中国实用口腔科杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (3): 293-300.DOI: 10.19538/j.kq.2026.03.007

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

口腔种植机器人植入精度的影响因素分析

赵晓敏1,张    莹1,张    漫2,高小波1,2   

  1. 1. 内蒙古医科大学赤峰临床医学院,内蒙古 赤峰 024000;2. 赤峰市医院口腔科,内蒙古 赤峰 024000
  • 出版日期:2026-05-30 发布日期:2026-05-30
  • 通讯作者: 高小波
  • 基金资助:
    内蒙古自治区科技厅“十四五”重点研发和成果转化计划项目(2023YFSH0054);内蒙古医科大学校级联合项目(YKD2023LH003);内蒙古口腔医学会临床科研基金(IMSA-2024-C4)

  • Online:2026-05-30 Published:2026-05-30

摘要: 目的    分析种植区域、颌骨骨质、种植体长度、植入时机及单次手术种植体数量等因素对口腔种植机器人植入精度的影响。方法    选取2024年3—12月于赤峰市医院口腔科就诊的接受口腔种植机器人手术的患者80例(共116颗种植体)。所有患者的种植手术操作均在瑞医博口腔种植机器人引导下执行,并应用锥形束CT(cone beam CT,CBCT)采集其术前术后影像。通过三维配准技术量化7项精度指标[包括颈部偏差(总偏差、横向偏差、深度偏差)、根尖偏差(总偏差、横向偏差、深度偏差)及角度偏差],比较不同种植区域(前牙29颗与后牙87颗、上颌48颗与下颌68颗、左侧60颗与右侧56颗)、颌骨骨质(偏硬骨35颗与软质骨81颗)、种植体长度[长种植体(≥ 10 mm)50颗与短种植体(< 10 mm)66颗]、植入时机(前牙即刻种植12颗与前牙延期种植17颗)及单次手术种植体数量(单牙位植入62颗与多牙位协同植入54颗)对口腔种植机器人手术植入精度的影响。结果    偏硬骨种植的根尖总偏差[(0.24 ± 0.13)mm]、根尖横向偏差[(0.18 ± 0.06)mm]、根尖深度偏差[(0.17 ± 0.11)mm]及角度偏差[(0.63 ± 0.09)°]均明显小于软质骨[依次为(0.57 ± 0.15)mm、(0.44 ± 0.07)mm、(0.60 ± 0.23)mm、(1.57 ± 0.20)°];短种植体的角度偏差[(0.81 ± 0.39)°]明显小于长种植体[(1.84 ± 0.41)°];前牙延期种植的颈部总偏差[(0.21 ± 0.10)mm]、横向偏差[(0.13 ± 0.08)mm]、深度偏差[(0.16 ± 0.09)mm],根尖总偏差[(0.22 ± 0.06)mm]、横向偏差[(0.14 ± 0.04)mm]、深度偏差[(0.16 ± 0.09)mm],以及角度偏差[(0.90 ± 0.30)°]均明显小于前牙即刻种植[依次为(0.58 ± 0.17)mm、(0.44 ± 0.12)mm、(0.33 ± 0.05)mm、(0.41 ± 0.10)mm、(0.64 ± 0.20)mm、(0.46 ± 0.17)mm、(1.74 ± 0.50)°];单牙位植入的根尖总偏差[(0.20 ± 0.76)mm]明显小于多牙位协同植入[(0.50 ± 0.15)mm],差异均有统计学意义(均P < 0.05)。而不同种植区域的颈部偏差、根尖偏差及角度偏差,不同颌骨骨质的颈部偏差,不同种植体长度的颈部偏差、根尖偏差,不同单次手术种植体数量的颈部偏差、根尖横向偏差、根尖深度偏差及角度偏差比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P > 0.05)。结论    颌骨骨质、种植体长度、植入时机及单次手术种植体数量等均可能影响口腔种植机器人的植入精度,其中偏硬骨条件、短种植体、延期种植及单牙位植入的精度较高。

关键词: 口腔种植机器人, 口腔种植, 精度, 临床评估

Abstract: Objective    To analyze the influence of factors such as the implantation area,jawbone quality,implant length,implantation timing,and the number of implants in a single surgery on the implantation accuracy of oral implant robots. Methods    A total of 80 patients(116 implants)who underwent oral implant robot surgery at the Department of Stomatology of Chifeng Hospital from March to December 2024 were selected. All patients' implant surgeries were performed under the guidance of the Ruiyibo oral implant robot,and cone beam CT(CBCT)was used to collect preoperative and postoperative images. Seven accuracy indicators[including neck deviation(total deviation,lateral deviation,depth deviation),apical deviation(total deviation,lateral deviation,depth deviation),and angle deviation]were quantified through three-dimensional registration technology. The differences in implantation accuracy of oral implant robots were compared among different implantation areas(29 anterior teeth and 87 posterior teeth,48 maxillary and 68 mandibular,60 left and 56 right),jawbone quality(35 hard bone and 81 soft bone),implant length[50 long implants(≥ 10 mm)and 66 short implants(< 10 mm)],implantation timing(12 immediate anterior teeth and 17 delayed anterior teeth),and the number of implants in a single surgery(62 single-tooth implants and 54 multi-tooth coordinated implants). Results    The total apical deviation[(0.24 ± 0.13)mm],lateral apical deviation[(0.18 ± 0.06)mm],depth apical deviation [(0.17 ± 0.11)mm],and angle deviation[(0.63 ± 0.09)°]of hard bone implants were significantly smaller than those of soft bone implants [respectively(0.57 ± 0.15)mm,(0.44 ± 0.07)mm,(0.60 ± 0.23)mm,(1.57 ± 0.20)°];the angle deviation[(0.81 ± 0.39)°]of short implants was significantly smaller than that of long implants[(1.84 ± 0.41)°];the total neck deviation[(0.21 ± 0.10)mm],lateral deviation[(0.13 ± 0.08)mm],depth deviation[(0.16 ± 0.09)mm],total apical deviation[(0.22 ± 0.06)mm],lateral apical deviation[(0.14 ± 0.04)mm],depth apical deviation[(0.16 ± 0.09)mm],and angle deviation[(0.90 ± 0.30)°]of delayed anterior teeth implants were significantly smaller than those of immediate anterior teeth implants[respectively(0.58 ± 0.17)mm,(0.44 ± 0.12)mm,(0.33 ± 0.05)mm,(0.41 ± 0.10)mm,(0.64 ± 0.20)mm,(0.46 ± 0.17)mm,(1.74 ± 0.50)°];the total apical deviation[(0.20 ± 0.76)mm] of single-tooth implants was significantly smaller than that of multi-tooth coordinated implants[(0.50 ± 0.15)mm],and the differences were all statistically significant(all P < 0.05). However,there were no statistically significant differences in neck deviation,apical deviation,and angle deviation among different implantation areas,neck deviation among different jawbone qualities,neck deviation and apical deviation among different implant lengths,or neck deviation,lateral apical deviation,depth apical deviation and angle deviation among different numbers of implants in a single surgery(all P > 0.05). Conclusion     Factors such as the quality of the jawbone,the length of the implant,the timing of implantation,and the number of implants placed in a single surgery may all affect the implantation accuracy of oral implant robots. Among these,the implantation accuracy is relatively higher under conditions of harder bone,with shorter implants,in delayed implantation,and when only one tooth is implanted.

Key words: oral implant robot, oral implantation, accuracy, clinical evaluation

中图分类号: