Medical imaging in the era of digitalization and intelligentization facilitates the high-quality development of general surgery

WANG Hao, ZHAO Peng-fei, LV HAN, YANG Zheng-han, WANG Zhen-chang

Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (1) : 11-14.

PDF(1335 KB)
PDF(1335 KB)
Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (1) : 11-14. DOI: 10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2026.01.03

Medical imaging in the era of digitalization and intelligentization facilitates the high-quality development of general surgery

Author information +
History +

Abstract

In the era of digitalization and intelligentization, medical imaging is advancing rapidly across seven key dimensions: flexible image visualization, microscopic-level resolution, clinical application of functional imaging, quantification of metabolic imaging, visualization of molecular imaging, intelligent image diagnosis, and multimodal image fusion. By analyzing these advancements, this article aims to reveal their empowering value for general surgery across the entire workflow, from precise preoperative assessment and real-time intraoperative navigation to intelligent postoperative management. Furthermore, it looks forward to future trends such as interdisciplinary integration, data-driven approaches, and the integration of diagnosis and treatment.

Key words

digitalization and intelligentization / medical imaging / artificial intelligence / radiomics / surgical navigation / precision surgery

Cite this article

Download Citations
WANG Hao , ZHAO Peng-fei , LV HAN , et al . Medical imaging in the era of digitalization and intelligentization facilitates the high-quality development of general surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery. 2026, 46(1): 11-14 https://doi.org/10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2026.01.03

References

[1]
Tavakoli N, Shakeri Z, Gowda V, et al. Generative AI and foundation models in radiology: applications, opportunities, and potential challenges[J]. Radiology, 2025, 317(2):e242961. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.242961.
[2]
骈文婷, 张得志, 张伯生. MSCT多平面重建在结肠癌术前诊断与邻近组织侵犯评估中的价值[J]. 国际放射医学核医学杂志, 2025, 49(7):430-435. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn121381-202504024-00559.
[3]
潘银梅, 高谞杰. 多层螺旋CT对腹股沟疝的分型鉴别及应用价值[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(2):158-161. DOI:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2022.02.006.
[4]
张峻岭, 郭小超, 刘婧, 等. 术前多层螺旋CT血管成像评价右半结肠血管解剖在腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术中的应用价值[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2019, 57(12):927-933.DOI:10.3760cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2019.12.011.
[5]
王冬, 李欣, 郭志芹, 等. 多层螺旋CT检查壁外血管侵犯对Ⅲ期结肠癌病人预后的临床价值[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2016, 15(8):802-808.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-9752.2016.08.009.
[6]
王振常, 张鹏, 吕晗, 等. 树立多要素关联诊断新理念提升医学影像学在临床诊疗中的价值[J]. 国际医学放射学杂志, 2021, 44(5): 497-500. DOI: 10.19300/j.2021.S19394.
[7]
杨大为, 董雪, 张婧璇, 等. MR成像在肝细胞癌诊断与生物学行为评估的研究进展[J]. 中国研究型医院, 2023, 10(6):6-15. DOI:10.19450/j.cnki.jcrh.2023.06.002.
[8]
Marrero JA, Kulik LM, Sirlin CB, et al. Diagnosis, staging, and management of hepatocellular carcinoma: 2018 practice guidance by the American Association for the study of liver diseases[J]. Hepatology, 2018, 68(2):723-750. DOI: 10.1002/hep.29913.
[9]
居胜红, 于谦. 肝硬化门静脉高压和失代偿风险影像评估[J]. 国际医学放射学杂志, 2023, 46(4):373-377. DOI:10.19300/j.2023.S20750.
影像方法在门静脉高压的无创诊断中具有潜在的应用前景。近年来,通过计算机辅助和人工智能技术,影像方法在评估门静脉高压及其相关并发症方面取得了显著进展。阐述基于肝静脉压力梯度的肝硬化门静脉高压诊治体系,门静脉高压无创诊疗的现状、重要进展和发展机遇。基于影像的无创门静脉高压诊断将为病人提供更便捷和可行的评估手段,并为临床医生提供更准确的诊断和治疗决策支持。
[10]
Sartoris R, Rautou PE, Elkrief L, et al. Quantification of Liver Surface Nodularity at CT: Utility for Detection of Portal Hypertension[J]. Radiology, 2018, 289(3):698-707. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.
Purpose To determine whether quantification of liver surface nodularity (LSN) provides an estimate of the presence of clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) in patients with cirrhosis. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included a training cohort (n = 189) and separate external validation cohort (n = 78), both composed of patients with cirrhosis who underwent abdominal CT and hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement between 2010 and 2016. The LSN score, liver and spleen volumes, liver-to-spleen volume ratio, platelet count to spleen diameter ratio, Iranmanesh score, aspartate amino transferase-to-platelet ratio index, and Fibrosis-4 index were derived from CT images and serum laboratories. The accuracy of the various tests for predicting CSPH was evaluated with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and compared by using the DeLong test. Student t test and Pearson correlation coefficient were used. Results One hundred eighty-nine patients were analyzed (119 men [mean age ± standard deviation, 57 years ± 11; range, 29-81 years] and 70 women [mean age, 61 years ± 10; range, 34-83 years]; overall mean age, 58 years ± 10; range, 29-83 years). A total of 102 patients (54%) had CSPH. LSN score correlated with HVPG (r = 0.75; P <.001). Patients with CSPH had a higher LSN score than did those without CSPH (3.2 ± 0.6 vs 2.4 ± 0.3; P <.001). A cutoff value of 2.8 had a positive predictive value of 88% for CSPH; the AUROC of LSN was 0.88 ± 0.03. This was higher than that of other available noninvasive tests (DeLong, all P <.001). In the validation cohort, LSN score of 2.8 had a positive predictive value of 86% for CSPH; the AUROC was 0.87 ± 0.04. Conclusion The CT-based liver surface nodularity score demonstrated high diagnostic performance for detecting clinically significant portal hypertension and outperformed multiple other noninvasive tests. © RSNA, 2018 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
[11]
Liu F, Ning Z, Liu Y, et al. Development and validation of a radiomics signature for clinically significant portal hypertension in cirrhosis (CHESS1701): a prospective multicenter study[J]. EBioMedicine, 2018, 36(10):151-158. DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.09.023.
[12]
Huang YQ, Liang CH, He L, et al. Development and validation of a radiomics nomogram for preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2016, 34(18):2157-2164. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2015.65.9128.
To develop and validate a radiomics nomogram for preoperative prediction of lymph node (LN) metastasis in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).
[13]
刘瑶, 董蒨. 数字医学与AI赋能精准外科:中国学者的探索与国际贡献[J]. 数字医学与健康, 2025, 3(12):1-6. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn101909-20250419-00065.
[14]
董蒨, 王静淼, 修文丽. 数智医学赋能精准腹部外科手术的今天与未来[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2025, 63(10):878-882. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20250331-00169.
[15]
Zhang Y, Yang C, Liang L, et al. Preliminary experience of 5.0 T higher field abdominal diffusion-weighted MRI: agreement of apparent diffusion coefficient with 3.0 T imaging[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2022, 56(4):1009-1017.DOI: 10.1002/jmri.28097.
Recently, a prototype 5.0 T whole‐body MRI scanner was developed. A 5.0 T diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) may help overcome the issues that limit 3.0 T DWI.
[16]
Zheng L, Yang C, Liang L, et al. T2-weighted MRI and reduced-FOV diffusion-weighted imaging of the human pancreas at 5 T: A comparison study with 3 T[J]. Med Phys, 2023, 50(1):344-353. DOI: 10.1002/mp.15970.
The purpose of this study was to explore the feasibility of pancreatic imaging at 5 T and evaluate the practical improvement of T2‐weighted MRI and diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) at 5 T as compared with 3 T.
[17]
舒俊杰, 张岚, 冯智超. 5.0T超高场MRI腹部成像临床应用进展[J]. 中国医学影像学杂志, 2025, 33(7):730-734. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-5185.2025.07.008.
[18]
Zheng L, Yang C, Sheng R, et al. Renal imaging at 5 T versus 3 T: a comparison study[J]. Insights Imaging, 2022, 13(1):155. DOI: 10.1186/s13244-022-01290-9.
Recently, a whole-body 5 T MRI scanner was developed to open the door of abdominal imaging at high-field strength. This prospective study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of renal imaging at 5 T and compare the image quality, potential artifacts, and contrast ratios with 3 T.
[19]
