中国实用口腔科杂志 ›› 2010, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (11): 687-688.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

两种材料修复楔状缺损临床疗效评估

  

  1. 四川省德阳市口腔医院,四川  德阳  618000
  • 收稿日期:2010-08-09 修回日期:2010-10-20 出版日期:2010-11-15 发布日期:2010-12-10

  • Received:2010-08-09 Revised:2010-10-20 Online:2010-11-15 Published:2010-12-10

摘要:

目的    比较Dyract AP复合体和GC Fuji IX GP两种材料修复牙体楔状缺损的临床效果。方法    选择2007年9月至2009年10月,在四川省德阳市口腔医院口腔内科就诊的患者181例,共567颗中等以上深度楔状缺损牙,随机分为A、B两组,A组采用Dyract AP复合体充填修复,B组采用GC Fuji IX GP充填修复,随访1年,评定成功率。 结果    A组回访256颗患牙,成功225颗,成功率87.89% ;B组回访248颗患牙,成功196颗,成功率79.03% 。两组成功率差异有统计学意义(P < 0.01)。结论    Dyract AP复合体修复楔状缺损优于GC Fuji IX GP。

关键词: Dyract AP复合体 , GC Fuji IX GP , 楔状缺损

Abstract:

Objective    This study is to compare the clinical effect of two kinds of materials in restoration of wedge-shaped defects of teeth. Methods    The 181 cases (567 teeth)of medium or more depth of dental wedged-shaped defects were randomly divided into two groups. The defects of group A were restored by Dyract AP complex and group B by GC Fuji IX GP. The clinical effect was evaluated after observation for one year. Results    For the 256 teeth in Group A, 225 succeeded in restoration; for the 248 in Group B ,196 succeeded. The success rate of group A was 87.89%, group B 79.03%. There was statistical difference between the two groups (P < 0.01). Conclusion    The clinical effect of Dyract AP complex  is superior to the  GC Fuji IX GP in treating the wedge-shaped defects.

Key words: Dyract AP complex ;GC Fuji IX GP ;wedge-shaped defect