中国实用口腔科杂志

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

瑞芬太尼和丙泊酚持续静脉注射在困难气道清醒插管中的应用比较

何晓帆, 张 倩, 金玄玉   

  1. 中国医科大学口腔医学院
  • 收稿日期:2008-04-28 修回日期:2008-06-20 出版日期:2008-07-15 发布日期:2008-07-15

  • Received:2008-04-28 Revised:2008-06-20 Online:2008-07-15 Published:2008-07-15

摘要: 目的 比较瑞芬太尼和丙泊酚在困难气道清醒插管中应用的安全性和有效性。方法 2007年3月至2008年3月在中国医科大学口腔医学院选择困难气道需清醒气管插管患者24例,24例患者随机分为Ⅰ、Ⅱ两组, 在充分表面麻醉后,Ⅰ组(瑞芬太尼组),给予瑞芬太尼0.75μg/kg 的一次剂量后以 0.075μg/(kg·min)持续静脉注射;Ⅱ组 (丙泊酚组)给予丙泊酚0.5 mg/kg 的一次剂量后以6μg/(kg·min)持续静脉注射。记录两组患者在诱导前、导管出鼻后孔、盲探插管过程中以及导管进入气管后的心率、血压、血氧饱和度。结果 两组均能够完成盲探气管插管。Ⅰ组的血流动力学变化小于Ⅱ组,两组差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论 在表面麻醉基础上,持续静脉注射瑞芬太尼较丙泊酚能更好的完成困难气道的清醒盲探插管,血流动力学变化更小,更为安全。

关键词: 瑞芬太尼, 丙泊酚, 清醒插管, 血流动力学

Abstract: Remifentanil vs propofol continuous infusion for awake nasal intubation of difficult airways. HE Xiao-fan, ZHANG Qian, JIN Xuan-yu. Department of Anesthesia, School of Stomatology, China Medical University, Shenyang 110002, China
Abstract : Objective To compare the safety and availability of remifentanil and propofol for awake intubation of difficult air ways. Methods We recruited 24 ASA I-II patients, who were undergoing awake intubation after superficial anaesthesia . Patients were randomized to one of the two groups, Group Ⅰ (n=12) received remifentanil continous infusion 0.075 μg/(kg·min) after a bonus injection of 0.75 μg/kg, and Group Ⅱ (n=12) received propofol 6μg/(kg·min) after bonus injection of 0.5 mg/kg. Primary outcome measures were conditions(HR, SBP,DBP, SpO2) achieved at pre-intubation, intubation through choana, during intubation and post-intubation. Results All the patients completed awake intubation . Haemodynamic change in group I were significantly fewer than in group II. Conclusion After superficial anaesthesia, awake intubation is better achieved by continous injection of remifentanil than propofol; haemodynamic changes are fewer .

Key words: remifentanil, propofol, awake intubation, haemodynamic changes