中国实用口腔科杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (2): 197-201.DOI: 10.19538/j.kq.2026.02.011

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

正畸力辅助拔牙后牙槽窝不复位对青少年患者牙槽骨宽度保存效果研究

吕佳岭1,张    丽2,黎国彬1,潘    刚1,肖家意1,何其志1   

  1. 1. 富顺县人民医院口腔科,四川 自贡 643200;2. 西南医科大学附属口腔医院正畸科,四川 泸州 646000
  • 出版日期:2026-03-30 发布日期:2026-03-30
  • 通讯作者: 何其志
  • 基金资助:
    自贡市卫生健康委员会基金(21yb076)

  • Online:2026-03-30 Published:2026-03-30

摘要: 目的    通过正畸力松解青少年患者减数牙牙周附着后拔牙,研究牙槽窝不复位对牙槽骨宽度保存的效果。方法    选取2022—2024年于富顺县人民医院口腔科就诊的需行减数正畸治疗青少年患者32例,于正畸排齐牙列3个月后拔除上颌双侧第一前磨牙。采用自身对照法随机选择一侧牙槽窝不进行复位(不复位组),另一侧轻力复位(复位组)。于正畸治疗前(T1)、拔牙后当日(T2)、拔牙后3个月(T3)拍摄锥形束CT,之后行关闭拔牙间隙的正畸治疗。T1、T2、T3时间点测量的牙槽骨宽度分别记为W1、W2、W3,并计算各时间点间牙槽骨宽度变化量,记为W2-W1、W3-W1、W3-W1。结果    2组相同时间点的牙槽骨宽度比较显示,不复位组的W2、W3分别为(10.93 ± 0.83)、(8.91 ± 0.73)mm,均大于复位组[(9.83 ± 0.64)、(7.76 ± 0.67)mm],差异均有统计学意义(t值分别为5.940、6.552,均P < 0.001);不复位组与复位组的W1分别为(10.29 ± 0.77)、(10.11 ± 0.69)mm,其差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。2组各时间点间牙槽骨宽度变化量比较显示,2组W2-W1、W3-W1比较,差异有统计学意义(t值分别为10.539、-8.748,均P < 0.001);2组W3-W2比较,差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。不复位组W2-W1与W3-W1之间无相关性(r = 0.033,P = 0.858),复位组W2-W1与W3-W1间呈正相关(r = 0.498,P = 0.004)。结论    通过正畸力松解青少年患者减数牙牙周附着后拔牙,牙槽窝不复位比牙槽窝复位更利于牙槽骨宽度的维持,牙槽窝复位程度可能影响牙槽窝宽度的变化,但拔牙后3个月内牙槽骨宽度的变化量与是否复位牙槽窝无关。

关键词: 拔牙, 牙槽窝复位, 锥形束CT, 牙槽骨宽度, 正畸

Abstract: Objective    To investigate the effect of alveolar sockets non-repositioning on alveolar bone width preservation in adolescent patients,where teeth are extracted after loosening the periodontal attachment of the to-be-extracted teeth using orthodontic force. Methods    A total of 32 adolescent patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with tooth extraction were selected from the Department of Stomatology,Fushun County People's Hospital,between 2022 and 2024. After 3 months of orthodontic alignment of the dentition,the bilateral maxillary first premolars were extracted from each patient. A self-control method was adopted:one side of the alveolar socket was randomly selected for non-repositioning(non-repositioning group),while the other side was subjected to gentle-force repositioning(repositioning group). Cone beam CT(CBCT) scanning was performed at three time points:before orthodontic treatment(T1),on the day of tooth extraction(T2),and 3 months after tooth extraction(T3). Subsequent orthodontic treatment was conducted to close the extraction spaces. The alveolar bone width measured at T1,T2,and T3 was recorded as W1,W2,and W3,respectively,and the changes in alveolar bone width between different time points were calculated(W2-W1,W3-W1,and W3-W1). Results  Comparison of alveolar bone width at the same time points between the two groups showed:In the non-repositioning group,W2 and W3 were(10.93 ± 0.83)mm and(8.91 ± 0.73)mm,respectively,which were larger than those in the repositioning group [(9.83 ± 0.64)mm and(7.76 ± 0.67)mm],and the differences were statistically significant(t = 5.940 and 6.552,both P < 0.001);there was no statistically significant difference in W1 between the non-repositioning group [(10.29 ± 0.77)mm] and the repositioning group [(10.11 ± 0.69)mm](P > 0.05). Comparison of the changes in alveolar bone width between time points in the two groups showed:Statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of W2-W1 and W3-W1(t = 10.539 and -8.748,both P < 0.001),while no statistically significant difference was found in W3-W2 between the two groups(P > 0.05). There was no correlation between W2-W1 and W3-W1 in the non-repositioning group(r = 0.033,P = 0.858),whereas a positive correlation was observed between W2-W1 and W3-W1 in the repositioning group(r = 0.498,P = 0.004). Conclusion    After extracting teeth in adolescent patients following the release of periodontal attachments using orthodontic force,not repositioning the alveolar socket is more conducive to maintaining the width of the alveolar bone than repositioning it. The degree of alveolar socket repositioning may affect changes in the width of the alveolar socket,but the changes in alveolar bone width within 3 months after tooth extraction are not related to whether the alveolar socket is repositioned.

Key words: tooth extraction, alveolar socket repositioning, cone beam CT, alveolar bone width, orthodontics