翻转法经阴道自然腔道内镜下子宫肌瘤剔除术治疗宫底肌瘤临床效果观察

唐丹, 姚华, 许日华, 罗勇, 马进昇, 欧阳静茹, 李韵霞, 侯磊, 周静

中国实用妇科与产科杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (3) : 355-360.

PDF(10779 KB)
PDF(10779 KB)
中国实用妇科与产科杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (3) : 355-360. DOI: 10.19538/j.fk2026030116
论著

翻转法经阴道自然腔道内镜下子宫肌瘤剔除术治疗宫底肌瘤临床效果观察

作者信息 +

Clinical observation of flipping technique vNOTES myomectomy in the treatment of uterine fundus myoma

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 探讨采用翻转法经阴道自然腔道内镜下手术(vNOTES)行子宫肌瘤剔除术治疗宫底肌瘤的可行性及安全性。方法 收集2024-03-01—2025-12-31克拉玛依市中心医院收治的宫底肌瘤患者,根据手术方式,将其分为观察组(翻转法vNOTES组,42例)和对照组(传统腹腔镜组,42例)。比较两种术式在手术时间、术中出血量、术后疼痛、手术并发症、术后通气时间及术后住院时间等方面的差异。结果 翻转法vNOTES宫底肌瘤剔除术体表无瘢痕,术后疼痛较传统腹腔镜轻微(2分 vs. 4分,P<0.001),术后排气时间较传统腹腔镜早(16.0 h vs.22.0 h,P<0.01),在手术时间(150.93 min vs.171.83 min,P=0.069)、术中出血量(血红蛋白下降值12.24 g/L vs.12.12 g/L,P=0.931)、手术并发症(5例 vs. 3例,P=0.713)和术后住院时间(4 d vs. 4 d,P=0.306)方面均与传统腹腔镜相当。结论 翻转法vNOTES子宫肌瘤剔除术治疗宫底肌瘤安全可行,该方法进一步拓宽了vNOTES的手术适应证。

Abstract

Objective To explore the feasibility and safety of the flipping technique vNOTES myomectomy in the treatment of uterine fundus myoma.Methods Patients with uterine fundus myoma treated in Karamay Central Hospital from from March 1, 2024 to December 31, 2025 were collected and divided into observation group: the flipping technique vNOTES group (n=42) and control group: the traditional laparoscopy group (n=42) according to the mode of operation. The differences of operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative pain, operative complication, postoperative ventilation time and postoperative hospital stay between the two methods were compared.Results There is no scar on the body surface of flipping technique vNOTES uterine fundus myomectomy, and the postoperative pain is slighter than that of traditional laparoscopy(2 points vs. 4 points,P<0.001) and earlier first flatus time (16.0 hours vs. 22.0 hours, P<0.001). And it is similar to traditional laparoscopy in operation time(150.93 min vs. 171.83 min,P=0.069), intraoperative blood loss(Hemoglobin decrease value:12.24 g/L vs. 12.12 g/L,P=0.931), operative complication(5 cases vs. 3 cases,P=0.713), and postoperative hospital stay(4d vs. 4d,P=0.306).Conclusion Flipping technique vNOTES myomectomy is safe and feasible for the treatment of uterine fundal fibroids,futher expanding the indications of vNOTES.

关键词

翻转法 / 经阴道自然腔道内镜手术 / 子宫肌瘤 / 宫底肌瘤

Key words

fliping method / vNOTES / uterine leiomyoma / fundus myoma

引用本文

导出引用
唐丹, 姚华, 许日华, . 翻转法经阴道自然腔道内镜下子宫肌瘤剔除术治疗宫底肌瘤临床效果观察[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志. 2026, 42(3): 355-360 https://doi.org/10.19538/j.fk2026030116
TANG Dan, YAO Hua, XU Ri-hua, et al. Clinical observation of flipping technique vNOTES myomectomy in the treatment of uterine fundus myoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2026, 42(3): 355-360 https://doi.org/10.19538/j.fk2026030116
中图分类号: R713.74   

