中国实用外科杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (07): 801-805.DOI: 10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2025.07.14

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

全腹腔镜分隔式胃空肠吻合术在晚期胃癌合并幽门梗阻中应用研究

韩    硕,马跃东,周思彤,孙鹏达   

  1. 吉林大学第二医院胃肠营养及疝外科,吉林长春 130021
  • 出版日期:2025-07-01 发布日期:2025-07-27

  • Online:2025-07-01 Published:2025-07-27

摘要: 目的    对比分析全腹腔镜分隔式胃空肠吻合术治疗合并胃幽门梗阻(GOO)的晚期胃癌的安全性和有效性。方法    回顾性分析2021年9月至2023年6月吉林大学第二医院胃肠营养及疝外科收治的45例合并GOO的晚期胃癌病人的临床资料,根据胃空肠吻合方式分为分隔式吻合组(行全腹腔镜分隔式胃空肠吻合术,16例)和传统吻合组(行全腹腔镜传统胃空肠吻合术,29例)。比较两组病人围手术期各项临床指标,分析不同手术方式对合并(GOO)病人围手术期恢复的影响。结果    分隔式吻合组与传统吻合组病人在术中出血量、首次下床活动时间、出院白蛋白、出院胃幽门梗阻评分及术后并发症发生率方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);与传统吻合组比较,分隔式吻合组病人手术时间延长,术后排气时间、首次饮水时间、引流管拔除时间、胃管拔除时间、胃肠造影胃半排空和排空时间、首次肠内营养时间、出院时间均缩短,且差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。分隔式吻合组1例病人出现术后胃瘫,但两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论    在合并GOO的晚期胃癌病人,相较于全腹腔镜传统胃空肠吻合术,全腹腔镜分隔式胃空肠吻合术虽然操作难度增加导致手术时间延长,但未增加术中出血和术后并发症,且在术后胃肠道功能恢复、术后住院时间和进食时间方面具有明显优势,建议推广应用。

关键词: 晚期胃癌, 胃幽门梗阻, 分隔式胃空肠吻合术, 腹腔镜

Abstract: To observe the safety and perioperative efficacy of total laparoscopic stomach-partitioning gastrojejunostomy in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer combined with gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). Methods  The clinical data of 45 patients with advanced gastric cancer combined with GOO admitted to the Department of Gastrointestinal Nutrition and Hernia Surgery of the Second Hospital of Jilin University between September 2021 and June 2023 were retrospectively analyzed, and they were divided into the group of stomach-partitioning gastrojejunostomy (using total laparoscopic stomach-partitioning gastrojejunostomy, n=16) and the group of conventional gastrojejunostomy (using total laparoscopic conventional gastrojejunostomy, n=29) based on the intraoperative gastrojejunal anastomosis methods. Compare the perioperative clinical indexes of the two groups and analyze the effects of different surgical methods on the perioperative recovery of GOO patients . Results    The differences between patients in the stomach-partitioning gastrojejunostomy group and the conventional gastrojejunostomy group were not statistically significant in terms of intraoperative bleeding, first time of out-of-bed activity, discharge albumin, discharge GOOSS , and the incidence of postoperative complications (P>0.05). Compared with the conventional gastrojejunostomy group, patients in the stomach-partitioning gastrojejunostomy group had a longer operation time and a shorter time to to the following: first postoperative water intake, postoperative drain and gastric tube removal, gastroenterography gastric half-emptying, gastric complete-emptying, first postoperative enteral nutrition, and discharge after surgery, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05); despite one patient in the stomach-partitioning gastrojejunostomy group had gastroparesis, the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). Conclusion    Compared with total laparoscopic conventional gastrojejunostomy, total laparoscopic stomach-partitioning gastrojejunostomy has obvious advantages in the recovery of the postoperative gastrointestinal function, postoperative hospitalization time, and postoperative feeding time without increasing the intraoperative bleeding and postoperative complications although the increased difficulty of the operation led to a prolonged operative time, and it is recommended for popularization and application. 

Key words: advanced gastric cancer, gastric outlet obstruction, stomach-partitioning gastrojejunostomy,  , laparoscopy