中国实用口腔科杂志

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于锥形束CT分析骨性Ⅱ类错牙合畸形患者舌体舌骨位置及形态特征的研究

  

  1. 上海交通大学附属第九人民医院口腔正畸科,上海  200011
  • 出版日期:2020-08-15 发布日期:2020-09-09

  • Online:2020-08-15 Published:2020-09-09

摘要: 目的 应用锥形束CT(cone-beam CT,CBCT)研究骨性Ⅱ类错牙合畸形患者的舌体、舌骨位置及形态特征。方法 选取2016年1月至2018年12月于上海交通大学附属第九人民医院口腔正畸科就诊的骨性Ⅱ类错牙合畸形患者35例(Ⅱ组)、骨性Ⅰ类错牙合畸形患者35例(Ⅰ组)。各组患者根据垂直骨面型又分为高角型、均角型和低角型。所有患者拍摄CBCT,比较各组及各型患者舌体、舌骨位置及形态差异。结果 (1)两组患者舌体位置各项指标测量结果比较,差异均有统计学意义(均P < 0.05),且Ⅱ组的测量值均大于Ⅰ组;两组患者舌体长度比较,差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05),而Ⅰ组患者舌体矢状截面面积大于Ⅱ组,差异有统计学意义(均P < 0.05)。(2)两组患者舌骨位置测量结果比较发现,Ⅱ组患者的H-H′ (舌骨顶点到颈椎点和颏下点连线的垂直距离)和H-Y(舌骨顶点到PS平面的垂直距离)均大于Ⅰ组,差异有统计学意义(均P < 0.05);而两组患者舌骨形态测量结果比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P > 0.05)。(3)Ⅰ组低角型患者舌体长度与H-Me(舌骨顶点至颏下点的距离)的测量结果较均角型和高角型患者的大,差异均有统计学意义(均P < 0.05);而Ⅱ组不同垂直骨面型患者舌体、舌骨位置及形态的各项指标测量结果比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P > 0.05)。结论 与骨性Ⅰ类错牙合畸形患者相比,骨性Ⅱ类错牙合畸形患者具有较低的舌体姿势位,舌体也相对较小,舌骨位置较低并位于后下方。骨性Ⅰ类错牙合畸形患者中,与均角型和高角型患者比较,低角型患者舌体和下颌骨体部较长。

关键词: 锥形束CT, 舌体形态, 舌体位置, 舌骨形态, 舌骨位置, 肌功能训练

Abstract: Objective Cone-beam CT(CBCT)was used to study the position and morphological characteristics of  tongue and hyoid in patients with skeletal class Ⅱ malocclusion. Methods From January 2016 to December 2018,35 patients with skeletal class Ⅱ malocclusion(group Ⅱ)and 35 patients with skeletal class Ⅰ malocclusion(groupⅠ)were treated in the Department of Orthodontics,the Ninth People′s Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University. Each group was further subdivided into three groups based on the cephalometric analysis of FMA. Compare the position and morphology of the tongue and hyoid among the groups and among types of patients by CBCT images. Results (1)The measurement results of the tongue position of the two groups of patients were compared,and the differences were statistically significant(both P < 0.05),the measured values of group Ⅱ being greater than those of group Ⅰ;the tongue length of the two groups of patients was compared,and the difference was of no statistical significance(P > 0.05),while the sagittal cross-sectional area of the tongue in group Ⅰ was larger than that in group Ⅱ,the difference being statistically significant(both P < 0.05).(2)Comparison of the measurement results of the hyoid position between the two groups of patients found that the H-H′ (vertical distance from the vertex of the hyoid bone to the line between cervical vertebral point and the submental point)and H-Y(the vertical distance from vertex of hyoid bone to the PS plane)in group Ⅱ were greater than those in group Ⅰ,and the difference was statistically significant(both P < 0.05). The comparison of hyoid bone morphology between the two groups showed no significant difference(both P > 0.05).(3)The measurement results of tongue length and H-Me(distance from hyoid bone to submental point)in group Ⅰ patients with low angle were larger than those in patients with average angle and high angle,and the differences were statistically significant(both P < 0.05);the comparison of the measurement results of tongue body,hyoid position and morphology of patients with different vertical bone types in group Ⅱ showed no significant difference(all P > 0.05). Conclusion Class Ⅱ patients have the following characteristics compared to class Ⅰ:lower tongue posture and smaller tongue body,and the hyoid bone is usually placed in lower and posterior position. Among the patients with skeletal class Ⅰ malocclusion,the tongue and mandibular body are longer in patients with low angle than those with average angle and high angle.

Key words: cone-beam CT, CBCT;tongue morphology;tongue position;hyoid bone morphology;hyoid bone position;myofunctional training