妊娠期高血糖的认知变迁

隽娟, 舒心宇, 杨慧霞

中国实用妇科与产科杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (4) : 385-388.

PDF(834 KB)
PDF(834 KB)
中国实用妇科与产科杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (4) : 385-388. DOI: 10.19538/j.fk2025040101
述评

妊娠期高血糖的认知变迁

作者信息 +
文章历史 +

引用本文

导出引用
隽娟, 舒心宇, 杨慧霞. 妊娠期高血糖的认知变迁[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志. 2025, 41(4): 385-388 https://doi.org/10.19538/j.fk2025040101
中图分类号: R714.147   

参考文献

[1]
中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组, 中华医学会围产医学分会,中国妇幼保健协会妊娠合并糖尿病专业委员会. 妊娠期高血糖诊治指南(2022)[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2022, 57(1): 3-12. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20210917-00528.
[2]
American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. 2. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes: standards of care in diabetes-2025[J]. Diabetes Care, 2025, 48(1):S27-S49. DOI:10.2337/dc25-S002.
[3]
American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. 15. Management of diabetes in pregnancy: standards of care in diabetes-2025[J]. Diabetes Care, 2025, 48(1):S306-S320. DOI:10.2337/dc25-S015.
[4]
中华人民共和国卫生部. 中华人民共和国卫生行业标准-WS331-2011妊娠期糖尿病诊断[J]. 中华围产医学杂志, 2012, 15(2):100.
[5]
Hivert MF, Backman H, Benhalima K, et al. Pathophysiology from preconception,during pregnancy,and beyond[J]. Lancet, 2024, 404(10448):158-174. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00827-4.
[6]
Sovio U, Murphy HR, Smith GC. Accelerated fetal growth prior to diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study of nulliparous women[J]. Diabetes Care, 2016, 39(6):982-987. DOI:10.2337/dc16-0160.
To determine whether fetal overgrowth precedes the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and to quantify the interrelationships among fetal overgrowth, GDM, and maternal obesity.We conducted a prospective cohort study of unselected nulliparous women and performed ultrasonic measurement of the fetal abdominal circumference (AC) and head circumference (HC) at 20 and 28 weeks of gestational age (wkGA). Exposures were diagnosis of GDM ≥28 wkGA and maternal obesity. The risk of AC >90th and HC-to-AC ratio <10th percentile was modeled using log-binomial regression, adjusted for maternal characteristics.Of 4,069 women, 171 (4.2%) were diagnosed with GDM at ≥28 wkGA. There was no association between fetal biometry at 20 wkGA and subsequent maternal diagnosis of GDM. However, at 28 wkGA, there was an increased risk of AC >90th percentile (adjusted relative risk 2.05 [95% CI 1.37-3.07]) and HC-to-AC ratio <10th percentile (1.97 [1.30-2.99]). Maternal obesity showed similar associations at 28 wkGA (2.04 [1.62-2.56] and 1.46 [1.12-1.90], respectively). The combination of GDM and obesity was associated with an approximately fivefold risk of AC >90th (4.52 [2.98-6.85]) and approximately threefold risk of HC-to-AC ratio <10th percentile (2.80 [1.64-4.78]) at 28 wkGA. Fetal AC >90th percentile at 28 weeks was associated with an approximately fourfold risk of being large for gestational age at birth.Diagnosis of GDM is preceded by excessive growth of the fetal AC between 20 and 28 wkGA, and its effects on fetal growth are additive with the effects of maternal obesity.© 2016 by the American Diabetes Association. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered.
[7]
Simmons D, Gupta Y, Hernandez TL, et al. Call to action for a life course approach[J]. Lancet, 2024, 404(10448):193-214. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00826-2.
[8]
Simmons D, Immanuel J, Hague WM, et al. Treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosed early in pregnancy[J]. N Engl J Med, 2023, 388(23):2132-2144. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa2214956.
[9]
Sweeting A, Hannah W, Backman H, et al. Epidemiology and management of gestational diabetes[J]. Lancet, 2024, 404(10448):175-192. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00825-0.
[10]
Sweeting A, Enticott J, Immanuel J, et al. Relationship between early-pregnancy glycemia and adverse outcomes:findings from the TOBOGM study[J]. Diabetes Care, 2024, 47(12):2085-2092. DOI:10.2337/dc23-2214.
We evaluated associations between early-pregnancy oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) glucose and complications in the Treatment of Booking Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (TOBOGM) cohort to inform prognostic OGTT thresholds.
[11]
Benhalima K, Geerts I, Calewaert P, et al. The 2024 Flemish consensus on screening for gestational diabetes mellitus early and later in pregnancy[J]. Acta Clin Belg, 2024, 79(3):217-224. DOI:10.1080/17843286.2024.2384258.
[12]
Zhu WW, Yang HX, Wei YM, et al. Evaluation of the value of fasting plasma glucose in the first prenatal visit to diagnose gestational diabetes mellitus in china[J]. Diabetes Care, 2013, 36(3):586-590. DOI:10.2337/dc12-1157.
