中国实用口腔科杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (4): 427-433.DOI: 10.19538/j.kq.2023.04.009

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

固位结构的位置与基部宽度对个性化根形种植体影响的三维有限元分析

薛燕青1,阎    旭2   

  1. 1. 福建医科大学附属协和医院口腔科,福建 福州 350001;2. 中国医科大学口腔医学院·附属口腔医院干诊科,辽宁 沈阳  110002
  • 出版日期:2023-07-30 发布日期:2023-08-08

  • Online:2023-07-30 Published:2023-08-08

摘要: 目的    利用三维有限元分析方法研究不同位置和基部宽度的固位结构在即刻负载下对个性化根形种植体(root analogue implants,RAI)生物力学的影响,为RAI的临床设计提供参考。方法    研究在中国医科大学附属口腔医院干诊科进行。应用计算机辅助设计(computer aided design,CAD)软件建立包含下颌第一前磨牙RAI的下颌骨三维有限元模型,在RAI表面局限于近远中区域设置固位结构,所有固位结构的凸起高度均为0.2 mm。根据固位结构的位置不同将模型分为2组,其中A组固位结构分别设置于根颈1/3与根中1/3交界处,以及根中1/3与根尖1/3交界处;B组在根颈1/3、根中1/3及根尖1/3中点处各设置1个固位结构。每组根据基部宽度的不同(0.8、1.0、1.2、1.4、1.6、1.8、2.0 mm)建立7个实验模型,记为M1 ~ M7;未设计固位结构的标准RAI作为空白对照模型,记为M0。分别将129 N的垂直载荷及与RAI轴线成30°角的颊舌向载荷作用于RAI基台中心,分析2组不同模型的应力分布、最大von Mises应力、最大位移和共振频率。结果    所有模型的骨皮质应力峰值均出现在RAI颈部周围;除了M1模型的骨松质最大应力在固位结构处以外,其他模型的骨松质最大应力均位于RAI根尖部。在相同载荷条件下,A组M1 ~ M7模型的RAI最大位移均大于M0模型,B组M2 ~ M7模型的RAI最大位移均小于M0模型。在相同载荷及相同基部宽度条件下,A组模型RAI的最大位移均大于B组模型,而A组模型的共振频率均远低于B组模型。与M0模型相比,M1模型骨松质与骨皮质的最大von Mises应力及RAI的最大位移均显著增加,共振频率均显著降低;在M1 ~ M4模型中随着固位结构基部宽度的增加,RAI周围骨组织的最大von Mises应力与RAI的最大位移均显著降低,在M5 ~ M7模型中RAI的最大位移随着固位结构基部宽度的增加而增大,而RAI周围骨组织的最大von Mises应力基本不受基部宽度变化的影响;在RAI的共振频率方面,相同载荷条件下RAI的轴向共振频率大于颊舌向,在M1 ~ M3模型中RAI的共振频率随着固位结构基部宽度的增加而增大,而M4 ~ M7模型随之降低。结论    在RAI表面局限于近远中区域的根颈1/3、根中1/3及根尖1/3中点处各设置1个固位结构更有利于减少RAI的最大位移,增加其共振频率;当固位结构基部宽度为1.4 mm时,相对于其他宽度可能更有利于减小RAI周围骨组织的应力及提高RAI的初期稳定性。

关键词: 个性化根形种植体, 固位结构, 三维有限元分析, 即刻负载, 初期稳定性

Abstract: Objective    To evaluate the biomechanical influence of the different placements and base widths of retentions on custom-made root analogue implants(RAI)under immediate loading by means of three-dimensional finite elements analysis,providing reference for the clinical design of RAI. Methods    This study was conducted in the VIP Department of Stomatology Hospital Affiliated to China Medical University. Three-dimensional finite elements models of mandible containing mandibular first premolar RAI were constructed by means of computer aided design(CAD)software. The retentions were designed in the interdental space of RAI root. All of the protruding heights were 0.2 mm. The models were divided into two groups according to different placements of the retentions. Group A:the retentions were placed at the junctions between root neck 1/3 and root middle 1/3,and between root middle 1/3 and root apex 1/3,respectively. Group B:retentions were designed in the middle line of root neck 1/3,root middle 1/3 and root apex 1/3,respectively. In each group,seven experimental models were established according to different base widths of the retentions(0.8,1.0,1.2,1.4,1.6,1.8,2.0 mm),denoted as M1-M7. The standard RAI without retention was set as a blank control and recorded as M0. An average force of 129 N was applied to the base center of RAI under immediate loading vertically and buccolingually inclined 30° with the axis of the RAI,respectively. The maximum von Mises stress and stress distribution of bone tissues surrounding RAI and the maximum displacement,resonance frequency of the implants were analysed using CAD software. Results    In all models the peak value of bone density stress appeared around the neck of RAI. Except M1 model,whose maximum stress of cancellous bone was located at the retention,the maximum stress of cancellous bone was located at the root tip of RAI in other models. Under the same loading,the maximum displacements of group A M1-M7 were higher than that of M0,and the maximum displacements of group B M2-M7 were less than that of M0. Under the same loading and with same base width,the maximum displacement of group A was greater than that of group B,and the resonance frequency of group A was much lower than that of group B. The maximum von Mises stress of cancellous bone and cortical bone as well as the maximum displacements of RAI increased significantly,while the resonance frequency of RAI decreased significantly,compared to M0. In the M1-M4 models,the maximum von Mises stress of the bone tissues around the RAI and the maximum displacement of RAI decreased as the base width increased. In M5-M7 models,the maximum displacement of RAI increased as the base width of retention increased,and the maximum von Mises stress of bone tissue around RAI was roughly the same. In terms of the resonance frequency of RAI,the axial resonance frequency of RAI was higher than that of the buccal and lingual under the same loading. In the M1-M3 models,the resonance frequency of RAI increased as the base width of the retention increased,but it decreased in the M4-M7 models. Conclusion    Adding retention to RAI interdental space at the middle line of root neck 1/3,root middle 1/3 and root apex 1/3 helps to reduce the maximum displacement of the RAI and increase the resonance frequency. It is more beneficial to improve the stress distribution of bone tissue around RAI and increase the initial stability of the RAI when the base width of retention is 1.4 mm.

Key words: custom-made root analogue implants, retentions, three-dimensional finite elements analysis, immediate loading, initial stability