中国实用口腔科杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (1): 71-77.DOI: 10.19538/j.kq.2026.01.011

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同呼吸习惯青少年均角型患者唇肌力量对比研究

曹清欣,赵震锦,赵    璐,孙佳桢   

  1. 中国医科大学口腔医学院·附属口腔医院口腔正畸学教研室,第一门诊,辽宁省口腔疾病重点实验室,辽宁 沈阳 110002
  • 出版日期:2026-01-30 发布日期:2026-01-30
  • 通讯作者: 赵震锦
  • 基金资助:
    沈阳市科学技术计划项目-医工结合协同创新项目(22-321-32-17)

  • Online:2026-01-30 Published:2026-01-30

摘要: 目的    测量不同呼吸习惯青少年均角型患者的唇肌力量,分析呼吸习惯、骨骼矢状向关系、年龄及性别对唇肌力量的影响,为口周肌功能训练提供一定参考。方法    选取2022年6月至2025年3月在中国医科大学附属口腔医院正畸科及第一门诊就诊的青少年均角型患者560例,将所有患者分为鼻呼吸习惯组(正常经鼻通气呼吸,用B表示)和张口呼吸习惯组(存在张口呼吸习惯,用K表示),每组各280例。2组患者又可进一步分为骨性Ⅰ类[0.7° ≤ ANB(上牙槽座点、鼻根点和下牙槽座点构成的角 )≤ 4.7°,用Ⅰ表示]和骨性Ⅱ类(ANB > 4.7°,用Ⅱ表示),男性(用M表示)和女性(用F表示),年龄9 ~ 12岁(用1表示)和 > 12 ~ 16岁(用2表示),即分为BⅠM1、BⅠM2、BⅠF1、BⅠF2、BⅡM1、BⅡM2、BⅡF1、BⅡF2、KⅠM1、KⅠM2、KⅠF1、KⅠF2、KⅡM1、KⅡM2、KⅡF1、KⅡF2亚组,每亚组各35例。使用与中国科学院沈阳自动化研究所合作开发的唇肌测量及训练装置(专利号:ZL202210078382.4)测量所有患者的唇肌力量。结果    张口呼吸习惯组唇肌力量为(50.01 ± 7.58)gf,鼻呼吸习惯组唇肌力量为(130.37 ± 3.66)gf,1gf = 0.009 8 N,2组比较差异有统计学意义(t = -159.839,P < 0.001)。BⅠM1、BⅠM2、BⅠF1、BⅠF2、BⅡM1、BⅡM2、BⅡF1、BⅡF2、KⅠM1、KⅠM2、KⅠF1、KⅠF2、KⅡM1、KⅡM2、KⅡF1、KⅡF2亚组唇肌力量分别为(142.33 ± 3.57)、(163.54 ± 2.17)、(128.49 ± 4.58)、(131.29 ± 3.63)、(111.92 ± 2.51)、(119.24 ± 3.75)、(109.75 ± 4.22)、(116.41 ± 4.89)、(52.48 ± 9.62)、(51.91 ± 9.85)、(48.93 ± 5.82)、(50.83 ± 5.26)、(49.85 ± 5.62)、(48.84 ± 6.57)、(49.16 ± 7.12)、(48.12 ± 9.32)gf。其中,BⅠM1与BⅡM1、BⅠM2与BⅡM2、BⅠF1与BⅡF1、BⅠF2与BⅡF2、BⅠM1与BⅠF1、BⅠM2与BⅠF2、BⅡM1与BⅡF1、BⅡM2与BⅡF2、BⅠM1与BⅠM2、BⅠF1与BⅠF2、BⅡM1与BⅡM2、BⅡF1与BⅡF2亚组唇肌力量比较,差异均有统计学意义(均P < 0.05)。而KⅠM1与KⅡM1、KⅠM2与KⅡM2、KⅠF1与KⅡF1、KⅠF2与KⅡF2、KⅠM1与KⅠF1、KⅠM2与KⅠF2、KⅡM1与KⅡF1、KⅡM2与KⅡF2、KⅠM1与KⅠM2、KⅠF1与KⅠF2、KⅡM1与KⅡM2、KⅡF1与KⅡF2亚组唇肌力量比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P > 0.05)。结论    不同呼吸习惯青少年均角型患者唇肌力量不同,张口呼吸习惯患者唇肌力量小于鼻呼吸习惯患者。且鼻呼吸习惯患者中,不同骨骼矢状向关系(骨性Ⅰ类、骨性Ⅱ类)、年龄段(9 ~ 12岁、> 12 ~ 16岁)及性别患者的唇肌力量不同。

