Hereditary and acquired thrombophilia are risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Whether testing helps in guiding management decisions is controversial.These evidence-based guidelines from the American Society of Hematology (ASH) intend to support decision-making about thrombophilia testing.ASH formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel covering clinical and methodological expertise and minimizing bias from conflicts of interest. The McMaster University GRADE Centre provided logistical support, performed systematic reviews, and created evidence profiles and evidence-to-decision tables. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used. Recommendations were subject to public comment.The panel agreed on 23 recommendations regarding thrombophilia testing and associated management. Nearly all recommendations are based on very low certainty in the evidence due to modeling assumptions.The panel issued a strong recommendation against testing the general population before starting combined oral contraceptives (COC), and conditional recommendations for thrombophilia testing in the following scenarios: a) patients with VTE associated with non-surgical major transient or hormonal risk factors; b) patients with cerebral or splanchnic venous thrombosis, in settings where anticoagulation would otherwise be discontinued; c) individuals with a family history of antithrombin, protein C or protein S deficiency when considering thromboprophylaxis for minor provoking risk factors, and for guidance to avoid COC/HRT; d) pregnant women with a family history of high-risk thrombophilia types; e) patients with cancer at low or intermediate risk of thrombosis and with a family history of VTE. For all other questions, the panel provided conditional recommendations against testing for thrombophilia.Copyright © 2023 American Society of Hematology.

Inherited thrombophilias are associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism and have been linked to adverse outcomes in pregnancy. However, there is limited evidence to guide screening for and management of these conditions in pregnancy. The purpose of this document is to review common thrombophilias and their association with maternal venous thromboembolism risk and adverse pregnancy outcomes, indications for screening to detect these conditions, and management options in pregnancy. This Practice Bulletin has been revised to provide additional information on recommendations for candidates for thrombophilia evaluation, updated consensus guidelines regarding the need for prophylaxis in women with an inherited thrombophilia during pregnancy and the postpartum period, and discussion of new published consensus guidelines from the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology addressing thromboprophylaxis and neuraxial anesthetic considerations in the obstetric population.

Currently, it is recommended to arrange screening for all women who are referred for prenatal care before the 20 week of gestation. Congenital and genetic diseases lead to disability and death in 3% of babies. Prenatal diagnosis is the only way to prevent the birth of babies with genetic disorders. This study was conducted with the aim of investigating the indications of amniocentesis as well as its early and late complications.This retrospective study was conducted on 216 patients who were referred to the Perinatology Clinic of Sanandaj Besat Hospital in 2019-2020 and were candidates for amniocentesis. After collecting the data, analysis of data was done in SPSS software (version 21).In the investigation of complications caused by amniocentesis, spontaneous abortion occurred in five cases (2.31%), amniotic fluid leakage in nine cases (4.6%), spotting in seven cases (3.24%), chorioamnionitis in one case (0.46%), and premature birth in 35 cases (16.2%). In this study, there were no reports of skin and eye complications.Based on the results of this research, the most common early and late complications were amniotic fluid leakage and childbirth before 37 weeks of gestation, respectively.Copyright: © 2024 Advanced Biomedical Research.

