中国实用外科杂志 ›› 2011, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (04): 336-340.

• 国际疝外科精粹 • 上一篇    下一篇

腹股沟疝复发的时间分析

Magnusson N1,Nordin P2,Hedberg M1,Gunnarsson U3,Sandblom G3   

  • 出版日期:2011-04-01 发布日期:2011-05-30

  1. 1 Department of Surgery, Mora Hospital, Mora, Sweden; 2 Department of Surgery, Östersund Hospital, Östersund, Sweden; 3 CLINTEC, Division of Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
  • Online:2011-04-01 Published:2011-05-30

摘要:

目的    假设不同术式疝修补术术后复发的发病过程是不同的,那么疝复发的时间也是不同的。该研究的目的是分析影响初次手术到复发后再次手术时间间隔的危险因素。方法    研究数据来自瑞典疝登记注册系统。将5年随访期间的每一年的资料作为亚组分列,后合为大组。对于每个危险因素以再次手术为研究终点,运用Cox回归分析复发时间与危险因素之间的关系。结果    共分析了142578例,其中7.7%是女性,年龄平均59岁。5年总体复发率为4.3%。多因素分析显示复发疝修补后再次复发的时间较早(P<0.05);第一次手术后如果发生并发症,则发生复发也较早(P<0.05);缝合修补或腹腔镜修补后的复发要早于开放式补片修补者(P<0.05)。通过单因素分析提示,所有缝合修补的早期复发的危险要高于所有补片修补早期复发的危险(P < 0.05)。结论 不同术式疝修补术后复发的发病过程是不同的。腹腔镜修补、传统疝修补术(不应用补片)和复发疝修补术后早期复发率高可能是由于手术技术失误率较高。

关键词: 疝, 复发, 注册登记, 术后并发症, 网片

Abstract:

The time profile of groin hernia recurrences        Magnusson N*, Nordin P, Hedberg M, et al. *Department of Surgery, Mora Hospital, Mora, Sweden
Corresponding author: Magnusson N,E-mail: niklas.magnusson@ltdalarna.se
Abstract    Objective    If the pathogeneses of the development of a recurrence varies following the different methods of hernia repair, the time required to develop a recurrence could be expected to vary. The aim of the study was to identify risk factors affecting the time interval between the primary repair and the reoperation. Methods    Data from the Swedish Hernia Register were used. Each year of the 5-year follow-up period was treated as a separate subgroup and merged together into one large group. For each risk factor, we performed a Cox proportional hazard analysis, testing for interactions between the year and the risk factor, with reoperation as the endpoint. Results    Altogether, 142,578 repairs were recorded, of which 7.7% were performed on women. The mean age of the cohort was 59 years. The overall recurrence rate in the 5-year period was 4.3%. Multivariate analysis showed that recurrence following surgery for recurrent hernia occurred relatively early (P < 0.05).Recurrence also appeared early if postoperative complications were registered (P< 0.05). Recurrence after suture repair or laparoscopic repair appeared relatively early compared to recurrence following open mesh repair (P < 0.05). In a separate analysis, a relatively higher risk for early recurrence was seen for all sutured repairs compared to all mesh repairs (P< 0.05). Conclusion    The pathogenesis behind the development of recurrence probably differs depending on the technique applied during the hernia repair. The higher proportion of early recurrences following laparoscopic repair, suture repair and recurrent repair may be explained by the high proportion of technical failures.

Key words: Mesh, hernia, recurrence, registry, postoperative complication