生育舞蹈对妊娠期糖尿病产妇分娩恐惧、分娩自我效能及分娩结局的影响

曹齐, 牛三强, 秦凤远, 周利华

中国实用妇科与产科杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (2) : 218-224.

PDF(1239 KB)
PDF(1239 KB)
中国实用妇科与产科杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (2) : 218-224. DOI: 10.19538/j.fk2026020117
论著

生育舞蹈对妊娠期糖尿病产妇分娩恐惧、分娩自我效能及分娩结局的影响

作者信息 +

Influence of fertility dance on fear of childbirth,childbirth self-efficacy and delivery outcomes of pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 探讨生育舞蹈对妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)产妇分娩恐惧、分娩自我效能及分娩结局的影响。方法 对2021年12月至2023年12月于亳州市人民医院就诊的258例GDM产妇,根据是否接受生育舞蹈干预分为干预组(n=115)和非干预组(n=143),另选取150例同期于亳州市人民医院接受检查的健康产妇作为对照组进行研究。所有产妇按1∶1∶1的比例进行倾向性评分匹配,匹配后每组包含115例产妇。比较倾向性评分匹配前后产妇的一般资料,并对倾向性评分匹配后的协变量均衡性进行检验。比较3组产妇的产程时间,干预前后血糖指标、分娩恐惧评分、自我效能感评分,以及分娩结局。广义估计方程比较干预组和非干预组产妇分娩恐惧评分。广义线性混合模型(GLMM)分析生育舞蹈与GDM产妇不良分娩结局的关系。结果 (1)干预组的第一、二、三产程及总产程时间均明显短于非干预组和对照组(P<0.05)。(2)干预后,干预组的空腹血糖、餐后2 h血糖、糖化血红蛋白水平均明显低于非干预组,且较干预前明显降低(P<0.05)。(3)干预后,干预组的医院环境与干预恐惧、新生儿健康恐惧、失去控制恐惧、疼痛伤害恐惧评分均明显低于非干预组,且较干预前明显降低(P<0.05)。(4)干预后,干预组的自我效能感评分明显高于非干预组,且较干预前明显升高(P<0.05)。(5)干预组会阴侧切损伤、胎儿窘迫、新生儿1 min Apgar评分≤7分的发生率明显低于非干预组(P<0.05)。(6)广义估计方程分析结果显示,干预组的新生儿健康恐惧、医院环境与干预恐惧、疼痛伤害恐惧、失去控制恐惧评分改善情况明显优于非干预组(P<0.05)。(7)GLMM模型分析结果显示,调整混杂因素影响后,干预组产妇发生不良分娩结局的风险仍明显低于非干预组(OR=0.721,95%CI 0.419~0.816,P<0.001)。结论 生育舞蹈干预能够明显降低GDM产妇的分娩恐惧,提高分娩自我效能,改善不良分娩结局。

Abstract

Objective To explore the influence of fertility dance on the fear of childbirth,childbirth self-efficacy and delivery outcomes of pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Methods A total of 258 GDM pregnant women who visited Bozhou People's Hospital from December 2021 to December 2023 were selected for the study. They were divided into the intervention group (n=115) and the no-intervention group (n=143) based on whether they received the fertility dance intervention. Another 150 healthy pregnant women who were examined at the same hospital during the same period were selected as the control group for the study. All pregnant women were matched by propensity score at a ratio of 1:1:1. After matching,each group consisted of 115 pregnant women. The general data of the pregnant women before and after propensity score matching were compared,and the balance of covariates after propensity score matching was tested. The duration of labor,blood glucose indicators before and after intervention,fear scores before and after intervention,self-efficacy scores before and after intervention,and delivery outcomes of the three groups of pregnant women were compared. The generalized estimating equation was used to compare the fear scores of pregnant women in the intervention group and the no-intervention group. The generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) was used to analyze the relationship between fertility dance and adverse delivery outcomes in GDM pregnant women. Results (1)The duration of the first,second,and third stages of labor as well as the total labor duration in the intervention group was significantly shorter than that in the no-intervention group and the control group (P<0.05).(2)After the intervention,the fasting blood glucose,2-hour post-meal blood glucose,and glycosylated hemoglobin levels in the intervention group were significantly lower than those in the no-intervention group,and they were also significantly lower than those before the intervention (P<0.05).(3)After the intervention,the scores of hospital environment and intervention fear,fear of newborn health,fear of losing control,and fear of pain and injury in the intervention group were significantly lower than those in the no-intervention group,and were significantly lower than those before the intervention (P<0.05).(4)After the intervention,the self-efficacy scores of the intervention group were significantly higher than those of the no-intervention group,and they also showed a significant increase compared to those before the intervention (P<0.05).(5)The incidence of perineal lateral incision injury,fetal distress,and neonatal 1-minute Apgar score≤7 points in the intervention group was significantly lower than that in the no-intervention group(P<0.05).(6)The results of the generalized estimating equation analysis showed that the scores for neonatal health fear,fear of hospital environment and intervention,fear of pain and injury,and fear of losing control in the intervention group improved significantly more than those in the no-intervention group (P<0.05). (7)The results of the GLMM model analysis showed that after adjusting for confounding factors,the risk of adverse delivery outcomes for the intervention group was still significantly lower than that for the no-intervention group (OR=0.721,95% CI 0.419-0.816,P<0.001). Conclusion The fertility dance intervention can significantly reduce the fear of childbirth in women with gestational diabetes,enhance their self-efficacy during childbirth,and improve adverse delivery outcomes.

关键词

生育舞蹈 / 妊娠期糖尿病 / 分娩恐惧 / 分娩自我效能 / 分娩结局

Key words

fertility dance / gestational diabetes / fear of childbirth / birth self-efficacy / delivery outcome

引用本文

导出引用
曹齐, 牛三强, 秦凤远, . 生育舞蹈对妊娠期糖尿病产妇分娩恐惧、分娩自我效能及分娩结局的影响[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志. 2026, 42(2): 218-224 https://doi.org/10.19538/j.fk2026020117
CAO Qi, NIU San-qiang, QIN Feng-yuan, et al. Influence of fertility dance on fear of childbirth,childbirth self-efficacy and delivery outcomes of pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2026, 42(2): 218-224 https://doi.org/10.19538/j.fk2026020117
中图分类号: R473.71   