To evaluate the value of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) value in the first prenatal visit to diagnose gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).Medical records of 17,186 pregnant women attending prenatal clinics in 13 hospitals in China, including the Peking University First Hospital (PUFH), were examined. Patients with pre-GDM were excluded; data for FPG at the first prenatal visit and one-step GDM screening with 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) performed between 24 and 28 weeks of gestation were collected and analyzed.The median ± SD FPG value was 4.58 ± 0.437. FPG decreased with increasing gestational age. FPG level at the first prenatal visit was strongly correlated with GDM diagnosed at 24-28 gestational weeks (χ(2) = 959.3, P < 0.001). The incidences of GDM were 37.0, 52.7, and 66.2%, respectively, for women with FPG at the first prenatal visit between 5.10 and 5.59, 5.60 and 6.09, and 6.10-6.99 mmol/L. The data of PUFH were not statistically different from other hospitals.Pregnant women (6.10 ≤ FPG < 7.00 mmol/L) should be considered and treated as GDM to improve outcomes; for women with FPG between 5.10 and 6.09 mmol/L, nutrition and exercise advice should be provided. An OGTT should be performed at 24-28 weeks to confirm or rule out GDM. Based on our data, we cannot support an FPG value ≥5.10 mmol/L at the first prenatal visit as the criterion for diagnosis of GDM.
[13]
Liu B, Cai J, Xu Y, et al. Early diagnosed gestational diabetes mellitus is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes:a prospective cohort study[J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2020, 105(12):dgaa633. DOI:10.1210/clinem/dgaa633.
[14]
Immanuel J, Simmons D. Screening and treatment for early-onset gestational diabetes mellitus:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Curr Diab Rep, 2017, 17(11):115. DOI:10.1007/s11892-017-0943-7.
[15]
Harper LM, Jauk V, Longo S, et al. Early gestational diabetes screening in obese women:a randomized controlled trial[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2020, 222(5):495.e1-495.e8. DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2019.12.021.
[16]
Vinter CA, Tanvig MH, Christensen MH, et al. Lifestyle Intervention in danish obese pregnant women with early gestational diabetes mellitus according to WHO 2013 criteria does not change pregnancy outcomes:results from the lip (lifestyle in pregnancy) study[J]. Diabetes Care, 2018, 41(10):2079-2085. DOI:10.2337/dc18-0808.
To study effects of lifestyle intervention on metabolic and clinical outcomes in obese women fulfilling the World Health Organization (WHO) 2013 diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in early gestation.
[17]
Roeder HA, Moore TR, Wolfson MT, et al. Treating hyperglycemia in early pregnancy:a randomized controlled trial[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM, 2019, 1(1):33-41. DOI:10.1016/j.ajogmf.2019.03.003.
[18]
Simmons D, Nema J, Parton C, et al. The treatment of booking gestational diabetes mellitus (TOBOGM) pilot randomised controlled trial[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2018, 18(1):151. DOI:10.1186/s12884-018-1809-y.
[19]
ACOG Clinical Practice Update: Screening for gestational and pregestational diabetes in pregnancy and postpartum[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2024, 144(1):20-23. DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000005612.
[20]
中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组, 中华医学会围产医学分会妊娠合并糖尿病协作组. 妊娠合并糖尿病临床诊断与治疗推荐指南(草案)[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2007, 23(6):475-477. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-2216.2007.06.033.
[21]
Metzger BE, Gabbe SG, Persson B, et al. International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy[J]. Diabetes care, 2010, 33:676-682. DOI:10.2337/dc09-1848.
[22]
International Diabetes Federation, Global guideline on pregnancy and diabetes[S]. Brussels: International Diabetes Federation, 2009.
[23]
Walker JD. Nice guidance on diabetes in pregnancy:management of diabetes and its complications from preconception to the postnatal period. Nice clinical guideline 63. London,march 2008[J]. Diabet Med, 2008, 25(9):1025-1027. DOI:10.1111/j.1464-5491.2008.02532.x.
[24]
Hoffman L, Nolan C, Wilson JD, et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus--management guidelines. The australasian diabetes in pregnancy society[J]. Med J Aust, 1998, 169(2):93-97. Doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.1998.tb140192.x.
[25]
中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组, 中华医学会围产医学分会妊娠合并糖尿病协作组. 妊娠合并糖尿病诊治指南(2014)[J]. 中华围产医学杂志, 2014, 17(8):537-545.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-9408.2014.08.009.
[26]
Feig DS, Donovan LE, Corcoy R, et al. CONCEPTT Collaborative Group. Continuous glucose monitoring in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes (CONCEPTT):a multicentre international randomized controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2017, 390(10110):2347-2359. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32400-5.
[27]
Kristensen K, Ogge LE, Sengpiel V, et al. Continuous glucose monitoring in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes: an observational cohort study of 186 pregnancies[J]. Diabetologia, 2019, 62(7):1143-1153. DOI:10.1007/s00125-019-4850-0.
The aim of this study was to analyse patterns of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data for associations with large for gestational age (LGA) infants and an adverse neonatal composite outcome (NCO) in pregnancies in women with type 1 diabetes.This was an observational cohort study of 186 pregnant women with type 1 diabetes in Sweden. The interstitial glucose readings from 92 real-time (rt) CGM and 94 intermittently viewed (i) CGM devices were used to calculate mean glucose, SD, CV%, time spent in target range (3.5-7.8 mmol/l), mean amplitude of glucose excursions and also high and low blood glucose indices (HBGI and LBGI, respectively). Electronic records provided information on maternal demographics and neonatal outcomes. Associations between CGM indices and neonatal outcomes were analysed by stepwise logistic regression analysis adjusted for confounders.The number of infants born LGA was similar in rtCGM and iCGM users (52% vs 53%). In the combined group, elevated mean glucose levels in the second and the third trimester were significantly associated with LGA (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.12, 2.08, and OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.12, 2.19, respectively). Furthermore, a high percentage of time in target in the second and the third trimester was associated with lower risk of LGA (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.94, 0.99 and OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.95, 1.00, respectively). The same associations were found for mean glucose and for time in target and the risk of NCO in all trimesters. SD was significantly associated with LGA in the second trimester and with NCO in the third trimester. Glucose patterns did not differ between rtCGM and iCGM users except that rtCGM users had lower LBGI and spent less time below target.Higher mean glucose levels, higher SD and less time in target range were associated with increased risk of LGA and NCO. Despite the use of CGM throughout pregnancy, the day-to-day glucose control was not optimal and the incidence of LGA remained high.
[28]
Law GR, Gilthorpe MS, Secher AL, et al. Translating HbA1c measurements into estimated average glucose values in pregnant women with diabetes[J]. Diabetologia, 2017, 60(4):618-624. DOI:10.1007/s00125-017-4205-7.
[29]
GO MOMs Study Group. Design, rationale and protocol for Glycemic Observation and Metabolic Outcomes in Mothers and Offspring (GO MOMs):an observational cohort study[J]. BMJ Open, 2024, 14(6):e084216. DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084216.
Given the increasing prevalence of both obesity and pre-diabetes in pregnant adults, there is growing interest in identifying hyperglycaemia in early pregnancy to optimise maternal and perinatal outcomes. Multiple organisations recommend first-trimester diabetes screening for individuals with risk factors; however, the benefits and drawbacks of detecting glucose abnormalities more mild than overt diabetes in early gestation and the best screening method to detect such abnormalities remain unclear.
[30]
Xie W, Dai P, Qin Y, et al. Effectiveness of telemedicine for pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus:an updated meta-analysis of 32 randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2020, 20(1):198. DOI:10.1186/s12884-020-02892-1.
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is now a global health problem. Poor blood glucose control during pregnancy may lead to maternal and neonatal/foetal complications. Recently, the development of information and communication technology has resulted in new technical support for the clinical care of GDM. Telemedicine is defined as health services and medical activities provided by healthcare professionals through remote communication technologies. This study aimed to update the systematic review of the effectiveness of telemedicine interventions on glycaemic control and pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women with GDM.
[31]
Lee TTM, Collett C, Bergford S, et al. Automated insulin delivery in women with pregnancy complicated by type 1 diabetes[J]. N Engl J Med, 2023, 389(17):1566-1578. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa2303911.

基金

国家自然科学基金(82470863)
北京市科技新星计划资助(2024010)
中央高水平医院临床研究基金(22cz020401-4811009)

PDF(834 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/