Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most prevalent primary liver cancer and a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Ninety percent of HCC cases arise from cirrhosis, during which liver cells undergo chronic cycles of necrosis and regeneration. The complex genomic landscape of HCC has been extensively investigated to draw correlations between recurrently mutated pathways and patient prognosis. However, our limited success with targeted therapy shows that knowing the presence of somatic mutations alone is insufficient for us to gauge the full spectrum of their functional consequences in the context of tumor evolution. In addition, the current molecular classification of HCC offers little information on the relationship between the molecular features and immunological properties of HCC tumors and their immune microenvironment. This review introduces current challenges and advancements made in HCC surveillance, diagnosis, and treatment. We also discuss the suite of HCC-associated genetic changes and describe recent studies that provide evidence for an evolving functional model and its implications for understanding and targeting HCC progression.

In 2015, the second cycle of the CONCORD programme established global surveillance of cancer survival as a metric of the effectiveness of health systems and to inform global policy on cancer control. CONCORD-3 updates the worldwide surveillance of cancer survival to 2014.CONCORD-3 includes individual records for 37·5 million patients diagnosed with cancer during the 15-year period 2000-14. Data were provided by 322 population-based cancer registries in 71 countries and territories, 47 of which provided data with 100% population coverage. The study includes 18 cancers or groups of cancers: oesophagus, stomach, colon, rectum, liver, pancreas, lung, breast (women), cervix, ovary, prostate, and melanoma of the skin in adults, and brain tumours, leukaemias, and lymphomas in both adults and children. Standardised quality control procedures were applied; errors were rectified by the registry concerned. We estimated 5-year net survival. Estimates were age-standardised with the International Cancer Survival Standard weights.For most cancers, 5-year net survival remains among the highest in the world in the USA and Canada, in Australia and New Zealand, and in Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden. For many cancers, Denmark is closing the survival gap with the other Nordic countries. Survival trends are generally increasing, even for some of the more lethal cancers: in some countries, survival has increased by up to 5% for cancers of the liver, pancreas, and lung. For women diagnosed during 2010-14, 5-year survival for breast cancer is now 89·5% in Australia and 90·2% in the USA, but international differences remain very wide, with levels as low as 66·1% in India. For gastrointestinal cancers, the highest levels of 5-year survival are seen in southeast Asia: in South Korea for cancers of the stomach (68·9%), colon (71·8%), and rectum (71·1%); in Japan for oesophageal cancer (36·0%); and in Taiwan for liver cancer (27·9%). By contrast, in the same world region, survival is generally lower than elsewhere for melanoma of the skin (59·9% in South Korea, 52·1% in Taiwan, and 49·6% in China), and for both lymphoid malignancies (52·5%, 50·5%, and 38·3%) and myeloid malignancies (45·9%, 33·4%, and 24·8%). For children diagnosed during 2010-14, 5-year survival for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia ranged from 49·8% in Ecuador to 95·2% in Finland. 5-year survival from brain tumours in children is higher than for adults but the global range is very wide (from 28·9% in Brazil to nearly 80% in Sweden and Denmark).The CONCORD programme enables timely comparisons of the overall effectiveness of health systems in providing care for 18 cancers that collectively represent 75% of all cancers diagnosed worldwide every year. It contributes to the evidence base for global policy on cancer control. Since 2017, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development has used findings from the CONCORD programme as the official benchmark of cancer survival, among their indicators of the quality of health care in 48 countries worldwide. Governments must recognise population-based cancer registries as key policy tools that can be used to evaluate both the impact of cancer prevention strategies and the effectiveness of health systems for all patients diagnosed with cancer.American Cancer Society; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Swiss Re; Swiss Cancer Research foundation; Swiss Cancer League; Institut National du Cancer; La Ligue Contre le Cancer; Rossy Family Foundation; US National Cancer Institute; and the Susan G Komen Foundation.Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

