Standardized screening and prevention of preeclampsia

ZHU Jia-yu, CHEN Yu-ying, HUANG Li-ping

Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (8) : 792-796.

PDF(923 KB)
PDF(923 KB)
Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (8) : 792-796. DOI: 10.19538/j.fk2026080106

Standardized screening and prevention of preeclampsia

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Preeclampsia(PE)is a severe pregnancy-specific complication with complex pathological mechanisms,and no etiological treatment is currently available. Therefore,standardized screening and precision prevention are critical to improving maternal and neonatal outcomes. However,in clinical practice,standardization is frequently misinterpreted as comprehensiveness,leading to overtreatment of costly testing in low-risk populations and overuse of drugs that increase risks and strain healthcare resources.This article integrates domestic and international guidelines and evidence-based data to review a standardized screening pathway and stratified prevention strategy,emphasizing that the cornerstone of precise prevention and control of PE lies in strictly defining intervention boundaries and avoiding overscreening and unnecessary prevention without clear indications,thus ensuring that medical resources are genuinely directed toward high-risk populations.

Key words

preeclampsia / standardized screening / precise prevention / overtreatment

Cite this article

Download Citations
ZHU Jia-yu , CHEN Yu-ying , HUANG Li-ping. Standardized screening and prevention of preeclampsia[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2026, 42(8): 792-796 https://doi.org/10.19538/j.fk2026080106

