中国实用外科杂志

• 论蓍 • 上一篇    下一篇

单层与双层胰管-空肠黏膜胰肠吻合在胰十二指肠切除术中应用价值临床对比研究

潘树波1吴春利1,侯    辉1,2[Author]) AND 1[Journal]) AND year[Order])" target="_blank">赵红川22[Author]) AND 1[Journal]) AND year[Order])" target="_blank">刘付宝2谢胜学1周大臣1李未祥1熊奇如1耿小平1,2   

  1. 1安徽医科大学第二附属医院肝胆胰外科,安徽合肥230601;2安徽医科大学第一附属医院器官移植中心,安徽合肥230032
  • 出版日期:2020-11-01 发布日期:2020-11-23

  • Online:2020-11-01 Published:2020-11-23

摘要: 目的    比较单层胰管-空肠黏膜吻合与双层胰管-空肠黏膜吻合对胰十二指肠切除术后发生临床性胰瘘的影响。方法    回顾性分析2015年8月至2020年9月安徽医科大学第二附属医院肝胆胰外科和安徽医科大学第一附属医院器官移植中心同一手术组医师实施的303例胰十二指肠切除术病人的病例资料。根据胰肠吻合方式分成单层胰管-空肠黏膜吻合组(单层组,116例)和双层胰管-空肠黏膜吻合组(双层组,187例)。结果    两组病人进行1∶1匹配后,各103例,年龄分别为(62.1±9.3)岁(范围:39~76岁)和(62.5±10.2)岁(范围:39~76岁)。在胰肠吻合时间方面,单层组中位时间为12min,明显短于双层组的25 min,差异有统计学意义(Z=-3.683,P=0.002)。在术后住院天数方面,单层组为(13.7±2.7)d,短于双层组的(15.3±3.7)d,差异有统计学意义(t=-3.001,P=0.003)。在临床相关性胰瘘发生率方面,单层组为4.9%,明显低于双层组的19.4%,差异有统计学意义(χ2=10.243,P=0.001)。在严重并发症发生率方面,单层组为6.8%,低于双层组的17.5%,差异有统计学意义(χ2=5.509,P=0.019)。多因素分析显示,双层胰管-空肠黏膜(95% CI 1.086-11.230,P=0.036)和胰管直径细(95%CI 1.719-12.946,P=0.003)是术后临床相关性胰瘘的独立危险因素。结论    与双层胰管-空肠黏膜相比,单层胰管-空肠黏膜胰肠吻合技术可缩短胰肠吻合时间、减少术后住院天数、降低临床相关性胰瘘发生率和严重并发症发生率,是一种安全、简单、有效的胰肠吻合方式。

关键词: 胰肠吻合, 胰瘘, 胰十二指肠切除术

Abstract: One-layer versus two-layer duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy:a retrospective cohort study based on propensity score matching analysis        PAN Shu-bo*,WU Chun-li,HOU Hui,et al. *Department of General Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University,Hefei 230601,China
Corresponding authors:GENG Xiao-ping,E-mail:xp_geng@163.net;XIONG Qi-ru, E-mail: xiongqiru2012@126.com
Abstract    Objective    To compare the clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) after one-layer to two-layer duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy (PE) for pancreaticoduodenectomy(PD). Methods    Clinical data of 303 patients for PD from August 2015 to September 2020 from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University and the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University were retrospectively analyzed, which were divided into one-layer group(116 cases) and two-layer group(187 cases) acording to PE methods. Results    After propensity score matching (PSM) study, there were 103 patients in both one-layer group and the two-layer group, respectively. The age were (62.1±6.3) years(range from 39 to 76 years) and (62.5±10.2)(range from 39 to 76 years) respectively. The PE time was shorter in one-layer group (12 min vs. 25 min, Z=-3.683 P=0.002). The length of the postoperative hospital-stay in one-layer group was significantly shorten than that in the two-layer group[(13.7±2.7)days vs.(15.3±3.7)days, t=-3.001, P=0.003]. The one-layer group had significantly lower incidence of severe complications (Clavien-Dindo grade > Ⅲ) (6.8% vs. 17.5%, χ2=5.509, P=0.019). and incidence of CR-POPF (4.9% vs. 19.4%, χ2=10.243, P=0.001) than the two-layer group. Moreover,two-layer duct-to-mucosa PE (95%CI 1.086-11.230, P=0.036) and pancreatic duct diameter (95%CI 1.719-12.946, P=0.003)  were independent risk factors for CR-POPF. Conclusion Compared with two-layer duct-to-mucosa PE, the new one-layer duct-to-mucosa PE is safe and effective for the treatment of PD with the clinical benefits of shorter PE time, shorter postoperative hospital stay,fewer morbidity and fewer CR-POPF.

Key words: pancreaticoenterostomy, postoperative pancreatic fistula, pancreaticoduodenectomy