Application of ultrasonic volume auto-scan in the diagnosis and treatment of elderly abdominal incisional hernia

QIU Zhi-ying, LI Shao-jie, TANG Jian-xiong, FANG Liang, CHEN Lin

Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4) : 497-502.

PDF(2053 KB)
PDF(2053 KB)
Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4) : 497-502. DOI: 10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2026.04.19

Application of ultrasonic volume auto-scan in the diagnosis and treatment of elderly abdominal incisional hernia

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective To explore the application of ultrasonic volume auto-scan (UVAS) in the classification, diagnosis, and treatment of abdominal incisional hernia. Methods Using a prospective, randomized, and single-blind study design, The study subjects were 46 elderly patients with abdominal wall incisional hernia recruited from the Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, from August 2023 to December 2024. totally 56 abdominal wall defects (hernia rings), were recruited based on inclusion criteria. UVAS was employed to measure the width, area, and hernia sac volume (HSV) of the hernia rings. The consistency between these measurements and the HSV determined by CT was evaluated. Additionally, the ultrasound-based classification diagnosis of incisional hernia was compared with the surgical diagnosis. Results The average ratio of UVAS and CT measurements for HSV values was 1.007, which was close to 1. Only 1.79% (1/56) of the points fall outside the 95% consistency bounds 0.997-1.026, which showed good consistency between the two methods in measuring HSV. Based on the location and width of the abdominal wall defect, UVAS preoperative classification diagnosis showed a good accuracy rate (94.6%, 98.2%), achieving good consistency with postoperative diagnosis (K=0.86, 95%CI 0.718-0.996; K=0.95, 95%CI 0.887-0.999). In large and giant incisional hernias, the mesh size is 2 to 9 times the area of the abdominal wall defect measured by UVAS. Conclusion UVAS could accurately diagnose and measure the width, area, and HSV of abdominal incisional hernia, perform preoperative classification and localization, have the advantages of no radiation hazard and instant report provision and provide detailed and reliable data and imaging information for comprehensive preoperative evaluation of elderly patients with incisional hernia.

Key words

ultrasonic volume auto-scan / elderly / incisional hernia / abdominal wall defect / hernia sac volume

Cite this article

Download Citations
QIU Zhi-ying , LI Shao-jie , TANG Jian-xiong , et al . Application of ultrasonic volume auto-scan in the diagnosis and treatment of elderly abdominal incisional hernia[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery. 2026, 46(4): 497-502 https://doi.org/10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2026.04.19

References

[1]
Erstoep L, de Smet GHJ, Sneiders D, et al. Hernia width explains differences in outcomes between primary and incisional hernias: a prospective cohort study of 9159 patients[J]. Hernia, 2021, 25(2):463-469. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-020-02340-1.
[2]
Manoharan S, Liu G, Crump RT, et al. Incisional hernia repair surgery improves patient reported outcomes[J]. Am J Surg, 2020, 219(5):874-878. DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.03.027.
[3]
Melland-Smith M, Khan U, Smith L, et al. Comparison of two fascial defect closure methods for laparoscopic incisional hernia repair[J]. Hernia, 2022, 26(3): 945-951. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-021-02443-3.
[4]
Decker E, Currie A, Baig MK. Prolene hernia system versus Lichtenstein repair for inguinal hernia: A Meta-analysis[J]. Hernia, 2019, 23(3): 541-546. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-019-01897-w.
[5]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组, 中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科专家工作组. 腹壁切口疝诊疗指南(2024版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2025, 45(2): 128-136. DOI:10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2025.02.02.
[6]
Beck WC, Holzman MD, Sharp KW, et al. Comparative effectiveness of dynamic abdominal sonography for hernia vs computed tomography in the diagnosis of incisional hernia[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2013, 216(3):447-453. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.11.012.
[7]
Emily Harris. Radiation from CT scans in young people tied to higher cancer risk[J]. JAMA, 2023, 330(22): 2146. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2023.22935.
[8]
裘之瑛, 陈悦, 常才. 比较自动超声容积断层扫描和传统超声检查在腹外疝诊断分类中的应用价值[J]. 中国超声医学杂, 2012, 28(5): P446-449.
[9]
Den Hartog D, Dur AH, Kamphuis AG, et al. Comparison of ultrasonography with computed tomography in the diagnosis of incisional hernias[J]. Hernia, 2009, 13(1):45-48. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-008-0420-y.
[10]
Al-Mansour MR, Wu J, Gagnon G, et al. Linear versus volumetric CT analysis in predicting tension-free fascial closure in abdominal wall reconstruction[J]. Hernia, 2021, 25(1): 91-98. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-020-02349-6.
[11]
Sima O, De Vismes Ott A, Dias MS, et al. Consistency test of coincidence-summing calculation methods for extended sources[J]. Appl Radiat Isot, 2020, 155(1): 108921. DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2019.108921.
[12]
William CB, Michael DH, Kenneth WS, et al. Comparative effectiveness of dynamic abdominal sonography for hernia vs computed tomography in the diagnosis of incisional hernia[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2013, 216(3):447-452. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.11.012.
[13]
Bloemen A, van Dooren P, Huizinga BF, et al. Comparison of ultrasonography and physical examination in the diagnosis of incisional hernia in a prospective study[J]. Hernia, 2012, 16(1): 53-57. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-011-0865-2.
[14]
Cingi A, Solmaz A, Attaallah W, et al. Enterostomy closure site hernias: a clinical and ultrasonographic evaluation[J]. Hernia, 2008, 12(4): 401-405. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-008-0355-3.
[15]
李健文, 张云, 乐飞. 腹腔镜腹壁切口疝修复术中腹壁功能重建[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2024, 29(4): 285-291. DOI:10.16139/j.1007-9610.2024.04.02.
[16]
Muysoms FE, Miserez M, Berrevoet F, et al. Classification of primary and incisional abdominal wall hernias[J]. Hernia, 2009, 13(4): 407-414. DOI:10.1007/s10029-009-0518-x.
[17]
疝修补术后腹腔间隔室综合征预防与处理专家共识编写委员会, 广东省医师协会疝与腹壁外科医师分会. 疝修补术后腹腔间隔室综合征预防与处理中国专家共识(2022版)[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2022, 31(12):1578-1589. DOI: 10.7659/j.issn.1005-6947.2022.12.004.
[18]
托呼提阿吉·依干木, 艾斯卡尔·艾沙. 腹壁巨大切口疝病者的术前评估及准备分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2014, 8(5):441-443. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2014.05.014.
[19]
汤福鑫, 李英儒, 杨伟胜, 等. 术前渐进性气腹在老年腹壁巨大切口疝修补术中的应用价值[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(2): 105-110. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2019.02.003.
[20]
Holzmer S, DeCino A, McCarthy M, et al. Preoperative progressive pneumoperitoneum for incisional hernia repair with loss of domain[J]. Am Surg, 2018, 84(5): 748-749. PMID: 29966579.

Footnotes

利益冲突 所有作者均声明不存在利益冲突

Funding

Fund Shanghai Municipal Health Commission Clinical Research Project(202340140)
Shanghai Hospital Development Center Research-Oriented Physician Innovation and Translation Capacity Training Program(SHDC2022CRD021)
PDF(2053 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/