Thrombocytopenia is a common hematologic abnormality in pregnancy, encountered in ∼10% of pregnancies. There are many possible causes, ranging from benign conditions that do not require intervention to life-threatening disorders necessitating urgent recognition and treatment. Although thrombocytopenia may be an inherited condition or predate pregnancy, most commonly it is a new diagnosis. Identifying the responsible mechanism and predicting its course is made challenging by the tremendous overlap of clinical features and laboratory data between normal pregnancy and the many potential causes of thrombocytopenia. Multidisciplinary collaboration between hematology, obstetrics, and anesthesia and shared decision-making with the involved patient is encouraged to enhance diagnostic clarity and develop an optimized treatment regimen, with careful consideration of management of labor and delivery and the potential fetal impact of maternal thrombocytopenia and any proposed therapeutic intervention. In this review, we outline a diagnostic approach to pregnant patients with thrombocytopenia, highlighting the subtle differences in presentation, physical examination, clinical course, and laboratory abnormalities that can be applied to focus the differential. Four clinical scenarios are presented to highlight the pathophysiology and treatment of the most common causes of thrombocytopenia in pregnancy: gestational thrombocytopenia, preeclampsia, and immune thrombocytopenia.

Hematologists are often consulted for thrombocytopenia in pregnancy, especially when there is a concern for a non-pregnancy-specific etiology or an insufficient platelet count for the hemostatic challenges of delivery. The severity of thrombocytopenia and trimester of onset can help guide the differential diagnosis. Hematologists need to be aware of the typical signs of preeclampsia with severe features and other hypertensive disorders of pregnancy to help distinguish these conditions, which typically resolve with delivery, from other thrombotic microangiopathies (TMAs) (eg, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura or complement-mediated TMA). Patients with chronic thrombocytopenic conditions, such as immune thrombocytopenia, should receive counseling on the safety and efficacy of various medications during pregnancy. The management of pregnant patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia who are refractory to first-line treatments is an area that warrants further research. This review uses a case-based approach to discuss recent updates in diagnosing and managing thrombocytopenia in pregnancy.Copyright © 2022 by The American Society of Hematology.

Obstetricians frequently diagnose thrombocytopenia in pregnant women because platelet counts are included with automated complete blood cell counts obtained during routine prenatal screening (1). Although most U.S. health care providers are trained using U.S. Conventional Units, most scientists, journals, and countries use Systeme International (SI) units. The laboratory results reported in U.S. Conventional Units can be converted to SI Units or vice versa by using a conversion factor. Given the conversion factor is 1.0, when converting from 103/mL to 109/L the platelet "count" does not seemingly change. Thrombocytopenia, defined as a platelet count of less than 150 3 109/L, is common and occurs in 7-12% of pregnancies at the time of delivery (2, 3). Thrombocytopenia can result from a variety of physiologic or pathologic conditions, several of which are unique to pregnancy. Some causes of thrombocytopenia are serious medical disorders that have the potential for maternal and fetal morbidity. In contrast, other conditions, such as gestational thrombocytopenia, are benign and pose no maternal or fetal risks. Because of the increased recognition of maternal and fetal thrombocytopenia, there are numerous controversies about obstetric management of this condition. Clinicians must weigh the risks of maternal and fetal bleeding complications against the costs and morbidity of diagnostic tests and invasive interventions. This Practice Bulletin is a targeted revision to reflect limited changes to information about new estimates for thrombocytopenia in pregnancy and the risk of recurrence of fetal-neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia in subsequent pregnancies, and to provide new information on the level of thrombocytopenia that permits regional anesthesia.

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in pregnancy is challenging for both mother and fetus. Understanding the pathophysiology, treatments, and risks to the mother and fetus leads to proper management resulting in successful pregnancy and delivery in almost all cases.1 ITP in a pregnant woman has many similarities to ITP not in pregnancy although gestational thrombocytopenia can be confused with ITP. However, recognizing differences is instrumental in avoiding bleeding complications and toxicities of treatment. This Nutshell review focuses on the natural history of ITP in pregnancy, its treatment, and dilemmas.