关键词: 唇肌力量, 鼻呼吸习惯, 张口呼吸习惯, 青少年, 错??畸形

Abstract: Objective    By measuring the lip muscle strength of adolescent patients with average-angle profiles and different breathing habits,this study aims to analyze the effects of breathing habits,sagittal skeletal relationship,age,and gender on lip muscle strength,thereby providing references for perioral muscle function training. Methods    A total of 560 adolescent patients with average-angle profiles who visited the Department of Orthodontics and the First Outpatient Clinic of the Stomatological Hospital affiliated to China Medical University between June 2022 and March 2025 were selected. All patients were divided into a nasal breathing habit group(normal nasal breathing,denoted as B)and a mouth breathing habit group(exhibiting mouth breathing habits,denoted as K),with 280 patients in each group. Patients in both groups were further subdivided into skeletal Class Ⅰ[0.7° ≤ ANB(angle formed by the maxillary alveolar ridge,nasal root,and mandibular alveolar ridge) ≤ 4.7°,denoted as Ⅰ]and skeletal Class Ⅱ(ANB > 4.7°,denoted as Ⅱ),male(denoted as M)and female(denoted as F),and aged 9 - 12 years(denoted as 1)and > 12 - 16 years(denoted as 2). This resulted in the following subgroups:BⅠM1,BⅠM2,BⅠF1,BⅠF2,BⅡM1,BⅡM2,BⅡF1,BⅡF2,KⅠM1,KⅠM2,KⅠF1,KⅠF2,KⅡM1,KⅡM2,KⅡF1,and KⅡF2,with 35 patients in each subgroup. Lip muscle strength was measured for all patients using a lip muscle measurement and training device(Patent No.ZL202210078382.4)developed in collaboration with the Shenyang Institute of Automation,Chinese Academy of Sciences. Results    The lip muscle strength in the mouth-breathing habit group was(50.01 ± 7.58)gf,while that in the nasal-breathing habit group was(130.37 ± 3.66)gf,showing a statistically significant difference between the two groups(t = -159.839,P < 0.001). The lip muscle strengths for the BⅠM1,BⅠM2,BⅠF1,BⅠF2,BⅡM1,BⅡM2,BⅡF1,BⅡF2,KⅠM1,KⅠM2,KⅠF1,KⅠF2,KⅡM1,KⅡM2,KⅡF1,and KⅡF2 subgroups were(142.33 ± 3.57),(163.54 ± 2.17),(128.49 ± 4.58),(131.29 ± 3.63),(111.92 ± 2.51),(119.24 ± 3.75),(109.75 ± 4.22),(116.41 ± 4.89),(52.48 ± 9.62),(51.91 ± 9.85),(48.93 ± 5.82),(50.83 ± 5.26),(49.85 ± 5.62),(48.84 ± 6.57),(49.16 ± 7.12)and(48.12 ± 9.32)gf,respectively. Among these,statistically significant differences in lip muscle strength were found between the following subgroup pairs:BⅠM1 vs. BⅡM1,BⅠM2 vs. BⅡM2,BⅠF1 vs. BⅡF1,BⅠF2 vs. BⅡF2,BⅠM1 vs. BⅠF1,BⅠM2 vs. BⅠF2,BⅡM1 vs. BⅡF1,BⅡM2 vs. BⅡF2,BⅠM1 vs. BⅠM2,BⅠF1 vs. BⅠF2,BⅡM1 vs. BⅡM2,and BⅡF1 vs. BⅡF2(all P < 0.05). In contrast,no statistically significant differences were observed between the following subgroup pairs:KⅠM1 vs. KⅡM1,KⅠM2 vs. KⅡM2,KⅠF1 vs. KⅡF1,KⅠF2 vs. KⅡF2,KⅠM1 vs. KⅠF1,KⅠM2 vs. KⅠF2,KⅡM1 vs. KⅡF1,KⅡM2 vs. KⅡF2,KⅠM1 vs. KⅠM2,KⅠF1 vs. KⅠF2,KⅡM1 vs. KⅡM2,and KⅡF1 vs. KⅡF2(all P > 0.05). Conclusion    Adolescent patients with average-angle profiles and different breathing habits exhibit varying lip muscle strength. Patients with mouth-breathing habits demonstrate lower lip muscle strength than those with nasal-breathing habits. Among patients with nasal-breathing habits,differences in sagittal skeletal relationship(skeletal Class Ⅰ and Class Ⅱ),age group(9 - 12 years and > 12 - 16 years),and gender are associated with variations in lip muscle strength.

Key words: lip muscle strength, nasal-breathing habit, mouth-breathing habit, adolescents, malocclusion

中图分类号: