中国实用外科杂志

• 论蓍 • 上一篇    下一篇

机器人与腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术近期疗效对比研究

杜晓辉   

  1. 中国人民解放军总医院普通外科,北京 100853
  • 出版日期:2016-11-01 发布日期:2016-10-27

  • Online:2016-11-01 Published:2016-10-27

摘要:

目的    比较分析达芬奇机器人手术系统应用于直肠癌手术的安全性及近期疗效。方法    回顾性分析中国人民解放军总医院2012年1月至2015年12月行达芬奇机器人直肠癌前切除术的78例直肠癌病人(机器人组)的临床资料,以同期行腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术的156例直肠癌病人(腹腔镜组)作为对照,对比分析临床病理因素及近期疗效。结果    机器人组较腹腔镜组术中出血明显减少[(53.9±12.4)mL vs.(75.7±58.6)mL,P=0.000],但手术时间延长[(208.5±118.5) min vs.(173.7±35.4)min,P=0.003]。两组病人术后排气时间、恢复进食时间、留置导尿时间、淋巴结清扫数、术后并发症、术后住院时间等方面差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。机器人组手术费用明显高于腹腔镜组[(8.4±1.3)万元 vs.(7.0±1.3)万元,P=0.004]。结论    达芬奇机器人直肠癌前切除术安全可行,与腹腔镜手术具有相同的近期疗效,远期疗效须进一步研究。

关键词: 直肠肿瘤, 机器人手术系统, 腹腔镜, 全直肠系膜切除

Abstract:

Robotic versus laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer: A comparative study of short-term outcomes            DU Xiao-hui. Department of General Surgery,Chinese PLA General Hospital,Beijing 100853,China
Abstract    Objective    To investigate the safety and short-term outcomes of da Vinci robotic surgical system in rectal cancer radical surgery. Methods    The clinical data of 78 patients who underwent da Vinci robotic rectal anterior resection (robotic group) and 156 patients who underwent laparoscopy-assisted rectal anterior resection (laparoscopic group) from January 2012 to December 2015 in Chinese PLA General Hospital were compared retrospectively. Evaluation was focused on clinicopathological characteristics and short-term outcomes. Results    The blood loss was significant less in the robotic group than that in the laparoscopic group [(53.9±12.4)mL vs.(75.7±58.6)mL,P=0.000]. The operating time was longer in the robotic group than that in the laparoscopic group [(208.5±118.5) min vs.(173.7±35.4)min,P=0.003]. There was no significant difference in the time of first flatus passage,the time of first diet,the time of removing the urinary catheter,the number of retrieved lymph nodes,the postoperative complications and the length of stay(P>0.05). In addition,the cost of surgery was significant higher in robotic group in comparison with the laparoscopic group [(84.0±13.1) thousands yuan vs. (69.6±12.7) thousands yuan,P=0.004). Conclusion Da Vinci robotic system is safe and feasible for patients with rectal cancer. The short-term outcomes of the robotic anterior resection of rectal cancer is identical to those of the laparoscopic operation. The long-term oncologic outcomes need the further evaluation.

Key words: rectal neoplasms, robotic surgical system, laparoscopy, total mesorectal excision