中国实用口腔科杂志

中国实用口腔科杂志 ›› 2011, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (07): 416-417.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

空管用药与根管充填治疗乳牙牙髓炎疗效比较研究

  

  1. 1.惠州市第三人民医院，广东  惠州  516002；2.惠州市口腔医院，广东  惠州  516001
  • 收稿日期:2011-04-28 修回日期:2011-06-27 出版日期:2011-07-15 发布日期:2011-08-24

  • Received:2011-04-28 Revised:2011-06-27 Online:2011-07-15 Published:2011-08-24

摘要：

目的    比较空管药物疗法和根管充填术治疗乳牙牙髓炎的临床疗效。方法    选择2008年3月至2009年12月在惠州市第三人民医院口腔科门诊就诊的乳牙牙髓炎患儿160例（160颗患牙），随机分为空管药物组（空管药物疗法）和根管充填组（根管充填术），各80颗患牙。比较2种治疗方法的临床疗效。结果    空管药物组治疗成功率为97.5%，略高于根管充填组（93.8%），组间差异无统计学意义（P > 0.05）。结论    空管药物疗法成功率较高，操作简单，可减少患儿群体复诊次数，是适合儿童的一种较好的治疗方法。

关键词: 乳牙牙髓炎, 空管药物疗法, 根管充填术, 疗效比较

Abstract:

Objective    To compare the clinical effect of empty root canal drug therapy and root canal filling therapy for deciduous teeth endodontitis. Methods    From March 2008 to December 2009，160 child patients with deciduous teeth endodontitis were treated by empty root canal drug threapy and root canal filling threapy respectively. These 160 cases were randomly divided into two groups，treated respectively by empty root canal drug therapy and root canal filling therapy. Compare  clinical efficacy of two kinds of treatment. Results    The treatment success rate of empty root canal drug therapy was 97.5%. It is slightly higher than that of root canal filling therapy，which was 93.8%. There was no significant difference between the two groups（P > 0.05）. Conclusion    Empty root canal drug therapy was higher success rate. It is very simple and can reduce the number of children referral. It is a better treatment suitable for children.

Key words: deciduous teeth endodontitis；empty root canal drug therapy；root canal filling therapy；efficacy comparison