To report response rates (using mRECIST), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival and local tumour recurrence-free survival (LRFS) of balloon-occluded transarterial chemoembolisation (bTACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Patients from five European centres treated with conventional or drug-eluting microsphere bTACE for HCC were included, and patients already lost to follow-up before 12 months were excluded. Possible factors contributing to LRFS and OS were evaluated with Cox proportional hazards models.Seventy-three patients were enrolled. The mean number of nodules per patient was 2.07(± 1.68), and the average maximum diameter of the nodules was 37 ± 19.9 mm. The response of the target lesion at 6 months was complete response (CR) in 58.9%, partial response (PR) in 28.8%, stable disease (SD) in 6.8% and progressive disease (PD) in 5.5%. The median follow-up time was 31 months; at the last follow-up, target tumour response was CR in 49.3%, PR in 12.3%, SD in 5.5% and PD 32.9%. Overall response at the last follow-up was CR in 17.8%, PR in 9.6%, SD 2.7% and PD in 69.9% (for new lesions in 37% of patients). Median OS was not reached; mean overall survival was 50.0 months, while median LRFS was 31.0 months. At uni- and multivariable analysis, only tumour maximum diameter was related to LRFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.021; 95% CI 1.004-1.038, P = 0.015).bTACE demonstrated high efficacy for HCC, with a complete response in 58.9% of patients, a median local recurrence-free survival of 31.0 months and a mean overall survival of 50.0 months.© 2024. The Author(s).

In order to adapt to the reduced availability of nutrients and oxygen in the tumor microenvironment and the increased requirements of energy and building blocks necessary for maintaining their high proliferation rate, malignant cells undergo metabolic changes that result in an increased production of lactate, nitric oxide, reactive oxygen species, prostaglandins and other byproducts of arachidonic acid metabolism that influence both the composition of the inflammatory microenvironment and the function of the tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). In response to cues present in the TME, among which products of altered tumor cell metabolism, TAMs are also required to reprogram their metabolism, with activation of glycolysis, fatty acid synthesis and altered nitrogen cycle metabolism. These changes result in functional reprogramming of TAMs which includes changes in the production of cytokines and angiogenetic factors, and contribute to the tumor progression and metastasis. Understanding the metabolic changes governing the intricate relationship between the tumor cells and the TAMs represents an essential step towards developing novel therapeutic approaches targeting the metabolic reprogramming of the immune cells to potentiate their tumoricidal potential and to circumvent therapy resistance.Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

BACKGROUND

The present study aimed to investigate the effects of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) on the immune function of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A total of 114 patients with HCC were selected and their peripheral blood was collected before and 1 month after TACE treatment. Flow cytometry and reverse transcription-quantitative PCR were performed to analyze the changes in immune function in patients before and after treatment. Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted for survival analysis. The programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1) expression before TACE treatment were significantly higher in patients with poor TACE response compared with those patients with well response. Higher PD-L1 mRNA expression in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells after TACE predicted a superior prognosis. After TACE treatment, the proportion of CD4/CD8 cells were decreased while the expression levels of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1) were significantly increased. To conclude, TACE could reduce the proportion of CD4/CD8 cells and improve the mRNA expression levels of PD1 in patients with HCC. The expression levels of PD1 and PD-L1 were closely related to the therapeutic effect of TACE and the prognosis of patients with HCC. TACE combined with immunotherapy may have potential clinical value for patients with HCC.Copyright: © Guo et al.

