Current status, controversies, and future perspectives of robotic thyroid surgery in Korea

Kyung Ho Kang, Hyeji Kim, Hyeon Uk Hwang, Hyungju Kwon

Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (6) : 745-753.

PDF(2165 KB)
PDF(2165 KB)
Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (6) : 745-753. DOI: 10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2026.06.06

Current status, controversies, and future perspectives of robotic thyroid surgery in Korea

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Over the past two decades, robotic thyroid surgery has developed rapidly in South Korea. The Korean experience has not represented a linear evolution of a single technique; rather, it has been characterized by the parallel development and continuous refinement of multiple remote-access approaches. Representative approaches include the gasless transaxillary approach, the bilateral axillo-breast approach (BABA), and more recently, single-port techniques such as the one-port areolar approach (OPAA). Among the various remote-access approaches, BABA has become one of the most highly standardized and reproducible techniques because of its symmetric operative field, operative ergonomics similar to those of the conventional midline approach, and favorable applicability to bilateral thyroidectomy. Based on nationwide claims data from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) from 2006 to 2022 and data from the 2024 Intuitive Surgical Korean registry, the proportion of robotic thyroidectomy among all thyroidectomies in South Korea increased from 0.03% in 2006 to 12.75% in 2022. By 2024, a total of 203 da Vinci surgical systems had been installed in South Korea, and thyroidectomy accounted for 92.0% of all robotic head and neck procedures. In 2024, the distribution of robotic thyroidectomy approaches was as follows: transaxillary approach, 38.0%; BABA, 35.7%; retroauricular approach, 21.8%; and transoral approach, 4.5%. Single-port procedures accounted for 34.0%, representing a marked increase from 3.0% in 2018. The adoption rate of robotic surgery was highest among young women aged 20-39 years, and by 2022 this group accounted for 24.9%. In appropriately selected patients, the major approaches have oncologic outcomes comparable to those of conventional open thyroidectomy. Overall, the development of robotic thyroid surgery in South Korea reflects the coexistence and complementarity of multiple remote-access approaches in a mature stage of evolution: BABA provides a standardized platform with a symmetric operative field for bilateral procedures and is conducive to broader dissemination, whereas single-port approaches further explore the possibility of reducing surgical invasiveness on this basis. Future progress will continue to depend on ongoing technical refinement, structured training systems, and strict patient selection, supported by data from high-volume centers.

Key words

robotic thyroidectomy / bilateral axillo-breast approach (BABA) / one-port areolar approach (OPAA) / transaxillary approach / thyroid cancer / remote-access thyroid surgery

Cite this article

Download Citations
Kyung Ho Kang , Hyeji Kim , Hyeon Uk Hwang , et al. Current status, controversies, and future perspectives of robotic thyroid surgery in Korea[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery. 2026, 46(6): 745-753 https://doi.org/10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2026.06.06

