中国实用口腔科杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (3): 301-307.DOI: 10.19538/j.kq.2026.03.008

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

下颌第三磨牙拔除对相邻第一磨牙和第二磨牙邻接关系远期影响及其影响因素的锥形束CT研究

曹    政,王泽凡,郑    铭,张大为,张    宇,薛    洋   

  1. 口颌系统重建与再生全国重点实验室,口腔疾病国家临床医学研究中心,陕西省口腔疾病临床医学研究中心,空军军医大学口腔医院颌面外科,陕西 西安 710032
  • 出版日期:2026-05-30 发布日期:2026-05-30
  • 通讯作者: 薛洋

  • Online:2026-05-30 Published:2026-05-30

摘要: 目的     探讨下颌第三磨牙拔除对相邻第一磨牙和第二磨牙邻接关系的远期影响,并分析其相关影响因素。方法    选取2018—2024年于空军军医大学口腔医院进行锥形束CT(cone beam CT,CBCT)检查的145例患者的临床和影像学资料进行回顾性分析,根据末次CBCT检查时间,将所有患者分为术后6 ~ 12个月组(15例)、术后> 12 ~ 24个月组(40例)、术后> 24 ~ 36个月组(40例)及术后> 36个月组(50例)。通过三维测量软件,量化评估所有患者下颌第三磨牙拔除前后相邻第一磨牙和第二磨牙间的邻接线长度、颊外展隙角、舌外展隙角、外展隙角及第二磨牙轴倾角等指标差异,并分析性别、年龄、阻生类型、随访时间等因素对变化量(术后与术前测量值之差)的影响。结果    下颌第三磨牙拔除后,所有患者相邻第一磨牙和第二磨牙间的整体邻接线长度[术前、术后分别为(2.42 ± 0.52)、(2.23 ± 0.61)mm]和舌外展隙角[术前、术后分别为(47.79 ± 9.88)°、(45.84 ± 9.71)°]显著减小,且术后> 12 ~ 24个月组、术后> 36个月组的邻接线长度[分别为(2.15 ± 0.54)、(2.24 ± 0.72)mm]较术前[分别为(2.36 ± 0.55)、(2.48 ± 0.61)mm]显著减小,差异均有统计学意义(均P < 0.05);其余指标整体及各组间比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P > 0.05)。对于不同性别而言,男性患者相邻第一磨牙和第二磨牙间的外展隙角和第二磨牙轴倾角在术后增加[变化量分别为(1.29 ± 9.59)°、(0.47 ± 4.09)°],女性患者在术后减小[变化量分别为(-2.01 ± 10.17)°、(-2.05 ± 6.71)°],二者变化量比较,差异均有统计学意义(t值分别为-1.993、-2.639,P值分别为0.048、0.009);其余指标变化量比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P > 0.05)。对于不同Winter分类而言,Winter分类为近中阻生患者的舌外展隙角在术后增加[变化量为(0.57 ± 10.13)°],垂直阻生和水平阻生患者在术后减小[变化量分别为(-1.24 ± 10.85)°、(-5.28 ± 11.38)°],三者变化量比较,差异有统计学意义(F = 3.452,P = 0.034);进一步两两比较发现,近中阻生患者的舌外展隙角变化量较水平阻生患者明显增加,差异有统计学意义(t = 2.540,P = 0.012);其余指标变化量比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P > 0.05)。不同年龄、Pell-Gregory分类、随访时间组患者各评价指标的变化量比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P > 0.05)。结论    下颌第三磨牙拔除可导致相邻第一磨牙和第二磨牙邻接关系发生改变,且该变化可能受性别与Winter阻生类型影响。临床医生在制定下颌第三磨牙拔除手术决策时,应充分考虑上述因素,对高风险患者加强术后长期随访,重点评估邻接关系及食物溢出道形态,及时给予口腔维护指导,以降低术后牙周及牙体疾病的发生风险。

关键词: 下颌第三磨牙, 锥形束CT, 邻接关系, 食物嵌塞

Abstract: Objective    To investigate the long-term effects of mandibular third molar extraction on the proximal contact relationship between the adjacent first and second molars and to analyze the related influencing factors. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical and imaging data of 145 patients who underwent cone beam CT(CBCT)examination at School of Stomatology,the Fourth Military Medical University from 2018 to 2024. According to the time of the last CBCT examination,all patients were divided into four groups:6 - 12 months after extraction(n = 15),> 12 - 24 months(n = 40),> 24 - 36 months(n = 40),and > 36 months(n = 50). Three‑dimension measurement software was used to quantitatively evaluate the differences in contact line length,buccal embrasure angle,lingual embrasure angle,occlusal embrasure angle,and second molar axial inclination before and after mandibular third molar extraction. The influence of gender,age,impaction type,and follow-up time on the amount of change(difference between postoperative and preoperative measurements)was analyzed. Results    After mandibular third molar extraction,the overall contact line length [preoperative vs. postoperative:(2.42 ± 0.52)mm vs.(2.23 ± 0.61)mm]and lingual embrasure angle[preoperative vs. postoperative:(47.79 ± 9.88)° vs.(45.84 ± 9.71)°]between the adjacent first and second molars decreased significantly in all patients. The contact line length in the > 12 - 24 months group and the > 36 months group[(2.15 ± 0.54)mm and(2.24 ± 0.72)mm,respectively]was significantly smaller than the preoperative value[(2.36 ± 0.55)mm and(2.48 ± 0.61)mm,respectively](all P < 0.05). No significant differences were found in the other indicators either in the overall analysis or among groups(all P > 0.05). Regarding gender,the occlusal embrasure angle and M2 axial inclination of the first and second molars increased postoperatively in male patients[amount of change:(1.29 ± 9.59)° and(0.47 ± 4.09)°,respectively]but decreased in female patients[amount of change:(-2.01 ± 10.17)° and(-2.05 ± 6.71)°,respectively],with significant differences(t = -1.993 and -2.639,P = 0.048 and 0.009,respectively). No significant differences were found in the amount of change in the other indicators between genders(all P > 0.05). Regarding Winter classification,the lingual embrasure angle increased postoperatively in patients with mesioangular impaction[amount of change:(0.57 ± 10.13)°]but decreased in patients with vertical and horizontal impactions[amount of change:(-1.24 ± 10.85)° and(-5.28 ± 11.38)°,respectively],and the difference among the three was statistically significant(F = 3.452,P = 0.034). Further pairwise comparison showed that the amount of change in lingual embrasure angle in patients with mesioangular impaction was significantly greater than that in patients with horizontal impaction(t = 2.540,P = 0.012). No significant differences were found in the amount of change in the other indicators among different Winter classifications(all P > 0.05). There were no significant differences in the amount of change in any indicator among groups of different age,Pell-Gregory classification,or follow-up time(all P > 0.05). Conclusion    Mandibular third molar extraction can alter the proximal contact relationship between the adjacent first and second molars,and these changes are influenced by gender and Winter impaction type. When making decisions about mandibular third molar extraction,clinicians should fully consider the above factors,strengthen long-term postoperative follow-up for high-risk patients,focus on evaluating the proximal contact relationship and the morphology of the food escape way,and provide timely oral maintenance guidance to reduce the risk of postoperative periodontal and dental diseases.

Key words: mandibular third molar, cone beam CT, proximal contact relationship, food impaction

中图分类号: