[1] Aflatoonian A, Oskouian H, Ahmadi S, et al. RETRACTED ARTICLE: Can fresh embryo transfers be replaced by cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfers in assisted reproductive cycles? A randomized controlled trial [J]. J Assisted Reprod Genet, 2010, 27(7): 357-363.[2] Roque M, Lattes K, Serra S, et al. Fresh embryo transfer versus frozen embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Fertil Steril, 2013, 99(1): 156-162.[3] Horcajadas JA, Díaz-Gimeno P, Pellicer A, et al. Uterine receptivity and the ramifications of ovarian stimulation on endometrial function[J].Semin Reprod Med, 2007, 25(6): 454-460.[4] Haouzi D, Assou S, Mahmoud K, et al. Gene expression profile of human endometrial receptivity: comparison between natural and stimulated cycles for the same patients[J]. Hum Reprod, 2009, 24(6): 1436-1445.[5] Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Garner FC, et al. Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen–thawed embryo transfer in normal responders [J]. Fertil Steril, 2011, 96(2): 344-348.[6] Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Garner FC, et al. Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfers in high responders[J]. Fertil Steril, 2011; 96(3): 516-518.[7] Basir GS, Wai-Sum O, Ng EHY, et al. Morphometric analysis of peri-implantation endometrium in patients having excessively high oestradiol concentrations after ovarian stimulation[J]. Hum Reprod, 2001, 16(3): 435-440.[8] Kok JD, Looman CWN, Weima SM, et al. A high number of oocytes obtained after ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection is not associated with decreased pregnancy outcome[J]. Fertil Steril, 2006, 85(4): 918-924.[9] Fa?bregues F, Peñarrubia J, Vidal E, et al. Oocyte quality in patients with severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a self-controlled clinical study[J]. Fertil Steril, 2004, 82(4): 827-833.[10] Friedler S, Zimerman A, Schachter M, et al. The midluteal decline in serum estradiol levels is drastic but not deleterious for implantation after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer in patients with normal or high responses[J]. Fertil Steril, 2005, 83(1): 54-60.[11] Pellicer A, Valbuena D, Cano F, et al. Lower implantation rates in high responders: evidence for an altered endocrine milieu during the preimplantation period[J]. Fertil Steril, 1996, 65(6): 1190-1195.[12] Maheshwari A, Bhattacharya S. Elective frozen replacement cycles for all: ready for prime time?[J]. Hum Reprod, 2013, 28(1): 6-9.[13] Devroey P, Polyzos NP, Blockeel C. An OHSS-free clinic by segmentation of IVF treatment[J]. Hum Reprod, 2011, 26(10): 2593-2597.[14] Healy DL, Breheny S, Halliday J, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for obstetric haemorrhage in 6730 singleton births after assisted reproductive technology in victoria Australia[J]. Hum Reprod, 2010, 25(1): 265-274. [15] Kalra KS, Ratcliffe SJ, Milman L, et al. Perinatal morbidity after in vitro fertilization is lower with frozen embryo transfer[J]. Fertili Steril, 2011, 95(2): 548-553.[16] Amor DJ, Xu JX, Halliday JL, et al. Pregnancies conceived using assisted reproductive technologies (ART) have low levels of pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) leading to a high rate of false-positive results in first trimester screening for Down syndrome[J]. Hum Reprod, 2009, 24(6): 1330-1338.[17] Maheshwari A, Pandey S, Shetty A, et al. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from the transfer of frozen thawed versus fresh embryos generated through in vitro fertilization treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Fertil Steril, 2012, 98(2): 368-377. (2014-05-08收稿 2014-07-10修回) |