We sought to classify endocervical adenocarcinomas (ECAs) based on morphologic features linked to etiology (ie, human papillomavirus [HPV] infection), unlike the World Health Organization 2014 classification. The International Endocervical Adenocarcinoma Criteria and Classification (IECC criteria), described herein, distinguishes between human papillomavirus-associated adenocarcinoma (HPVA), recognized by the presence of luminal mitoses and apoptosis seen at scanning magnification, and no or limited HPVA features (nonhuman papillomavirus-associated adenocarcinoma [NHPVA]). HPVAs were then subcategorized based on cytoplasmic features (mostly to provide continuity with preexisting classification schemes), whereas NHPVAs were subclassified based on established criteria (ie, gastric-type, clear cell, etc.). Complete slide sets from 409 cases were collected from 7 institutions worldwide. Tissue microarrays representing 297 cases were constructed; immunohistochemistry (p16, p53, vimentin, progesterone receptor) and chromogenic in situ hybridization using an RNA-based probe set that recognizes 18 varieties of high-risk HPV were performed to validate IECC diagnoses. The 5 most common IECC diagnoses were usual-type (HPVA) (73% of cohort), gastric-type (NHPVA) (10%), mucinous adenocarcinoma of HPVA type, including intestinal, mucinous not otherwise specified, signet-ring, and invasive stratified mucin-producing carcinoma categories (9%), clear cell carcinoma (NHPVA) (3%) and adenocarcinoma, not otherwise specified (2%). Only 3 endometrioid carcinomas were recognized and all were NHPVA. When excluding cases thought to have suboptimal tissue processing, 90% and 95% of usual-type IECC cases overexpressed p16 and were HPV, whereas 37% and 3% of NHPVAs were p16 and HPV, respectively. The 1 HPV gastric-type carcinoma was found to have hybrid HPVA/NHPVA features on secondary review. NHPVA tumors were larger and occurred in significantly older patients, compared with HPVA tumors (P<0.001). The high-risk HPV chromogenic in situ hybridization probe set had superior sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (0.955, 0.968, 0.992, 0.833, respectively) compared with p16 immunohistochemistry (0.872, 0.632, 0.907, 0.545, respectively) to identify HPV-related usual carcinoma and mucinous carcinoma. IECC reliably segregates ECAs into HPVA and NHPVA types using morphology alone. This study confirms that usual-type ECAs are the most common type worldwide and that mucinous carcinomas comprise a mixture of HPVA and NHPVA, with gastric-type carcinoma being the major NHPVA type. Endometrioid and serous carcinomas of the endocervix are extraordinarily rare. Should clinical outcomes and genomic studies continue to support these findings, we recommend replacement of the World Health Organization 2014 criteria with the IECC 2017.

Dysregulated expression of oncogenic types of E6 and E7 is necessary for human papillomavirus (HPV)-driven carcinogenesis. An HPV E6/E7 mRNA in situ hybridization (ISH) assay covering 18 common high-risk types ("HR-RISH," aka HR-HPV RNA18 ISH) has not been extensively studied in the anogenital tract or validated on automated technology. We herein compare HR-RISH to DNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR), p16 immunohistochemistry, and a previously available HPV DNA ISH assay in HPV-related anogenital and head and neck (H&N) neoplasia. A total of 102 squamous intraepithelial lesions (16 CIN1, 25 CIN3, 3 AIN1, 12 AIN3, 9 VIN3)/invasive squamous cell carcinomas (17 cervical, 2 anal, 18 H&N) as well as 10 normal and 15 reactive cervix samples were collected. HR-RISH, DNA ISH, and p16 immunohistochemistry were performed on whole formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections. RNA ISH for 6 low-risk HPV types (LR-RISH) was also performed. RNA and DNA ISH assays used automated systems. HR-HPV PCR was performed on morphology-directed formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded punches. HR-RISH was ≥97% sensitive for PCR+ and p16+ neoplasia, as well as morphologically defined anogenital high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion/invasive squamous cell carcinoma. HR-RISH was also positive in 78% of anogenital low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, including 81% of CIN1. Furthermore, a subset of PCR-negative/invalid and p16-negative lesions was positive for HR-RISH. Only 1 problematic reactive cervix sample and no normal cervix samples stained. These results demonstrate that HR-RISH is a robust method for the detection of HR-HPV-related neoplasia and provides insight into HPV pathobiology. Performance meets or exceeds that of existing assays in anogenital and H&N lesions and may play a role in resolving diagnostically challenging CIN1 versus reactive cases.

The expression of p16 is a good surrogate of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in HPV-associated cancers. The significance of p16 expression, HPV genotype and genera in the outcome of patients with HPV-associated cervical cancer (CC) is unclear. Our aim is to ascertain the prognostic significance of these factors. Data from 348 patients (median age: 47.5 years old) with CC, diagnosed in two referral centers, were retrospectively collected. Advanced disease (FIGO2018 IB2-IV) was present in 68% of patients. A single HPV genotype was identified in 82.8% of patients. The most common HPVs were HPV16 (69%) and HPV18 (14%). HPV genera reflected this distribution. HPV16 tumors presented at an earlier stage. P16 was negative in 18 cases (5.2%), 83.3% of which were squamous cell carcinomas. These cases occurred in older patients who tended to have advanced disease. In the univariate analysis, HPV16 (HR: 0.58; p = 0.0198), α-9 genera (HR: 0.37; p = 0.0106) and p16 overexpression (HR: 0.54; p = 0.032) were associated with better survival. HPV16 (HR: 0.63; p = 0.0174) and α-9 genera (HR: 0.57; p = 0.0286) were associated with less relapse. In the multivariate analysis, only the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage retained an independent prognostic value. HPV16, α-9 genera and p16 overexpression were associated with better survival, although not as independent prognostic factors. Patients with p16-negative HPV-associated CC were older, presented with advanced disease and had worse prognosis.

Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer among women globally. Historically, human papillomavirus (HPV) infection was considered necessary for the development of both precursor and invasive epithelial tumors of the cervix; however, studies in the last decade have shown that a significant proportion of cervical carcinomas are HPV-independent (HPVI). The 2020 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Female Genital Tumors separates both squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) and endocervical adenocarcinomas (ECAs) by HPV status into HPV-associated (HPVA) and HPVI tumors. The classification further indicates that, in contrast to endocervical adenocarcinomas, HPVI and HPVA SCCs cannot be distinguished by morphological criteria alone and suggests that HPV testing or correlates thereof are required for correct classification. Moreover, while HPVA SCC precursor lesions (ie, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion) are well known and characterized, precursors to HPVI SCCs have only been described recently in a small number of cases. We studied 670 cases of SCCs from the International Squamous Cell Carcinoma Project (ISCCP) to analyze the reproducibility of recognition of invasive SCC growth patterns, presence of lymphovascular space invasion, tumor grade, and associations with patient outcomes. Consistent with previous studies, we found histologic growth patterns and tumor types had limited prognostic implications. In addition, we describe the wide morphologic spectrum of HPVA and HPVI SCCs and their precursor lesions, including tumor growth patterns, particular and peculiar morphologic features that can lead to differential diagnoses, and the role of ancillary studies in the diagnosis of these tumors.

Since the publication of the 2021 FIGO Cancer Report, there has been further progress in the global effort to attain the WHO goal of cervical cancer elimination using a three‐pillar approach of vaccination, screening, and treatment. The HPV vaccination is now included in the national program of over 140 countries. Two‐dose schedules are being implemented in 80 countries and one‐dose schedules in 60 countries. Screening has seen major advances with the wider implementation of HPV testing, including the option of self‐sampling, portable screening and treatment devices, and the incorporation of artificial intelligence. Diagnostic accuracy is being enhanced with immunohistochemistry and receptor assays. Surgical treatment of invasive cancer is being revolutionized with the possibility of conservative surgery in very early stages, minimizing complications and adverse effects and offering feasibility of fertility sparing. New data on minimally invasive surgery are redefining the role of laparoscopy and robotic surgery in early stages with small tumor size. Sentinel lymph node evaluation is an emerging alternative to complete lymphadenectomy. Immunotherapy has opened up new possibilities for the management of recurrent and metastatic disease. This chapter discusses the management of cervical cancer based on the stage of disease, including attention to palliation and quality‐of‐life issues, with insights into the results from recent landmark trials.

