中国实用口腔科杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (3): 307-315.DOI: 10.19538/j.kq.2025.03.009

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

乳牙列错𬌗畸形牙弓异常机制的智能化研究

廖珮吟,李小兵   

  1. 口腔疾病防治全国重点实验室 国家口腔医学中心 国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心 四川大学华西口腔医院儿童口腔科,四川 成都 610041
  • 出版日期:2025-05-30 发布日期:2025-05-30
  • 通讯作者: 李小兵

  • Online:2025-05-30 Published:2025-05-30

摘要: 目的    应用牙弓形态点云智能化分析系统分析乳牙列错畸形牙弓,以探究牙弓异常对乳牙列错畸形形成的影响。方法    选取2022年12月至2023年12月于四川大学第二幼儿园自愿报名的169名4 ~ 5岁成都地区乳牙列期儿童,将其分为错畸形组(104名)和个别正常组(65名);错畸形组根据错畸形表现进一步分为前牙深覆/深覆盖组[即前牙具有深覆和(或)深覆盖,16名]、牙列拥挤组(39名)、前牙切/反组[即前牙具有切和(或)反,19名],其他类型样本量较少则不展开分析。对所有儿童进行口腔扫描,获取乳牙列牙弓三维模型,测量分析错畸形组和个别正常组的牙弓宽度及长度;建立乳牙列牙弓形态点云智能化分析系统,并分析前牙深覆/深覆盖组的牙弓形态及异常程度。结果    ①错畸形组的上颌乳尖牙区牙弓宽度、下颌乳尖牙区牙弓宽度、上颌第二乳磨牙区牙弓长度明显小于个别正常组,上颌乳尖牙区牙弓长度、下颌乳尖牙区牙弓长度明显大于个别正常组,差异均有统计学意义(均P < 0.05)。前牙深覆/深覆盖组的上下颌乳尖牙区牙弓宽度明显小于个别正常组,上下颌乳尖牙区牙弓长度、下颌第二乳磨牙区牙弓宽度明显大于个别正常组;牙列拥挤组的上下颌乳尖牙区牙弓宽度、下颌第一乳磨牙区牙弓长度明显小于个别正常组,下颌乳尖牙区牙弓长度明显大于个别正常组;前牙切/反组的上下颌乳尖牙区牙弓宽度明显小于个别正常组,上下颌乳尖牙区牙弓长度明显大于个别正常组,差异均有统计学意义(均P < 0.05)。②乳牙列个别正常组牙弓形态可分为7个簇(记为1 ~ 7),上颌与下颌牙弓形态簇之间最普遍的配对是上颌形态3配下颌形态1(占11.110%),其次为上颌形态1配下颌形态4、上颌形态3配下颌形态6、上颌形态4配下颌形态7、上颌形态6配下颌形态6、上颌形态7配下颌形态4(均占6.349%);前牙深覆/深覆盖组牙弓异常形态可分为A(上下颌牙弓形态均异常)、B(上颌牙弓形态异常、下颌牙弓形态正常)、C(上颌牙弓形态正常、下颌牙弓形态异常)、D(上下颌牙弓形态基本正常但匹配异常)4类,且其牙弓形态异常值均实现量化。结论    乳牙列错畸形的牙弓大小和形态存在异常,应用乳牙列牙弓形态点云智能化分析系统能够准确诊断牙弓异常,在儿童早期矫治的诊断、方案设计及疗效评价中表现出极大的应用潜力。

关键词: 乳牙列, 牙弓大小, 牙弓形态, 错机制, 点云智能化分析

Abstract: Objective    To analyze the dental arch morphology in deciduous dentition malocclusion using an intelligent point cloud-based analysis system in order to investigate the impact of dental arch abnormalities on the development of deciduous dentition malocclusion. Methods    A total of 169 children aged 4 to 5 years in the stage of deciduous dentition,who voluntarily enrolled at the Second Kindergarten of Sichuan University between December 2022 and December 2023,were included in this study. Participants were divided into a malocclusion group(n = 104)and an individual normal occlusion group(n = 65). The malocclusion group was further categorized into three subgroups based on malocclusion characteristics:the anterior deep overbite/overjet group(n = 16,exhibiting either deep overbite or deep overjet,or both),the dental crowding group(n = 39),and the anterior crossbite/reverse overjet group(n = 19,exhibiting either crossbite or reverse overjet,or both). Other malocclusion types with smaller sample sizes were not analyzed. Intraoral scanning was performed to obtain three-dimensional models of the deciduous dental arch,and measurements of dental arch width and length were compared between the malocclusion and normal occlusion groups. An intelligent point cloud-based analysis system for dental arch morphology of deciduous dentition was developed and applied to assess the morphology and severity of abnormalities in the anterior deep overbite/overjet group. Results    ①The malocclusion group exhibited significantly smaller maxillary and mandibular intercanine arch widths,as well as maxillary inter-second molar arch length,compared to the normal occlusion group. However,maxillary and mandibular intercanine arch lengths were significantly greater in the malocclusion group than in the normal occlusion group(all P < 0.05). In the anterior deep overbite/overjet group,both maxillary and mandibular intercanine arch widths were significantly smaller than those in the normal occlusion group,while maxillary and mandibular intercanine arch lengths,as well as mandibular inter-second molar arch width,were significantly greater. The dental crowding group showed significantly smaller maxillary and mandibular intercanine arch widths and mandibular inter-first molar arch length than the normal occlusion group,whereas the mandibular intercanine arch length was significantly greater in the dental crowding group. In the anterior crossbite/reverse overjet group,maxillary and mandibular intercanine arch widths were significantly smaller compared to those in the normal occlusion group,while maxillary and mandibular intercanine arch lengths were significantly greater(all P < 0.05). ②The dental arch morphology in the normal occlusion group could be classified into seven clusters. The most common maxillary-mandibular arch pairing was maxillary type 3 paired with mandibular type 1(11.110%),followed by maxillary type 1 with mandibular type 4,maxillary type 3 with mandibular type 6,maxillary type 4 with mandibular type 7,maxillary type 6 with mandibular type 6,and maxillary type 7 with mandibular type 4(each 6.349%). In the anterior deep overbite/overjet group,abnormal dental arch morphology could be categorized into four types:A(abnormalities in both maxillary and mandibular arches),B(abnormalities in the maxillary arch with a normal mandibular arch),C(abnormalities in the mandibular arch with a normal maxillary arch),and D(nearly normal maxillary and mandibular arches but with abnormal occlusal pairing). Additionally,the severity of these dental arch abnormalities was quantified. Conclusion    Abnormalities in the size and morphology of the dental arch are present in deciduous dentition malocclusion. The application of an intelligent point cloud-based analysis system enables accurate diagnosis of dental arch abnormalities,demonstrating significant potential for early orthodontic diagnosis,treatment planning,and therapeutic outcome evaluation in pediatric patients.

Key words: deciduous dentition, arch size, arch morphology, malocclusion mechanism, intelligent point cloud-based analysis