Several clinical trials comparing the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus molecular-targeted agents versus TACE alone revealed no clinical benefits in progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS). Here, we report the final OS analysis from the TACTICS trial, which previously demonstrated significant improvement in PFS with TACE plus sorafenib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (NCT01217034).Patients with unresectable HCC were randomized to a TACE plus sorafenib group ( = 80) or a TACE alone group ( = 76). Patients in the combination treatment group received sorafenib 400 mg once daily for 2-3 weeks before TACE, followed by 800 mg once daily during on-demand conventional TACE sessions until time to untreatable progression. In this trial, TACE-specific PFS was used. TACE-specific PFS is defined as the time from randomization to progressive disease (PD) or death from any cause, and PD was defined as untreatable progression, caused by the inability of a patient to further receive or benefit from TACE for reasons that include intrahepatic tumor progression (25% increase vs. baseline) according to response evaluation criteria in cancer of the liver, the detection of extrahepatic spread, vascular invasion, or transient deterioration of liver function to Child-Pugh C after TACE.At the cut-off date of July 31, 2020, 131 OS events were observed. The median OS was 36.2 months with TACE plus sorafenib and 30.8 months with TACE alone (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.861; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.607-1.223; = 0.40, ΔOS, 5.4 months). The updated PFS was 22.8 months with TACE plus sorafenib and 13.5 months with TACE alone (HR = 0.661; 95% CI, 0.466-0.938; = 0.02). Post-trial treatments with active procedures/agents were received by 47 (58.8%) patients in the TACE plus sorafenib group and 58 (76.3%) in the TACE alone group ( = 0.01). In post hoc analysis, PFS and OS benefit were shown in HCC patients with tumor burden beyond up-to-7 criteria.In TACTICS trial, TACE plus sorafenib did not show significant OS benefit over TACE alone; however, clinical meaningful OS prolongation and significantly improved PFS was observed. Thus, the TACE plus sorafenib can be considered a choice of treatment in intermediate-stage HCC, especially in patients with high tumor burden. Trial Registration: NCT01217034.Copyright © 2022 by The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.

Tremelimumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that binds to cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) on the surface of activated T lymphocytes. Ablative therapies induce a peripheral immune response which may enhance the effect of anti-CTLA4 treatment in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to demonstrate whether tremelimumab could be combined safely and feasibly with ablation.Thirty-two patients with HCC were enrolled: male:female: 28:4; median age: 62 (range 36-76). Patients were given tremelimumab at two dose levels (3.5 and 10mg/kg i.v.) every 4weeks for 6 doses, followed by 3-monthly infusions until off-treatment criteria were met. On day 36, patients underwent subtotal radiofrequency ablation or chemoablation. Staging was performed by contrast-enhanced CT or MRI scan every 8weeks.No dose-limiting toxicities were encountered. The most common toxicity was pruritus. Of the 19 evaluable patients, five (26.3%; 95% CI: 9.1-51.2%) achieved a confirmed partial response. Twelve of 14 patients with quantifiable HCV experienced a marked reduction in viral load. Six-week tumor biopsies showed a clear increase in CD8 T cells in patients showing a clinical benefit only. Six and 12-month probabilities of tumor progression free survival for this refractory HCC population were 57.1% and 33.1% respectively, with median time to tumor progression of 7.4months (95% CI 4.7 to 19.4months). Median overall survival was 12.3months (95% CI 9.3 to 15.4months).Tremelimumab in combination with tumor ablation is a potential new treatment for patients with advanced HCC, and leads to the accumulation of intratumoral CD8 T cells. Positive clinical activity was seen, with a possible surrogate reduction in HCV viral load.Studies have shown that the killing of tumors by direct methods (known as ablation) can result in the immune system being activated or switched on. The immune system could potentially also recognize and kill the cancer that is left behind. There are new drugs available known as immune checkpoint inhibitors which could enhance this effect. Here, we test one of these drugs (tremelimumab) together with ablation.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01853618.Published by Elsevier B.V.

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) may prime adaptive immunity and enhance immunotherapy efficacy. PETAL evaluated safety, preliminary activity of TACE plus pembrolizumab and explored mechanisms of efficacy.Patients with liver-confined hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were planned to receive up to two rounds of TACE followed by pembrolizumab 200 mg every 21 days commencing 30 days post-TACE until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity for up to 1 year. Primary endpoint was safety, with assessment window of 21 days from pembrolizumab initiation. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and evaluation of tumor and host determinants of response.Fifteen patients were included in the safety and efficacy population: 73% had nonviral cirrhosis; median age was 72 years. Child-Pugh class was A in 14 patients. Median tumor size was 4 cm. Ten patients (67%) received pembrolizumab after one TACE; 5 patients after two (33%). Pembrolizumab yielded no synergistic toxicity nor dose-limiting toxicities post-TACE. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 93% of patients, most commonly skin rash (40%), fatigue, and diarrhea (27%). After a median follow-up of 38.5 months, objective response rate 12 weeks post-TACE was 53%. PFS rate at 12 weeks was 93% and median PFS was 8.95 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 7.30-NE (not estimable)]. Median duration of response was 7.3 months (95% CI: 6.3-8.3). Median overall survival was 33.5 months (95% CI: 11.6-NE). Dynamic changes in peripheral T-cell subsets, circulating tumor DNA, serum metabolites, and in stool bacterial profiles highlight potential mechanisms of action of multimodal therapy.TACE plus pembrolizumab was tolerable with no evidence of synergistic toxicity, encouraging further clinical development of immunotherapy alongside TACE.©2024 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Numerous studies have demonstrated limited survival benefits of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) alone in the treatment of intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) beyond up-to-seven criteria. The advent of immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has opened new avenues for HCC treatment. However, TACE combined with ICIs has not been investigated for patients with intermediate-stage HCC beyond the up-to-seven criteria. The study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this treatment strategy for such patients.

Transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) is standard of care for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma that is amenable to embolisation; however, median progression-free survival is still approximately 7 months. We aimed to assess whether adding durvalumab, with or without bevacizumab, might improve progression-free survival.In this multiregional, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study (EMERALD-1), adults aged 18 years or older with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma amenable to embolisation, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 at enrolment, and at least one measurable intrahepatic lesion per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) were enrolled at 157 medical sites including research centres and general and specialist hospitals in 18 countries. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1), stratified by TACE method, region, and portal vein invasion, using an interactive voice response or web response system, to TACE plus either durvalumab plus bevacizumab (1500 mg intravenous durvalumab once every 4 weeks, then 1120 mg durvalumab plus 15 mg/kg intravenous bevacizumab once every 3 weeks), durvalumab plus placebo (same regimen using placebo instead of bevacizumab), or placebo alone (same regimen using placebo instead of durvalumab and instead of bevacizumab). Participants, investigators, and those assessing outcomes were masked to treatment assignment until data analysis. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, by blinded independent central review (BICR), and per RECIST version 1.1, with durvalumab plus bevacizumab versus placebo alone in the intention-to-treat population (ITT; ie, all participants assigned to treatment). Key secondary endpoints were progression-free survival by BICR per RECIST version 1.1 with durvalumab plus placebo versus placebo alone, overall survival, and time to deterioration in select patient-reported outcomes. Participants continue to be followed up for overall survival, and overall survival and patient-reported outcomes will be reported in a later publication. Safety was assessed in the safety analysis set, which included all participants assigned to treatment who received any study treatment (ie, any durvalumab, bevacizumab, or placebo) by treatment received. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03778957, and is closed to accrual.Between Nov 30, 2018, and July 19, 2021, 887 patients were screened, of whom 616 were randomly assigned to durvalumab plus bevacizumab (n=204), durvalumab plus placebo (n=207), or placebo alone (n=205; ITT population). Median age was 65·0 years (IQR 59·0-72·0), 135 (22%) of 616 participants were female, 481 (78%) were male, 375 (61%) were Asian, 176 (29%) were White, 22 (4%) were American Indian or Alaska Native, nine (1%) were Black or African American, one (<1%) was native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, and 33 (5%) were other races. As of data cutoff (Sept 11, 2023) median follow-up for progression-free survival was 27·9 months (95% CI 27·4-30·4), median progression-free survival was 15·0 months (95% CI 11·1-18·9) with durvalumab plus bevacizumab, 10·0 months (9·0-12·7) with durvalumab, and 8·2 months (6·9-11·1) with placebo. Progression-free survival hazard ratio was 0·77 (95% CI 0·61-0·98; two-sided p=0·032) for durvalumab plus bevacizumab versus placebo, and 0·94 (0·75-1·19; two-sided p=0·64) for durvalumab plus placebo versus placebo. The most common maximum grade 3-4 adverse events were hypertension in participants who received durvalumab and bevacizumab (nine [6%] of 154 participants), anaemia in participants who received durvalumab and placebo (ten [4%] of 232 participants), and post-embolisation syndrome in participants who received placebo alone (eight [4%] of 200 participants). Study treatment-related adverse events that led to death occurred in none of 154 participants who received durvalumab and bevacizumab, three (1%) of 232 who received durvalumab and placebo (n=1 for arterial haemorrhage, liver injury, and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome), and three (2%) of 200 who received placebo alone (n=1 for oesophageal varices haemorrhage, upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage, and dermatomyositis).Durvalumab plus bevacizumab plus TACE has the potential to set a new standard of care. With additional follow-up of the EMERALD-1 study, future analyses, including the final overall survival data and patient-reported outcomes, will help to further characterise the potential clinical benefits of durvalumab plus bevacizumab plus TACE in hepatocellular carcinoma amenable to embolisation.AstraZeneca.Copyright © 2025 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.

