孕产妇脓毒症的集束化管理

姬晓宇, 陈鹏正, 王谢桐

中国实用妇科与产科杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (6) : 596-599.

PDF(902 KB)
PDF(902 KB)
中国实用妇科与产科杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (6) : 596-599. DOI: 10.19538/j.fk2026060106
专题笔谈

孕产妇脓毒症的集束化管理

作者信息 +

Bundle management of maternal sepsis

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

孕产妇脓毒症是妊娠及产褥期严重威胁母儿健康的感染性疾病,在全球范围内是导致孕产妇死亡的主要原因之一。孕产妇特殊的生理变化容易掩盖脓毒症的早期症状,导致临床诊断延迟和治疗不及时,集束化管理通过整合一系列基于循证医学的标准化干预措施,为产科脓毒症的规范诊疗提供了系统方案。在早期识别脓毒症的基础上,尽早启动产科脓毒症集束化管理方案,包括乳酸检测、微生物培养、广谱抗生素应用、液体复苏、血管升压药使用等相关措施的产科适配要点,并强调抗生素治疗的及时性与降阶梯原则。脓毒症本身并非立即终止妊娠的指征,去除原因后妊娠大多可以继续。

Abstract

Maternal sepsis is a severe infectious condition occurring during pregnancy and the puerperium that poses a significant threat to both maternal and fetal health. Globally, it remains one of the leading causes of maternal mortality. The unique physiological changes associated with pregnancy may obscure the early manifestations of sepsis, thereby contributing to delayed clinical diagnosis and untimely intervention.Bundle management, which integrates a series of evidence-based standardized interventions, provides a systematic framework for the standardized diagnosis and treatment of obstetric sepsis. Upon early identification of sepsis, the bundle management of obstetric sepsis should be initiated promptly. This includes the measures concerning lactate measurement, microbiological cultures, administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics, fluid resuscitation, and the use of vasopressors, with careful consideration of obstetric-specific adaptations. Particular emphasis should be placed on the timeliness of antibiotic therapy and adherence to the principle of de-escalation. Sepsis itself is not an indication for termination of pregnancy; in most cases, pregnancy can be safely continued once the underlying cause of infection is identified and appropriately managed.

关键词

产科脓毒症 / 集束化管理 / 产科适配策略 / 抗感染 / 多学科协作

Key words

obstetric sepsis / bundle management / obstetric adaptation / anti-infection / multidisciplinary collaboration

引用本文

导出引用
姬晓宇, 陈鹏正, 王谢桐. 孕产妇脓毒症的集束化管理[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志. 2026, 42(6): 596-599 https://doi.org/10.19538/j.fk2026060106
JI Xiao-yu, CHEN Peng-zheng, WANG Xie-tong. Bundle management of maternal sepsis[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2026, 42(6): 596-599 https://doi.org/10.19538/j.fk2026060106
中图分类号: R714.62+6   

参考文献

[1]
Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2021, 47(11): 1181-1247. DOI:10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y.
[2]
Levy MM, Evans LE, Rhodes A. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Bundle: 2018 Update[J]. Crit Care Med, 2018, 46(6): 997-1000. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003119.
[3]
连岩, 王谢桐. 妊娠期和产褥期脓毒症诊断与治疗[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2020, 9(4): 208-212. DOI:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3259.2020.04.005.
[4]
王广娇, 刘国莉. 产科脓毒症及脓毒性休克:重在预防[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2024, 40(8):801-804.DOI:10.19538/j.fk2024080108.
[5]
NICE. Suspected sepsis in pregnant or recently pregnant people: recognition, diagnosis and early manLondon[M/ON]// National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: Clinical Guidelines. London: NICE. 2025. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41875254.
[6]
California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative. Improving Diagnosis and Treatment of Obstetric Sepsis,V2.0 Toolkit (2025). Accessed Mar. 18, 2026. https://www.cmqcc.org/resource/improving-diagnosis-and-treatment-obstetric-sepsis-v20-toolkit-2025.
[7]
Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3)[J]. JAMA, 2016, 315(8): 801-810. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
Definitions of sepsis and septic shock were last revised in 2001. Considerable advances have since been made into the pathobiology (changes in organ function, morphology, cell biology, biochemistry, immunology, and circulation), management, and epidemiology of sepsis, suggesting the need for reexamination.To evaluate and, as needed, update definitions for sepsis and septic shock.A task force (n = 19) with expertise in sepsis pathobiology, clinical trials, and epidemiology was convened by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Definitions and clinical criteria were generated through meetings, Delphi processes, analysis of electronic health record databases, and voting, followed by circulation to international professional societies, requesting peer review and endorsement (by 31 societies listed in the Acknowledgment).Limitations of previous definitions included an excessive focus on inflammation, the misleading model that sepsis follows a continuum through severe sepsis to shock, and inadequate specificity and sensitivity of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria. Multiple definitions and terminologies are currently in use for sepsis, septic shock, and organ dysfunction, leading to discrepancies in reported incidence and observed mortality. The task force concluded the term severe sepsis was redundant.Sepsis should be defined as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. For clinical operationalization, organ dysfunction can be represented by an increase in the Sequential [Sepsis-related] Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score of 2 points or more, which is associated with an in-hospital mortality greater than 10%. Septic shock should be defined as a subset of sepsis in which particularly profound circulatory, cellular, and metabolic abnormalities are associated with a greater risk of mortality than with sepsis alone. Patients with septic shock can be clinically identified by a vasopressor requirement to maintain a mean arterial pressure of 65 mm Hg or greater and serum lactate level greater than 2 mmol/L (>18 mg/dL) in the absence of hypovolemia. This combination is associated with hospital mortality rates greater than 40%. In out-of-hospital, emergency department, or general hospital ward settings, adult patients with suspected infection can be rapidly identified as being more likely to have poor outcomes typical of sepsis if they have at least 2 of the following clinical criteria that together constitute a new bedside clinical score termed quickSOFA (qSOFA): respiratory rate of 22/min or greater, altered mentation, or systolic blood pressure of 100 mm Hg or less.These updated definitions and clinical criteria should replace previous definitions, offer greater consistency for epidemiologic studies and clinical trials, and facilitate earlier recognition and more timely management of patients with sepsis or at risk of developing sepsis.
[8]
Agarwal R, Yadav RK, Garg S, et al. Lactic acid as an adjuvant marker in pregnancy-associated sepsis[J]. S Afr J Obstet Gynaecol, 2018, 24(1):8-10. DOI:10.7196/SAJOG.2018.v24i1.1219.
[9]
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Bacterial Sepsis in Pregnancy. Green-top Guideline No. 64a. Accessed Mar. 18, 2026. https://www.rcog.org.uk/media/ea1p1r4h/gtg_64a.pdf.
[10]
Bauer ME, Housey M, Bauer ST, et al. Risk factors, etiologies, and screening tools for sepsis in pregnant women: a multicenter case-control study[J]. Anesth Analg, 2019, 129(6): 1613-1620. DOI:10.1213/ANE.0000000000003709.
Given the significant morbidity and mortality of maternal sepsis, early identification is key to improve outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the performance characteristics of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), quick Sequential [Sepsis-related] Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA), and maternal early warning (MEW) criteria for identifying cases of impending sepsis in parturients. The secondary objective of this study is to identify etiologies and risk factors for maternal sepsis and to assess timing of antibiotics in patients diagnosed with sepsis.
[11]
李磊, 王谢桐. 从临床救治再谈产科重症监护病房建设[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2024, 40(10):974-978.DOI:10.19538/j.fk2024100104.
[12]