Mutation of the p53 tumor suppressor gene is the most commonly found genetic alteration in human cancer. The E6 gene product of human papillomavirus (HPV) 16 and 18 can inactivate the p53 protein by promoting its degradation. Because most HPV-positive cervical carcinoma cell lines contain wild-type p53 whereas HPV-negative cell lines have point mutations in the p53 gene, a major role in the development of HPV-negative cervical cancer has been attributed to p53. Recent studies, however, have observed no consistent presence of p53 mutation in HPV-negative primary cervical carcinomas. The MDM2 oncogene, which forms an autoregulatory loop with the wild-type p53 protein, has been found amplified in a high percentage of human sarcomas, thus abolishing the antiproliferative function of p53.Forty-three primary cervical carcinomas and 10 autopsy-derived distant metastases from one patient were examined for p53 mutation and MDM2 amplification. These tumors had been selected from 238 cervical cancers that had been HPV-typed by Southern blot hybridization and polymerase chain reaction as a representative sample for their HPV status and their clinicopathologic characteristics. Seventeen of the cases had a remarkably good or poor clinical outcome. Human papillomavirus DNA sequences had been detected in 30 of these 43 primary tumors and 13 were negative for HPV by both methods. p53 mutation in the highly conserved exons 5-8 was studied by single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis and direct sequencing. MDM2 amplification was analyzed by Southern blot hybridization.Only two missense point mutations and one nucleotide sequence polymorphism were detected: a TAC-->TGC transition in codon 234 in exon 7, resulting in a Tyr-->Lys substitution, a CGT-->TGT transition in codon 273 in exon 8, resulting in an Arg-->Cys substitution and a polymorphism (CGA-->CGG) in codon 213 in exon 6. Both tumors revealing the point mutations were HPV-negative carcinomas. Amplification of the MDM2 gene was observed in 1 of the 53 specimens tested.In contrast to data derived from cultured cervical carcinoma cell lines and primary sarcomas, these results indicate that p53 mutation and amplification of the MDM2 oncogene are rare even in HPV-negative primary cervical carcinomas. However, to the authors; knowledge, this is the first observation of MDM2 amplification in humans outside sarcomas and neuroepithelial tumors.

Recently, the World Health Organization (WHO) recognized the existence of human papillomavirus (HPV)-independent invasive cervical squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), but HPV-independent precursor lesions were not included due to the lack of description of this rare entity. We present the histologic spectrum of highly differentiated squamous HPV-negative and p16ink4a-negative precursor lesions adjacent to and/or preceding invasive HPV-negative cervical SCC in 3 patients. The histologic features resembled those described for vulvar HPV-negative precursor lesions. One precursor featured a proliferation of atypical basal keratinocytes with mitotic activity, premature squamatization in elongated epithelial rete, and mostly regular superficial squamous differentiation with TP53 mutation and immunohistochemical p53 overexpression termed differentiated cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (d-CIN). The other 2 precursors included verruciform acanthosis with plump rete, minimal atypia, and an EGFR mutation that resembled vulvar acanthosis with altered differentiation, and an exophytic papillary proliferation with a PIK3CA mutation resembling the differentiated exophytic vulvar intraepithelial lesion. Two precursors that preceded the invasive SCC harbored an additional pathogenic SMARCB1 mutation. The cytologic smears of d-CIN revealed 3-dimensional branched basaloid tubular structures and eosinophilic squamous cell clusters mimicking the histologic features. In conclusion, highly differentiated cervical HPV-negative precursors are characteristic intraepithelial squamous lesions with somatic mutations that resemble those described in vulvar HPV-independent carcinogenesis. For optimal reproducibility, we propose a simplistic classification of these HPV-negative cervical precursors in TP53-mutated d-CIN and p53 wild-type verruciform intraepithelial neoplasia.Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Recurrent vulvar squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) are a poorly understood and aggressive group of treatment-resistant neoplasms. Currently, it remains unclear whether these are in fact recurrences of the same primary tumor, or the development of entirely new tumors. Here, to address this question, we examined the mutational profile of a series of patients with recurrent or multifocal non-human papilloma virus (HPV)-associated vulvar SCC. We performed a targeted 33-gene next-generation sequencing panel on a series of 14 patients with recurrent or multifocal non-HPV-associated vulvar SCC and precursor neoplasms. This amounted to 54 cases (33 SCC, 1 verrucous carcinoma, 13 differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia, and 7 differentiated exophytic vulvar intraepithelial lesion), with 79 mutations detected altogether. TP53 [51/79 (65%)] was the most frequently mutated gene. Mutations in PIK3CA [16/79 (20%)), HRAS [6/79 (8%)], PTEN [4/79 (5%)], EGFR [1/79 (1%)], and GNAS [1/79 (1%)] were occasionally seen. Most patients with SCC [5/9 (56%)] recurrent, 4/5 (80%) multifocal] demonstrated a clonal relationship, and harbored the same mutations in the same genes in metachronous or synchronous tumors. A subset of the recurrent tumors [2/5 (40%)] recurred with additional mutations. These clonal relationships were shared between SCC and differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia in each case. By contrast, a small number of recurrent tumors [3/9 (33%)] demonstrated novel mutations, entirely different from the primary tumor. Thus, our findings suggest that recurrent non-HPV-associated vulvar SCC can arise from 2 mechanisms.Copyright © 2020 by the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.