Liu J, Wang Z, Yu D, et al. Comparative analysis of hepatic fat quantification across 5 T, 3 T and 1.5 T: A study on consistency and feasibility[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2024, 180:111709. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111709.
[20]
中华医学会放射学分会, 《中华放射学杂志》光子计数CT临床应用协作组. 光子计数CT临床应用专家共识[J]. 中华放射学杂志, 2025, 59(4):364-383. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112149-20250207-00068.
[21]
黄瑞坤, 杨琰昭, 柴维敏. 光子计数CT在胰腺成像中的应用进展[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2025, 24(2): 111-117.DOI:10.16150/j.1671-2870.2025.02.001.
[22]
刘静怡, 朱亮, 蔺晨, 等. 光子计数探测器CT在胰腺癌术前评估中应用价值研究[J]. 中华放射学杂志, 2025, 59(12):1369-1376. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112149-20250804-00455.
[23]
Schwartz FR, Ehsan S, Daniele M, et al. Exploiting the potential of photon-counting CT in abdominal imaging[J]. Invest Radiol, 2023, 58(7):488-498. DOI:10.1097/RLI.0000000000000949.
Photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) imaging uses a new detector technology to provide added information beyond what can already be obtained with current CT and MR technologies. This review provides an overview of PCCT of the abdomen and focuses specifically on applications that benefit the most from this new imaging technique. We describe the requirements for a successful abdominal PCCT acquisition and the challenges for clinical translation. The review highlights work done within the last year with an emphasis on new protocols that have been tested in clinical practice. Applications of PCCT include imaging of cystic lesions, sources of bleeding, and cancers. Photon-counting CT is positioned to move beyond detection of disease to better quantitative staging of disease and measurement of treatment response.Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
[24]
Racine D, Mergen V, Viry A, et al. “Photon-counting detector CT with quantum iterative reconstruction: impact on liver lesion detection and radiation dose reduction.”[J]. Invest Radiol, 2023, 58(4): 245-252. DOI:10.1097/RLI.0000000000000925.
To assess image noise, diagnostic performance, and potential for radiation dose reduction of photon-counting detector (PCD) computed tomography (CT) with quantum iterative reconstruction (QIR) in the detection of hypoattenuating and hyperattenuating focal liver lesions compared with energy-integrating detector (EID) CT.
[25]
Schwartz FR, Vinson EN, Spritzer CE, et al. Prospective multireader evaluation of photon-counting CT for multiple myeloma screening[J]. Radiol Imaging Cancer, 2022, 4(6), e220073. DOI: 10.1148/rycan.220073.
[26]
Thompson SM, Wang J, Chandan VS, et al. MR elastography of hepatocellular carcinoma: Correlation of tumor stiffness with histopathology features-Preliminary findings[J]. Magn Reson Imaging, 2016, 37(11), 41-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2016.11.005.
[27]
Hennedige TP, Wang G, Leung FP, et al. Magnetic resonance elastography and diffusion weighted imaging in the evaluation of hepatic fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B[J]. Gut Liver, 2017, 11(3), 401-408. DOI: 10.5009/gnl16079.
Comparison of the accuracy of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB).In this retrospective analysis, we investigated 63 patients with CHB and liver fibrosis. DWI was performed with both breath-hold (DWI-BH) and free-breathing (DWI-FB) sequences (b=0, 500). The mean liver stiffness and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were calculated by drawing regions of interest maps. Fibrosis staging according to the METAVIR system was independently performed by an experienced pathologist. A receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis was conducted to determine the accuracy of MRE, DWI-BH and DWI-FB in the detection and stratification of liver fibrosis. The performance of the detection of significant fibrosis (≥F2), advanced fibrosis (≥F3), and cirrhosis (F4) was also evaluated by comparing areas under the ROC.There was a moderate and significantly negative correlation between the ADC values and liver stiffness. The accuracies for the detection of ≥F2/≥F3/F4 stage fibrosis with DWI-FB, DWI-BH and MRE were 0.84/0.76/0.72, 0.72/0.83/0.79 and 0.99/0.99/0.98, respectively. The performance of MRE was significantly better than DWI-FB and DWI-BH. There were no significant differences between the performance of DWI-FB and DWI-BH.MRE is more accurate than DWI for the detection and stratification of liver fibrosis in CHB.
[28]
李灵, 余成新, 李梁. 四维血流磁共振成像在肝脏疾病中的应用进展[J]. 磁共振成像, 2024, 15(6):212-217. DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2024.06.034.
[29]
Zhou Y, Zheng J, Yang C, et al. Application of intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging in hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2022, 28(27):3334-3345. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i27.3334.
[30]
Ren P, Ma X, Liu Y, et al. Short-term repeatability and postprandial effect assessment of liver perfusion quantification in healthy subjects using arterial spin labeling MRI[J]. Insights Imaging, 2025, 16(1), 167. DOI: 10.1186/s13244-025-02051-0.
[31]
马文玲, 郭顺林, 魏柯香, 等. 功能磁共振成像技术在肝脏的应用现状[J]. 磁共振成像, 2017, 8(11):866-870.DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2017.11.013.
[32]
高琳, 张晶, 段艳华, 等. 短时间18F-脱氧葡萄糖全身动态PET-CT扫描对大动脉炎的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2025, 105(22):1820-1826.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20250422-00995.
[33]
李红岩, 夏晓天, 兰晓莉, 等. PET分子影像与肿瘤微环境的可视化[J]. 中华核医学与分子影像杂志, 2019, 39(3):174-177. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-2848.2019.03.014.
[34]
王国昌, 徐鹏飞, 张静静, 等. 伊文思蓝改构放射性药物在诊疗一体化中的应用进展[J]. 中华核医学与分子影像杂志, 2024, 44(1):35-40. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn321828-20221107-00335.
[35]
Han X, Wu X, Wang S, et al. Automated segmentation of liver segment on portal venous phase MR images using a 3D convolutional neural network[J]. Insights Imaging, 2022, 13(1), 26.DOI:10.1186/s13244-022-01163-1.
We aim to develop and validate a three-dimensional convolutional neural network (3D-CNN) model for automatic liver segment segmentation on MRI images.
[36]
Huang YQ, Chen XB, Cui YF, et al. Enhanced risk stratification for stage Ⅱ colorectal cancer using deep learning-based CT classifier and pathological markers to optimize adjuvant therapy decision[J]. Ann Oncol, 2025, 36(10):1178-1189. DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2025.05.537.
[37]
刘昕, 张斌, 伍雪威, 等. 医学影像数字孪生的现状与未来[J]. 中华放射学杂志, 2025, 59(3):241-245. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112149-20241011-00620.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China(82572190)
PDF(1335 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/