Acta Metallurgica Sinica

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for endometrial cancer:system review.

XIAO Chang-ji, ZHAO Jing, GUO Peng, XIANG Yang.   

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences,Beijing 100730,China
  • Online:2014-08-02 Published:2014-07-23

腹腔镜手术治疗子宫内膜癌的系统评价

肖长纪,赵静,郭朋,向阳   

  1. 作者单位:中国医学科学院 北京协和医学院 北京协和医院妇产科, 北京 100730
  • 通讯作者: 向阳

Abstract:

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of laparoscopy versus laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.Methods The databases such as Cochrane Library,PubMed,EMbase,Ovid,CBM,WanFang Data,VIP Information and CNKI were searched to collect the randomized control trials (RCTs) between January 1990 and September 2013. The software of meta-analysis was RevMan 5.1. Results A total 13 RCTs include 7640 patients.There was no significant difference between laparoscopic and laparotomic approaches to endometrial cancer in 3-5 years overall survival, recurrence at 3-5 years follow-up, and the number of pelvic node yield. The bene?ts of laparoscopic surgery versus laparotomy were lesser amount of intraoperative bleeding (P= 0.0001), shorter length of hospital stay (P<0.00001), lower rates of total complications (P<0.00001) and postoperative complications (P<0.00001). Disadvantages were higher rates of intraoperative complications (P=0.03) and longer duration of surgical procedures (P= 0.004). Conclusion Compared with laparotomy, laparoscopic surgery seems to be beneficial in women with endometrial cancer, in particular as total complications and length of hospital stay.

Key words: endometrial cancer, laparoscopic hysterectomy, laparotomy, systematic review, randomized controlled trial

摘要:

目的 系统评价腹腔镜与开腹手术在子宫内膜癌治疗中的疗效及安全性。方法 检索Cochrane Library、PubMed、EMbase、Ovid、CBM、万方、维普及CNKI等数据库1990年1月至2013年9月比较腹腔镜和开腹手术治疗所有期别的子宫内膜癌的随机对照试验,采用RevMan 5.1软件进行Meta分析。结果 最终纳入13个随机对照试验,共7317例患者。Meta分析结果:两组术后随访3~5年子宫内膜癌患者总生存率、复发率以及清扫盆腔淋巴结数目无明显差别。与开腹手术相比,腹腔镜手术治疗子宫内膜癌术中出血量更少(P=0.0001),住院时间更短(P<0.00001),总并发症(P<0.00001)、术后并发症(P<0.00001)发生率更低。但腹腔镜组的术中并发症发生率高于开腹组(P=0.03)、手术时间较开腹组长(P=0.004)。结论 与开腹手术相比,腹腔镜在子宫内膜癌的治疗中更有优势,尤其在总并发症和住院时间等方面优势更明显。

关键词: 子宫内膜癌, 腹腔镜手术, 开腹手术, 系统评价, 随机对照试验

CLC Number: