中国实用口腔科杂志

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同金属烤瓷冠临床效果对比观察

金 磊,孙晓琳,彭 巍   

  1. 大连大学附属中山医院口腔科
  • 收稿日期:2009-05-22 修回日期:2009-08-22 出版日期:2009-09-15 发布日期:2009-09-15

  • Received:2009-05-22 Revised:2009-08-22 Online:2009-09-15 Published:2009-09-15

摘要: 摘要:目的 评价镍铬合金、镀金镍铬合金、钛合金、金钯合金4种金属烤瓷冠的临床应用效果。方法 对2003年4月至2006年9月大连大学附属中山医院口腔科门诊需要行金属烤瓷冠修复的320例患者的上前牙320颗,根据患者的要求分别制作铸造镍铬合金、镀金镍铬合金、钛合金、金钯合金烤瓷冠各80颗,并进行3年的临床追踪观察。对各组烤瓷冠进行边缘适合度、颜色及牙龈染色情况评价。结果 金钯合金烤瓷冠边缘密合度好,优于镍铬合金、镀金镍铬合金和钛合金(P < 0.05);金钯合金烤瓷冠颜色效果好,与镍铬合金冠及钛合金烤瓷冠比较,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);牙龈染色现象在钛合金烤瓷冠组发生率最高,金钯合金烤瓷冠组发生率最低(P < 0.05)。结论 金钯合金烤瓷冠具有良好的边缘适合性和生物相容性,制作出的烤瓷冠表现出较好的美学效果,几乎不会出现颈缘黑线,是目前金属烤瓷修复中比较理想的修复材料。

关键词: 全冠修复体, 镍铬合金, 镀金镍铬合金, 钛合金, 金钯合金

Abstract: Abstract:Objective To compare the clinical effect of the Ni-Cr alloy,Gold-plating Ni-Cr alloy,Titanium alloy and Au-Pd alloy coping of the porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM). Methods According to the request of 320 patients who needed to have the PFM repairment,manufacture the metal coping of Ni-Cr alloy,Gold-plating Ni-Cr alloy,Titanium alloy and Au-Pd alloy respectively,with 80 for each,and 3-year clinical tracing observation was made. Results Au-Pd alloy had highter edge adhesion than the Ni-Cr alloy,Gold-plating Ni-Cr alloy and the Titanium alloy(P < 0.05). The color effect of Au-Pd based dental alloy proves to be good(P < 0.05),when compared with the other alloy groups. The incidence of the marginal gingival coloration and gingivitis was the highest in Titanium alloy,and Au-Pd alloy was the lowest when compared with other 3 groups(P < 0.05). Conclusion The Au-Pd based dental alloy has good edge suitability and biological compatibility,and the gold-plating Ni-Cr alloy and the Ni-Cr alloy have stable biology property. Titanium alloy stability and the color change need further studies.

Key words: prosthesis of full crown, Ni-Cr alloy, Gold-plating Ni-Cr alloy, Titanium alloy, Au-Pd alloy