Five cases of so-called "adenoma malignum" of the cervix are presented. This term has been used to describe an extremely well-differentiated adenocarcinoma characterized histologically be distorted and architecturally irregular endocervical glands which penetrate deeply into the wall of the cervix, but without more than minimal and focal evidence of gland cell stratification, anaplasia, or mitotic activity. Despite this innocuour histologic appearance, these tumors have classically been thought to be clinically highly malignant, with an almost invariably rapid lethal outcome. This discrepancy between the histology and behavior has been presented as justification for the otherwise paradoxical name, "adenoma malignum". In the present series, all patients were treated with modern radiotherapeutic techniques, and four of the five are long-term survivors. Of the patients in the literature who died after rapid dissemination, none received treatment with acceptable radiotherapeutic techniques. Thus, we believe that with proper therapy this tumor is no more malignant than one would expect for a highly differentiated adenocarcinoma, and we suggest that the name, "adenoma malignum," be replaced by "minimal deviation adenocarcinoma of the cervix."

Endocervical-type mucinous adenocarcinoma (ECA) of the uterine cervix is defined as a tumor composed of cells resembling those of the endocervical glands, but recent studies have demonstrated that a minority of ECAs displays a gastric immunophenotype. The aim of this study was to assess the significance of the gastric phenotype. Fifty-three cases of mucinous adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix (37 FIGO stage IB, 4 stage IIA, and 12 stage IIB) were reviewed and reevaluated using a newly established morphologic criteria for distinguishing gastric type adenocarcinoma, which was defined as a tumor showing clear and/or pale eosinophilic and voluminous cytoplasm, with distinct cell borders. The results were correlated with gastric immunophenotype, determined by HIK1083 and MUC6 immunostaining, and patient outcome. Following the current World Health Organization scheme (2003), 47 tumors (89%) were classified as ECA, 1 (2%) as intestinal type, 1 (2%) as mixed endocervical and intestinal type, and 4 (8%) as minimal deviation adenocarcinoma. Twelve of 47 (26%) ECAs and all 4 minimal deviation adenocarcinomas, reclassified as gastric type using the novel criteria, were frequently positive for HIK1083 with a rate of 75% (12/16), whereas only 11% (4/37) of nongastric tumors were positive. There was no significant difference in MUC6 reactivity between gastric and nongastric type tumors (31%, 5/16 vs. 16%, 6/37; P=0.4). Patients with gastric-type adenocarcinomas had a significantly decreased 5-year disease-specific survival rate (30 vs. 77%; P<0.0001), and the gastric type morphology was related to a significant risk for disease recurrence compared with the nongastric type (P=0.001; HR, 4.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.42-14.2). HIK1083-positivity was also related to decreased 5-year disease-specific survival rate (38% vs. 74%; P<0.005). Mucinous adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix with gastric immunophenotype can be a distinct morphologic variant showing an aggressive clinical course.

The fourth edition of the World Health Organization classification set up new entities of endocervical adenocarcinoma (ECA), namely the “usual type” and “gastric type.” These 2 types are considered to be distinct histogenetically because of their differing immunophenotypes, human papillomavirus (HPV) status, and prognoses. Usual-type ECAs (U-ECAs) are virtually always associated with high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infection. Gastric-type ECAs (G-ECAs) are believed not to be associated with HR-HPV infection. Morphologically, U-ECA cells are characterized by mucin-poor and eosinophilic cytoplasm, resembling endometrioid carcinoma (a pseudoendometrioid feature). G-ECA cells are characterized by abundant clear or pale, mucinous cytoplasm and distinct cell borders. However, in routine practice we noticed that some ECAs contain morphologically usual type–like components and gastric type–like components in a single tumor; we have named these “G+U” ECAs. The histogenesis of such tumors has not been investigated. We conducted the present study to clarify the clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical features and HPV status of G+U ECAs, and to determine whether G+U ECAs are genuine G-ECAs mimicking U-ECAs or genuine U-ECAs with gastric type–like morphology. We retrospectively analyzed a series of 70 consecutive cases of ECA diagnosed as mucinous ECA, endocervical type, and we reclassified them on the basis of the latest World Health Organization classification. We identified 48 (69%) pure U-ECAs, 9 pure G-ECAs, and 13 G+U ECAs. Ten of the 13 G+U ECAs (77%) showed no HR-HPV infection by in situ hybridization (HPV-unrelated G+U ECAs) and showed frequent HIK1083 expression and aberrant p53 expression in both usual type–like and gastric type–like components. The other 3 G+U ECAs showed HR-HPV infection (HPV-related G+U EACs) and frequent p16+/p53−/HIK1083− immunophenotype in both usual type–like and gastric type–like components. The U-ECAs were characterized by HR-HPV infection detected by in situ hybridization and frequent p16+/p53−/HIK1083− immunophenotype, similar to that of the HPV-related G+U ECAs. In contrast, the pure G-ECAs were characterized by the absence of HPV infection and frequent HIK1083 expression and aberrant p53 expression, similar to that of HPV-unrelated G+U ECAs. G+U ECAs thus represent a heterogenous group composed of genuine G-ECAs and genuine U-ECAs. Most of the G+U ECAs we examined were genuine HPV-unrelated G-ECAs with usual type–like components showing mucin-poor, eosinophilic cytoplasm (pseudoendometrioid morphology). A small population of G+U ECAs was genuine HPV-related U-ECAs with gastric type–like components showing mucin-rich, voluminous cytoplasm. Thus, both types of ECAs can occasionally display patterns of differentiation suggesting a component of the other type but true mixed tumors do not appear to exist. Ancillary techniques (immunohistochemical analysis of p16, p53, and HPV DNA detection assays) should be used to assure proper classification of tumors with mixed morphologic features.

Claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) is contained within normal gastric mucosa epithelial tight junctions; upon malignant transformation, CLDN18.2 epitopes become exposed. Zolbetuximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody, mediates specific killing of CLDN18.2-positive cells through immune effector mechanisms.The FAST study enrolled advanced gastric/gastro-oesophageal junction and oesophageal adenocarcinoma patients (aged ≥18 years) with moderate-to-strong CLDN18.2 expression in ≥40% tumour cells. Patients received first-line epirubicin + oxaliplatin + capecitabine (EOX, arm 1, n = 84) every 3 weeks (Q3W), or zolbetuximab + EOX (loading dose, 800 mg/m then 600 mg/m Q3W) (arm 2, n = 77). Arm 3 (exploratory) was added after enrolment initiation (zolbetuximab + EOX 1000 mg/m Q3W, n = 85). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was a secondary endpoint.In the overall population, both PFS [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.44; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.29-0.67; P < 0.0005] and OS (HR = 0.55; 95% CI, 0.39-0.77; P < 0.0005) were significantly improved with zolbetuximab + EOX (arm 2) compared with EOX alone (arm 1). This significant PFS benefit was retained in patients with moderate-to-strong CLDN18.2 expression in ≥70% of tumour cells (HR = 0.38; 95% CI, 0.23-0.62; P < 0.0005). Significant improvement in PFS was also reported in the overall population of arm 3 versus arm 1 (HR = 0.58; 95% CI, 0.39-0.85; P = 0.0114) but not in high CLDN18.2-expressing patients; no significant improvement in OS was observed in either population. Most adverse events (AEs) related to zolbetuximab + EOX (nausea, vomiting, neutropenia, anaemia) were grade 1-2. Grade ≥3 AEs showed no substantial increases overall (zolbetuximab + EOX versus EOX alone).In advanced gastric/gastro-oesophageal junction and oesophageal adenocarcinoma patients expressing CLDN18.2, adding zolbetuximab to first-line EOX provided longer PFS and OS versus EOX alone. Zolbetuximab + EOX was generally tolerated and AEs were manageable. Zolbetuximab 800/600 mg/m is being evaluated in phase III studies based on clinical benefit observed in the overall population and in patients with moderate-to-strong CLDN18.2 expression in ≥70% of tumour cells.Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