References

[1]
Yoon JH, Park CH, Chung WY. Gasless endoscopic thyroidectomy via an axillary approach: Experience of 30 cases[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2006, 16(4):226-231.DOI: 10.1097/00129689-200608000-00006.
Surgery for thyroid disease requires skin incisions that can result in postsurgical problems such as prominent scars, adhesions, hypesthesia, and paresthesia in the neck. To overcome these problems we performed gasless endoscopic thyroidectomy via an axillary approach. Between May 2004 and April 2005, 30 patients underwent gasless endoscopic thyroidectomy via an axillary approach. The mean operating time was 126.8+/-32.4 minutes, and the mean length of hospital stay was 4.3+/-1.1 days. No cases required conversion to open surgery and none involved significant intraoperative complications. Three patients (10.0%) complained of slight hypesthesia or paresthesia in the anterior chest wall, and only 2 patients (6.7%) complained of discomfort while swallowing 4 months after surgery. All patients were satisfied with the cosmetic results. Gasless endoscopic thyroidectomy via an axillary approach is feasible and safe and provides excellent cosmetic results with a minimal degree of postoperative complaints.
[2]
Kang SW, Jeong JJ, Yun JS, et al. Gasless endoscopic thyroidectomy using trans-axillary approach: Surgical outcome of 581 patients[J]. Endocr J, 2009, 56(3):361-369.DOI: 10.1507/endocrj.K08E-306.
[3]
Kang SW, Jeong JJ, Nam KH, et al. Robot-assisted endoscopic thyroidectomy for thyroid malignancies using a gasless transaxillary approach[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2009, 209(2):e1-e7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.05.003.
[4]
Kang SW, Lee SC, Lee SH, et al. Robotic thyroid surgery using a gasless,transaxillary approach and the da Vinci S system: The operative outcomes of 338 consecutive patients[J]. Surgery, 2009, 146(6):1048-1055.DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.09.007.
[5]
Choe JH, Kim SW, Chung KW, et al. Endoscopic thyroidectomy using a new bilateral axillo-breast approach[J]. World J Surg, 2007, 31(3):601-606. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-006-0481-y.
[6]
Kim HY, Chai YJ, Dionigi G, et al. Transoral robotic thyroidectomy: Lessons learned from an initial consecutive series of 24 patients[J]. Surg Endosc, 2018, 32(2):688-694. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5724-5.
Transoral thyroid surgery is an ideal method for minimally invasive thyroidectomy, as there is less flap dissection during the procedure and no postoperative scars. Nonetheless, technical obstacles have precluded the wide dissemination of this procedure. We present the surgical procedures and outcomes of transoral robotic thyroidectomy (TORT).From September 2012 to June 2016, we performed TORT at Korea University Hospital. We used three intraoral ports and a single axillary port for the system's four robotic arms. The surgical outcomes were retrospectively reviewed.Twenty-four female patients (mean age 39.6 ± 11.6 years; mean tumor size 1.0 ± 1.3 cm) underwent unilateral thyroid lobectomies with or without ipsilateral central neck dissection. Twenty patients had papillary thyroid carcinomas (PTC), three had benign nodules, and one had a follicular thyroid carcinoma. The mean surgical time was 232 ± 41 min; the mean hospital stay was 3.3 ± 0.8 days. The number of retrieved central lymph nodes in the PTC patients was 4.7 ± 3.2. There were no reports of transient or permanent vocal cord palsy, recurrence, or mortality during the median follow-up period of 16.8 months. Paresthesia of the lower lip and the chin due to mental nerve injury was observed in nine of the first 12 patients (six transient, three permanent), but no further reports of paresthesia were recorded after patient 12, when the locations of the intraoral incisions were modified.TORT is feasible and safe for selected patients after technical refinements, and can be a potential alternative approach for scarless thyroid surgery.
[7]
Lee SM, Hwang H, Shin MH, et al. One-year clinical experience of single-port and multi-port robotic thyroid surgery in a single institution[J]. J Clin Med, 2024, 13(18):5486. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13185486.
Background: With the advent of da Vinci SP, surgical methods using da Vinci SP are becoming popular in thyroid surgery. The authors previously reported on a new surgical method called the single-port robotic areolar (SPRA) approach, which evolved from the previous bilateral axillary breast approach (BABA). This paper reports a comparative analysis of SPRA and BABA over one year. Methods: The data on SPRA and BABA thyroid surgery performed at the authors’ hospital from December 2022 to December 2023 were analyzed. Results: 111 SPRA and 159 BABA surgeries were performed. SPRA was performed overwhelmingly on women (1 man vs. 110 women), and the body mass index (BMI) was lower in SPRA patients (23.63 ± 3.49 vs. 25.71 ± 4.39, p < 0.001). The proportion of total thyroidectomy was significantly higher in BABA patients, and a modified radical neck dissection (MRND) was only performed using the BABA method. The time for flap formation before robot docking was significantly shorter in SPRA patients (12.08 ± 3.99 vs. 18.34 ± 5.84 min, p < 0.001). Postoperative drain amount was also significantly lower in SPRA patients (53.87 ± 35.45 vs. 81.74 ± 30.26 mL, p < 0.001). Hospital stay after surgery was significantly shorter with SPRA (3.04 ± 0.48 vs. 3.36 ± 0.73 days, p < 0.001). Thyroglobulin levels after a total thyroidectomy (0.06 ± 0.13 vs. 0.45 ± 0.78, p = 0.002) and stimulated Tg level before the RAI (1.03 ± 0.74 vs. 5.01 ± 13.63, p = 0.046) were significantly lower in the SPRA group. No significant differences were observed between the two groups according to the postoperative complications, including vocal cord palsy and hypoparathyroidism. Conclusions: Based on the authors’ experience, SPRA is a less invasive robot thyroid surgery method than BABA.
[8]
Kim BS, Kang KH, Kang H, et al. Central neck dissection using a bilateral axillo-breast approach for robotic thyroidectomy: Comparison with conventional open procedure after propensity score matching[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2014, 24(1):67-72.DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182a4bfec.
Despite advancements in surgical robot technology, the da Vinci-assisted central neck dissection (CND) in thyroid cancer remains challenging. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of robotic thyroidectomy and CND.Between March 2011 and July 2012, 515 consecutive patients who had undergone thyroidectomy and CND for papillary thyroid carcinoma were retrospectively reviewed. A thyroid surgeon performed either an open thyroidectomy and CND (n=392) or a robotic thyroidectomy and CND (n=123) using the bilateral axillo-breast approach (BABA). Propensity score matching using 10 clinicopathologic factors was used to generate 2 matched cohorts, each composed of 123 patients.Mean age, body mass index, and tumor size were lower in those who underwent BABA compared with an open procedure before propensity matching. Evaluation of stimulated thyroglobulin levels did not show significant differences between the 2 groups. After cohort matching, significant differences in age, body mass index, and tumor size between the 2 groups were no longer present. The matched cohort showed that the number of retrieved lymph nodes was lower in the BABA (8.74±5.13) than in the open thyroidectomy (10.71±6.68) (P=0.006).BABA robotic thyroidectomy revealed that a less-extensive CND was obtained when compared with an open procedure. BABA may be suitable for thyroid cancer without lymphadenopathy in central neck compartment. Conversely, BABA should not be recommended to a patient with thyroid cancer when multiple lymph node metastases in the lower central neck compartment are suspected.
[9]
Kim BS, Kang KH, Park SJ. Robotic modified radical neck dissection by bilateral axillary breast approach for papillary thyroid carcinoma with lateral neck metastasis[J]. Head Neck, 2015, 37(1):37-45.DOI: 10.1002/hed.23545.
[10]
Choi JY, Kang KH. Robotic modified radical neck dissection with bilateral axillo-breast approach[J]. Gland Surg, 2017, 6(3):243-249.DOI: 10.21037/gs.2017.06.09.
Bilateral axillo-breast approach (BABA) robotic thyroidectomy has been performed since 2008, and the indications of the BABA robotic operation has been widened to the robotic modified radical neck dissection (MRND). The indication for BABA robotic MRND is suspicious lateral neck metastasis of well-differentiated thyroid carcinoma, and the contraindication is far advanced carcinoma such as encasement of common carotid artery. Surgical procedures start from flap formation as a routine BABA robotic thyroidectomy and the lateral neck dissection is performed from level IV and Vb to level III and IIA. The procedures are very similar to those of open MRND. Comparison between robotic MRND and open MRND in mean age, sex, body mass index, and tumor size were not different significantly. There was no statistically significant difference in the number of retrieved lymph nodes, metastatic lymph nodes or stimulated thyroglobulin level between the groups. The operation time was longer in the robotic group. BABA robotic MRND can be safe and feasible method to treat lateral neck metastasis of well differentiated thyroid carcinoma. More prospective, controlled, multicenter studies are required to establish robotic MRND as an alternative standard and to justify additional costs beyond the cosmetic advantages.
[11]
Paek SH, Kang KH. Robotic thyroidectomy and cervical neck dissection for thyroid cancer[J]. Gland Surg, 2016, 5(3):342-351.DOI: 10.21037/gs.2015.10.04.
A robotic approach for thyroid surgery was developed to overcome the limitations of endoscopic thyroidectomy and provide many technical advantages. This approach facilitates the surgeon's control through a magnified three-dimensional view, decreased tremor, and freedom of motion with articulated instruments. Robotic thyroidectomy is safe and technically feasible in patients with well-differentiated, low-risk thyroid cancer. Furthermore, robotic thyroidectomy may become a good surgical alternative option for patients with more advanced thyroid cancer. Our modified bilateral axillo-breast approach (BABA) for central and lateral cervical neck lymph node (LN) dissection has yielded excellent surgical outcomes as an open procedure. The incorporation of robotics in thyroid cancer surgery will continue to evolve, and the surgical indications for robotic thyroidectomy will continue to expand. Further analyses that include long-term outcomes and randomized comparative trials remain important.
[12]
Choi YS, Shin WY, Yi JW. Single surgeon experience with 500 cases of the robotic bilateral axillary breast approach(BABA)for thyroid surgery using the da-Vinci Xi system[J]. J Clin Med, 2021, 10(18):4048. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10184048.
[13]
Bae HL, Wong JSH, Kim S, et al. Surgical outcomes of robotic thyroidectomy for thyroid tumors over 4 cm via the bilateral axillo-breast approach[J]. Sci Rep, 2024, 14(1):11646.DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-62021-2.
The study investigated the feasibility of robotic bilateral axillo-breast approach (BABA) thyroidectomy for patients with thyroid tumors larger than 4 cm. BABA thyroidectomy has previously shown safety and effectiveness for thyroid surgeries but lacked extensive data on its application to larger tumors. Between October 2008 and August 2022, there were 74 patients underwent robotic BABA thyroidectomy due to thyroid nodules exceeding 4 cm in size. The mean patient age was 40.3 years. Fine needle aspiration results classified the tumors as benign (50.0%), atypia of undetermined significance (27.0%), follicular neoplasm (16.2%), suspicious for malignancy/malignancy (5.4%), or lymphoma (1.4%). The average tumor size was 4.9 cm, with the majority (85.1%) undergoing thyroid lobectomy, and the rest (14.9%) receiving total thyroidectomy. The mean total operation time was 178.4 min for lobectomy and 207.3 min for total thyroidectomy. Transient vocal cord palsy (VCP) was found in 3 patients (4.1%), and there was no permanent VCP. Among patients who underwent total thyroidectomy, transient hypoparathyroidism was observed in three (27.2%), and permanent hypoparathyroidism was observed in one (9.1%). There were no cases of open conversion, tumor spillage, bleeding, flap injury, or tumor recurrence. In conclusion, robotic BABA thyroidectomy may be a safe treatment option for large-sized thyroid tumors that carries no significant increase in complication rates.© 2024. The Author(s).
[14]
Kang J, Lee JH, Kim YY, et al. Analysis of initial experience of robotic bilateral axillo-breast approach thyroidectomy for 30 months[J]. J Endocr Surg, 2023, 23(2):47-58. DOI: 10.16956/jes.2023.23.2.47.
[15]
Kim JK, Lee CR, Kang SW, et al. Expansion of thyroid surgical territory through 10,000 cases under the da Vinci robotic knife[J]. Sci Rep, 2024, 14(1):7555. DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-57163-2.
With the progress of robotic transaxillary thyroid surgery (RTTS), the indications for this procedure have gradually expanded. This study presents the insights gained from performing 10,000 RTTS cases at a single institution, along with the expansion of indications over time. RTTS was performed on 10,000 patients using the da Vinci robot system between October 2007 and April 2023 at the Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea. Among 10,000 patients, 9461 (94.0%) were diagnosed with thyroid cancer, whereas 539 (5.4%) had either a benign thyroid nodule or Graves' disease. Surgical procedures were performed using four-arm-based robots (da Vinci S, Si, or Xi) for 8408 cases (84.1%), with the remaining 1592 cases (15.9%) being performed using the da Vinci SP surgical robotic system. Notably, for 53 patients with nodules ≥ 5 cm, which were not included in the eligibility criteria of the previous study, RTTS was performed safely without significant complications. The most common postoperative complication was transient hypoparathyroidism (37.91%), and recurrence occurred in 100 patients with thyroid cancer (1.1%). In conclusion, RTTS appears safe and feasible from both surgical and oncological perspectives, and the spectrum of indications suitable for RTTS surgery is progressively expanding.© 2024. The Author(s).
[16]
Kim MJ, Nam KH, Lee SG, et al. Yonsei experience of 5000 gasless transaxillary robotic thyroidectomies[J]. World J Surg, 2018, 42(2):393-401.DOI: 10.1007/s00268-017-4209-y.
Since the use of robot systems in thyroid surgery was introduced in 2007, we have advanced a novel method of robotic thyroidectomy (RT) using a gasless transaxillary approach (TAA). We report our experience with this technique and detail the surgical outcome of 5000 robotic thyroidectomies.From October 2007 to May 2016, we successfully performed 5000 robotic thyroidectomies using a gasless TAA at the Department of Surgery, Yonsei University Health System. The medical records of the patients are reviewed retrospectively, and the details of clinicopathologic characteristics, operation times, perioperative complications, and oncologic outcomes are analyzed.The 5000 patients with thyroid tumor (4804 with cancer and 196 with benign tumor) underwent RT using a gasless TAA. Mean operation time was 134.5 ± 122.0 min. The most common histologic subtype of thyroid cancer was papillary (98%), and the mean tumor size was 8.0 ± 6.0 mm. Stage I was found in 85.4% patients regarding tumor nodes metastasis staging. The 196 benign tumors consisted of 104 adenomatous hyperplasias (53.0%), 43 follicular adenomas (21.9%), 30 Graves' diseases (15.3%), and 19 others (9.7%). Postoperative complication occurred in 24.1% without any serious one, and overall morbidity tended to decrease over time. No disease-specific mortality was observed during the follow-up period. Locoregional recurrence was developed in 26 patients (0.5%).The authors have tried to improve RT technique using gasless TAA and achieved acceptable surgical outcomes. The rapid evolution of surgical robot technology and our constant effort to advance RT technique using gasless TAA would make it possible to reduce the perioperative morbidity and gain the best possible operative and oncologic outcomes.
[17]
Kim JK, Lee CR, Kang SW, et al. Robotic transaxillary lateral neck dissection for thyroid cancer: Learning experience from 500 cases[J]. Surg Endosc, 2022, 36(4):2436-2444. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08526-7.
[18]
Kim JK, Choi SH, Choi SM, et al. Single-port transaxillary robotic thyroidectomy(START):200-cases with two-step retraction method[J]. Surg Endosc, 2022, 36(4):2688-2696.DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08837-9.
[19]
Kang IK, Park J, Bae JS, et al. Safety and feasibility of single-port trans-axillary robotic thyroidectomy: Experience through consecutive 100 cases[J]. Medicina(Kaunas), 2022, 58(10):1486. DOI: 10.3390/medicina58101486.
[20]
Oh MY, Park D, Chai YJ, et al. Transoral robotic thyroidectomy: Lessons learned from consecutive series of 1,000 patients[J]. Surgery, 2024, 176(6):1627-1634.DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.08.005.
[21]
Kang YJ, Cho JH, Stybayeva G, et al. Safety and efficacy of transoral robotic thyroidectomy for thyroid tumor: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Cancers(Basel), 2022, 14(17):4230.DOI: 10.3390/cancers14174230.
[22]
Nguyen VC, Song CM, Ji YB, et al. Comparison of surgical outcomes of transoral robotic and endoscopic thyroidectomy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis[J]. Head Neck, 2024, 46(3):688-701.DOI: 10.1002/hed.27644.
[23]
Kim D, Sim NS, Kim D, et al. Robot-assisted total thyroidectomy with or without robot-assisted neck dissection in pediatric patients with differentiated thyroid cancer[J]. J Clin Med, 2022, 11(12):3320.DOI: 10.3390/jcm11123320.
Pediatric thyroid cancer more frequently develops cervical node metastasis than adult thyroid cancer, even in differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC). Thus, cervical neck dissection often needs to be performed simultaneously with thyroidectomy in pediatric patients. Herein, we describe our experience with robot-assisted total thyroidectomy with/without robot-assisted neck dissection in pediatric patients compared with the conventional operated group. A total of 30 pediatric patients who underwent thyroidectomy for DTC between July 2011 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Among them, 22 underwent robot-assisted operation, whereas 8 underwent conventional operation. There was no statistical difference in the mean operation times, blood loss, drainage amounts, and hospital stay length between the robot-assisted and conventional operation groups; however, the operation time was less in the retroauricular approach subgroup (robot-assisted operation group) with better satisfaction on cosmesis. No postoperative complications, such as seromas, hemorrhages, or hematomas were observed. Our experience suggested that robot-assisted thyroidectomy with or without neck dissection through the retroauricular approach is a feasible and safe alternative treatment, producing outstanding esthetic results compared to the conventional approach, especially in pediatric patients with DTC.
[24]
Lee SG, Lee J, Kim MJ, et al. Long-term oncologic outcome of robotic versus open total thyroidectomy in papillary thyroid carcinoma: A case-matched retrospective study[J]. Surg Endosc, 2016, 30(8):3474-3479.DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4632-9.
[25]
