中国实用外科杂志

• 指南(共识)解读 • 上一篇    下一篇

美国胃肠内镜外科医师学会《阑尾炎诊断与治疗指南(2024)》解读

陈志亮,丁嘉宁,陶凯雄,张    鹏   

  1. 华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院胃肠外科,湖北武汉430022
  • 出版日期:2024-12-01

  • Online:2024-12-01

摘要: 当前阑尾炎的诊断与治疗已相对成熟,但在具体诊治细节方面仍存在差异。合理选用影像学检查,选择合适的治疗方案与治疗时机及完善术前术后的有关操作有利于降低病人治疗风险并改善预后。2024年美国胃肠内镜外科医师学会(SAGES)召集多学科指南制定专家小组(GDG),讨论并制定了《阑尾炎诊断与治疗指南(2024)》,该指南聚焦阑尾炎诊治中的关键问题,涵盖诊断手段、治疗方式、手术时机等方面。该指南指出,影像学检查在诊断急性阑尾炎中起重要作用,其中CT和MRI的诊断准确性显著高于超声,推荐为确诊首选,特别在育龄期女性中更适合使用MRI,而超声则作为合理的一线筛查手段。急性单纯性阑尾炎病人推荐手术治疗,阑尾切除术为标准方法,但在病人可接受复发风险情况下,非手术治疗亦可作为替代方案。对于复杂性阑尾炎,研究结果表明手术优于非手术治疗,有助于减少住院时间和再入院率,适合大多数病人。此外,对于是否进行延迟手术、抽吸时是否加入灌洗以及是否放置引流等操作,指南提供了建议,例如推荐依据病人实际情况决定手术时间,且不建议常规放置引流。术后抗生素的使用方面,短期抗生素治疗在降低并发症方面优于长期使用。对于既往接受非手术治疗的无症状复杂性阑尾炎病人,择期阑尾切除术能明确诊断并降低恶性肿瘤漏诊风险,尤其适用于有肿瘤家族史的病人。该指南为阑尾炎的规范诊治提供了参考依据,指导临床医生在不同病例中做出最佳诊疗选择,以实现更优的治疗效果和预后。

关键词: 阑尾炎, 指南, 解读, 影像学检查, 手术时机, 抗生素策略

Abstract: The diagnosis and treatment of appendicitis have become relatively standardized, but variations still exist in specific diagnostic and therapeutic details. Proper selection of imaging modalities, choosing an appropriate treatment approach and timing, as well as optimizing perioperative management, are essential for reducing treatment risks and improving patient outcomes. In 2024, the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) convened a multidisciplinary Guideline Development Group (GDG) to discuss and develop the “Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Appendicitis (2024)” which focuses on critical issues in the diagnosis and management of appendicitis, including diagnostic modalities, treatment strategies, and surgical timing. The guidelines emphasize the importance of imaging in diagnosing acute appendicitis, with CT and MRI demonstrating significantly higher diagnostic accuracy than ultrasound. CT and MRI are recommended as primary diagnostic modalities, with MRI being particularly suitable for women of reproductive age, while ultrasound serves as a reasonable first-line screening tool. For patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis, surgical intervention is recommended, with appendectomy being the standard treatment. However, for patients who can accept the risk of recurrence, non-surgical management may be considered as an alternative. In cases of complicated appendicitis, studies indicate that surgery is superior to non-surgical treatment, as it can reduce hospital stay and readmission rates, making it suitable for most patients. Additionally, the guidelines provide recommendations on aspects such as delayed surgery, irrigation during aspiration, and drainage placement. For example, the timing of surgery should be based on the patient's clinical situation, and routine drainage placement is not recommended. Regarding postoperative antibiotic use, short-term antibiotic therapy is favored over long-term use in reducing complications. Elective appendectomy is recommended for asymptomatic patients with a history of non-surgical treatment for complicated appendicitis, as it allows for a definitive diagnosis and reduces the risk of missing malignancy, particularly in patients with a family history of cancer. These guidelines provide a reference for the standardized diagnosis and management of appendicitis, guiding clinicians in making optimal diagnostic and therapeutic decisions across varied clinical scenarios to achieve better treatment outcomes and prognosis.

Key words: appendicitis, guidelines, interpretation, imaging modalities, surgical timing, antibiotic strategy