田忠辉1a,2[Author]) AND 1[Journal]) AND year[Order])" target="_blank">2[Author]) AND 1[Journal]) AND year[Order])" target="_blank">2[Author]) AND 1[Journal]) AND year[Order])" target="_blank">2[Author]) AND 1[Journal]) AND year[Order])" target="_blank">2[Author]) AND 1[Journal]) AND year[Order])" target="_blank">2[Author]) AND 1[Journal]) AND year[Order])" target="_blank">2[Author]) AND 1[Journal]) AND year[Order])" target="_blank">2,范存晖1a,刘沂1b,王宏扬3,房晓旭1a,2[Author]) AND 1[Journal]) AND year[Order])" target="_blank">2[Author]) AND 1[Journal]) AND year[Order])" target="_blank">2[Author]) AND 1[Journal]) AND year[Order])" target="_blank">2[Author]) AND 1[Journal]) AND year[Order])" target="_blank">2[Author]) AND 1[Journal]) AND year[Order])" target="_blank">2[Author]) AND 1[Journal]) AND year[Order])" target="_blank">2[Author]) AND 1[Journal]) AND year[Order])" target="_blank">2,徐晓琳1a,2[Author]) AND 1[Journal]) AND year[Order])" target="_blank">2[Author]) AND 1[Journal]) AND year[Order])" target="_blank">2[Author]) AND 1[Journal]) AND year[Order])" target="_blank">2[Author]) AND 1[Journal]) AND year[Order])" target="_blank">2[Author]) AND 1[Journal]) AND year[Order])" target="_blank">2[Author]) AND 1[Journal]) AND year[Order])" target="_blank">2[Author]) AND 1[Journal]) AND year[Order])" target="_blank">2,张琦1a,2[Author]) AND 1[Journal]) AND year[Order])" target="_blank">2[Author]) AND 1[Journal]) AND year[Order])" target="_blank">2[Author]) AND 1[Journal]) AND year[Order])" target="_blank">2[Author]) AND 1[Journal]) AND year[Order])" target="_blank">2[Author]) AND 1[Journal]) AND year[Order])" target="_blank">2[Author]) AND 1[Journal]) AND year[Order])" target="_blank">2[Author]) AND 1[Journal]) AND year[Order])" target="_blank">2
摘要:
目的 比较替牙期单侧完全性唇腭裂(unilateral complete cleft lip and palate,UCLP)患者裂隙侧与非裂隙侧下颌骨体积的差异,并将两者分别与非唇腭裂(non cleft lip and palate,NCLP)儿童单侧下颌骨体积比较,以研究唇腭裂对下颌骨生长发育的影响。方法 选取2012—2016年于青岛大学附属医院口腔正畸科就诊的替牙期UCLP患者25例作为UCLP组,另选同期就诊的替牙期NCLP儿童25名作为NCLP组。对所有研究对象的头颅部进行锥形束CT(cone-beam CT,CBCT)扫描,获取影像数据,利用Mimics 17.0软件对下颌骨进行三维重建。比较两组双侧的下颌升支、体部及半侧下颌骨体积,并将UCLP组裂隙侧和非裂隙侧的上述测量指标分别与NCLP组进行比较。结果 (1)UCLP组裂隙侧下颌升支体积大于非裂隙侧,差异有统计学意义(t = 2.192,P < 0.05);而下颌体部及半侧下颌骨的体积比较,差异无统计学意义(均P > 0.05);NCLP组两侧的下颌升支、体部及半侧下颌骨体积差异均无统计学意义(均P > 0.05)。(2)UCLP组裂隙侧与非裂隙侧的下颌升支体积均小于NCLP组,UCLP组非裂隙侧半侧下颌骨体积小于NCLP组,差异均有统计学意义(t值分别为-2.938、-3.325、-2.023,P < 0.05)。结论 替牙期UCLP患者两侧下颌骨体积存在差异,裂隙侧下颌升支体积大于非裂隙侧,且替牙期UCLP患者下颌骨的生长发育较NCLP儿童差。