Tae K, Song CM, Ji YB, et al. Oncologic outcomes of robotic thyroidectomy: 5-year experience with propensity score matching[J]. Surg Endosc, 2016, 30(11):4785-4792. DOI:10.1007/s00464-016-4808-y.
The oncologic outcome of robotic thyroidectomy is not yet well established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the recurrence rate after robotic thyroidectomy in comparison with conventional thyroidectomy for papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC).We analyzed 896 patients with PTC who either underwent robotic (212 patients using a gasless unilateral axillary or an axillo-breast approach) or conventional cervical thyroidectomy (684 patients) with/without central neck dissection between October 2008 and February 2014. We excluded patients who underwent concomitant lateral neck dissection or completion thyroidectomy, and cases with T4 tumor, tumor lager than 4 cm, other types of thyroid cancer, recurrent cancer, and distant metastasis. A propensity score matching analysis was done with ten covariates including age, gender, body mass index, tumor size, multifocality, bilaterality, extrathyroidal extension, type of thyroidectomy, extent of central neck dissection, and RAI ablation to reduce selection bias.In baseline data, the male ratio and the mean age were lower in the robotic group. Stage, multifocality, and bilaterality were higher in the conventional group. The rate of total thyroidectomy was higher in the conventional group. The two matched groups of each 185 patients were produced and well balanced by propensity score matching. In the comparison of propensity score matched groups, operative time was longer in the robotic group (P < 0.001), and postoperative complications did not differ between the two groups, except for transient hypoparathyroidism and formation of seroma. The recurrence rate did not differ between the two groups after a mean follow-up of 43.6 months (0.5 and 1.1 % in the robotic and conventional groups, respectively, P = 0.375).The oncologic outcome of robotic thyroidectomy in 5-year experience is comparable to that of conventional thyroidectomy in selected patients with PTC.
[26]
Nguyen VC, Lee DW, Song CM, et al. Oncologic outcomes and surgical completeness of remote-access thyroidectomy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2024, 409(1):117.DOI:10.1007/s00423-024-03316-w.
[27]
Ban EJ, Yoo JY, Kim WW, et al. Surgical complications after robotic thyroidectomy for thyroid carcinoma: A single center experience with 3,000 patients[J]. Surg Endosc, 2014, 28(9):2555-2563. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3502-1.
Robotic thyroidectomy (RT), a new gasless, transaxillary approach developed by the Yonsei University group in Seoul, Korea, eliminates the need for a cervical incision. Since RT is technically complex and has a steep learning curve, the surgical complication rate may initially be higher than with conventional surgery. This study evaluated the complication rates of transaxillary RT and assessed ways to prevent surgical complications.Between October 2007 and March 2013, 3,000 patients underwent RT for thyroid cancer in the Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine at Severance Hospital, Seoul. The medical records of these patients were reviewed retrospectively, and surgical complications were assessed on the basis of clinical findings.The most common surgical complication was symptomatic hypocalcemia, of which 37.43 % cases were transient and 1.10 % permanent. Other surgical complications included recurrent laryngeal nerve injury (1.23 % transient, 0.27 % permanent), seroma (1.73 %), hematoma (0.37 %), chyle leakage (0.37 %), trachea injury (0.2 %), Horner's syndrome (0.03 %), carotid artery injury (0.03 %), and brachiocephalic vein injury (0.03 %). The technique-related complications, which were never seen in conventional open thyroidectomy, were axillary skin flap perforation (0.1 %), and traction injury of the arm on the side the lesion was located (0.13 %).Surgeons who have mastered standardized robotic surgical procedures and who understand potential complications and how to prevent them can perform RT safely.
[28]
Jackson NR, Yao L, Tufano RP, et al. Safety of robotic thyroidectomy approaches: Meta-analysis and systematic review[J]. Head Neck, 2014, 36(1):137-143. DOI: 10.1002/hed.23223.
This study compared the efficacy of robotic thyroidectomy via a gasless, axillary approach with conventional cervical and endoscopic techniques by meta‐analysis.
[29]
Ouyang H, Xue W, Zhang Z, et al. Learning curve for robotic thyroidectomy using BABA: CUSUM analysis of a single surgeon’s experience[J]. Front Endocrinol(Lausanne), 2022, 13:942973. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.942973.
[30]
Kim KH, Ji YB, Song CM, et al. Learning curve of transoral robotic thyroidectomy[J]. Surg Endosc, 2023, 37(1):535-543.DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09549-4.
[31]
Berber E, Bernet V, Fahey TJ 3rd, et al. American Thyroid Association statement on remote-access thyroid surgery[J]. Thyroid, 2016, 26(3):331-337.DOI: 10.1089/thy.2015.0407.
Remote-access techniques have been described over the recent years as a method of removing the thyroid gland without an incision in the neck. However, there is confusion related to the number of techniques available and the ideal patient selection criteria for a given technique. The aims of this review were to develop a simple classification of these approaches, describe the optimal patient selection criteria, evaluate the outcomes objectively, and define the barriers to adoption.A review of the literature was performed to identify the described techniques. A simple classification was developed. Technical details, outcomes, and the learning curve were described. Expert opinion consensus was formulated regarding recommendations for patient selection and performance of remote-access thyroid surgery.Remote-access thyroid procedures can be categorized into endoscopic or robotic breast, bilateral axillo-breast, axillary, and facelift approaches. The experience in the United States involves the latter two techniques. The limited data in the literature suggest long operative times, a steep learning curve, and higher costs with remote-access thyroid surgery compared with conventional thyroidectomy. Nevertheless, a consensus was reached that, in appropriate hands, it can be a viable option for patients with unilateral small nodules who wish to avoid a neck incision.Remote-access thyroidectomy has a role in a small group of patients who fit strict selection criteria. These approaches require an additional level of expertise, and therefore should be done by surgeons performing a high volume of thyroid and robotic surgery.
[32]
Yu HW, Chung JW, Yi JW, et al. Intraoperative localization of the parathyroid glands with indocyanine green and Firefly technology during BABA robotic thyroidectomy[J]. Surg Endosc, 2017, 31(7):3020-3027.DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-5330-y.
[33]
Dabaghi E, Berber E. An update on the use of near-infrared autofluorescence imaging in endocrine surgical procedures[J]. J Surg Oncol, 2024, 129(1):40-47. DOI: 10.1002/jso.27541.
Over the past decade, near‐infrared autofluorescence (NIRAF) imaging has been a major breakthrough in endocrine surgery. Although initial focus was directed at the parathyroid glands, subsequent work has also shown that non‐parathyroid neuroendocrine tumors also possess autofluorescence properties. The aim of this review is to present an update and synopsis about NIRAF applications in various endocrine surgical procedures. Methodology includes a review of the literature supplemented with expert opinion. Overall, our review reveals that the use of NIRAF may provide the surgeon with adjunctive critical information that has the potential to change the conduct of many various endocrine surgical procedures.
[34]
Park J, Kim K. Current and future of robotic surgery in thyroid cancer treatment[J]. Cancers(Basel), 2024, 16(13):2470.DOI: 10.3390/cancers16132470.
[35]
Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer[J]. Thyroid, 2016, 26(1):1-133. DOI: 10.1089/thy.2015.0020.
Thyroid nodules are a common clinical problem, and differentiated thyroid cancer is becoming increasingly prevalent. Since the American Thyroid Association's (ATA's) guidelines for the management of these disorders were revised in 2009, significant scientific advances have occurred in the field. The aim of these guidelines is to inform clinicians, patients, researchers, and health policy makers on published evidence relating to the diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer.The specific clinical questions addressed in these guidelines were based on prior versions of the guidelines, stakeholder input, and input of task force members. Task force panel members were educated on knowledge synthesis methods, including electronic database searching, review and selection of relevant citations, and critical appraisal of selected studies. Published English language articles on adults were eligible for inclusion. The American College of Physicians Guideline Grading System was used for critical appraisal of evidence and grading strength of recommendations for therapeutic interventions. We developed a similarly formatted system to appraise the quality of such studies and resultant recommendations. The guideline panel had complete editorial independence from the ATA. Competing interests of guideline task force members were regularly updated, managed, and communicated to the ATA and task force members.The revised guidelines for the management of thyroid nodules include recommendations regarding initial evaluation, clinical and ultrasound criteria for fine-needle aspiration biopsy, interpretation of fine-needle aspiration biopsy results, use of molecular markers, and management of benign thyroid nodules. Recommendations regarding the initial management of thyroid cancer include those relating to screening for thyroid cancer, staging and risk assessment, surgical management, radioiodine remnant ablation and therapy, and thyrotropin suppression therapy using levothyroxine. Recommendations related to long-term management of differentiated thyroid cancer include those related to surveillance for recurrent disease using imaging and serum thyroglobulin, thyroid hormone therapy, management of recurrent and metastatic disease, consideration for clinical trials and targeted therapy, as well as directions for future research.We have developed evidence-based recommendations to inform clinical decision-making in the management of thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. They represent, in our opinion, contemporary optimal care for patients with these disorders.
