Uterine contraction quantification technology and safe delivery:from basic research to clinical application

CHEN Yun-shan, LIU Hui-shu

Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4) : 396-399.

PDF(901 KB)
PDF(901 KB)
Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4) : 396-399. DOI: 10.19538/j.fk2026040103

Uterine contraction quantification technology and safe delivery:from basic research to clinical application

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Effective and safe uterine contractions are the core driving force of childbirth,and the limitations of traditional assessment methods of uterine contractions have restricted the precise management of labor progress and uterine contractility. Non-invasive uterine electromyography (uEMG) technology can non-invasively reflect the onset,propagation direction,and intensity distribution of uterine contractions by capturing the electrical activity characteristics of uterine smooth muscle in real time. It can automatically extract parameters such as uterine contraction frequency,duration,and synchrony,thereby realizing the quantification of uterine contraction monitoring. The development of non-invasive uEMG technology is further elaborated based on the basic physiology of uterine bioelectrical activity. It has demonstrated the clinical application value of refined assessment in aspects such as the objective monitoring and abnormal diagnosis of uterine contractility during labor,the accurate prediction of preterm birth,and the individualized decision-making of delivery timing in high-risk pregnancies,providing a new perspective for the clinical intervention of uterine contractility. In the future,it is necessary to further promote the standardization and AI intelligence of the technology,and facilitate its integration with multi-modal information such as fetal heart rate monitoring,so as to construct an intelligent safe labor management system and achieve safe childbirth.

Key words

uterine contraction quantification technology / safe delivery / uterine electromyography

Cite this article

Download Citations
CHEN Yun-shan , LIU Hui-shu. Uterine contraction quantification technology and safe delivery:from basic research to clinical application[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2026, 42(4): 396-399 https://doi.org/10.19538/j.fk2026040103

