Comparative analysis of surgical procedures for recurrent inguinal hernia repair and risk factors for postoperative complications: a multicenter retrospective study

WANG Dian-chen, BO Peng-fei, SHANG Teng-fei, ZHENG Wei, HU De-sheng, ZHANG Jian-song, SU Bao-wei, LEI Ting, HOU Sen, GAO Lei, ZHANG Hui, FU Yang

Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4) : 480-486.

PDF(1308 KB)
PDF(1308 KB)
Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4) : 480-486. DOI: 10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2026.04.16

Comparative analysis of surgical procedures for recurrent inguinal hernia repair and risk factors for postoperative complications: a multicenter retrospective study

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective To compare outcomes of open and laparoscopic repair for recurrent inguinal hernia and identify risk factors of postoperative complications. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 94 patients with recurrent inguinal hernia who underwent tension-free repair at The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou Central Hospital, Xuchang Central Hospital and Luoyang Central Hospital between January and December 2023. Hernia defect diameter, hernia position, hernia type, repair method, operation time, urinary retention, wound infection, hematoma, seroma and hospital stay were recorded. Follow-up included hernia recurrence, chronic pain, foreign body sensation and quality of life. Results Twenty-one patients underwent open repair, and 73 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery. Postoperatively, urinary retention occurred in 10 patients, surgical site infection occurred in 4, hematoma occurred in 5, and seroma occurred in 6. Follow-up was completed on 89 patients, among whom 4 experienced recurrence, 8 had chronic pain, and 14 reported foreign body sensation. The 36-item short-form general survey questionnaire (SF-36) score was 24 (21, 26). Sixty-five patients had undergone open surgery previously, of whom 59 received laparoscopic repair in the current operation. Twenty-four patients had undergone laparoscopic surgery previously, of whom 14 underwent open surgery in the current operation. Six patients underwent open surgery twice, and 10 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery twice. The SF-36 score was significantly higher in patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery twice than in those who underwent open surgery twice (P=0.042). There were statistically significant differences between the laparoscopic and open surgery groups in the proportion of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification, hernia ring diameter and length of hospital stay(P<0.001、<0.001、=0.002). Univariate analysis revealed that for patients with recurrent inguinal hernia, the presence of coronary heart disease, BPH and advanced age were risk factors for postoperative recurrence (P=0.012, 0.021, 0.043). Bilateral hernia was a risk factor for chronic postoperative pain (P=0.021), while lower ASA classification and the occurrence of seroma during the perioperative period were risk factors for postoperative foreign body sensation (P=0.021, <0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that seroma was an independent risk factor for postoperative foreign body sensation (OR=35.482, 95%CI 3.491-360.585, P=0.003). Conclusion The efficacy of laparoscopic surgery and open surgery in treating recurrent inguinal hernia is comparable. For elderly patients with comorbid coronary heart disease and BPH, thorough evaluation and management are required to reduce recurrence risk; bilateral hernia patients may benefit from multimodal analgesia postoperatively; measures should be taken to prevent seroma formation and minimize foreign body sensation.

Key words

recurrent inguinal hernia / laparoscopic repair / open repair / risk factor / postoperative complication

Cite this article

Download Citations
WANG Dian-chen , BO Peng-fei , SHANG Teng-fei , et al . Comparative analysis of surgical procedures for recurrent inguinal hernia repair and risk factors for postoperative complications: a multicenter retrospective study[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery. 2026, 46(4): 480-486 https://doi.org/10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2026.04.16