参考文献

[1]
Hurni Y, Simonson C, Di Serio M, et al. Early surgical outcomes of 550 consecutive patients treated for benign gynecological conditions by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2024, 103(11):2203-2210.DOI:10.1111/aogs.14889.
Evidence about intra‐ and postoperative complication rates related to transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) for benign gynecological conditions is still limited. We report and analyze data from a large cohort of patients operated in a single institution during 3.5 years.
[2]
Baekelandt J, Kapurubandara S. Benign gynaecological procedures by vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES): Complication data from a series of 1000 patients[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2021, 256:221-224.DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.10.059.
To evaluate the safety and feasibility of vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) for benign gynaecological indications.Prospective observational study (Canadian Task Force classification II-3) in a non-university teaching hospital. One thousand consecutive patients (2013-2018) who were eligible for vNOTES approach to benign gynaecological surgery were included.Patient data and perioperative outcomes were included for analysis after the vNOTES surgical approach was standardized and made the default route of surgery. Of the 1000 vNOTES cases performed during this study period, hysterectomy (73%) was the most common followed by adnexal surgery (18%) and salpingectomy (4%). The mean age of the patient cohort was 46 yrs of age (22-83) and mean BMI, 26 kg/m(16.5-52). There was a conversion rate of 0.4% (4 cases), 3 to conventional laparoscopy and 1 to laparotomy. The mean operating time was 42 minutes (14-250 minutes). The total complication rate was 3.9% (39) of which 1% (10) was intraoperative complications and 2.9% (29) were post-operative complications. When the hysterectomy cohort was sub analyzed, the total complication rate was 5.2% in this group (intraoperative 1.4% and post-operative 3.8%) with only a 0.4% complication rate in the non-hysterectomy sub-group. Of the complications in the hysterectomy group there were 9 cystotomies (1.2%). The mean specimen weight for all hysterectomies was 172 g (20-3361 g) with an average operating time of 46 minutes (20-250).The perioperative outcomes of this large vNOTES case series for benign gynaecological indications is comparable to other vNOTES procedures reported in the literature apart from the risk of cystotomy which is a hysterectomy specific risk. The outcomes are that of a single high-volume surgeon incorporating cases within his respective learning curve of the surgical technique and as such should be interpreted accordingly. Since 2015 the International NOTES Society has initiated a prospective complication database where all vNOTES surgeons are invited to register their cases.Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.
[3]
Li CB, Hua KQ. Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) in gynecologic surgeries: A systematic review[J]. Asian J Surg, 2020, 43(1):44-51.DOI:10.1016/j.asjsur.2019.07.014.
[4]
Dubuisson J, Alec M. Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery meshless anterior repair for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2022, 29(6):705-706. DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2022.03.008.
[5]
Tekin AB, Yassa M, Kaya C, et al. Implementing the transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) "first" strategy in benign gynecological surgeries[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2023, 307(4):1007-1013.DOI:10.1007/s00404-022-06859-9.
[6]
彭靖, 陈义松. 经阴道自然腔道内镜手术在盆腔器官脱垂中的应用[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2025, 41(7):687-688.DOI:10.19538/j.fk2025070104.
[7]
Baekelandt J, Jespers A, Huber D, et al. vNOTES retroperitoneal sentinel lymph node dissection for endometrial cancer staging: First multicenter,prospective case series[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2024, 103(7):1311-1317.DOI:10.1111/aogs.14843.
The current standard treatment for endometrial cancer is a laparoscopic hysterectomy with adnexectomies and bilateral sentinel node resection. A retroperitoneal vNOTES sentinel node resection has several theoretical potential advantages. These include being less invasive, leaving no visible scars, operating without Trendelenburg, and therefore offering the anesthetic advantage of easier ventilation in obese patients and following the natural lymph node trajectory from caudally to cranially and therefore a lower risk of missing the sentinel node. The aim of this study is to determine the feasibility of a retroperitoneal vNOTES approach to sentinel lymph node dissection for staging of endometrial cancer.
[8]
Baekelandt J. vNOTES radical hysterectomy:a new approach to cervical cancer[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2024, 31(9):723.DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2024.04.009.
[9]
Comba C, Karakas S, Erdogan SV, et al. Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (VNOTES) retroperitoneal sentinel lymph node BIOPSY compared with conventional laparoscopy in patients with endometrial cancer[J]. Surg Oncol, 2024, 55:102099.DOI:10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102099.
[10]
Hurni Y, Romito F, Huber D. Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for surgical staging of early-stage ovarian cancers:a report of two cases[J]. Front Surg, 2022, 9:833126.DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2022.833126.
Surgical staging is essential in the management of ovarian cancers. This staging has traditionally been performed by laparotomy, but minimally invasive techniques are increasingly employed. Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) is a promising technique in the field of gynecological oncology. We report 2 cases of vNOTES surgical staging for suspicious ovarian tumors. We operated on 2 patients aged of 81 and 62 years for low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma and ovarian cystadenofibroma, respectively. We performed surgical staging with a pure vNOTES technique for the first patient and used a hybrid approach for the second. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were observed. We suggest that vNOTES is a feasible and effective approach to surgically manage early-stage ovarian cancers.
[11]
Wasinghon P, Lee CL, Khan S. Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery myomectomy followed by hysterectomy[J]. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther, 2020, 9(3):179-181.DOI:10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_62_18.
Transvaginal surgery is the most minimally invasive surgery for a gynecologic procedure. A 67-year-old woman who had four children with vaginal deliveries and one abortion, with no underlying disease and a body mass index of 22.4 kg/m, came to the hospital due to menorrhagia. Her diagnosis was myoma uteri from an asymptomatic palpated mass at the lower abdomen. The ultrasonography showed a 9 cm × 5.9 cm myoma mass at the anterior wall of the uterus. After counseling, the transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) operation was conducted on May 2018. The process was a transvaginal NOTES hysterectomy following a transvaginal NOTES-assisted myomectomy. The uterine weight was 376 g. In this case, the surgeons could not enter into the pelvic cavity completely because the myoma mass was attached to the bladder which led to the surgeons safely performing the transvaginal NOTES myomectomy before the hysterectomy.Copyright: © 2020 Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy.
[12]
Lee CL, Wu KY, Huang CY, et al. Subtotal hysterectomy by natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery[J]. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther, 2017, 6(4):195-198.DOI:10.1016/j.gmit.2017.02.005.
[13]
Tantitamit T, Temtanakitpaisan T, Lee CL. Bladder safety during natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery hysterectomy in the patients with extensive vesicouterine adhesion[J]. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther, 2019, 8(3):129-131.DOI:10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_87_18.
Adhesion at the vesicouterine fold presents a great challenge when performing hysterectomy through transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopy surgery (NOTES) in women with a history of cesarean section. An attempt to lyse adhesions often prolongs the procedure and may inadvertently result in cystostomy. The purpose of this report is to demonstrate a safe technique for the lysis of vesicouterine adhesions during NOTES hysterectomy. We present the cases of two patients with a history of cesarean section. Severe adhesions at the vesicouterine peritoneum were encountered in both cases, and one patient had an extensive adhesion involving lower half of the uterus. Although the lateral approach is sufficient in most cases, it does not allow a surgeon to approach the peritoneal cavity if there is extensive adhesion. In cases such as these, direct dissection of the adhesion on the uterus is required.
[14]
Kita M, Sumi G, Butsuhara Y, et al. Resection of vaginal recurrence of granulosa cell tumor by pneumovaginal endoscopic surgery[J]. Gynecol Oncol Rep, 2021, 36:100743.DOI:10.1016/j.gore.2021.100743.
[15]
中国医师协会妇产科医师分会妇科肿瘤专业委员会学组. 实施腹腔镜下子宫(肌瘤)分碎术的中国专家共识[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2020, 36(7):626-632.DOI:10.19538/j.fk2020070113.
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 子宫肌瘤是女性生殖系统最常见的良性肿瘤,尸检显示35岁以上妇女20%患有子宫肌瘤。其手术治疗方式包括肌瘤切除术及子宫切除术,手术途径有开腹、经阴道或腹腔镜手术,其中腹腔镜微创手术已成为重要的术式。浏览更多请关注本刊微信公众号及当期杂志。
[16]
Kho KA, Nezhat CH. Evaluating the risks of electric uterine morcellation[J]. JAMA, 2014, 311(9):905-906.DOI:10.1001/jama.2014.1093.
[17]
叶明珠, 薛敏. 子宫肌瘤微无创治疗的适应证和禁忌证[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2024, 40(9):886-891.DOI:10.19538/j.fk2024090107.
[18]
Hou Q, Li X, Li Y, et al. Analysis and suggestions on the complications in 2000 cases of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: Can it be a conventional surgery?[J]. Int J Gynecol Obstet, 2024, 164: 541-549. DOI:10.1002/ijgo.15035.
To reflect on the complications of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES), identify the corresponding risk factors, and provide caution to surgeons when performing this novel surgery.
[19]
Yassa M, Kaya C, Kalafat E, et al. The Comparison of Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery and conventional laparoscopy in opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy for permanent female sterilization[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2022, 29(5):691.DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2022.03.001.
[20]
Wang J, Xu X, Xu J. Application of single-port procedure and ERAS management in the laparoscopic myomectomy[J]. BMC Womens Health, 2023, 23(1):401.DOI:10.1186/s12905-023-02550-6.
Advances in surgical techniques and perioperative management are the two major contributing factors to improved surgical outcomes. The purpose of the current study was to compare the efficacy of single-port surgery and perioperative enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) management in laparoscopic myomectomy.The present study included 120 patients undergoing laparoscopic myomectomy in the Gynecological Ward of Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University. According to the traditional perioperative management mode and ERAS management, multi-port and single-port procedures, all patients were assigned to the Conventional-SPLS (Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery with conventional perioperative care) group (n = 34), Conventional-Multi (multi-port laparoscopic surgery with conventional perioperative care) group (n = 47), and ERAS (multi-port laparoscopic surgery with ERAS perioperative care) group (n = 39). The surgical outcomes of the three groups were compared operation time, intraoperative blood loss, variations in postoperative hemoglobin, postoperative walking time, postoperative flatus expelling time, postoperative hospital stay, and visual analog scale (VAS) scores at 6 and 12 h following surgery.The ERAS group recovered the quickest in terms of postoperative walking time and flatus expelling duration. The ERAS group also recovered the shortest postoperative hospital stay (3.85 ± 1.14 days), which differed significantly from that in the Conventional-Multi group, but not significantly from that in the Conventional-SPLS group. In terms of VAS scores at 6 and 12 h after surgery, the ERAS group had the lowest pain intensity, which differed significantly from that of the other two groups. The effect of surgical procedures or postoperative care on hospital stay was assessed using multiple regression analysis. The results demonstrated that ERAS was an important independent contributor to reducing postoperative hospital stay (β = 0.270, p = 0.002), while single-port surgery did not affect this index (β = 0.107, p = 0.278).In laparoscopic myomectomy, perioperative ERAS management could control postoperative pain and shorten hospital stay. Single-port surgery could speed up the recovery of gastrointestinal function and postoperative walking time, but it did not affect postoperative pain management or the length of hospital stay. Thus, the most effective approach to improving postoperative outcomes in laparoscopic myomectomy was the application of perioperative ERAS management.© 2023. The Author(s).
[21]
Chen Y, Fu M, Huang G, et al. Effect of the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol on recovery after laparoscopic myomectomy:A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Gland Surg, 2022, 11(5):837-846.DOI:10.21037/gs-22-168.
[22]
Lerner VT, May G, Iglesia CB. Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery revolution:the next frontier in gynecologic minimally invasive surgery[J]. JSLS, 2023, 27(1):e2022.00082.DOI:10.4293/JSLS.2022.00082.
[23]
Cheng W, Li X, Liu T, et al. Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for myomectomy: A more suitable surgical approach for enhanced recovery after surgery[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2024, 295:143-149.DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.02.005.
Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) is widely recognized for its potential benefits, including reducing post-surgical pain and leaving no discernible scarring. However, the anatomical specificity of the vNOTES approach may elevate the risk of nearby organ damage, such as the rectum and bladder. Thus, this study aims to demonstrate the safety and relative merits of vNOTES over transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS).The Longitudinal Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery Study (LovNOTESS), which was conducted in Chengdu, China. A total of 110 patients who underwent myomectomy in vNOTES or LESS from January 2021 to December 2022. This study prospectively collected and compared perioperative and follow-up data of the two groups.In the vNOTES group, patients had shorter postoperative anal exhaust time, lower pain medications use rate, shorter hospital stay but higher intraoperative conversion rate, and higher postoperative fever rate. vNOTES decreased the anal exhaust time by approximately 8.7 h (95 %CI: -16.182, -1.262, p = 0.007). Moreover, vNOTES reduces pain medication use risk by 73.1 % (OR: 0.269, 95 %CI: 0.172, 0.318, p = 0.016).Relative to LESS, vNOTES can make patients mitigate postoperative discomfort, accelerate the recovery of gastrointestinal function, curtail hospitalization duration, and enable a more rapid return to daily activities in myomectomy. However, vNOTES has a higher risk of surgical conversion and adjacent organ injury. Therefore, larger scale prospective studies are needed to prove its security and promote the widespread application of vNOTES in myomectomy.Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
