Application effects of different surgical methods in cesarean section of placenta previa

ZHANG Shao-feng, ZHAN Min-jin, CHEN Hai-tian, ZHU Cai-xia

Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4) : 456-459.

PDF(915 KB)
PDF(915 KB)
Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4) : 456-459. DOI: 10.19538/j.fk2026040114

Application effects of different surgical methods in cesarean section of placenta previa

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective To explore the application effects of different surgical techniques in cesarean section for placenta previa,with consideration of varying fertility policies. Methods To explore the application effects of different surgical methods in cesarean section for placenta previa,with consideration of changes in fertility policies. MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 237 pregnant women with placenta previa who underwent cesarean section in the Obstetric Department of our hospital from January 1,2003 to December 31,2022. Based on the time of changes in fertility policies,they were divided into three groups: Group A (before the two-child policy, from January 1,2003 to December 31,2015),Group B (after the two-child policy, from January 1,2016 to December 31,2019),and Group C (after the three-child policy, from January 1,2020 to December 31,2022). During this period,the main surgical approaches for managing placenta previa in our department included hysterectomy,ligation of the ascending uterine artery branches intraoperatively and placement of an intrauterine hemostatic balloon,and cervical suture ligation. We analyzed and compared the hysterectomy rates,length of hospital stay,surgical duration,intraoperative blood loss,perioperative transfusion rates,perioperative infection rates,and perioperative ICU transfer rates among the three time periods. Results Comparison among the three groups showed that the hysterectomy rates were 31.6%,16.7%,and 11.3%,respectively; the lengths of hospital stay were 12.72 days,8.80 days,and 10.11 days,respectively; there were statistically significant differences (all P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in surgical duration,intraoperative blood loss,perioperative transfusion rates,perioperative infection rates,or perioperative ICU transfer rates among the three groups. Conclusion With changes in fertility policies,comprehensive treatment for placenta previa,especially improvements in surgical methods,has contributed to reducing hysterectomy rates and shortening the length of maternal hospital stay.

Key words

fertility policy / surgical method improvements / placenta previa / hysterectomy

Cite this article

Download Citations
ZHANG Shao-feng , ZHAN Min-jin , CHEN Hai-tian , et al. Application effects of different surgical methods in cesarean section of placenta previa[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2026, 42(4): 456-459 https://doi.org/10.19538/j.fk2026040114

References

[1]
陈敦金, 陈艳红, 黄振宇. 前置胎盘手术中更应该强调个体化[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2026, 42(1):43-46. DOI:10.19538/j.fk2026010111.
[2]
孔令英, 杨慧霞. 胎盘植入性疾病剖宫产手术的关键解剖及手术要点[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2025, 41(1):56-61. DOI:10.19538/j.fk2025010116.
[3]
中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组. 前置胎盘的诊断与处理指南(2020)[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2020, 55(1):3-8. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567X.2020.01.002.
[4]
黄畅晓, 彭珠芸, 李力. 胎盘植入性疾病的高危因素和预防要点[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2024, 40(2):244-247. DOI:10.19538/j.fk2024020123.
[5]
Gurol-Urganci I, Cromwell DA, Edozien LC, et al. Risk of placenta previa in second birth after first birth cesarean section:a population-based study and meta-analysis[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2011, 11:95. DOI:10.1186/1471-2393-11-95.
[6]
魏素梅, 金莹, 熊雯, 等. 前次剖宫产术对再次妊娠影响的临床评价[J]. 实用妇产科杂志, 2017, 33(8):619-622.
[7]
严伟珍. 前置胎盘产妇产后出血相关因素研究[J]. 罕少疾病杂志, 2023, 30(11):64-66. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-3257.2023.11.029.
[8]
张慧娟, 凌利, 李丽, 等. 前置胎盘患者围生产期的妊娠结局及相关影响因素分析[J]. 皖南医学院学报, 2023, 42(1):25-28+32. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-0217.2023.01.007.
[9]
张清泉, 王世军. 腹腔镜下全子宫切除术如何从解剖学角度避免输尿管损伤[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2025, 41(1):53-55. DOI:10.19538/j.fk2025010115.
[10]
张秀娜. 子宫压迫缝合+宫腔球囊压迫对中央性前置胎盘孕妇剖宫产产后出血止血有效率的影响[J]. 江西医药, 2022, 57(9):1223-1225. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-2238.2022.09.071.
[11]
林琼, 王钦, 张秀芳. 宫腔球囊压迫与B-Lynch缝合止血对前置胎盘剖宫产产后出血的止血效果及应激指标的影响[J]. 右江医学, 2021, 49(12):940-943. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-1383.2021.12.013.
[12]
袁江静, 王玉东. 子宫肌瘤规范化治疗中的个体化[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2026, 42(1):51-54. DOI:10.19538/j.fk2026010113.
[13]
范文芳. 子宫压迫缝合联合子宫动脉上行支结扎术治疗剖宫产术后出血的临床研究[J]. 实用中西医结合临床, 2021, 21(24):40-41+67. DOI:10.13638/j.issn.1671-4040.2021.24.018.
[14]
柯可, 董静. 卡前列素氨丁三醇联合缩宫素在减少凶险性前置胎盘产后出血中的临床效果及安全性[J]. 当代医学, 2022, 28(7):59-61. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-4393.2022.07.020.
[15]
陈功立, 漆洪波. 产后出血手术缝扎止血的解剖学基础[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2025, 41(1):61-64.DOI:10.19538/j.fk2025010117.
[16]
隽娟, 舒心宇, 杨慧霞. 妊娠期高血糖的认知变迁[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2025, 41(4):385-388. DOI:10.19538/j.fk2025040101.

Footnotes

利益冲突 所有作者均声明不存在利益冲突

Funding

Guangdong Provincial Natural Science Foundation(2023A1515110982)
PDF(915 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/