PDF(1013 KB)
Evaluation of clinical effects of three kinds of anterior vaginal wall repair in the pelvic floor reconstruction
JIANG Zhuo-fei, HUANG Xiao-bin, LIU Xiao-chun, HE Jun-chu, ZOU Lian, LIAO Yan-bin, CHEN Yong-lian
Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1) : 91-94.
PDF(1013 KB)
PDF(1013 KB)
Evaluation of clinical effects of three kinds of anterior vaginal wall repair in the pelvic floor reconstruction
Objective To explore the clinical efficacy and safety of three autologous tissue-based anterior vaginal wall repair for patients with anterior pelvic organ prolapse (POP),and to provide reference for the selection of surgical approaches. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 88 patients with anterior POP who underwent surgical treatment at Foshan Maternal and Child Health Hospital from January 2017 to June 2023. All patients received the same surgical procedures for the middle and posterior compartments,including vaginal hysterectomy combined with right sacrospinous ligament fixation of the vaginal vault,posterior vaginal wall repair,and repair of old perineal lacerations. According to the anterior compartment repair technique,patients were divided into three groups: Group A (sacro-ligament-pubovaginal muscle cross-fixation,n=26),Group B (traditional anterior vaginal wall repair,n=31),and Group C (anterior vaginal fascial flap suspension to the pubic periosteum,n=31). Baseline data,perioperative outcomes,changes in pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) points before surgery and at 3 months postoperatively were compared and Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20) was used to evaluate life quality; meanwhile, postoperative complications were compared. Results There were no significant differences in baseline data or middle and posterior compartment POP-Q points among the three groups before surgery (P>0.05). Significant differences were observed in preoperative anterior compartment points Aa and Ba (P<0.05),with more severe prolapse in Groups A and C than in Group B. At 3 months postoperatively,all POP-Q points and PFDI-20 scores in the three groups showed significant improvement compared with those before operation (P<0.05),while no significant differences were found in postoperative POP-Q points among the groups (P>0.05). The postoperative PFDI-20 score in Group A was higher than that in Group B(P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the incidence of long-term postoperative complications among the three groups (P>0.05). Conclusions All three autologous tissue-based anterior vaginal wall repair procedures can effectively improve anatomical outcomes and quality of life in patients with anterior POP. Sacro-ligament-pubovaginal muscle cross-fixation is more suitable for patients with more severe anterior compartment prolapse; however,it is associated with relatively higher postoperative subjective pelvic floor distress,and appropriate selection of surgical procedure is required in clinical practice.
pelvic organ prolapse / anterior vaginal wall prolapse / sacro-ligament-pubovaginal muscle cross-fixation / traditional anterior vaginal wall repair / anterior vaginal wall fascial flap suspension to the pubic periosteum
| [1] |
| [2] |
刘倩倩, 杨莹莹, 吴桂珠. 盆底重建手术术后肠道并发症的评估与处理[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2024, 40(3):271-275. DOI:10.19538/j.fk2024030104.
|
| [3] |
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
周莹, 俞茜蓝, 朱兰. 骶骨固定术后盆腔器官脱垂的复发与网片暴露[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2024, 40(3):287-292. DOI:10.19538/j.fk2024030108.
|
| [10] |
赵成志, 卢深涛, 王荥, 等. 腹腔镜下自体组织修复手术在纠正女性盆腔器官脱垂中的应用[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2021, 37(12):1198-1202. DOI:10.19538/j.fk2021120107.
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
考森. 经阴道手术学[M].熊光武,译. 福州: 福建科学技术出版社,2008:60.
|
| [13] |
毛丽丽, 王武亮, 徐臻, 等. 阴道前壁黏膜瓣悬吊治疗前盆腔器官脱垂52例疗效分析[J]. 中国妇产科临床杂志, 2011, 12(4):275-277. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1861.2011.04.010.
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
唐翔, 史文静, 于水莲. 单切口 TVT-S 手术对压力性尿失禁患者生活质量和性功能的短期影响分析[J]. 贵州医药, 2016, 40(5):499-500+501. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-744X.2016.05.023.
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
常琳琳, 韩丽英, 林萍, 等. 女性盆腔脏器脱垂手术治疗[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2015, 30(22):3920-3922. DOI:10.7620/zgfybj.j.issn.1001-4411.2015.22.60.
|
利益冲突 作者声明不存在利益冲突
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |