statistically significant difference compared with the preoperative baseline. At 1 week postoperatively, the gastric half-emptying time in the LSBD group was significantly better than that in the LRG-LSBD group (P<0.017), whereas no significant difference was found among the groups at 3 months postoperatively. Most nutritional indicators in each group decreased significantly at 1 week postoperatively and returned to preoperative levels at 3 months postoperatively, with no significant differences observed among the groups. Regarding QoL, scores for most indicators declined significantly at 1 month postoperatively and recovered to preoperative levels at 3 months postoperatively. At 1 month postoperatively, the LSBD group demonstrated significantly better indigestion symptom scores and total symptom scores in the Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale-45 (PGSAS-45) than the LRG-LSBD group (P<0.017), while differences in other scales and postoperative scores among the groups were not statistically significant. Within 90 days postoperatively, two complications occurred (one grade I and one grade II), both of which resolved after conservative treatment; no complications of grade ≥ III were observed. Conclusion LECS-SNNS strategy for EGC provides a safe, individualized treatment selection through accurate preoperative assessment and intraoperative lymph node navigation, achieving oncological R0 resection while effectively maximizing short-term organ function and quality of life preservation.

Key words

laparoscopic-endoscopic cooperative surgery / sentinel lymph node navigation surgery / early gastric cancer / gastric emptying function / quality of life

Cite this article

Download Citations
WANG Zi-meng , ZHENG Zhi , WEI Xi-cheng , et al . Individualized efficacy analysis of the laparoscopic-endoscopic cooperative sentinel lymph node navigation surgery strategy for early gastric cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery. 2026, 46(7): 945-952 https://doi.org/10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2026.07.16

References

[1]
王子萌, 郑智, 闫笑生, 等. 胃癌前哨淋巴结研究的文献计量学与可视化分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2025(1): 34-41. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0793.2025.01.006.
[2]
Hur H, Lee YJ, Kim Y, et al. Clinical efficacy of laparoscopic sentinel node navigation surgery for stomach preservation in patients with early gastric cancer[J]. Ann Surg, 2024, 281(2): 296-303. DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006219.
[3]
Eom BW, Yoon HM, Kim Y, et al. Quality of life and nutritional outcomes of stomach-preserving surgery for early gastric cancer: A secondary analysis of the SENORITA randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA Surg, 2024, 159(8): 900-908. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.1210.
[4]
Kim Y, Min J, Yoon HM, et al. Laparoscopic sentinel node navigation surgery for stomach preservation in patients with early gastric cancer: A randomized clinical trial[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2022, 40(21):2342-2351. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.21.02242.
[5]
Zheng Z, Wang ZM, Yan XS, et al. Sentinel lymph node in surgical oncology: Current concepts and applications[J]. Asian J Surg, 2025, 48(12): 7261-7270. DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2025.06.068.
[6]
Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines 2021 (6th edition)[J]. Gastric Cancer, 2022, 26(1): 1-25. DOI: 10.1007/s10120-022-01331-8.
[7]
Wang FH, Zhang XT, Tang L, et al. The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO): Clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer, 2023[J]. Cancer Commun (Lond), 2023, 44(1): 127-172. DOI: 10.1002/cac2.12516.
[8]
郑智, 王子萌, 徐瑞, 等. 内镜-腹腔镜胃区域性切除联合前哨淋巴结引流区清扫术在早期胃癌患者中的应用研究[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2025, 63(7): 587-596. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20250117-00034.
[9]
国家消化系统疾病临床医学研究中心, 消化健康全国重点实验室, 中华医学会消化内镜学分会, 等. 早期胃癌双镜联合前哨淋巴结导航手术多学科临床诊疗实践专家共识(2025版)[J]. 中华消化内镜杂志, 2025, 42(12): 932-948. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn321463-20251128-00507.
[10]
Notghi A, James G, Hay PD. British Nuclear Medicine Society clinical guidelines for gastric empty[J]. Nucl Med Commun, 2023, 44(7):563-570. DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000001699.
[11]
Lee H. Management strategy of non-curative esd in gastric cancer: curative criteria, and the critical building block for determining beyond it[J]. J Gastric Cancer, 2025, 25(1): 210. DOI: 10.5230/jgc.2025.25.e5.
[12]
Yabuuchi Y, Masui Y, Kumagai K, et al. External validation of the eCura system and comparison with the W-eCura score for predicting lymph node metastasis after non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: A multicenter retrospective cohort study[J]. J Gastroenterol, 2025, 60(7): 829-837. DOI: 10.1007/s00535-025-02261-9.
[13]
Wang Z, Zheng Z, Jian Y, et al. Letter to the Editor “Feasibility of sentinel basin mapping after non-curative endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer: A prospective multicenter cohort study (SENORITA 2 Trial)”[J]. Int J Surg, 2026. DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000005057. [Epub ahead of print].
[14]
Wang Z, Zheng Z, Zhang J. Variable sensitivity despite high detection rates: is sentinel node navigation surgery feasible following non-curative gastric ESD?[J]. Int J Surg, 2026. DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000005139. [Epub ahead of print].
[15]
Camilleri M, Sanders KM. Gastroparesis[J]. Gastroenterology, 2022, 162(1): 68-87. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.10.028.
[16]
Camilleri M. Relationship of motor mechanisms to gastroparesis symptoms: Toward individualized treatment[J]. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, 2021, 320(4): G558-G563. DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00006.2021.
[17]
Peters EG, De Jonge WJ, Smeets BJJ, et al. The contribution of mast cells to postoperative ileus in experimental and clinical studies[J]. Neurogastroenterology and motility, 2015, 27(6): 743-749. DOI: 10.1111/nmo.12579.
[18]
Browning KN, Verheijden S, Boeckxstaens GE. The Vagus Nerve in Appetite Regulation, Mood, and Intestinal Inflammation[J]. Gastroenterology, 2017, 152(4):730-744. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.10.046.
[19]
王子萌, 侯祎, 郑智, 等. 双镜联合前哨淋巴结导航手术对早期胃癌术后胃排空功能及生活质量影响:一项前瞻性随机对照试验[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2026, 46(5): 660-668. DOI: 10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2026.05.12.

Footnotes

利益冲突 所有作者均声明不存在利益冲突

Funding

Beijing Research Ward Excellence Program(BRWEP2024W162020100)
Beijing Research Ward Excellence Program(BRWEP2024W162020112)
Beijing Research Ward Excellence Program(BRWEP2024W162020114)
National Key Research and Development Program of China(2023YFC2507406)
National Natural Science Foundation of China(82300646)
Beijing Natural Science Foundation(7232334)
Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals Incubating Program(PX2020001)
Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals Incubating Program(PX20240103)
Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission AI+ Health Collaborative Innovation Cultivation Project(Z241100007724004)
Capital’s Funds for Health Improvement and Research(2024-2-2028)
Excellent Plan for Medicine Innovation and Translation Project(YC202401QX0824)
Beijing Integrated Medical Association Clinical Research Funding Program(B012ZHKY‑2025‑1869(B012))
PDF(1328 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/