[24]
周静, 李韵霞, 姚华, 等. 经阴道单孔腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜在全子宫切除术中的对比分析[J]. 新疆医学, 2022, 52(7):765-769.
[25]
周静, 张乔燕, 唐丹, 等. 经阴道与经脐单孔腹腔镜全子宫切除术的对比分析[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2023, 28(8):614-618.DOI:10.13499/j.cnki.fqjwkzz.2023.08.614.
[26]
王罕瑾, 蒋本贵. 经阴道与经脐单孔腹腔镜在子宫肌瘤手术中的应用比较[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2020, 26(12):60-65.DOI:10.12235/E20190706.
[27]
郭娟, 王浩. 子宫动脉结扎或子宫动脉上行支结扎在子宫肌瘤剥除术中的应用及对术后降低瘤腔感染率的研究[J]. 实用妇科内分泌电子杂志, 2022, 9(34):34-36,40. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-8803.2022.34.011.
[28]
王海英. 子宫动脉结扎术在腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤挖除术中的应用价值[J]. 中国医师进修杂志, 2014, 37(9):22-24.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4904.2014.09.008.
[29]
Kapurubandara S, Lowenstein L, Salvay H, et al. Consensus on safe implementation of vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES)[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2021, 263:216-222.DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.06.019.
The first ever report of vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) for benign gynaecological was reported in 2012. There has been an exponential uptake of the number of surgeons performing such procedures worldwide with no official guidance to ensure the safe implementation of this technique into gynaecological practice due its recency. The objective of this study is to report an international consensus-based statement to help guide a basis for adopting vNOTES into clinical practice.The consensus-based statement was developed amongst 39 international experts using the Delphi methodology over three successive rounds. Consensus was pre-defined as an agreement of 80% or more by the experts. Consensus sought over eight key concepts pertaining to vNOTES including patient selection, perioperative management, surgical technique, instruments, anatomy, training, registries and trials and definition of the surgical technique. Recommendations from an expert anaesthetist and urogynaecologist were also sought to give a broader perspective with respect to the implementation of vNOTES.Fifty nine international surgeons were invited to participate and 39 (66%) agreed to participate based on being involved in a minimum of 20 vNOTES procedures. They were from 13 countries across 5 continents (Europe, North America, South America, Australia and Asia). Participation was 100% on all three rounds. Overall, consensus was reached in 50 of the 56 questions (89%) with the remaining 6 questions where consensus was not reached pertaining to the domain of patient selection.An international expert based vNOTES statement is presented here to help guide adoption of vNOTES based on the experience of early adopters. Consensus was achieved on most components of this consensus statement. Given the recency of this technique, until high-level evidence becomes available, this statement provides an appropriate guidance to the safe implementation of vNOTES into gynaecological practice.Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
[30]
世界华人医师协会妇产科专业组, 刘娟, 郑莹, 等. 妇科经阴道自然腔道内镜手术专家共识[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2023, 23(7):481-490.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2023.07.001.
[31]
Nakayama K, Razia S, Ishikawa M, et al. Comparison between bidirectional Stratafix®barbed suture and conventional suture in laparoscopic myomectomy:A retrospective study[J]. BMC Women's Health, 2020, 20(1):164. DOI:10.1186/s12905-020-01030-5.
Laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) is one of the techniques feasible for the treatment of intramural myoma. This technique is reported to be difficult when large fibroids are involved because of excessive blood loss during surgery. Skillful and fast suturing appears to be associated with reduced blood loss during LM. In this study we compared the surgical outcomes of using bidirectional Stratafix® barbed suture versus conventional suture during LM.
[32]
王秀琪, 孙智晶. 子宫切除术与盆腔器官脱垂[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2022, 57(4):311-315.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20211114-00665.
[33]
Kuittinen T, Tulokas S, Rahkola-Soisalo P, et al. Pelvic organ prolapse after hysterectomy: A 10-year national follow-up study[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2023, 102(5):556-566.DOI:10.1111/aogs.14542.
Hysterectomy may have an effect on the pelvic floor. Here, we evaluated the rates and risks for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgeries and visits among women with a history of hysterectomy for benign indication excluding POP.
[34]
葛蓓蕾, 孙静. 保留生育功能的经阴道自然腔道内镜手术应用与进展[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2025, 41(7):683-687.DOI:10.19538/j.fk2025070103.
[35]
刘仙, 魏婧媛, 熊员焕, 等. 经阴道腹膜外子宫肌瘤剔除术临床应用价值研究[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2024, 40(1):110-113.DOI:10.19538/j.fk2024010122.
[36]
袁江静, 王玉东. 子宫肌瘤规范化治疗中的个体化[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2026, 42(1):51-54.DOI:10.19538/j.fk2026010113.

脚注

利益冲突 所有作者均声明不存在利益冲突

基金

新疆维吾尔自治区自然科学基金面上项目(2024D01C10)
新疆维吾尔自治区自然科学基金青年项目(2021D01B11)
克拉玛依市科技计划项目(2025DB0082)
新疆第二医学院临床医学重点学科(XKZ202503)

PDF(10779 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/