中国实用外科杂志

• 指南(共识)解读 • 上一篇    下一篇

《IHPBA-APHPBA临床实践指南:国际德尔菲胆囊癌共识推荐》解读

何开举,吴向嵩,龚    伟   

  1. 上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院普外科 上海交通大学医学院胆道疾病实验室 上海市胆道疾病研究重点实验室 上海市胆道疾病研究中心,上海 200092
  • 出版日期:2025-03-01

  • Online:2025-03-01

摘要: 《IHPBA-APHPBA临床实践指南:国际德尔菲胆囊癌共识推荐》由国际肝胆胰协会(IHPBA)与亚太肝胆胰协会(APHPBA)组织全球45位专家通过德尔菲共识法制定,旨在为胆囊癌的临床实践提供统一规范。该指南重点围绕胆囊癌外科治疗争议、术语标准化及可切除性评估提出指导意见,并与国内外现有指南进行对比。胆囊癌的高危因素中,该指南强调膳食因素、环境污染物及胆石病的作用,但明确胆囊腺肌症并非风险因素,与国内指南存在分歧。对于无症状胆石病病人,共识不支持预防性胆囊切除术以降低胆囊癌风险,而国内指南则建议对高危病人实施择期手术。胆囊息肉治疗标准与国内指南一致:直径≥
1 cm的息肉需手术切除,直径≥2 cm或伴可疑特征者术前需完善CT检查。病理学检查方面,该指南建议所有胆囊切除标本均应常规行病理学检查,以降低漏诊风险。手术命名与范围中,根治性胆囊癌切除术定义为肝切除联合肝十二指肠韧带淋巴结清扫;胆囊癌扩大根治术则涵盖大范围肝切除、肝外器官或血管切除等。对于意外胆囊癌,T1a期病人可观察,T1b期需再手术,但需结合病人全身状况评估手术风险。肝切除术范围根据分期决定:T2期可行肝楔形切除术,T3期存在肝楔形切除或肝Ⅳb~Ⅴ段整块切除的分歧。淋巴结清扫范围首次达成全球共识:T1b期及以上病人需行标准D2清扫(No.8、No.12、No.13a淋巴结),若腹主动脉旁淋巴结(No.16b1)转移则视为远处转移,放弃手术。微创手术仅推荐用于早期病例,晚期胆囊癌不建议常规施行微创手术。该共识首次提出临界可切除/局部进展期胆囊癌(BR/LA-GBC)的评估标准,包括肝门阻塞、淋巴结转移或血管侵犯等。正电子发射计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)被推荐用于局部进展期分期及新辅助治疗反应评估。对于转移性病例,共识推荐姑息性化疗,仅在必要时考虑姑息性手术。该指南通过规范外科治疗流程及定义推动胆囊癌管理的标准化,但受限于地区医疗差异,部分推荐内容需结合实际情况灵活应用。

关键词: 胆囊癌, 临床指南, Delphi共识, 流行病学, 胆囊息肉, 根治性手术, 局部进展期胆囊癌

Abstract: The “IHPBA-APHPBA clinical practice guidelines’: International Delphi consensus recommendations for gallbladder cancer” were developed by 45 global experts organized by the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (IHPBA) and the Asia Pacific Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (APHPBA) using the Delphi consensus method. The objective of these guidelines is to provide unified standards for clinical practice in gallbladder cancer. The guidelines focus on controversial issues on surgical treatment, the standardization of terminology, and resectability assessment, while comparing these recommendations to existing guidelines both domestically and internationally. Among the high-risk factors for gallbladder cancer, the consensus emphasizes the roles of dietary factors, environmental pollutants, and cholelithiasis, but clearly states that gallbladder adenomyomatosis is not a risk factor, which differs from domestic guidelines. For asymptomatic cholelithiasis patients, the consensus does not support prophylactic cholecystectomy to reduce the risk of gallbladder cancer, whereas domestic guidelines suggest elective surgery for high-risk patients. The treatment standards for gallbladder polyps are consistent with domestic guidelines: polyps with a diameter ≥1 cm should be removed; those ≥2 cm or with suspicious characteristics should undergo preoperative CT examination. Regarding pathological examination, the consensus recommends routine pathological examination for all gallbladder resection specimens to reduce the risk of misdiagnosis. In terms of surgical nomenclature and scope, radical cholecystectomy is defined as hepatectomy combined with lymphadenectomy of the hepatoduodenal ligament; extended radical cholecystectomy includes extensive hepatectomy and resection of extrahepatic organs or vessels. For incidental gallbladder cancer, patients with T1a stage can be observed, while those with T1b stage should undergo further surgery, but this decision should be based on the patient’s overall health condition. The extent of liver resection is determined by staging: wedge resection can be performed for T2 stage, while for T3 stage, there is a divergence between wedge resection and liver resection of the Ⅳb-Ⅴ segments. For lymphadenectomy, the consensus reached global agreement for the first time: patients with T1b stage and above should undergo standard D2 lymphadenectomy (No.8, No.12, No.13a lymph nodes), and if there is metastasis to the lymph nodes around the abdominal aorta (No.16b1), it is considered distant metastasis and surgery should be abandoned. Minimally invasive surgery is only recommended for early-stage cases, and routine use in advanced gallbladder cancer is not recommended. The consensus also introduces for the first time the evaluation criteria for borderline resectable/locally advanced gallbladder cancer (BR/LA-GBC), including hilar obstruction, lymph node metastasis, or vascular invasion. PET/CT is recommended for staging in locally advanced cases and for assessing response to neoadjuvant therapy. For metastatic cases, the consensus recommends palliative chemotherapy and palliative surgery should only be considered when necessary. These guidelines promote the standardization of gallbladder cancer management by regulating surgical treatment processes and definitions. However, due to regional healthcare differences, some recommendations should be applied flexibly in practice.

Key words: gallbladder cancer, clinical guidelines, Delphi consensus, epidemiology, gallbladder polyps, radical resection, locally advanced gallbladder cancer