To evaluate the pattern of cervical cancer (CC) diagnosis and outcomes in women under 25.Thirty-two women younger than 25 years of age treated between 2001 and 2016 were studied and the year, symptom or cytology before diagnosis, time since sexual debut, age group, histology, and stage were considered. Data were compared with older age groups, and survival analysis was performed using a subset of them.Thirty-two CC diagnoses (1.5% of all cases) exhibited a positive linear trend (P = 0.075). Driven by cytology, 18 were asymptomatic and 14 were symptomatic (with vaginal bleeding in 11). The mean time since sexual debut was 6.9 years. Advanced stage (44% vs 29%) and adenosquamous histology (12.5% vs 1.7%-5.0%) were higher in younger women. Five-year overall survival rate was 76%, better for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (86% vs 43% for other histologies; P = 0.018). There were seven deaths, all within 15 months of diagnosis. Age groups of less than 25 years (53%) and 25-29 years (48.5%) had similar proportions of Stage IA1.The rate of CC-diagnosed women under 25 years was 1.5% of all cases, exhibiting more advanced stage and non-SCC histology. For asymptomatic women, cytology allowed the diagnosis at an early stage. Being symptomatic and non-SCC was associated with a higher proportion of advanced stages and poor survival.© 2020 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

Cervical clear cell carcinoma (CCC) is a rare human papillomavirus-independent adenocarcinoma. While recent studies have focused on gastric-type endocervical adenocarcinoma (GTA), little is known about CCC. A total of 58 (CCCs) were collected from 14 international institutions and retrospectively analyzed using univariable and multivariable methods and compared with 36 gastric-type adenocarcinomas and 173 human papillomavirus-associated (HPVA) endocervical adenocarcinoma (ECA) regarding overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Most cases were FIGO stage I (72.4%), with Silva C pattern of invasion (77.6%), and the majority were treated with radical surgery (84.5%) and adjuvant therapy (55.2%). Lymphovascular invasion was present in 31%, while lymph node metastasis was seen in 24.1%; 10.3% were associated with abdominopelvic metastases at the time of diagnosis; 32.8% had recurrences, and 19% died of disease. We did not find statistically significant differences in OS and RFS between CCC and GTA at 5 and 10 years (P=0.313 and 0.508, respectively), but there were significant differences in both OS and RFS between CCC and HPVA ECA (P=0.003 and 0.032, respectively). Also, OS and RFS in stage I clear cell and GTA were similar (P=0.632 and 0.692, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that OS is influenced by the presence of recurrence (P=0.009), while RFS is influenced by the FIGO stage (P=0.025). Cervical CCC has poorer outcomes than HPVA ECA and similar outcomes to human papillomavirus-independent GTA. Oncologic treatment significantly influences RFS in univariate analysis but is not an independent prognostic factor in multivariate analysis suggesting that alternative therapies should be investigated.Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Cervical cancer is the second most common cancer in females worldwide, and the majority of squamous cell carcinomas and adenocarcinomas are associated with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. However, the relationship between clear cell carcinoma of the cervix (CCCC) and HPV is unclear. In this study, we sought to determine if HPV infection is associated with CCCC and to elucidate the signaling pathways involved.We collected samples from 13 CCCC patients and collated the relevant clinicopathologic data. We then evaluated the presence of HPV types 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 52, and 58 by broad-spectrum amplification by polymerase chain reaction and HPV types 39, 45, 51, 56, 59, and 68 by nested polymerase chain reaction assay that combines degenerate E6/E7 consensus primers and type-specific primers from extracted genomic DNA. Immunohistochemistry was used to analyze the expression of EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor), HER2, PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homolog), phospho-AKT, phospho-mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin), p16, and p53. EGFR and HER2 gene amplification was determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization.Patients with stage IB CCCC had a better 3-year overall survival rate compared with those with advanced-stage cancer (100% vs 44%; P = 0.014). High-risk HPVs were not detected in any of the cases examined. EGFR immunostaining was observed in 9 (75%) of 12 patients, HER2 in 3 (25%) of 12, PTEN in 6 (50%) of 12, and phospho-AKT in 7 (58%) of 12, and phospho-mTOR in 6 (50%) of 12. EGFR amplification could not be detected, but HER2 amplification was identified in 1 of (12.5%) 8 cases.Patients with stage I CCCC demonstrated good overall survival and rare recurrence. Clear cell carcinoma of the cervix is unrelated to high-risk HPV infection; hence, current vaccines will not prevent the incidence of CCCC. However, increased EGFR or HER2 expression or activation of AKT or mTOR was observed in all cases, indicating that inhibitors of tyrosine kinases or the AKT-mTOR pathway may be suitable treatment regimens for CCCC.

