中国实用口腔科杂志 ›› 2012, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (9): 551-554.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

五种不同方法预备根管后对根尖部清洁程度的比较研究

刘雁马卫东高蔚虹   

  1. 作者单位:大连市口腔医院,辽宁  大连  116021
  • 出版日期:2012-09-15 发布日期:2012-11-24

Effect of cleanness at the root tip by using five different techniques in root canal preparation

LIU  Yan, MA Wei-dongGAO Wei-Hong   

  1. Dalian Stomatological Hospital, Dalian  116021,China
  • Online:2012-09-15 Published:2012-11-24

摘要: 目的    比较5种不同方法预备根管后对根尖1/3根管壁的清洁能力。方法    将2007年12月至2008年3月在大连市口腔医院颌面外科门诊拔除的60颗离体牙随机分为6组,每组10颗。各组的牙齿先使用Protaper进行根管预备,然后使用不同的方法处理根管壁,分别为:A组H2O2和生理盐水(对照组)、B组EDTA凝胶和5.25%的NACLO,C组超声波荡洗根管、D组Nd:YAG激光、E组超声波(蒸馏水)+EDTA、F组:超声波(5.25%NACLO)+EDTA。完成之后将样本纵向剖开,扫描电镜观察根管壁的界面,比较根尖1/3根管壁的清洁程度和牙本质小管的状态。结果    对照组(A组)牙齿根尖部被玷污层全部覆盖,未见开放的牙本质小管;各实验组(B、C、D、E、F组)牙齿根尖部根管壁玷污层不同程度被去除。B、C、D、E、F组根尖1/3玷污层的评分与A组比较,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);5个实验组间根尖1/3玷污层的评分比较,D组与E组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),其余各组间差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论    5种不同的方法在一定程度上可去除根尖部的玷污层,以超声波(5.25%NACLO)+EDTA处理根管壁的效果最佳。

关键词: 玷污层, 扫描电镜, 超声波, Nd:YAG激光

Abstract: Objective    To compare the ability of five techniques on cleanness at the apical third of root. Methods    Sixty extracted single-rooted human teech ,randomly distributed into 6 groups ,were prepared by using Protaper rotary instruments and subjected to different techniques on removal of smear layer;hydrogen peroxide and normal saline( group A); 5.25%sodium hypochlorite(NAOCL) and ethylenediamine tetraacetis(EDTA) gel (group B),irrigation with ultrasonics(group C); with Nd:YAG laser( group D), EDTA gel and ultrasonics with normal saline irrigation (group E);EDTA gel and ultrasonics with 5.25% NAOCL irrigation ( group F). Samples were examined under the scanning electron microscope (SEM) and scored for cleanness at the apical third of root and the condition of dentin tubule. Results    In group A the apical root and dentine tubules were covered by smear layer. The smear layer of the other 5 groups were cleared partly.There were significant difference bwteen group A and other groups(P < 0.05). There were no significant difference between the group D and group E(P > 0.05). There were significant difference among  the other tested groups(P < 0.05). Conclusion    the smear layer at the root tip can be removed effectively  by using chemical ,ultrasonics and Nd:YAG laser. EDTA gel combined with ultrasonics and 5.25% NAOCL irrigation (group F) was best.

Key words: smear layer, scanning electron microscope(SEM), ultrasonics, Nd:YAG laser

中图分类号: