中国实用口腔科杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (4): 411-415.DOI: 10.19538/j.kq.2022.04.006

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

口呼吸青少年儿童上气道形态与舌骨位置的特征研究

杨    咪1,卢彩莲1,王小琴1,2   

  1. 1. 山西医科大学口腔医学院·口腔医院, 山西  太原  030001;2. 山西医科大学第一医院口腔正畸科, 山西  太原 030001
  • 出版日期:2022-07-30 发布日期:2022-08-29

  • Online:2022-07-30 Published:2022-08-29

摘要: 目的    应用锥形束CT(CBCT)评估口呼吸患者与鼻呼吸患者上气道形态以及舌骨位置的差异。方法    按照纳入标准选取2018—2021年就诊于山西医科大学第一医院口腔正畸科的青少年儿童骨性Ⅰ类均角患者78例,根据呼吸方式分为口呼吸组(39例)与鼻呼吸组(39例)并拍摄CBCT。应用Dolphin11.95软件进行上气道的三维重建,分别测量上气道各段容积、矢状面表面积、最小横截面积、气道三维结构表面积及舌骨位置,对数据进行统计学分析。结果    口呼吸组上气道腭咽段和舌咽段的容积、矢状面表面积、最小横截面积以及气道三维结构表面积均小于鼻呼吸组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);口呼吸组与鼻呼吸组的上气道鼻咽段与喉咽段测量项目差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05);舌骨相对于前颅底平面的垂直向距离和水平向距离在两组之间的差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。结论    青少年儿童口呼吸骨性Ⅰ类均角患者的上气道明显较鼻呼吸患者狭窄,但口呼吸对舌骨位置的影响不显著。

关键词: 口呼吸, 锥形束CT, 上气道, 舌骨位置

Abstract: Objective    To evaluate the difference in upper airway morphology and hyoid bone position between mouth-breathing children and nasal-breathing children by cone-beam CT(CBCT). Methods    A total of 78 adolescents and children with normal-angle and skeletal classⅠmalocclusion were included according to the inclusion criteria in the Department of Orthodontics,the First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University,from 2018 to 2021,and the 78 cases were divided into mouth-breathing group(n = 39)and nasal- breathing group(n = 39) and CBCT was taken. The upper airway was reconstructed by Dolphin11.95 software. The volume,sagittal surface area,minimum cross-sectional area,three-dimensional structural surface area of the upper airway and the position of the hyoid bone were measured. The data were statistically analyzed. Results    The volume,sagittal surface area,minimum cross-sectional area and three-dimensional structural surface area of palato-pharyngeal segment and hyold-pharyngeal segment of upper airway in mouth-breathing group were significantly lower than those in nasal-breathing group(P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the measurement items of nasopharyngeal segment or laryngopharyngeal segment of upper airway between mouth-breathing group and nasal-breathing group(P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the vertical or horizontal distance between the hyoid and the anterior skull base plane between the two groups(P > 0.05). Conclusion    The upper airway of mouth-breathing patients with normal-angle and skeletal classⅠmalocclusion is significantly narrower than that of nasal-breathing patients,but the effect on hyoid position is not significant.

Key words: mouth-breathing, cone-beam CT, CBCT, upper airway, hyoid bone position