References

[1]
Liu Y, Li N, Li Z, et al. Impact of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia on fetal gender:a large prospective cohort study in China[J]. Pregnancy Hypertens, 2019,18:132-136. DOI:10.1016/j.preghy.2019.09.020.
[2]
Yang M, Wang M, Li N. Advances in pathogenesis of preeclampsia[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2024, 309(5):1815-1823. DOI:10.1007/s00404-024-07393-6.
Preeclampsia is a major cause of health problems for both pregnant women and unborn babies worldwide. However, the underlying causes of preeclampsia are not fully understood, leading to limited effective treatments. The goal of this study is to enhance our knowledge of its causes, devise prevention strategies, and develop treatments.We performed a systematic literature search. Six models regarding the pathogenesis of preeclampsia are discussed in this review.This review focuses on the latest advancements in understanding preeclampsia's origins. Preeclampsia is a complex condition caused by various factors, processes, and pathways. Reduced blood flow and oxygen to the uterus and placenta, heightened inflammatory reactions, immune imbalances, altered genetic changes, imbalanced blood vessel growth factors, and disrupted gut bacteria may contribute to its development.Preeclampsia is thought to result from the interplay of these factors.© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
[3]
中华医学会妇产科学分会妊娠期高血压疾病学组. 子痫前期预测与预防指南(2025)[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2025, 60(1):1-8. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn11214120241130-00636.
[4]
Hennessy A, Ng J, Makris A. The pathophysiology of pre-eclampsia[J]. Nat Rev Nephrol, 2026, 22(9):622-634. DOI:10.1038/s41581-026-01085-x.
[5]
Roberts JM, Rich-Edwards JW, McElrath TF, et al. Subtypes of Preeclampsia:Recognition and Determining Clinical Usefulness[J]. Hypertension, 2021, 77(5):1430-1441. DOI:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.14781.
[6]
O’Gorman N, Wright D, Syngelaki A, et al. Competing risks model in screening for preeclampsia by maternal factors and biomarkers at 11-13 weeks gestation[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2016, 214(1):103.e1-103. e12. DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.034.
[7]
O’Gorman N, Wright D, Poon LC, et al. Accuracy of competing-risks model in screening for preeclampsia by maternal factors and biomarkers at 11-13 weeks’gestation[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2017, 49(6):751-755. DOI:10.1002/uog.17399.
[8]
Primentel RCG, da Silva Costa F, Coutinho CM. Uterine artery Doppler assessment in pregnancy[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2026, 106:102729.DOI:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2026.102729.
[9]
万书婷, 王谢桐. 子宫动脉血流监测在产科的应用[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2022, 38(4):403-6.DOI:10.19538/j.fk2022040106.
[10]
Mo LY, Bascom PA, Ritchie K, et al. A transmission line modelling approach to the interpretation of uterine Doppler waveforms[J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 1988, 14(5):365-376. DOI:10.1016/0301-5629(88)90072-5.
An electrical analogue model of an artery that terminates into a vascular bed is presented. The model consists of an uniform transmission line that represents the artery and a load impedance that represents the vascular bed. The transmission line parameters are based on a well-established first-order approximation of the Navier-Stokes equations for fluid flow in distensible tubes. The model can be used to predict the incident and reflected components of both the arterial pressure and flow waveforms. In addition, it can predict the vessel diameter change and the mean blood velocity waveforms. In this study, the model was applied to the uterine artery so that the characteristics of the utero-placental circulation can be related to Doppler ultrasound recordings. It was found that the presence of the dicrotic notch in the uterine artery time-velocity waveform is the result of wave reflection and that a persistent notch past 20 weeks' gestation may be indicative of an abnormally high placental bed resistance. It is shown that the simulation results are consistent with the known physiological data and the clinically recorded uterine Doppler waveforms.
[11]
Akbas M, Sen C, Calay Z. Correlation between First and Second Trimester Uterine Artery Doppler Velocimetry and Placental Bed Histopathology[J]. Int Sch Res Notices, 2014, 2014:890534. DOI:10.1155/2014/890534.
[12]
Alfirevic Z, Stampalija T, Gyte GM. Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2010,(1): CD007529.DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD007529.pub2.
[13]
Levine RJ, Maynard SE, Qian C, et al. Circulating angiogenic factors and the risk of preeclampsia[J]. N Engl J Med, 2004, 350(7):672-683. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa031884.
[14]
Zeisler H, Llurba E, Chantraine F, et al. Predictive Value of the sFlt-1:PlGF Ratio in Women with Suspected Preeclampsia[J]. N Engl J Med, 2016, 374(1):13-22. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1414838.
[15]
