Colposcopy diagnosis and directed biopsy are the key components in cervical cancer screening programs. However, their performance is limited by the requirement for experienced colposcopists. This study aimed to develop and validate a Colposcopic Artificial Intelligence Auxiliary Diagnostic System (CAIADS) for grading colposcopic impressions and guiding biopsies.Anonymized digital records of 19,435 patients were obtained from six hospitals across China. These records included colposcopic images, clinical information, and pathological results (gold standard). The data were randomly assigned (7:1:2) to a training and a tuning set for developing CAIADS and to a validation set for evaluating performance.The agreement between CAIADS-graded colposcopic impressions and pathology findings was higher than that of colposcopies interpreted by colposcopists (82.2% versus 65.9%, kappa 0.750 versus 0.516, p < 0.001). For detecting pathological high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or worse (HSIL+), CAIADS showed higher sensitivity than the use of colposcopies interpreted by colposcopists at either biopsy threshold (low-grade or worse 90.5%, 95% CI 88.9-91.4% versus 83.5%, 81.5-85.3%; high-grade or worse 71.9%, 69.5-74.2% versus 60.4%, 57.9-62.9%; all p < 0.001), whereas the specificities were similar (low-grade or worse 51.8%, 49.8-53.8% versus 52.0%, 50.0-54.1%; high-grade or worse 93.9%, 92.9-94.9% versus 94.9%, 93.9-95.7%; all p > 0.05). The CAIADS also demonstrated a superior ability in predicting biopsy sites, with a median mean-intersection-over-union (mIoU) of 0.758.The CAIADS has potential in assisting beginners and for improving the diagnostic quality of colposcopy and biopsy in the detection of cervical precancer/cancer.

Human papillomavirus vaccination and cervical screening are lacking in most lower resource settings, where approximately 80% of more than 500 000 cancer cases occur annually. Visual inspection of the cervix following acetic acid application is practical but not reproducible or accurate. The objective of this study was to develop a "deep learning"-based visual evaluation algorithm that automatically recognizes cervical precancer/cancer.A population-based longitudinal cohort of 9406 women ages 18-94 years in Guanacaste, Costa Rica was followed for 7 years (1993-2000), incorporating multiple cervical screening methods and histopathologic confirmation of precancers. Tumor registry linkage identified cancers up to 18 years. Archived, digitized cervical images from screening, taken with a fixed-focus camera ("cervicography"), were used for training/validation of the deep learning-based algorithm. The resultant image prediction score (0-1) could be categorized to balance sensitivity and specificity for detection of precancer/cancer. All statistical tests were two-sided.Automated visual evaluation of enrollment cervigrams identified cumulative precancer/cancer cases with greater accuracy (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.89 to 0.93) than original cervigram interpretation (AUC = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.63 to 0.74; P < .001) or conventional cytology (AUC = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.65 to 0.77; P < .001). A single visual screening round restricted to women at the prime screening ages of 25-49 years could identify 127 (55.7%) of 228 precancers (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2/cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3/adenocarcinoma in situ [AIS]) diagnosed cumulatively in the entire adult population (ages 18-94 years) while referring 11.0% for management.The results support consideration of automated visual evaluation of cervical images from contemporary digital cameras. If achieved, this might permit dissemination of effective point-of-care cervical screening.Published by Oxford University Press 2019.

A deep learning classifier that improves the accuracy of colposcopic impression.Colposcopy images taken 56 seconds after acetic acid application were processed by a cervix detection algorithm to identify the cervical region. We optimized models based on the SegFormer architecture to classify each cervix as high-grade or negative/low-grade. The data were split into histologically stratified, random training, validation, and test subsets (80%-10%-10%). We replicated a 10-fold experiment to align with a prior study utilizing expert reviewer analysis of the same images. To evaluate the model's robustness across different cameras, we retrained it after dividing the dataset by camera type. Subsequently, we retrained the model on a new, histologically stratified random data split and integrated the results with patients' age and referral data to train a Gradient Boosted Tree model for final classification. Model accuracy was assessed by the receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC), Youden's index (YI), sensitivity, and specificity compared to the histology.Out of 5,485 colposcopy images, 4,946 with histology and a visible cervix were used. The model's average performance in the 10-fold experiment was AUC = 0.75, YI = 0.37 (sensitivity = 63%, specificity = 74%), outperforming the experts' average YI of 0.16. Transferability across camera types was effective, with AUC = 0.70, YI = 0.33. Integrating image-based predictions with referral data improved outcomes to AUC = 0.81 and YI = 0.46. The use of model predictions alongside the original colposcopic impression boosted overall performance.Deep learning cervical image classification demonstrated robustness and outperformed experts. Further improved by including additional patient information, it shows potential for clinical utility complementing colposcopy.Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the ASCCP.

This study evaluates multimodal AI models' accuracy and responsiveness in answering NEJM Image Challenge questions, juxtaposed with human collective intelligence, underscoring AI's potential and current limitations in clinical diagnostics. Anthropic's Claude 3 family demonstrated the highest accuracy among the evaluated AI models, surpassing the average human accuracy, while collective human decision-making outperformed all AI models. GPT-4 Vision Preview exhibited selectivity, responding more to easier questions with smaller images and longer questions.© 2024. The Author(s).