Women with a history of spontaneous preterm birth (SPTB) are at a significantly increased risk for recurrent preterm birth (PTB). To date, only one large U.S. clinical trial comparing 17-OHPC (17-α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate or "17P") to placebo has been published, and this trial was stopped early due to a large treatment benefit.This study aimed to assess whether 17-OHPC decreases recurrent PTB and neonatal morbidity in women with a prior SPTB in a singleton gestation.This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled international trial involving women with a previous singleton SPTB (: NCT01004029). Women were enrolled at 93 clinical centers (41 in the United States and 52 outside the United States) between 16 to 20 weeks in a 2:1 ratio, to receive either weekly intramuscular (IM) injections of 250 mg of 17-OHPC or an inert oil placebo; treatment was continued until delivery or 36 weeks. Co-primary outcomes were PTB < 35 weeks and a neonatal morbidity composite index. The composite included any of the following: neonatal death, grade 3 or 4 intraventricular hemorrhage, respiratory distress syndrome, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, necrotizing enterocolitis, or proven sepsis. A planned sample size of 1,707 patients was estimated to provide 98% power to detect a 30% reduction in PTB < 35 weeks (30% to 21%) and 90% power to detect a 35% reduction in neonatal composite index (17%-11%) using a two-sided type-I error of 5%. Finally, this sample size would also provide 82.8% power to rule out a doubling in the risk of fetal/early infant death assuming a 4% fetal/early infant death rate. Analysis was performed according to the intention-to-treat principle.Baseline characteristics between the 1,130 women who received 17-OHPC and 578 women who received placebo were similar. Overall, 87% of enrolled women were Caucasian, 12% had >1 prior SPTB, 7% smoked cigarettes, and 89% were married/lived with partner. Prior to receiving study drug, 73% women had a transvaginal cervical length measurement performed and <2% had cervical shortening <25 mm. There were no significant differences in the frequency of PTB < 35 weeks (17-OHPC 11.0% vs. placebo 11.5%; relative risk = 0.95 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.71-1.26]) or neonatal morbidity index (17-OHPC 5.6% vs. placebo 5.0%; relative risk = 1.12 [95% CI: 0.68-1.61]). There were also no differences in frequency of fetal/early infant death (17-OHPC 1.7% vs. placebo 1.9%; relative risk = 0.87 [95% CI: 0.4-1.81]. Maternal outcomes were also similar. In the subgroup of women enrolled in the United States ( = 391; 23% of all patients), although the rate of PTB < 35 weeks was higher than the overall study population, there were no statistically significant differences between groups (15.6% vs. 17.6%; relative risk = 0.88 [95% CI: 0.55, 1.40].In this study population, 17-OHPC did not decrease recurrent PTB and was not associated with increased fetal/early infant death.Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Preterm birth is a global health priority. Using a progestogen during high-risk pregnancy could reduce preterm birth and adverse neonatal outcomes.We did a systematic review of randomised trials comparing vaginal progesterone, intramuscular 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17-OHPC), or oral progesterone with control, or with each other, in asymptomatic women at risk of preterm birth. We identified published and unpublished trials that completed primary data collection before July 30, 2016, (12 months before data collection began), by searching MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, the Maternity and Infant Care Database, and relevant trial registers between inception and July 30, 2019. Trials of progestogen to prevent early miscarriage or immediately-threatened preterm birth were excluded. Individual participant data were requested from investigators of eligible trials. Outcomes included preterm birth, early preterm birth, and mid-trimester birth. Adverse neonatal sequelae associated with early births were assessed using a composite of serious neonatal complications, and individually. Adverse maternal outcomes were investigated as a composite and individually. Individual participant data were checked and risk of bias assessed independently by two researchers. Primary meta-analyses used one-stage generalised linear mixed models that incorporated random effects to allow for heterogeneity across trials. This meta-analysis is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42017068299.Initial searches identified 47 eligible trials. Individual participant data were available for 30 of these trials. An additional trial was later included in a targeted update. Data were therefore available from a total of 31 trials (11 644 women and 16185 offspring). Trials in singleton pregnancies included mostly women with previous spontaneous preterm birth or short cervix. Preterm birth before 34 weeks was reduced in such women who received vaginal progesterone (nine trials, 3769 women; relative risk [RR] 0·78, 95% CI 0·68-0·90), 17-OHPC (five trials, 3053 women; 0·83, 0·68-1·01), and oral progesterone (two trials, 181 women; 0·60, 0·40-0·90). Results for other birth and neonatal outcomes were consistently favourable, but less certain. A possible increase in maternal complications was suggested, but this was uncertain. We identified no consistent evidence of treatment interaction with any participant characteristics examined, although analyses within subpopulations questioned efficacy in women who did not have a short cervix. Trials in multifetal pregnancies mostly included women without additional risk factors. For twins, vaginal progesterone did not reduce preterm birth before 34 weeks (eight trials, 2046 women: RR 1·01, 95% CI 0·84-1·20) nor did 17-OHPC for twins or triplets (eight trials, 2253 women: 1·04, 0·92-1·18). Preterm premature rupture of membranes was increased with 17-OHPC exposure in multifetal gestations (rupture <34 weeks RR 1·59, 95% CI 1·15-2·22), but we found no consistent evidence of benefit or harm for other outcomes with either vaginal progesterone or 17-OHPC.Vaginal progesterone and 17-OHPC both reduced birth before 34 weeks' gestation in high-risk singleton pregnancies. Given increased underlying risk, absolute risk reduction is greater for women with a short cervix, hence treatment might be most useful for these women. Evidence for oral progesterone is insufficient to support its use. Shared decision making with woman with high-risk singleton pregnancies should discuss an individual's risk, potential benefits, harms and practicalities of intervention. Treatment of unselected multifetal pregnancies with a progestogen is not supported by the evidence.Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Placental pathology lesions are common in early-onset fetal growth restriction (eoFGR). Therapeutic interventions to improve eoFGR outcomes are needed. In the international STRIDER trials (Sildenafil Therapy In Dismal prognosis Early-onset intrauterine growth Restriction) sildenafil didn't improve perinatal outcomes of eoFGR. We aimed to study the underlying placental pathology in the Dutch STRIDER trial and the effects of sildenafil on placental histopathology by describing the associations with sildenafil treatment, placental-dysfunction serum biomarkers and markers of oxidative stress.The Dutch STRIDER trial was a randomized controlled trial of sildenafil versus placebo in 216 singleton pregnancies complicated by eoFGR, included between 20+0- and 29+6-weeks' gestation. In 158 cases, placental histology was available. Lesions were classified independently by three perinatal pathologists blinded for clinical data, according to the international criteria of the Amsterdam Placental Workshop Group Consensus Statement. Blood samples taken at inclusion were analyzed for free thiols (FT), placental growth factor (PlGF) and soluble FMS-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1, n = 85).The 'big four' placental lesions (maternal and fetal vascular malperfusion, and chronic or acute inflammatory lesions) were equally distributed in both groups. However, massive perivillous fibrin deposition (MPFD) and chronic histiocytic intervillositis (CHIV) were less common in the sildenafil-treated group compared to the placebo-treated group (p = 0.026 and p = 0.043). FT, PlGF and sFlt-1 at inclusion were not discriminative for placental lesions.Sildenafil had no effect on common placental lesions. The lower incidence of MPFD and CHIV after sildenafil exposure merits more research on the interaction between sildenafil and the immune system.Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.