Ohkuchi A, Saito S, Yamamoto T, et al. Short-term prediction of preeclampsia using the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio:a subanalysis of pregnant Japanese women from the PROGNOSIS Asia study[J]. Hypertension Res, 2021, 44(7):813-821. DOI:10.1038/s41440-021-00629-x.
Two prospective multicenter studies demonstrated that a soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt-1)/placental growth factor (PlGF) ratio cutoff of ≤38 can rule out preeclampsia within 1 week with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 99.3% (PROGNOSIS) and 98.6% (PROGNOSIS Asia). We report a subanalysis of the Japanese cohort from the PROGNOSIS Asia study. Pregnant women with suspected preeclampsia between gestational weeks 18 + 0 days and 36 + 6 days were enrolled at eight Japanese sites. Primary objectives: Assess the performance of the Elecsys® sFlt-1/PlGF ratio cutoff ≤38 to rule out preeclampsia within 1 week and of the cutoff >38 to rule in preeclampsia within 4 weeks. Key secondary objectives: Prediction of maternal and fetal adverse outcomes (MAOs/FAOs) and their relationship with duration of pregnancy. Of 192 women enrolled, 180 (93.8%)/175 (91.1%) were evaluable for primary/combined endpoint analyses. Overall preeclampsia prevalence was 13.3%. A sFlt-1/PlGF ratio of ≤38 provided an NPV of 100% (95% confidence interval [CI], 97.5–100) for ruling out preeclampsia within 1 week, and a ratio of >38 provided a positive predictive value of 32.4% (95% CI, 18.0–49.8) for ruling in preeclampsia within 4 weeks. The area under the curve for the prediction of preeclampsia/maternal/fetal adverse outcomes within 1 week was 94.2% (95% CI, 89.3–97.8). After adjusting for gestational age and final preeclampsia status, Cox regression indicated a 2.8-fold greater risk of imminent delivery for women with a sFlt-1/PlGF ratio >38 versus ≤38. This subanalysis of Japanese women with suspicion of preeclampsia showed high predictive value for a Elecsys sFlt-1/PlGF ratio cutoff of 38 for short-term prediction of preeclampsia.
[16]
Tang J, Xiao D, Yang S, et al. sFlt-1/PlGF Ratio Predicts Short-Term Maternal-Fetal Outcomes in Chinese Hypertensive Pregnancies:A Prospective Cohort Study[J]. Hypertension, 2026, 83(2):e25022. DOI:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.125.25022.
[17]
Lee NMW, Chaemsaithong P, Poon LC. Prediction of preeclampsia in asymptomatic women[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2023, 92:102436. DOI:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2023.102436.
[18]
刘翠莲, 李佳欣. 简约英国胎儿医学基金会子痫前期预测模型在单胎妊娠中的应用[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2025, 60(1):46-51. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20241011-00550.
[19]
Rolnik DL, Wright D, Poon LC, et al. Aspirin versus Placebo in Pregnancies at High Risk for Preterm Preeclampsia[J]. New England Journal of Medicine, 2017, 377(7):613-622. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1704559.
[20]
Liu J, Chen YY, Tai ST, et al. First Trimester Preeclampsia Screening and Prevention:Perspective in Chinese Mainland[J]. Maternal-Fetal Medicine, 2024, 6(2):84-91. DOI:10.1097/FM9.0000000000000215.
Preeclampsia (PE), a multisystem disorder in pregnancy, is one of the leading causes of perinatal morbidity and mortality that poses financial and physical burdens worldwide. Preterm PE with delivery at <37 weeks of gestation is associated with a higher risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes than term PE with delivery at ≥37 weeks of gestation. A myriad of first trimester screening models have been developed to identifying women at risk of preterm PE. In fact, the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) first trimester prediction model has undergone successful internal and external validation. The FMF triple test enables the estimation of patient-specific risks, using Bayes theorem to combine maternal characteristics and medical history together with measurements of mean arterial pressure, uterine artery pulsatility index, and serum placental growth factor. Establishing a quality control process for regular monitoring and to ensure data standardization, reliability, and accuracy is key to maintaining optimal screening performance. The rate of preterm PE can be reduced by 62% by using the FMF prediction model, followed by the administration of low-dose aspirin. Recent evidence has also demonstrated that metformin has the potential for preventing PE in patients at high-risk of the disorder. In this article, we will summarize the existing literature on the different screening methods, different components of risk assessment, therapeutic interventions, and clinical implementation of the first trimester screening and prevention program for PE with specific considerations for Chinese mainland.
[21]
Xiong Y, et al. The effect of maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index on hypertensive disorders of pregnancy:a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of cohort studies involving 50 million pregnancies[J]. EClinicalMedicine, 2025, 81:103395. DOI:10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103395.
[22]