References

[1]
Yang C, Deng S. Laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for the treatment of recurrent inguinal hernia: A systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Ann Palliat Med, 2020, 9(3): 1164-1173. DOI: 10.21037/apm-20-968.
[2]
Spencer Netto FAC, Mainprize M, Yilbas A, et al. Surgical aspects and early morbidity of patients undergoing open recurrent inguinal hernia repair[J]. Hernia, 2023, 27(5): 1225-1233. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-023-02801-3.
[3]
Li X, Xu L, Zhang J, et al. Clinical comparison of modified TEP technique with open preperitoneal approach and transabdominal preperitoneal repair for recurrent inguinal hernia[J]. Minerva Gastroenterol, 2023, 69(3): 453-455. DOI: 10.23736/S2724-5985.23.03399-5.
[4]
Fernandez-Alberti J, Iriarte F, Croceri RE, et al. Laparoscopic treatment(reTAPP) for recurrence after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair[J]. Hernia, 2021, 25(5): 1301-1307. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-020-02357-6.
[5]
Awad PBA, Hassan BHA, Kashwaa MFA, et al. A comparative study between open pre-peritoneal approach versus laparoscopic trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal approach in recurrent inguinal hernia repair: A prospective cohort study[J]. Hernia, 2024, 28(2): 629-635. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-024-02967-4.
[6]
HerniaSurge Group. International guidelines for groin hernia management[J]. Hernia, 2018, 22(1): 1-165. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-017-1668-x.
[7]
Liu Y, Zhu Y, Cao J, et al. Clinical value of the laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal technique in recurrent inguinal hernia repair[J]. Asian J Surg, 2020, 43(10): 986-990. DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2019.12.004.
[8]
李琦, 孟祥朝, 孙惠军. 不同手术方法对复发性腹股沟疝的疗效分析[J]. 山西医药杂志, 2022, 51(9): 1018-1020. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-9926.2022.09.016.
[9]
Rönkä K, Vironen J, Kössi J, et al. Randomized multicenter trial comparing glue fixation,self-gripping mesh,and suture fixation of mesh in lichtenstein hernia repair (FinnMesh study)[J]. Ann Surg, 2015, 262(5): 714-720. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001458.
[10]
Lovisetto F, Zonta S, Rota E, et al. Use of human fibrin glue (Tissucol) versus staples for mesh fixation in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty: A prospective,randomized study[J]. Ann Surg, 2007, 245(2): 222-231. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000245832.59478.c6.
[11]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组, 中华医学会外科学分会腹腔镜与内镜外科学组, 大中华腔镜疝外科学院. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术焦点问题中国专家共识(1)—术式选择[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2023, 43(6): 631-645. DOI: 10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2023.06.03.
[12]
Eklund A, Rudberg C, Leijonmarck CE, et al. Recurrent inguinal hernia: randomized multicenter trial comparing laparoscopic and Lichtenstein repair[J]. Surg Endosc, 2007, 21(4):634-640. DOI:10.1007/s00464-006-9163-y.
[13]
Cowan B, Kvale M, Yin J, et al. Risk factors for inguinal hernia repair among US adults[J]. Hernia, 2023, 27(6): 1507-1514. DOI:10.1007/s10029-023-02913-w.
[14]
Lee CS, Kim JH, Choi BJ, et al. Retrospective study on prevalence of recurrent inguinal hernia: a large-scale multi-institutional study[J]. Ann Surg Treat Res, 2020, 98(1): 51-55. DOI:10.4174/astr.2020.98.1.51.
[15]
Wu YH, Juan YS, Shen JT, et al. Lower urinary tract symptoms-Benign prostatic hyperplasia may increase the risk of subsequent inguinal hernia in a Taiwanese population: A nationwide population-Based cohort study[J]. PLoS One, 2020, 15(6): e0234329. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0234329.
[16]
Gholghesaei M, Langeveld HR, Veldkamp R, et al. Costs and quality of life after endoscopic repair of inguinal hernia vs open tension-free repair: A review[J]. Surg Endosc, 2005, 19(6): 816-821. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-004-8949-z.
[17]
Tazaki T, Sasaki M, Kohyama M, et al. A single surgeon's experience of 1000 consecutive transabdominal preperitoneal repair cases and measures to prevent recurrence[J]. Int J Abdom Wall Hernia Surg, 2022, 5(2): 69-76. DOI: 10.4103/IJAWhs.IJAWHS_80_21.
[18]
Reinpold WM, Nehls J, Eggert A. Nerve management and chronic pain after open inguinal hernia repair: a prospective two phase study[J]. Ann Surg, 2011, 254(1): 163-168. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000466.
[19]
Liu Y, Zhou M, Zhu X, et al. Risk and protective factors for chronic pain following inguinal hernia repair: A retrospective study[J]. J Anesth, 2020, 34(3): 330-337. DOI:10.1007/s00540-020-02743-5.
[20]
Aiolfi A, Cavalli M, Ferraro SD, et al. Treatment of inguinal hernia: Systematic review and updated network Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Ann Surg, 2021, 274(6): 954-961. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004735.
[21]
van Dijk JFM, Zaslansky R, van Boekel RLM, et al. Postoperative pain and age: A retrospective cohort association study[J]. Anesthesiology, 2021, 135(6): 1104-1119. DOI:10.1097/ALN.0000000000004000.
[22]
Foley C, Kendall MC, Apruzzese P, et al. American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification as a reliable predictor of postoperative medical complications and mortality following ambulatory surgery: An analysis of 2,089,830 ACS-NSQIP outpatient cases[J]. BMC Surg, 2021, 21(1): 253. DOI:10.1186/s12893-021-01256-6.
[23]
Reddy VM, Sutton CD, Bloxham L, et al. Laparoscopic repair of direct inguinal hernia: A new technique that reduces the development of postoperative seroma[J]. Hernia, 2007, 11(5): 393-396. DOI:10.1007/s10029-007-0233-4.
[24]
Morales-Conde S. A new classification for seroma after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair[J]. Hernia, 2012, 16(3): 261-267. DOI:10.1007/s10029-012-0911-8.
[25]
Oliveira Trindade B, Marcolin P, Brandao GR, et al. Heavyweight versus non-heavyweight mesh in ventral hernia repair: A systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Hernia, 2024, 28(2): 291-300. DOI:10.1007/s10029-023-02865-1.

Footnotes

利益冲突 所有作者均声明不存在利益冲突

Funding

The Joint Fund of Henan Provincial Research and Development Program for Science and Technology(242301420008)
PDF(1308 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/