References

[1]
张盼盼, 周玮. 产程中子宫收缩的监测[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2024, 40(2):147-150. DOI:10.19538/j.fk2024020105.
[2]
Garfield RE, Murphy L, Gray K, et al. Review and Study of Uterine Bioelectrical Waveforms and Vector Analysis to Identify Electrical and Mechanosensitive Transduction Control Mechanisms During Labor in Pregnant Patients[J]. Reprod Sci, 2021, 28(3):838-856. DOI:10.1007/s43032-020-00358-5.
[3]
Young RC, Marinescu PS, Seligman NS. Monitoring uterine contractions during labor: current challenges and future directions[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2023, 228(5S):S1192-S1208. DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2022.10.039.
[4]
Namadurai P, Padmanabhan V, Swaminathan R. Multifractal Analysis of Uterine Electromyography Signals for the Assessment of Progression of Pregnancy in Term Conditions[J]. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform, 2019, 23(5):1972-1979. DOI:10.1109/JBHI.2018.2878059.
[5]
Haran G, Elbaz M, Fejgin MD, et al. A comparison of surface acquired uterine electromyography and intrauterine pressure catheter to assess uterine activity[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2012, 206(5):412.e1-412.e4125. DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2011.12.015.
[6]
Young R, Marinescu P, Seligman N, et al. Directional Sensors for Recording Uterine EMG During Pregnancy[J]. Reprod Sci, 2023, 30(11):3190-3196. DOI:10.1007/s43032-023-01268-y.
[7]
Benfield R, Newton ER. Use of External Uterine Electromyography Across Stage I Labor[J]. J Midwifery Womens Health, 2023, 68(5):575-580. DOI:10.1111/jmwh.13501.
[8]
Qian X, Li P, Shi S, et al. Measurement of Uterine and Abdominal Muscle Electromyography in Pregnant Women for Estimation of Expulsive Activities during the 2nd Stage of Labor[J]. Gynecol Obstet Invest, 2019, 84(6):555-561. DOI:10.1159/000499493.
[9]
Qian X, Li P, Shi SQ, et al. Uterine and Abdominal Muscle Electromyographic Activities in Control and PCEA-Treated Nulliparous Women During the Second Stage of Labor[J]. Reprod Sci, 2017, 24(8):1214-1220. DOI:10.1177/1933719116682875.
[10]
Oppenheimer LW, Bland ES, Dabrowski A, et al. Uterine contraction pattern as a predictor of the mode of delivery[J]. J Perinatol, 2002, 22(2):149-153. DOI:10.1038/sj.jp.7210622.
[11]
Vasak B, Graatsma EM, Hekman-Drost E, et al. Uterine electromyography for identification of first-stage labor arrest in term nulliparous women with spontaneous onset of labor[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2013, 209(3):232.e1-232.e2328. DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2013.05.056.
[12]
Qian X, Zhou B, Li P, et al. Quantitative analysis for grading uterine electromyography activities during labor[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM, 2023, 5(2):100798. DOI:10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100798.
[13]
郑峥, 狄小丹, 毛迪, 等. 特布他林与硝苯地平用于产时胎儿宫内复苏:前瞻性随机对照研究[J]. 中华围产医学杂志, 2022, 25(2):129-135. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn113903-20210622-00569.
[14]
Kissler KJ, Lowe NK, Hernandez TL. An Integrated Review of Uterine Activity Monitoring for Evaluating Labor Dystocia[J]. J Midwifery Womens Health, 2020, 65(3):323-334. doi:10.1111/jmwh.13119.
[15]
李品, 胡慧平, 王乐乐, 等. 早期分娩镇痛对子宫肌电活动的影响[J]. 中华围产医学杂志, 2019, 22(8):604-609. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-9408.2019.08.013.
[16]
Ye Y, Song X, Liu L, et al. Effects of Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia on Uterine Electromyography During Spontaneous Onset of Labor in Term Nulliparous Women[J]. Reprod Sci, 2015, 22(11):1350-1357. DOI:10.1177/1933719115578926.
[17]
Qian X, Wang Q, Ou X, et al. Effects of Ropivacaine in Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia on Uterine Electromyographic Activities during Labor[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2018, 2018:7162865. DOI:10.1155/2018/7162865.
[18]
Grgic O, Matijevic R, Kuna K. Raised electrical uterine activity and shortened cervical length could predict preterm delivery in a low-risk population[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2012, 285(1):31-35. DOI:10.1007/s00404-011-1906-x.
[19]
Vinothini S, Punitha N, Karthick PA, et al. Cyclostationary analysis of uterine EMG measurements for the prediction of preterm birth[J]. Biomed Eng Lett, 2024, 14(4):727-736. DOI:10.1007/s13534-024-00367-2.
[20]
Mas-Cabo J, Prats-Boluda G, Perales A, et al. Uterine electromyography for discrimination of labor imminence in women with threatened preterm labor under tocolytic treatment[J]. Med Biol Eng Comput, 2019, 57(2):401-411. DOI:10.1007/s11517-018-1888-y.
[21]
Xie H, Zhu M, Deng K, et al. Use of uterine electromyography in the prediction of preterm birth after transvaginal cervical cerclage[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2024, 24(1):716. DOI:10.1186/s12884-024-06779-3.
[22]
Wang X, Zhu M, Ji X, et al. The predictive role of uterine electromyography in delivery before 28 weeks of gestation after transvaginal cervical cerclage[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2025, 25(1):1252. DOI:10.1186/s12884-025-08380-8.
[23]
Yang J, Pan X, Garfield RE, et al. Uterine electromyography (EMG) measurements to predict preterm caesarean section in patients with complete placenta previa[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol, 2021, 41(4):532-535. DOI:10.1080/01443615.2020.1755620.
[24]
潘秀玉, 郑峥, 周蓓, 等. 基于妊娠期筛查诊断管理策略前置血管孕妇的临床结局[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2021, 56(10):712-717. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20210423-00222.
[25]
李品, 刘慧姝. 子宫肌电监测在宫缩评估中的应用和研究进展[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2025, 14(3):189-192. DOI:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3259.2025.03.012.

Footnotes

利益冲突 所有作者均声明不存在利益冲突

Funding

Research Project on Medical Education by the China Medical Education Development Center(2025B68)
Guangzhou Clinical High-Tech Project(2019GX07)
Guangzhou Health Science and Technology Project(20231A011027)
Guangzhou Health Science and Technology Project(2025A03J4301)
Key clinical specialties in Guangzhou(202301719)
Collaborative Education Project of the Ministry of Education(2410250043)
Collaborative Education Project of the Ministry of Education(2508115810)
PDF(901 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/