中国实用口腔科杂志

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

安氏Ⅱ类1分类病例治疗中微种植体支抗的应用11例分析

孔存英李凤华   

  1. 山东省济宁口腔医院
  • 收稿日期:2009-03-09 修回日期:2009-06-05 出版日期:2009-07-15 发布日期:2009-07-15

  • Received:2009-03-09 Revised:2009-06-05 Online:2009-07-15 Published:2009-07-15

摘要: 目的 探讨应用微种植体支抗治疗安氏Ⅱ类1分类错牙合畸形临床疗效及治疗方法临床要点。方法 对2005—2008年在山东省济宁口腔医院就诊的安氏Ⅱ类1分类上颌前突或伴轻微下颌后缩的正畸患者11例,采用MBT(滑动)直丝弓矫治技术,进行减数双尖牙矫治。黏结矫治器之前在上颌双侧第二双尖牙和第一磨牙之间的颊侧分别植入微种植体,在治疗早期应用自攻型微种植体进行尖牙向远中牵引,并在更换至稳定弓丝后利用微种植体整体内收前牙,牵引力值为1.5~2 .0 N,平均治疗时间为19个月,治疗结束观察1年。于治疗前后拍摄头颅侧位片,进行头影测量分析。结果 11例患者除1例种植体松动脱落,其余患者第一磨牙在前后向和垂直向均未发生显著性移动,患者的颜面侧貌得到明显改善,取得较为满意的治疗效果。与治疗前相比,治疗后SNA、 ANB、 FH to U1、IMPA角明显减小,差异均具有统计学意义;SNB角略有增大,FMA略有减小,但差异无统计学意义。结论 微种植体支抗能够有效治疗安氏Ⅱ类1分类患者,并达到磨牙强支抗的效果。

关键词: 正畸支抗, 微种植体支抗, 安氏Ⅱ类1分类

Abstract: Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate the treatment results and clinical treatment method of Angel’s Class Ⅱ1 malocclusion cases by the application of microscrews anchorage. Methods The study comprised 11 patients from Orthodontic Department of Jining Stomatology Hospital from the year 2005 to 2008. All the patients presented with maxillary protrusion or little mandible intrusion treated with MBT straight wire appliance by extraction of premolars. Self-drilling microscrews were impanted in the bilateral buccal alveolar bone between the maxillary first molars and second premolar before bonding straight wire appliance.Upper canines were ligated backward to the microscrews in the initial treatment.When the main arch was stable enough,the frontal teeth were retracted together with the microscrews anchorage 1.5 to 2N force each side was added to microscrews and retracted teeth. The average treatment time was 19 months, and follow-up lasted 1 year after the treatment .The cephalometric films before and after the treatment were measured and compared. Results Angel’s Class Ⅱ1 malocclusion in 11 patients were corrected effectively, except for 1 failure case. First molars had no significant changes in anteroposterior and vertical directions. Patients’ facial profile had been improved greatly. After the treatment, SNA、 ANB、 FH to U1 and IMPA angle decreased significantly. Furthermore SNB increased a little ,but FMA decreased a little. Neither of them had significant changes. Conclusion Angel’s Class Ⅱ1 malocclusion can be treated effectively by microscrew anchorage, with no loss of molar anchorage.

Key words: orthodontic anchorage, microscrew anchorage, Angel’s Class Ⅱ1 malocclusion