参考文献

[1]
Moon JH, Jang HC. Gestational diabetes mellitus:diagnostic approaches and maternal-offspring complications[J]. Diabetes Metab J, 2022, 46(1):3-14. DOI:10.4093/dmj.2021.0335.
[2]
李想, 盛晴, 吴天晨, 等. 早孕期空腹血糖及高危因素对单双胎妊娠期糖尿病及其他不良围产结局的影响[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2025, 41(2):228-233. DOI:10.19538/j.fk2025020116.
[3]
Moholdt T. Diet, Exercise and gestational diabetes mellitus[J]. Nutrients, 2023, 15(10):2251. DOI:10.3390/nu15102251.
[4]
Xie Y, Zhao H, Zhao M, et al. Effects of resistance exercise on blood glucose level and pregnancy outcome in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus:a randomized controlled trial[J]. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care, 2022, 10(2):e002622. DOI:10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002622.
[5]
Ugwudike B, Kwok M. Update on gestational diabetes and adverse pregnancy outcomes[J]. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 2023, 35(5):453-459. DOI:10.1097/GCO.0000000000000901.
[6]
Zhang L, Yue R, Xiao F, et al. The effects of dance on maternal childbirth:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2025, 25(1):20. DOI:10.1186/s12884-024-07132-4.
[7]
余昕烊, 吴侠霏, 漆洪波. 昆士兰卫生组织《妊娠期糖尿病指南(2021年版)》要点解读[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2021, 37(9):933-936. DOI:10.19538/j.fk2021090113.
[8]
Lu W, Hu C. Molecular biomarkers for gestational diabetes mellitus and postpartum diabetes[J]. Chin Med J (Engl), 2022, 135(16):1940-1951. DOI:10.1097/CM9.0000000000002160.
[9]
隽娟, 舒心宇, 杨慧霞. 妊娠期高血糖的认知变迁[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2025, 41(4):385-388.DOI:10.19538/j.fk2025040101.
[10]
张勤建, 颜建英. 妊娠期高血糖的分类和特点[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2025, 41(4):389-392.DOI:10.19538/j.fk2025040102.
[11]
Wicklow B, Retnakaran R. Gestational diabetes mellitus and its implications across the life span[J]. Diabetes Metab J, 2023, 47(3):333-344. DOI:10.4093/dmj.2022.0348.
[12]
李东言, 魏玉梅. 妊娠期高血糖的母儿远期转归[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2025, 41(4):404-407.DOI:10.19538/j.fk2025040106.
[13]
范岩峰, 钟红秀, 李丽榕, 等. 营养干预对妊娠期糖尿病孕妇孕期体重增长和血脂代谢水平及分娩结局的影响[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2022, 38(9):929-933.DOI:10.19538/j.fk2022090114.
[14]
Akin B, Yurteri Türkmen H, Yalnız Dilcen H, et al. The effect of labor dance on traumatic childbirth perception and comfort:a randomized controlled study[J]. Clin Nurs Res, 2022, 31(5):909-917. DOI:10.1177/10547738211030745.
[15]
Kalog Lu Binici D, Aktaş S. The effect of labor dance in the first stage of labor on labor pain,anxiety,duration of labor,and maternal satisfaction with labor:a randomized controlled study[J]. J Integr Complement Med, 2024, 30(4):383-393. DOI:10.1089/jicm.2022.0818.
[16]
魏向妮, 王晓茹, 厚福玲, 等. 基于温柔分娩理念的助产士陪伴干预结合孕晚期生育舞蹈对初产妇产痛程度及分娩结局的影响[J]. 临床医学研究与实践, 2023, 8(9):134-136. DOI:10.19347/j.cnki.2096-1413.202309039.
[17]
Alizadeh-Dibazari Z, Abdolalipour S, Mirghafourvand M. The effect of prenatal education on fear of childbirth,pain intensity during labour and childbirth experience:a scoping review using systematic approach and meta-analysis[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2023, 23(1):541. DOI:10.1186/s12884-023-05867-0.
[18]
曹齐, 周静, 程琳. 生育舞蹈干预在妊娠糖尿病产妇中的应用效果[J]. 中国医药导报, 2023, 20(4):193-196. DOI:10.20047/j.issn1673-7210.2023.04.44.
[19]
Keating N, Coveney C, McAuliffe FM, et al. Aerobic or resistance exercise for improved glycaemic control and pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus:a systematic review[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2022, 19(17):10791. DOI:10.3390/ijerph191710791.
[20]
Souto SPAD, Silva RCGD, Prata AP, et al. Midwives' interventions for reducing fear of childbirth in pregnant women:a scoping review[J]. JBI Evid Synth, 2022, 20(12):2867-2935. DOI:10.11124/JBIES-21-00382.
[21]
Sánchez-García JC, Cortés-Martín J, Rodríguez-Blanque R. Preparation for Childbirth:Coping with the Fear of Childbirth[J]. Healthcare (Basel), 2023, 1(4):480. DOI:10.3390/healthcare11040480.
[22]
Buran G, Ozyazicioglu N, Aydın AI, et al. Evaluation of breastfeeding success and self-efficacy in mothers giving birth via vaginal delivery or cesarean section:a cross-sectional study[J]. Women Health, 2022, 62(9-10):788-798. DOI:10.1080/03630242.2022.2146832.
[23]
周新枚, 李丽, 谢雪莲, 等. 生育舞蹈对初产妇产时疼痛、产程及分娩结局的影响[J]. 海南医学, 2024, 35(2):236-239. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-6350.2024.02.017.

脚注

利益冲突 所有作者均声明不存在利益冲突

基金

安徽省转化医学研究院护理学联合专项课题(2024zhyx-hl-A01)

PDF(1239 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/