Lynch syndrome, a hereditary cancer syndrome, occurs because of germline mutations in at least one of four DNA mismatch repair genes (MutL Homolog 1 (MLH1), MutS Homolog 2 (MSH2), MutS Homolog 6 (MSH6), and PMS1 Homolog 2 (PMS2)). The disorder is associated with colorectal, endometrial, and other epithelial malignancies, but not cervical cancer. We report a woman with Lynch syndrome with synchronous cervical cancer. This is the first report of Lynch syndrome-related clear cell carcinoma of the cervix, which indicates the possibility of an association between cervical cancer and Lynch syndrome. Suitable genetic tests are required to determine whether common genetics can account for synchronous or subsequent malignancies in Lynch syndrome patients and their families. Such knowledge will also enhance our understanding of the genetic mechanisms governing the development of apparently unrelated cancers.

Mesonephric carcinomas of the gynecologic tract are neoplasms that are often under-recognized due to their varied morphologic appearances. Recently, GATA3 and TTF1 have been reported to be useful immunohistochemical markers for distinguishing mesonephric carcinomas from its morphologic mimics. Herein, we compared the performance of GATA3 and TTF1 to the traditional markers used for mesonephric carcinomas, CD10 and calretinin. We studied 694 cases: 8 mesonephric carcinomas (7 cervical [includes 3 mesonephric carcinosarcomas], 1 vaginal), 5 mesonephric-like carcinomas (4 uterine corpus, 1 ovarian), 585 endometrial adenocarcinomas, and 96 cervical adenocarcinomas. Mesonephric-like carcinomas were defined as tumors exhibiting the classic morphologic features of mesonephric carcinoma, but occurring outside of the cervix and without convincing mesonephric remnants. GATA3 had the highest sensitivity and specificity (91% and 94%) compared with TTF1 (45% and 99%), CD10 (73% and 83%), and calretinin (36% and 89%). GATA3, however, also stained a substantial number of uterine carcinosarcomas (23/113, 20%). TTF1 was positive in 5/5 (100%) mesonephric-like carcinomas and only 1/8 (13%) mesonephric carcinomas. In 4/6 (67%) TTF1 positive cases, GATA3 exhibited an inverse staining pattern with TTF1. In summary, GATA3 was the best overall marker for mesonephric and mesonephric-like carcinomas, but cannot be used to distinguish mesonephric carcinosarcomas from Müllerian carcinosarcomas. The inverse staining pattern between GATA3 and TTF1, suggests that TTF1 may be useful when GATA3 is negative in small biopsies where mesonephric or mesonephric-like carcinoma is suspected. The greater TTF1 positivity in mesonephric-like carcinomas suggests they may be biologically different from prototypical mesonephric carcinomas.