To compare the clinical benefit and tolerability of triple therapy of lenvatinib, programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor, and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) versus dual therapy of lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitor in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients.Between October 2018 and September 2021, patients with unresectable HCC who received triple therapy of lenvatinib, PD-1 inhibitor, and TACE or dual therapy of lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitor participated in this study. The efficacy was evaluated by survival and therapeutic response, and the tolerability was evaluated by the frequency and severity of key adverse events (AEs).In total, 118 eligible patients with unresectable HCC who received combination therapy were included in this study. Among them, 60 patients received triple therapy of lenvatinib, PD-1 inhibitor, and TACE (L-P-T group), and 58 eligible patients received dual therapy of lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitor (L-P group). Patients who received triple therapy had better overall survival (OS) [median, 29.0 vs. 17.8 months, p < 0.01] and progression-free survival (PFS) [median, 16.2 vs. 10.2 months, p < 0.01] than those who received dual therapy. The objective response rate (76.7 vs. 44.9%, p < 0.01) and disease control rate (96.7 vs. 75.9%, p < 0.01) in the L-P-T group were higher than in the L-P group, respectively. Multivariate analyses revealed that the treatment option and BCLC stage were independent prognostic factors for OS, while treatment option and tumor number were independent prognostic factors for PFS. The incidence and severity of AEs in the L-P-T group were comparable to those in the L-P group (any grade, 95.0 vs. 94.8%, p = 1.00; grade ≥ 3, 30.0 vs. 27.6%, p = 0.93).Triple therapy of lenvatinib, PD-1 inhibitor, and TACE may achieve more favorable survival benefits than dual therapy of lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitor in unresectable HCC patients with manageable safety profiles.© 2023. Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver.

Transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) is standard care for unresectable, non-metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma. We aimed to evaluate the addition of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab to TACE versus dual placebo plus TACE in patients with unresectable, non-metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma.In this multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 study (LEAP-012), patients were recruited from 137 global sites in 33 countries or regions. Eligible patients were age 18 years or older with unresectable, non-metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma not amenable to curative treatment, but with tumours amenable to TACE, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1, and Child-Pugh class A disease. Eligible participants were randomly assigned (1:1), stratified by study site, α-fetoprotein level, ECOG performance status, albumin-bilirubin grade, and tumour burden, by a central interactive response system, to receive TACE and either oral lenvatinib (bodyweight ≥60 kg: 12 mg; bodyweight <60 kg: 8 mg; once daily) plus intravenous pembrolizumab (400 mg once every 6 weeks for up to 2 years) or matched dual placebo (oral and intravenous). Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (threshold one-sided p=0·025), per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1 (modified for the current study to allow for up to five target tumours in the liver and requiring new intrahepatic tumours to meet LI-RADS 5 criteria to be considered progressive disease) by blinded independent central review, and overall survival (threshold one-sided p=0·0012) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (ie, all participants randomly assigned to treatment). Safety was assessed in the as-treated population (ie, all participants who were randomly assigned and received at least one dose of any study treatment). Here, we report results from the first interim analysis (final analysis for progression-free survival). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04246177, and is active but not recruiting.Between May 22, 2020, and Jan 11, 2023, 847 patients were screened, of whom 480 (57%) were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive TACE plus lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab (n=237) or TACE plus dual placebo (n=243; ITT population). Median age was 66 years (IQR 58-73), 82 (17%) of 480 participants were female, 398 (83%) were male, 98 (20%) were White, 347 (72%) were Asian, four (1%) were Black or African American, and five (1%) were American Indian or Alaska Native. Median follow-up as of data cutoff (Jan 30, 2024) was 25·6 months (IQR 19·5-32·4). Median progression-free survival was 14·6 months (95% CI 12·6-16·7; 132 events [20 deaths and 112 progressions]) with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab and 10·0 months (8·1-12·2; 154 events [eight deaths and 146 progressions]) with placebo (hazard ratio [HR] 0·66 [95% CI 0·51-0·84]; one-sided p=0·0002). 69 (29%) of 237 in the lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab group and 82 (34%) of 243 from the placebo group died, with a 24-month overall survival rate of 75% (95% CI 68-80) in the lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab group and 69% (62-74) in the placebo group (HR 0·80 [95% CI 0·57-1·11]; one-sided p=0·087). Grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events occurred in 169 (71%) of 237 participants in the lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab group and in 76 (32%) of 241 in the placebo group, the most common of which were hypertension (57 [24%] vs 18 [7%]) and platelet count decreased (27 [11%] vs 15 [6%]). Deaths due to treatment-related adverse events occurred in four (2%) participants in the lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab group (n=1 each due to hepatic failure, gastrointestinal haemorrhage, myositis, and immune-mediated hepatitis) and one (<1%) in the placebo group (due to brain stem haemorrhage).TACE plus lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab showed significant, clinically meaningful improvement in progression-free survival in patients with unresectable, non-metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma compared with TACE plus placebo. The numerical improvement in overall survival is encouraging, but longer follow-up is necessary.Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Inc, Rahway, NJ, USA, and Eisai, Nutley, NJ, USA.Copyright © 2025 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.

This study aimed to evaluate how the timing of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) relative to systemic therapy (tyrosine-kinase inhibitors [TKIs] and immune checkpoint inhibitors [ICIs]) influences oncological outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A retrospective analysis was conducted on HCC patients treated with TACE plus TKIs and ICIs from January 2018 to February 2023. We compared objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) between patients receiving TACE before versus after systemic therapies. Multivariate Cox regression analyses identified potential prognostic factors. Of the 194 patients enrolled, 111 received TACE before systemic therapies, and 83 after. The median age at diagnosis was 52.8 years. There were no significant differences in ORR (40.72% vs. 30.41%, p = 0.989) or DCR (48.45% vs. 35.57%, p = 0.770) between the groups. Likewise, OS (18.73 vs. 18.20 months, p = 0.091) and PFS (11.53 vs. 10.05 months, p = 0.336) were similar regardless of treatment sequence. In the result of Cox analysis, a 20% decrease in AFP from baseline at one month was associated with improved OS (HR = 0.35, 95% CI 0.17-0.70, p = 0.003) and PFS (HR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.49-0.96, p = 0.028). Large tumor size (≥ 10 cm) was a poor prognostic factor for OS (HR = 2.12, 95% CI 1.07-4.21, p = 0.032), and the presence of portal vein tumor thrombus adversely affected PFS (HR = 2.31, 95% CI 1.47-3.62, p < 0.001). The sequencing of TACE and systemic therapies does not significantly impact the prognosis of advanced HCC. A 20% reduction in AFP within one month of treatment commencement emerges as a protective prognostic factor for HCC.© 2024. The Author(s).