[36]
Yi KH, Lee EK, Kang HC, et al. 2016 Revised Korean Thyroid Association management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and thyroid cancer[J]. Int J Thyroidol, 2016, 9(2):59-126. DOI: 10.11106/ijt.2016.9.2.59.
[37]
Ito Y, Miyauchi A, Kihara M, et al. Patient age is significantly related to the progression of papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid under observation[J]. Thyroid, 2014, 24(1):27-34. DOI: 10.1089/thy.2013.0367.
We showed previously that subclinical low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC) could be observed without immediate surgery. Patient age is an important prognostic factor of clinical papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). In this study, we investigated how patient age influences the observation of low-risk PTMC.Between 1993 and 2011, 1235 patients with low-risk PTMC chose observation without immediate surgery. They were followed periodically with ultrasound examinations. These patients were enrolled in this study. We divided them into three subsets based on age at the beginning of observation: young (<40 years), middle-aged (40-59 years), and old patients (≥60 years). Observation periods ranged from 18 to 227 months (average 75 months).We set three parameters for the evaluation of PTMC progression: (i) size enlargement, (ii) novel appearance of lymph-node metastasis, and (iii) progression to clinical disease (tumor size reaching 12 mm or larger, or novel appearance of nodal metastasis). The proportion of patients with PTMC progression was lowest in the old patients and highest in the young patients. On multivariate analysis, young age was an independent predictor of PTMC progression. However, none of the 1235 patients showed distant metastasis or died of PTC during observation. Although only 51 patients (4%) underwent thyrotropin (TSH) suppression based on physician preference, the PTMC of all patients enrolled in this TSH suppression study, except one, were clinically stable. To date, 191 patients underwent surgery for various reasons after observation. None showed recurrence except for one in the residual thyroid, and none died of PTC after surgery.Old patients with subclinical low-risk PTMC may be the best candidates for observation. Although PTMC in young patients may be more progressive than in older patients, it might not be too late to perform surgery after subclinical PTMC has progressed to clinical disease, regardless of patient age.
[38]
Tuttle RM, Fagin JA, Minkowitz G, et al. Natural history and tumor volume kinetics of papillary thyroid cancers during active surveillance[J]. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2017, 143(10):1015-1020. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2017.1442.
[39]
Tong M, Li S, Li Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of radiofrequency, microwave and laser ablation for treating papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Int J Hyperthermia, 2019, 36(1):1278-1286. DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2019.1700559.
[40]
Yan L, Lan Y, Xiao J, et al. The efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation for bilateral papillary thyroid microcarcinoma[J]. Front Endocrinol(Lausanne), 2021, 12:663636.DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.663636.
[41]
Zhao Z, Liang N, Fu Q, et al. Safety and feasibility of bilateral axillo-breast approach robotic thyroidectomy: Experience of 232 cases in China[J]. Front Surg, 2022, 9:821882.DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.821882.
[42]
Kang YJ, Shin SH, Cho JH, et al. Surgical safety and effectiveness of bilateral axillo-breast approach robotic thyroidectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol, 2024, 90(3):101400.DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2023.101400.

Footnotes

利益冲突 所有作者均声明不存在利益冲突

感谢上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院普外科严佶祺教授对本文的翻译和编校工作。感谢梨花女子大学首尔医院(Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital)与中央大学医院的手术团队、护理人员、麻醉科医师及全体参与研究的病人。感谢HIRA提供全国理赔数据,以及直观医疗韩国(Intuitive Surgical Korea)提供机构登记数据。特别感谢高丽大学医学院九老医院乳腺与内分泌外科临床助理教授Yong Yeup Kim医师提供2006—2022年全国甲状腺切除术趋势的HIRA理赔数据,本文图1图2即基于该数据绘制。

PDF(2165 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/