Rand KH, Beal SG, Rivera K, et al. Hourly effect of pretreatment with iv antibiotics on blood culture positivity rate in emergency department patients[J]. Open Forum Infect Dis, 2019, 6(5): ofz179. DOI:10.1093/ofid/ofz179.
Although it is intuitive that antibiotics administered before obtaining a blood culture would reduce the likelihood of obtaining a positive culture, it is not clear exactly how rapidly and to what extent blood becomes sterile after administration of intravenous (IV) antibiotics. Using a large data set of patients admitted from the UFHealth Shands Adult Emergency Department (ED) between 2012 and 2016 (n = 25 686), we had the opportunity to more closely examine the effect of starting IV antibiotics before vs after obtaining blood cultures. We present data on the effect of pretreatment with IV antibiotics for both septic and nonseptic ED patients on the blood culture positivity rate on an hour-by-hour basis, as well as the effects on distribution of species recovered and the impact of antibiotic resistance in empiric treatment with antibiotics.
[13]
Plante LA, Pacheco LD, Louis JM, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM). SMFM Consult Series #47: Sepsis during pregnancy and the puerperium[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2019, 220(4): B2-B10. DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2019.01.216.
[14]
中华医学会重症医学分会. 中国严重脓毒症/脓毒症休克治疗指南(2014)[J]. 中华危重病急救医学, 2015, 54(6):401-426. DOI:10.3760/j.issn.2095-4352.2015.06.001.
[15]
Shields AD, Plante LA, Pacheco LD, et al. SMFM Publications Committee. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #67: Maternal sepsis[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2023, 229(3): B2-B19. DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2023.05.019.
[16]
Albright C, McCartney S, Hitti J. Identification and Management of Sepsis in Pregnancy: Obstetric Consensus Statement[EB/OL]. (2020-11-02)[2026-3-18]. Accessed Mar. 18, 2026. https://www.uwmedicine.org/sites/stevie/files/2020-11/Identification-and-Management-of-Sepsis-in-Pregnancy-OB-Consensus-Statement.pdf.
[17]
Manigrasso J, Desai N, Naoum E. Maternal sepsis: background, diagnosis and management[J]. BJA Educ, 2024, 24(11): 389-398. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjae.2024.06.004.
[18]
严少梅, 樊尚荣. 2019年美国母胎医学会"妊娠期及产褥期脓毒症诊断和治疗共识"解读[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2019, 8(2): 108-115. DOI:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3259.2019.02.010.
[19]
Lissauer D, Gadama L, Waitt C, et al. A multicomponent intervention to improve maternal infection outcomes[J]. N Engl J Med, 2025 Nov 19. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa2512698.
[20]
Colaneri M, Biscarini S, Tiranini L, et al. Maternal sepsis group. a multicenter study in northern italy to evaluate the impact of a sepsis bundle in obstetric settings: The SOS Study[J]. Open Forum Infect Dis, 2025, 12(7): ofaf337.DOI:10.1093/ofid/ofaf337.
[21]
Venkatesh KK, Glover AV, Vladutiu CJ, et al. Association of chorioamnionitis and its duration with adverse maternal outcomes by mode of delivery: a cohort study[J]. BJOG, 2019, 126(6): 719-727. DOI:10.1111/1471-0528.15565.
To investigate the association of chorioamnionitis and its duration with adverse maternal outcomes by mode of delivery.
[22]
Bauer ME, Albright C, Prabhu M, et al. Alliance for Innovation on Maternal Health: consensus bundle on sepsis in obstetric care[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2023, 142(3): 481-492. DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000005304.
Sepsis in obstetric care is one of the leading causes of maternal death in the United States, with Black, Asian/Pacific Islander, and American Indian/Alaska Native obstetric patients experiencing sepsis at disproportionately higher rates. State maternal mortality review committees have determined that deaths are preventable much of the time and are caused by delays in recognition, treatment, and escalation of care. The "Sepsis in Obstetric Care" patient safety bundle provides guidance for health care teams to develop coordinated, multidisciplinary care for pregnant and postpartum people by preventing infection and recognizing and treating infection early to prevent progression to sepsis. This is one of several core patient safety bundles developed by AIM (the Alliance for Innovation on Maternal Health) to provide condition- or event-specific clinical practices that should be implemented in all appropriate care settings. As with other bundles developed by AIM, the "Sepsis in Obstetric Care" patient safety bundle is organized into five domains: Readiness, Recognition and Prevention, Response, Reporting and Systems Learning, and Respectful, Equitable, and Supportive Care. The Respectful, Equitable, and Supportive Care domain provides essential best practices to support respectful, equitable, and supportive care to all patients. Further health equity considerations are integrated into the elements of each domain.Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
[23]
Bowyer L, Cutts BA, Barrett HL, et al. SOMANZ position statement for the investigation and management of sepsis in pregnancy 2023[J]. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 2025, 65(1): 37-46. DOI:10.1111/ajo.13848.
The Society of Australia and New Zealand (SOMANZ) published its first sepsis in pregnancy and the postpartum period guideline in 2017 (Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 57, 2017, 540). In the intervening 6 years, maternal mortality from sepsis has remained static.

脚注

利益冲突 所有作者均声明不存在利益冲突

基金

国家重点研发计划(2024YFC2707500)

PDF(902 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/