中国实用外科杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (03): 300-307.DOI: 10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2024.03.14

• 专家论坛 • 上一篇    下一篇

肝门部胆管癌外科诊疗难点、争议及团队23年实践体会

李    斌,姜小清   

  1. 海军军医大学第三附属医院(上海东方肝胆外科医院)胆道一科,上海200438
  • 出版日期:2024-03-01 发布日期:2024-04-07

  • Online:2024-03-01 Published:2024-04-07

摘要: 目前外科治疗仍是肝门部胆管癌最为有效的治疗方式,合理、安全的外科治疗方案涉及肿瘤可切除性评估、肝储备功能评估、术前准备、手术操作及术后并发症处理等多个核心环节。肝门区域肿瘤的准确归类和鉴别诊断、术前合理的胆道引流方案、合理的肝切除范围以及肝动脉切除后血管重建等,是影响肝门部胆管癌治疗结局的重要问题。不同类型肝门区域胆管癌的病理类型、分子特征、生物学行为、淋巴结转移路径等存在诸多差异,有必要对其作出严格区分以制定合理的临床决策和治疗方案。经皮肝穿刺胆管引流(PTBD)更有利于充分引流胆管,但也存在肿瘤细胞播散转移的风险,建议对计划联合实施半肝以上切除者,首选PTBD对拟保留肝叶实施单侧引流,同时重视术前胆汁回输对加速肝功能恢复的作用。联合半肝及以上范围切除能够提高R0切除率和生存率,但也要考虑肿瘤生物学特性和手术创伤的影响,应根据肿瘤分型和分期选择不同的手术方案,以实现合理控制手术损伤和更大治疗获益的目标。保留或重建残余肝叶动脉血供对防范术后肝衰竭的发生具有重要意义,术前三维重建对于合理规划手术方案具有重要价值。

关键词: 肝门部胆管癌, 外科治疗, 诊疗路径, 肝储备功能, 计划性肝切除

Abstract: Difficulties and controversies in the surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma and the treatment experience of Jiang's team in 23 years        LI Bin, JIANG Xiao-qing.Department of Biliary Tract I, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University (Shanghai Oriental Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital), Shanghai 200438, China
Corresponding author: JIANG Xiao-qing, E-mail:jxq122@VIP.sina.cn
Abstract    Surgical treatment is still the most effective treatment modality for hilar cholangiocarcinoma, and a reasonable and safe surgical treatment plan involves several core aspects, such as tumor resectability assessment, hepatic reserve function assessment, preoperative preparation, surgical operation, and postoperative complication management. Accurate classification and differential diagnosis of hilar region tumors, reasonable preoperative biliary drainage plan, the reasonable scope of hepatic resection, and the necessity of revascularization after hepatic artery resection are important issues affecting the outcome of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. There are many differences in the pathological types, molecular characteristics, biological behaviors, and lymph node metastasis pathways of different types of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. It is necessary to make a strict distinction to formulate reasonable clinical decisions and treatment plans. PTBD is more conducive to adequate biliary drainage, but there is also a risk of tumor cell spread and metastasis. It is recommended that for planned combined hepatectomy above semi-liver, PTBD should be the first choice for unilateral drainage of the planned preserved liver lobe, and the importance of preoperative bile reflux in accelerating liver function recovery should be emphasized. Combined resection of semi-liver and above can increase the R0 resection rate and survival rate, but the biological characteristics of the tumor and the impact of surgical trauma should also be considered. Different surgical plans should be selected according to the tumor type and stage to achieve the goal of reasonably controlling surgical injury and maximizing therapeutic benefits. Retaining or reconstructing the arterial blood supply of the residual liver lobe is of great significance for preventing postoperative liver failure. Preoperative three-dimensional reconstruction has important value in planning surgical plans.

Key words: hilar cholangiocarcinoma, surgical treatment, diagnosis and treatment pathway, hepatic reserve function, planned hepatectomy