Novelli GP, Silvestrini M, Farsetti D, et al. Physical exercise improves cardiovascular function after preeclampsia and reduces the risk of recurrent preeclampsia in the subsequent pregnancy:an echocardiographic prospective cohort study[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2026, 234(6):1791-1803. DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2026.02.013.
[23]
Li M, Grewal J, Hinkle SN, et al. Healthy dietary patterns and common pregnancy complications:a prospective and longitudinal study[J]. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2021, 114(4):1329-1337. DOI:10.1093/ajcn/nqab178.
[24]
尹建蓝, 陈慧. 妊娠期抗血小板及抗凝药物使用的安全性问题[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2025, 41(11):1104-1110.DOI:10.19538/j.fk2025110111.
[25]
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG committee opinion No. 743:low-dose aspirin use during pregnancy[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2018, 132(1):e44-e52. DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000002708.
\n Low-dose aspirin has been used during pregnancy, most commonly to prevent or delay the onset of preeclampsia. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists issued the\n Hypertension in Pregnancy Task Force Report\n recommending daily low-dose aspirin beginning in the late first trimester for women with a history of early-onset preeclampsia and preterm delivery at less than 34 0/7 weeks of gestation, or for women with more than one prior pregnancy complicated by preeclampsia. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force published a similar guideline, although the list of indications for low-dose aspirin use was more expansive. Daily low-dose aspirin use in pregnancy is considered safe and is associated with a low likelihood of serious maternal, or fetal complications, or both, related to use. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine support the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guideline criteria for prevention of preeclampsia. Low-dose aspirin (81 mg/day) prophylaxis is recommended in women at high risk of preeclampsia and should be initiated between 12 weeks and 28 weeks of gestation (optimally before 16 weeks) and continued daily until delivery. Low-dose aspirin prophylaxis should be considered for women with more than one of several moderate risk factors for preeclampsia. Women at risk of preeclampsia are defined based on the presence of one or more high-risk factors (history of preeclampsia, multifetal gestation, renal disease, autoimmune disease, type 1 or type 2 diabetes, and chronic hypertension) or more than one of several moderate-risk factors (first pregnancy, maternal age of 35 years or older, a body mass index greater than 30, family history of preeclampsia, sociodemographic characteristics, and personal history factors). In the absence of high risk factors for preeclampsia, current evidence does not support the use of prophylactic low-dose aspirin for the prevention of early pregnancy loss, fetal growth restriction, stillbirth, or preterm birth.\n
[26]
Rolnik DL, Wright D, Poon LC, et al. Aspirin versus placebo in pregnancies at high risk for preterm preeclampsia[J]. New England Journal of Medicine, 2017, 377(7):613-622. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1704559.
[27]
Mendoza M, Bonacina E, Garcia-Manau P, et al. Aspirin discontinuation at 24 to 28 weeks' gestation in pregnancies at high risk of preterm preeclampsia:a randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA, 2023, 329(7):542-550. DOI:10.1001/jama.2023.0691.
Aspirin reduces the incidence of preterm preeclampsia by 62% in pregnant individuals at high risk of preeclampsia. However, aspirin might be associated with an increased risk of peripartum bleeding, which could be mitigated by discontinuing aspirin before term (37 weeks of gestation) and by an accurate selection of individuals at higher risk of preeclampsia in the first trimester of pregnancy.To determine whether aspirin discontinuation in pregnant individuals with normal soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 to placental growth factor (sFlt-1:PlGF) ratio between 24 and 28 weeks of gestation was noninferior to aspirin continuation to prevent preterm preeclampsia.Multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase 3, noninferiority trial conducted in 9 maternity hospitals across Spain. Pregnant individuals (n = 968) at high risk of preeclampsia during the first-trimester screening and an sFlt-1:PlGF ratio of 38 or less at 24 to 28 weeks of gestation were recruited between August 20, 2019, and September 15, 2021; of those, 936 were analyzed (intervention: n = 473; control: n = 463). Follow-up was until delivery for all participants.Enrolled patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to aspirin discontinuation (intervention group) or aspirin continuation until 36 weeks of gestation (control group).Noninferiority was met if the higher 95% CI for the difference in preterm preeclampsia incidences between groups was less than 1.9%.Among the 936 participants, the mean (SD) age was 32.4 (5.8) years; 3.4% were Black and 93% were White. The incidence of preterm preeclampsia was 1.48% (7/473) in the intervention group and 1.73% (8/463) in the control group (absolute difference, -0.25% [95% CI, -1.86% to 1.36%]), indicating noninferiority.Aspirin discontinuation at 24 to 28 weeks of gestation was noninferior to aspirin continuation for preventing preterm preeclampsia in pregnant individuals at high risk of preeclampsia and a normal sFlt-1:PlGF ratio.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03741179 and ClinicalTrialsRegister.eu Identifier: 2018-000811-26.
[28]
Lin PT, Wang SH, Chi CC. Low molecular weight heparin for prevention of microvascular occlusion in digital replantation[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2020, 4(4):CD009894.DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD009894.
[29]
Chen J, Huai J, Yang H. Low-molecular-weight heparin for the prevention of preeclampsia in high-risk pregnancies without thrombophilia:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2024, 24(1):68.DOI:10.1186/s12884-023-06218-9.
To systematically evaluate the efficacy of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) to prevent preeclampsia in high risk pregnant women without thrombophilia.
[30]
杨孜, 张为远. 《妊娠期高血压疾病诊治指南(2020)》解读[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2020, 55(6):425-432.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20200302-00159.
[31]
赵保静, 杨欣怡, 尹宗智. 双胎严重母体并发症和合并症预测与管理[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2025, 41(2):155-160.DOI:10.19538/j.fk2025020106.
[32]
World Health Organization. WHO recommendation:calcium supplementation during pregnancy for the prevention of pre-eclampsia and its complications[EB/OL]. Geneva: WHO, 2018. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK535809/.
[33]
Woo Kinshella ML, Sarr C, Sandhu A, et al. Calcium for pre-eclampsia prevention:a systematic review and network meta-analysis to guide personalised antenatal care[J]. BJOG, 2022, 129(11):1833. DOI:10.1111/1471-0528.17221.
[34]
Syngelaki A, Nicolaides KH, Balani J, et al. Metformin versus placebo in obese pregnant women without diabetes mellitus[J]. N Engl J Med, 2016, 374(5):434443. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1509819.
[35]
Bergmann A, Ahmad S, Cudmore M, et al. Reduction of circulating soluble Flt-1 alleviates preeclampsia-like symptoms in a mouse model[J]. J Cell Mol Med, 2010, 14(6B):18571867. DOI:10.1111/j.15824934.2009.00820.x.
[36]
Dobert M, Varouxaki AN, Mu AC, et al. Pravastatin versus placebo in pregnancies at high risk of term preeclampsia[J]. Circulation, 2021, 144(9):670-679. DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.053963.
Effective screening for term preeclampsia is provided by a combination of maternal factors with measurements of mean arterial pressure, serum placental growth factor and serum soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 at 35 to 37 weeks of gestation, with detection rate of about 75%, at screen positive rate of 10%. However, there is no known intervention to reduce the incidence of the disease. In this multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned 1,120 women with singleton pregnancies at high-risk of term preeclampsia to receive pravastatin, at a dose of 20 mg per day, or placebo from 35 to 37 weeks of gestation until delivery or 41 weeks. The primary outcome was delivery with preeclampsia at any time after randomization. The analysis was performed according to intention-to-treat. A total of 29 women withdrew consent during the trial. Preeclampsia occurred in 14.6% (80/548) participants in the pravastatin group and in 13.6% (74/543) in the placebo group. Allowing for the effect of risk at the time of screening and participating centre, the mixed effects Cox regression showed no evidence of an effect of pravastatin; hazard ratio (statin/placebo) 1.08 (95% confidence interval: 0.78, 1.49; p=0.65). There was no evidence of interaction between the effect of pravastatin, estimated risk of preeclampsia, previous pregnancy history, adherence and aspirin treatment. There was no significant between-group difference in the incidence of any secondary outcomes, including gestational hypertension, stillbirth, abruption, delivery of small for gestational age neonates, neonatal death or neonatal morbidity. There was no significant between-group difference in the treatment effects on serum placental growth factor and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 concentrations 1 and 3 weeks after randomization Adherence was good, with reported intake of 80% or more of the required number of tablets in 89% of participants. There were no significant between-group differences in neonatal adverse outcomes or other adverse events. Pravastatin in women at high risk of term preeclampsia did not reduce the incidence of delivery with preeclampsia. URL: https://www.isrctn.com Unique Identifier ISRCTN16123934.
[37]
杨孜. 推进子痫前期早发晚发病因分类临床分层共研究以循寻证有源致远[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2025, 41(1):15-22.DOI:10.19538/j.fk2025010105.

利益冲突

所有作者均声明不存在利益冲突

Funding

Regional Joint Key Poject of Naional Natural Science Foundation of China(U24A206663)
National Natural Science Foundation of China- General Program(82371690)
PDF(923 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/