National Health Commission guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer in China (2025 edition, abridged version)

Department of Medical Administration, National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China, Chinese Medical Association Oncology Branch

Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery ›› 2025, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (12) : 1353-1359.

PDF(1246 KB)
PDF(1246 KB)
Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery ›› 2025, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (12) : 1353-1359. DOI: 10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2025.12.01

National Health Commission guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer in China (2025 edition, abridged version)

Author information +
History +

Cite this article

Download Citations
Department of Medical Administration, National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China , Chinese Medical Association Oncology Branch. National Health Commission guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer in China (2025 edition, abridged version)[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery. 2025, 45(12): 1353-1359 https://doi.org/10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2025.12.01

References

[1]
Han BF, Zheng RS, Zeng HM, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2022[J]. J Natl Cancer Cent, 2024, 4(1): 47-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.jncc.2024.01.006.
[2]
中国临床肿瘤学会指南工作委员会. 中国临床肿瘤学会(CSCO)结直肠癌诊疗指南2025[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2025.
[3]
Nagtegaal ID, Odze RD, Klimstra D, et al. The 2019 WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system[J]. Histopathology, 2020, 76(2): 182-188. DOI: 10.1111/his.13975.
[4]
Gress DM, Edge SB, Greene FL, et al. Principles of cancer staging[M]// AminMB, EdgeSB, GreeneFL, et al.AJCC cancer staging manual. 8th ed. Chicago: Springer, 2017: 3-30.
[5]
Cercek A, Lumish M, Sinopoli J, et al. PD-1 blockade in mismatch repair-deficient, locally advanced rectal cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2022, 386(25): 2363-2376. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2201445.
[6]
Fokas E, Allgäuer M, Polat B, et al. Randomized phase II trial of chemoradiotherapy plus induction or consolidation chemotherapy as total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: CAO/ARO/AIO-12[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2019, 37(34): 3212-3222. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.19.00308.
Total neoadjuvant therapy is a new paradigm for rectal cancer treatment. Optimal scheduling of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and chemotherapy remains to be established.We conducted a multicenter, randomized, phase II trial using a pick-the-winner design on the basis of the hypothesis of an increased pathologic complete response (pCR) of 25% after total neoadjuvant therapy compared with standard 15% after preoperative CRT. Patients with stage II or III rectal cancer were assigned to group A for induction chemotherapy using three cycles of fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin before fluorouracil/oxaliplatin CRT (50.4 Gy) or to group B for consolidation chemotherapy after CRT. Secondary end points included toxicity, compliance, and surgical morbidity.Of the 311 patients enrolled, 306 patients were evaluable (156 in group A and 150 in group B). CRT-related grade 3 or 4 toxicity was lower (37% 27%) and compliance with CRT higher in group B (91%, 78%, and 76% 97%, 87%, and 93% received full-dose radiotherapy, concomitant fluorouracil, and concomitant oxaliplatin in groups A and B, respectively); 92% versus 85% completed all induction/consolidation chemotherapy cycles, respectively. The longer interval between completion of CRT and surgery in group B (median 90 45 days in group A) did not increase surgical morbidity. A pCR in the intention-to-treat population was achieved in 17% in group A and in 25% in group B. Thus, only group B ( <.001), but not group A ( =.210), fulfilled the predefined statistical hypothesis.Up-front CRT followed by chemotherapy resulted in better compliance with CRT but worse compliance with chemotherapy compared with group A. Long-term follow-up will assess whether improved pCR in group B translates to better oncologic outcome.
[7]
Li J, Qin S, Xu R, et al. Effect of fruquintinib vs placebo on overall survival in patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer: the FRESCO randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA, 2018, 319(24): 2486-2496. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2018.7855.
Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) have limited effective and tolerable treatment options.To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral fruquintinib, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) inhibitor, as third-line or later therapy in patients with metastatic CRC.FRESCO (Fruquintinib Efficacy and Safety in 3+ Line Colorectal Cancer Patients) was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter (28 hospitals in China), phase 3 clinical trial. From December 2014 to May 2016, screening took place among 519 patients aged 18 to 75 years who had metastatic CRC that progressed after at least 2 lines of chemotherapy but had not received VEGFR inhibitor therapy; 416 met the eligibility criteria and were stratified by prior anti-VEGF therapy and K-ras status. The final date of follow-up was January 17, 2017.Patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive either fruquintinib, 5 mg (n = 278) or placebo (n = 138) orally, once daily for 21 days, followed by 7 days off in 28-day cycles, until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or study withdrawal.The primary end point was overall survival. Key secondary efficacy endpoints were progression-free survival (time from randomization to disease progression or death), objective response rate (confirmed complete or partial response), and disease control rate (complete or partial response, or stable disease recorded ≥8 weeks postrandomization). Duration of response was also assessed. Safety outcomes included treatment-emergent adverse events.Of the 416 randomized patients (mean age, 54.6 years; 161 [38.7%] women), 404 (97.1%) completed the trial. Median overall survival was significantly prolonged with fruquintinib compared with placebo (9.3 months [95% CI, 8.2-10.5] vs 6.6 months [95% CI, 5.9-8.1]); hazard ratio (HR) for death, 0.65 (95% CI, 0.51-0.83; P < .001). Median progression-free survival was also significantly increased with fruquintinib (3.7 months [95% CI, 3.7-4.6] vs 1.8 months [95% CI, 1.8-1.8] months); HR for progression or death, 0.26 (95% CI, 0.21 to 0.34; P < .001). Grades 3 and 4 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 61.2% (170) of patients who received fruquintinib and 19.7% (27) who received placebo. Serious adverse events were reported by 15.5% (43) of patients in the fruquintinib group and 5.8% (8) in the placebo group, with 14.4% (40) of fruquintinib-treated and 5.1% (7) of placebo-treated patients requiring hospitalization.Among Chinese patients with metastatic CRC who had tumor progression following at least 2 prior chemotherapy regimens, oral fruquintinib compared with placebo resulted in a statistically significant increase in overall survival. Further research is needed to assess efficacy outside of China.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02314819.
[8]
Dasari A, Morris VK, Allegra CJ, et al. ctDNA applications and integration in colorectal cancer: an NCI Colon and Rectal-Anal Task Forces whitepaper[J]. Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 2020, 17(12): 757-770. DOI: 10.1038/s41571-020-0392-0.
[9]
Faber RA, Meijer RP, Droogh DH, et al. Indocyanine green near-infrared fluorescence bowel perfusion assessment to prevent anastomotic leakage in minimally invasive colorectal surgery (AVOID): a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial[J]. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2024, 9(10): 924-934. DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00198-5.
[10]
Pang YZ, Zhao L, Luo ZM, et al. Comparison of 68Ga-FAPI and 18F-FDG uptake in gastric, duodenal, and colorectal cancers[J]. Radiology, 2021, 298(2): 393-402. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020203275.
PDF(1246 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/