        血栓性微血管病（thrombotic microangiopathy，TMA）是一组以微血管栓塞为病理特征的疾病。主要表现为微血管病性溶血性贫血、血小板减少、微循环血小板血栓引起神经系统、肾脏等器官受累［1］。经典的血栓性微血管病主要指血栓性血小板减少性紫癜（TTP）和溶血性尿毒综合征（HUS）。TTP和HUS均有溶血及肾脏受累的症状，且血浆置换可取得较好的疗效，两者之间的鉴别诊断较为困难，其病理变化均为内皮细胞损伤、微血管内血栓形成。近年来也有学者提出将两种疾病合称为TTP-HUS综合征。浏览更多请关注本刊微信公众号及当期杂志。

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a rare thrombotic microangiopathy characterized by microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, severe thrombocytopenia, and ischemic end organ injury due to microvascular platelet-rich thrombi. TTP results from a severe deficiency of the specific von Willebrand factor (VWF)-cleaving protease, ADAMTS13 (a disintegrin and metalloprotease with thrombospondin type 1 repeats, member 13). ADAMTS13 deficiency is most commonly acquired due to anti-ADAMTS13 autoantibodies. It can also be inherited in the congenital form as a result of biallelic mutations in the ADAMTS13 gene. In adults, the condition is most often immune-mediated (iTTP) whereas congenital TTP (cTTP) is often detected in childhood or during pregnancy. iTTP occurs more often in women and is potentially lethal without prompt recognition and treatment. Front-line therapy includes daily plasma exchange with fresh frozen plasma replacement and immunosuppression with corticosteroids. Immunosuppression targeting ADAMTS13 autoantibodies with the humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab is frequently added to the initial therapy. If available, anti-VWF therapy with caplacizumab is also added to the front-line setting. While it is hypothesized that refractory TTP will be less common in the era of caplacizumab, in relapsed or refractory cases cyclosporine A, N-acetylcysteine, bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, or splenectomy can be considered. Novel agents, such as recombinant ADAMTS13, are also currently under investigation and show promise for the treatment of TTP. Long-term follow-up after the acute episode is critical to monitor for relapse and to diagnose and manage chronic sequelae of this disease.

Immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) is a rare medical emergency for which a correct and early diagnosis is essential. As a severe deficiency in A Disintegrin And Metalloproteinase with ThromboSpondin type 1 repeats, member 13 (ADAMTS13) is the underlying pathophysiology, diagnostic strategies require timely monitoring of ADAMTS13 parameters to differentiate TTP from alternative thrombotic microangiopathies (TMAs) and to guide initial patient management. Assays for conventional ADAMTS13 testing focus on the enzyme activity and presence of (inhibitory) anti-ADAMTS13 antibodies to discriminate immune-mediated TTP (iTTP) from congenital TTP and guide patient management. However, diagnosis of iTTP remains challenging when patients present borderline ADAMTS13 activity. Therefore, additional biomarkers would be helpful to support correct clinical judgment. Over the last few years, the evaluation of ADAMTS13 conformation has proven to be a valuable tool to confirm the diagnosis of acute iTTP when ADAMST13 activity is between 10 and 20%. Screening of ADAMTS13 conformation during long-term patient follow-up suggests it is a surrogate marker for undetectable antibodies. Moreover, some non-ADAMTS13 parameters gained notable interest in predicting disease outcome, proposing meticulous follow-up of iTTP patients. This review summarizes non-ADAMTS13 biomarkers for which inclusion in routine clinical testing could largely benefit differential diagnosis and follow-up of iTTP patients.

To study genetic variants and their function within genes coding for complement receptors in pre‐eclampsia.

Haemolytic uraemic syndrome is a form of thrombotic microangiopathy affecting predominantly the kidney and characterised by a triad of thrombocytopenia, mechanical haemolytic anaemia, and acute kidney injury. The term encompasses several disorders: shiga toxin-induced and pneumococcus-induced haemolytic uraemic syndrome, haemolytic uraemic syndrome associated with complement dysregulation or mutation of diacylglycerol kinase ɛ, haemolytic uraemic syndrome related to cobalamin C defect, and haemolytic uraemic syndrome secondary to a heterogeneous group of causes (infections, drugs, cancer, and systemic diseases). In the past two decades, experimental, genetic, and clinical studies have helped to decipher the pathophysiology of these various forms of haemolytic uraemic syndrome and undoubtedly improved diagnostic approaches. Moreover, a specific mechanism-based treatment has been made available for patients affected by atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome due to complement dysregulation. Such treatment is, however, still absent for several other disease types, including shiga toxin-induced haemolytic uraemic syndrome.Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) affecting pregnancy is a diagnostic and often a therapeutic challenge.We review the current diagnostic criteria for ITP in pregnancy and the potential utility of laboratory tests. We discuss the impact of ITP on pregnancy outcomes and the effects of pregnancy on patients living with chronic ITP.  We describe the criteria for intervention, the evidence supporting first-line treatment approaches and the therapeutic decisions and challenges in cases refractory to steroids and IVIG. We review the evidence supporting the potential use of thrombopoietin receptor agonists for refractory thrombocytopenia. Finally, we describe the diagnostic, prognostic, and treatment approaches to neonatal ITP and considerations regarding breastfeeding. We searched the terms 'immune thrombocytopenia' and 'pregnancy' on PubMed to identify the relevant literature published before 31 December 2023, including within cited references.Decreased platelet production may play a role in pregnancy-related ITP exacerbation. Putative mechanisms include placental hormones, such as inhibin. Although IVIG and prednisone usually suffice to achieve hemostasis for delivery, second-line agents are sometimes required to allow for neuraxial anesthesia. There is growing evidence supporting the use of romiplostim during pregnancy; however, its risk of venous thromboembolism warrants further evaluation.

Hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) is an acute disease and the most common cause of childhood acute renal failure. HUS is characterized by a triad of symptoms: microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and acute kidney injury. In most of the cases, HUS occurs as a result of infection caused by Shiga toxin-producing microbes: hemorrhagic Escherichia coli and Shigella dysenteriae type 1. They account for up to 90% of all cases of HUS. The remaining 10% of cases grouped under the general term atypical HUS represent a heterogeneous group of diseases with similar clinical signs. Emerging evidence suggests that in addition to E. coli and S. dysenteriae type 1, a variety of bacterial and viral infections can cause the development of HUS. In particular, infectious diseases act as the main cause of aHUS recurrence. The pathogenesis of most cases of atypical HUS is based on congenital or acquired defects of complement system. This review presents summarized data from recent studies, suggesting that complement dysregulation is a key pathogenetic factor in various types of infection-induced HUS. Separate links in the complement system are considered, the damage of which during bacterial and viral infections can lead to complement hyperactivation following by microvascular endothelial injury and development of acute renal failure.

Background: Early diagnosis of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) versus hemolytic and uremic syndrome (HUS) is critical for the prompt initiation of specific therapies. Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the proteinuria/creatininuria ratio (PU/CU) for TTP versus HUS. Patients/Methods: In a retrospective study, in association with the “French Score” (FS) (platelets < 30 G/L and serum creatinine level < 200 µmol/L), we assessed PU/CU for the diagnosis of TTP in patients above the age of 15 with thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA). Patients with a history of kidney disease or with on-going cancer, allograft or pregnancy were excluded from the analysis. Results: Between February 2011 and April 2019, we identified 124 TMA. Fifty-six TMA patients for whom PU/CU were available, including 35 TTP and 21 HUS cases, were considered. Using receiver–operating characteristic curves (ROC), those with a threshold of 1.5 g/g for the PU/CU had a 77% sensitivity (95% CI (63, 94)) and a 90% specificity (95% CI (71, 100)) for TTP diagnosis compared with those having an 80% sensitivity (95% CI (66, 92)) and a 90% specificity (95% CI (76, 100) with a FS of 2. In comparison, a composite score, defined as a FS of 2 or a PU/CU ≤ 1.5 g/g, improved sensitivity to 99.6% (95% CI (93, 100)) for TTP diagnosis and enabled us to reclassify seven false-negative TTP patients. Conclusions: The addition of urinary PU/CU upon admission of patients with TMA is a fast and readily available test that can aid in the differential diagnosis of TTP versus HUS alongside traditional scoring.

Pregnancy-associated atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) refers to the thrombotic microangiopathy resulting from uncontrolled complement activation during pregnancy or the postpartum period. Pregnancy-associated aHUS is a devastating disease for which there is a limited clinical understanding and treatment experience. Here we report a retrospective study to analyze the clinical and prognostic data of 22 cases of pregnancy-associated aHUS from the Spanish aHUS Registry under different treatments. Sixteen patients presented during the first pregnancy and as many as nine patients required hemodialysis at diagnosis. Identification of inherited complement abnormalities explained nine of the 22 cases, with CFH mutations and CFH to CFHR1 gene conversion events being the most prevalent genetic alterations associated with this disorder (66%). In thirteen of the cases, pregnancy complications were sufficient to trigger a thrombotic microangiopathy in the absence of genetic or acquired complement alterations. The postpartum period was the time with highest risk to develop the disease and the group shows an association of cesarean section with pregnancy-associated aHUS. Seventeen patients underwent plasma treatments with a positive renal response in only three cases. In contrast, ten patients received eculizumab with an excellent renal response in all, independent of carrying or not inherited complement abnormalities. Although the cohort is relatively small, the data suggest that pregnancy-associated aHUS is not different from other types of aHUS and suggest the efficacy of eculizumab treatment over plasma therapies. This study may be useful to improve prognosis in this group of aHUS patients.Copyright © 2017 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.