The treatment and prognosis of liver cancer remain the focus of medical research. Studies have shown that SPP1 and CSF1 play important roles in cell proliferation, invasion, and metastasis. Therefore, this study analyzed the oncogenic and immunologic roles of SPP1 and CSF1 in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We found that the expression levels of SPP1 and CSF1 in HCC were markedly increased and positively correlated. High SPP1 expression was significantly associated with poor OS, DSS, PFS, and RFS. It was not affected by gender, alcohol use, HBV, or race, whereas CSF1 was affected by these factors. Higher expression levels of SPP1 and CSF1 indicated higher levels of immune cell infiltration and a higher immune score with the R software package ESTIMATE. Further analysis revealed that many genes work co-expressed between SPP1 and CSF1 with the LinkedOmics database, which were mainly involved in signal transduction, the integral components of the membrane, protein binding, and osteoclast differentiation. In addition, we screened ten hub genes using cytoHubba, among which the expression of four genes was significantly associated with the prognosis of HCC patients. Finally, we demonstrated the oncogenic and immunologic roles of SPP1 and CSF1 using the vitro experiments. Reducing the expression of either SPP1 or CSF1 could significantly reduce the proliferation of HCC cells and the expression of CSF1, SPP1, and the other four hub genes. This study suggested that SPP1 and CSF1 interact with each other and have the potential to be therapeutic and prognostic targets for HCC.© 2023. The Author(s).

The response to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) varies among individuals with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to identify a biomarker for predicting TACE response in HCC patients and to investigate its correlations with the tumor microenvironment and pre-TACE radiomics features.GSE104580 data were obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Differentially expressed gene analysis and machine learning algorithms were used to identify genes for constructing the TACE failure signature (TFS). TFS scores were then calculated for HCC patients in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort. After obtaining images from The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA), tumor labeling and radiomics feature extraction, the Rad-score model was generated. Correlation analysis was performed between the TFS score and the Rad-score. CIBERSORT, ssGSEA and TME analysis were performed to explore differences in the immune landscape among distinct risk groups. The immunotherapy response was compared between different groups.ADH1C, CXCL11, EMCN, SPARCL1 and LIN28B were selected and incorporated into the TFS, which demonstrated satisfactory performance in predicting TACE response. Patients in the high TFS score group had poorer overall survival (OS) than those in the low TFS score group. The Rad-score model was constructed using six radiomics features, and the Rad-score was significantly correlated with hub gene expression and the TFS score. The high-TFS group was also characterized by an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and exhibited unfavorable responses to immunotherapy with PD-1 and CTLA-4 checkpoint inhibitors.This study established a transcriptomic biomarker for predicting the efficacy of TACE that correlates with radiomics features on pretreatment imaging, tumor immune microenvironment characteristics, and the efficacy of immunotherapy and targeted therapy in HCC patients.© 2024 Wang et al.

Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors have modest efficacy as a monotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A personalized therapeutic cancer vaccine (PTCV) may enhance responses to PD-1 inhibitors through the induction of tumor-specific immunity. We present results from a single-arm, open-label, phase 1/2 study of a DNA plasmid PTCV (GNOS-PV02) encoding up to 40 neoantigens coadministered with plasmid-encoded interleukin-12 plus pembrolizumab in patients with advanced HCC previously treated with a multityrosine kinase inhibitor. Safety and immunogenicity were assessed as primary endpoints, and treatment efficacy and feasibility were evaluated as secondary endpoints. The most common treatment-related adverse events were injection-site reactions, observed in 15 of 36 (41.6%) patients. No dose-limiting toxicities or treatment-related grade ≥3 events were observed. The objective response rate (modified intention-to-treat) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 was 30.6% (11 of 36 patients), with 8.3% (3 of 36) of patients achieving a complete response. Clinical responses were associated with the number of neoantigens encoded in the vaccine. Neoantigen-specific T cell responses were confirmed in 19 of 22 (86.4%) evaluable patients by enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assays. Multiparametric cellular profiling revealed active, proliferative and cytolytic vaccine-specific CD4 and CD8 effector T cells. T cell receptor β-chain (TCRβ) bulk sequencing results demonstrated vaccination-enriched T cell clone expansion and tumor infiltration. Single-cell analysis revealed posttreatment T cell clonal expansion of cytotoxic T cell phenotypes. TCR complementarity-determining region cloning of expanded T cell clones in the tumors following vaccination confirmed reactivity against vaccine-encoded neoantigens. Our results support the PTCV's mechanism of action based on the induction of antitumor T cells and show that a PTCV plus pembrolizumab has clinical activity in advanced HCC. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04251117.© 2024. The Author(s).